Scientists finish first sea census

Scientists wrapped up their first global census of sea life today, documenting an underwater world that turns out to be livelier and more connected than they thought it would be when they began the project 10 years ago.

The raw numbers behind the $650 million Census of Marine Life are impressive enough: Almost 30 million observations by 2,700 scientists from more than 80 nations spent 9,000 days at sea, producing 2,600 academic papers and documenting 120,000 species for a freely available online database.

Australian marine ecologist Ian Poiner, who chairs the project's steering committee, said the results will serve as a "global baseline" for assessing the state of the ocean's species over the decades to come. "That's not only something that wasn't available in 2000," he told me from London, where the census' final results were shared with the world today. "Many said it was too big a challenge and could not be done."


Kevin Raskoff / Monterey Peninsula College

A new species of hydromedusa, Bathykorus bouilloni, is common below depths of 3,300 feet. Hundreds of Bathykorus bouilloni were observed by a remotely operated vehicle in the Arctic, showing that a new species can be common in a habitat. The species has earned the nickname "Darth Vader jellyfish." Can you see why? Click through our slideshow of weird and wonderful species from the Census of Marine Life.

Scientists are already looking beyond the numbers to flesh out their picture of ocean health. What they found was surprising, said Fred Grassle, director emeritus of Rutgers University's Institute for Marine and Coastal Sciences and Poiner's predecessor as steering committee chair.

"To understand the ocean, you really have to deal with the diversity of species, because the greatest diversity on the planet is in the ocean," he told me. "The majority of that diversity is in the deep parts of the ocean, which have really only begun to be explored by the census."

Poiner said the census showed that life in the oceans is richer than expected, "even in the places some suggested may not have had a richness of life." The thousands upon thousands of species are more connected than expected as well. For example, the "snow" of nutrients that drift down from the ocean's higher levels into the depths play an important role in sustaining deep-sea diversity.

That diversity is under threat in regions ranging from the Mediterranean to the oil-hit Gulf of Mexico, as pointed out in research from the census published two months ago. In some areas of the ocean, up to 90 percent of the species have declined, due to overfishing, pollution and climate change and other ecosystem upsets, Poiner said.

Kevin Raskoff / Monterey Peninsula College

This bizarre new copepod, Ceratonotus steiningeri, was first discovered more than three miles deep in the Angola Basin in 2006. Within a year it was also collected in the southeastern Atlantic and the central Pacific Ocean. Scientists are puzzled about how this tiny animal achieved such widespread distribution, and how it avoