As many as 10 teams have fallen by the wayside in the $10 million Progressive Insurance Automotive X Prize contest for ultra-efficient cars — and other teams are working hard to stay in.
When this week's second round of on-track testing began at the Michigan International Speedway in Brooklyn, Mich., 24 teams were in the running for the prize. The competition is aimed at encouraging the development of marketable cars capable of getting 100 miles per gallon of gasoline, or equivalent energy efficiency for other power systems. That's what's known as 100 MPGe.
During this first week of the Knockout phase, the challenge has been all about being able to hit the 67 MPGe mark, which is two-thirds of the efficiency goal. The cars also had to prove that they could go 67 miles (for two-seaters) or 134 miles (for four-seaters) without refueling. If they can do that, then they move on next week to further rounds of tests to check their emission levels and handling. Those tests are due to continue until June 30. The cars that satisfy the requirements will return to Michigan for an even more grueling round of finals next month.
The $10 million purse, put up by Progressive, will be split among the top finisher in the four-seater "mainstream" category ($5 million), plus the leading two-seater "alternative" teams in two categories (tandem and side-by-side, $2.5 million each). That's assuming that at least some of the cars attain 100 MPGe, while satisfying requirements for range, emissions and safety. A lot of teams are not going to make it. AutoblogGreen's Sebastian Blanco quoted the competition's senior director, Eric Cahill, as saying he thought 10 to 16 cars would qualify to move on to the finals.
The Knockout stage isn't even over yet, and Cahill's assessment has already come true. On Friday, before the week's standings were announced, Illuminati Motor Works team leader Kevin Smith told me "there'll be some surprises on the website." The results posted on Saturday morning weren't pretty.
Smith's team was one of the survivors, but he's not overjoyed to see fellow competitors fail. "We've got some friends on other teams," he said. "It's upsetting to see this."
Here are the teams that have been dealt setbacks so far in this round:
• American HyPower: Eliminated due to a faulty fuel sensor. In a Facebook posting, the team emphasized that their elimination was not related to their car's hydrogen-fueled engine. "Although we're no longer in the competition, we'll continue to follow it as we further develop our technology," the team said.
• BITW Technologies: The standings show that the Indiana-based BITW team's Vincitore 1000, a Chevy Metro that was modified to use a three-cylinder biodiesel engine, was eliminated this week.
• Cornell 100+ MPG: Withdrew just as the Knockout stage was getting under way, due to a problem with the electronics that monitor the car's battery power, according to Consumer Reports.
• Edison2: The Virginia-based team came to the Knockout stage with four cars. This week its side-by-side two-seater was eliminated, but the team still has two four-seaters and a tandem two-seater in the running.
• Enginer: X Prize organizers said the team's hybrid steam combustion/electric vehicle was eliminated.
• Global-E: One of its two high-efficiency prototypes, the Pulse, was eliminated before the Knockout phase began. Its G1 model didn't make the grade during this week's testing, according to the X Prize standings. That means the team is finished for this year.
• K-Way MOTUS: As I mentioned a few days ago, the Italy-based K-Way team had to withdraw from the competition due to engine troubles.
• Liberty Motors Group: Also withdrew as the Knockout phase was beginning.
• Optamotive: The side-by-side, all-electric E-Rex was eliminated, but the judges' decision was still being appealed as of Saturday.
• Team EVX: The Texas-based team's all-electric SmartCar was eliminated this week.
• West Philly Hybrid X: This high-school team was a sentimental favorite, but both of its hybrid cars were knocked out during this week's trials, X Prize spokeswoman Arron Robinson told me.
That's 12 cars eliminated this week, including the two from West Philly. Nine teams are no longer in the $10 million competition, one team is appealing the elimination, and Edison2 still has other cars in the race. Additional cars could be eliminated as the teams "move on to complete next week's acceleration, braking and avoidance maneuver tests conducted by Consumer Reports' staff," Liza Barth wrote Friday on Consumer Reports' blog.
On the plus side, Western Washington University's team reportedly aced the range test on Friday and will move on to the next round. ZAP Alias said its celebrity driver, Al Unser Jr., "congratulated the team" on Friday's performance. Canada-based FVT Racing said its hybrid electric/gasoline fuel-vapor vehicle passed the range test "with flying colours."
Based on the reports so far, Kevin Smith and his Illuminati team were among the week's big winners. Their swoopy-looking Seven vehicle reportedly averaged 119.8 MPGe in its efficiency tests. AutoblogGreen's Blanco said the Seven's batteries needed some conditioning to achieve the required range - and when I asked about that, Smith acknowledged that working with the new batteries was a challenge.
"It's still posing some challenges, but we're getting there," he said.
The Knockout tests aren't finished yet. Next week, the survivors will have to prove they can handle the road safely and operate within emission standards. (The all-electric Seven should have no problem with that latter issue.) And then there are the finals next month ... and the lab tests in August ... and the awards ceremony in September. The end of the road, and the definitive demonstration that 100-mile-a-gallon efficiency is technically possible as well as marketable, is still a couple of months away for the X Prize competitors. But as Smith said, they're getting there.
Update for 9:30 p.m. ET June 28: There's more bad news from Monday's acceleration tests. Consumer Reports' Jeff Bartlett says via Twitter that the German-made, battery-electric TW4XP two-seater tried to pass its acceleration test and "did not make it." Bartlett also said Illuminati's Seven didn't make the grade: "Team Illuminati did not pass the accel test. Painful to see. Team has much to be proud of."
If Illuminati is out of the running, then the $5 million prize for the most efficient four-seat mainstream car would be Edison2's to lose. The only mainstream vehicles still in the competition are the two Very Light Cars fielded by Edison2. The same team has a two-seater in the running for an alternative-category prize. Edison2 reported that it exceeded the required 67 MPGe standard and hit 100 MPGe during the Knockout efficiency tests.
Over the weekend, I spoke with Eric Cahill, the competition's senior director, and he told me that the 67 MPGe requirement "has been the biggest hurdle" during the Knockout stage. But it sounds as if the zero-to-60 test is a killer as well. Cahill was well aware that the challenge for four-passenger vehicles is tougher than it is for two-passenger vehicles.
"We are very optimistic that we are going to have winners, most certainly in the alternative [category]," he told me. "With the mainstream [category], we're optimistic - but it's going to be a bit narrower."
Update for 12:30 p.m. ET June 29: In today's blog post, Consumer Reports' Jeff Bartlett indicates that TW4XP was at last able to pass the acceleration test. Illuminati appears to be out of the competition, along with the team fielding the Amp Electric Sky sports car. But Bartlett points out that appeals are still being heard, and so the word on some of these eliminations is not yet definitive. Stay tuned for the semifinal answers. (The finals are scheduled next month.)
Check out our wicked-cool slideshow featuring X Prize cars. Join the Cosmic Log corps by signing up as my Facebook friend or hooking up on Twitter. And if you really want to be friendly, ask me about "The Case for Pluto."



What's going on here ? You've written a story about our future . Our future a month from now ,a year from now . When the gas goes up to $8.00 ,$10.00 a gallon . Everybody will be voicing an outcry ," No one is doing anything for the future ".
People love your stories about all kinds of subjects . Write anything about "space " and there is untold number of comments .Every now and then you'll find one from me . But not one about the X Prize .
But when people start worrying about having enough money to buy gas for the week ,then they might try to remember about what big deal was about the X Prize .
The big deal is , they're trying to look into the future , and do something about it . They're trying to find a way to keep you from having to ride your kids bicycle down the side of the interstate to work .
In my minds eye I can see this happening with $15.00 gas , in the future . Look , there's Joe up ahead . Joe hay Joe wait up . Joe , I thought you bought one of those plug in cars ?
What do you mean it didn't get charged , because you turned on the heat last night ?
Joe , I hate to tell you ,but your riding a girls bicycle . No ,no I'm not trying to start a fight , don't be so touchy I like the basket .Joe , Joe I'm just joking . Lets get to work .
So we can read and learn about the cars of the future , or we can worry about the tires on our kids bicycle .
RON
I have mixed feelings about the x-prizes....we are a far cry from needing the magnetic compass of past calls for tech from the masses...I hope those eliminated DO NOT give up on their concepts!!...the edisons looks cool!!...I live in a college town, I could just see a bunch of those whizzing around the area but the electric car really needs a better battery, and ironically the best fuel cell would undoubtedly get it's hydrogen from...GAS!!!...hydrocarbons have one of the densest quantities of hydrogen...gasoline being right up there with kerosene!!...no way around it, not that I am not looking everywhere, fact is physics and chemistry are real...why no hoover cars?....gas or e, friction is a big component of the transportation equation!!...good story alan, I wonder how niel young is making out with his e-car project?
This is all fine and dandy for the east coast and California, But how about the folks in the middle? Is anybody working on HEAVY DUTY energy efficient vehicles that can do some work besides carrying people?Is someone looking at the service industries, ie; Electric companies, telephone, and the people that service all of them. I would like to see a vehicle that is kind of self sustaining that gets some mileage so it doesn't take 2 weeks to drive 1500 miles!!! Love the progress, but for me, it is not near practical enough to justify having one. AND knowing American companies, the vehicles will be too expensive for most people to afford anyway. Has anyone paid any attention to what happens in the event of an accident?? None of the vehicles I have seen look like no one would survive any kind of accident at all. I have worked for almost 50 years and all I have ever heard is Safety First!!! What ever happened to that???? These cars were designed to get mileage, NOT protect its occupants. A question to ask would be, "would I put my family in one of these?" Protection, Protection, Protection!!!
I like your comment about safety . Yes , you're very correct , and it's almost funny ., that
Progressive Auto Insurance is running this contest .Progressive is the one offering the
$10,000,000 prize . If we were wise , we should applaud Progressive for holding this contest .
Just maybe , a few years from now ,we'll be able to only need two gallons of gas at the end of the
week . Not the 15 to 20 gallons as we must buy each week now .
No, they're not turning a blind eye to safety . I would guess some of the car eliminated so far were for safety issues .
You saying you live in the middle of the nation . Having driven through there last year . I have respect for what you say about needing dependable transportation . It's a long way between ( A and B ) . You might come up over a hill and see city lights off in the distance and drive almost two hours before passing through the city lights and another couple of hour before getting to the next small town .
I'm a truck driver and would love to see someone have the same kind of contest for big trucks . People don't understand it's going to be much easier to break through the 100 M. P. G . barrier for cars , than it's going to be to break through the 10 M. P. G. barrier for big trucks . We burn up a lot of fuel to get what you and I need every day .
Do you want to hear a joke ? The company I drive for is having a contest. . Who ever can increase their fuel mileage ,will win a big gas guzzling dually pick-up truck . They want us to save on their fuel cost , but they're going to increase the winners cost for fuel. --- RON
This contest should be a lot bigger and state based for added interest. I would bet a bundle on California winning in the end.
With all the rules and regulations California has placed on the auto industry . I hope someone
comes up with a car that can get 150 M. P. G. , but refuse to sell to anyone in California .
Yes , we can thank California for making somethings better on our cars . But the auto industry has
possibly held back because of some of their rules . I think the auto industry could of passed this mile post long ago , of 100 M. P. G. --- RON
So punish consumers because california has stupid rules? Yeah thats fair, I for one would love to get a car that runs on electricity and can go 150 miles.
The only way the fires will be ignited under butgts for electric car or more fuel efficient cars is if gas goes up to $10+ a gallon. I hope it happens, I hope gas gets so expensive that it is imposible to fill up the tnak every week.
I am willing to deal with that pain and money drain for som real change to happen.
The USA my country has because a retard in science and technology development, we need to step up to the plate and be a leader in innovation again. Only a kick in the pants will make that happen.
We need another foreign country to show us up in the space race, in technology, we need to have our American Pride challanged.
Dont worry it is already on the path to happening, just look toward China.
Hey, I've been a H.D. Mechanic for over 40 years. Built many Hot Rods and High mileage cars. As with most Master Mechanic's, I can put build a 100 MPG with the use of standard parts now on the market. HHO, Steam and or electric power is easy to slip in with standard parts now on the market. Use a little power recovery system along with electric or HHO, Cut the weight and up the gear range. With little testing your over 100 MPG. Heck we have 56 MPG now with light cars and small engines. 50 MPG VW Diesel has bee around for 35 years. It's not a big deal at all! the deal is getting people to drive them and the FED'S to let them.
I really don't think the average person will save a cent with 100 MPG + cars. If cars get 100 MPG + Then gasoline will cost 500 dollars per gallon. The Fed is going to eat it up. No matter how much mileage we get, it will cost dearly to drive. If nothing elce, there will be a tax for every foot we drive. A street feet tax if you will.
First rule: Eliminate all plug-ins!
They overload the grid, rely on carbon burning electricity producers, and open the door for higher utility taxes (to make up for lost liquid fuels taxes) and bills.
As for those who do not plug in: BRAVO!
Hugh do you understand peak demand? Since most cars are plugged in at night they do not overload the grid so they are not a strain on the system, Electric cars are a start but we need to find new ways to generate electricity other then burning coal or oil.
So I wouldnt knock electric cars. besides how many people actually have them? Does it even reach 1% of the population of the USA?
The Sun and the enrgy that falls to the earth from it in one second is more energy then we have consumed since we started using electricity.
Thats where we should focus, on capturing that energy and ways to store it.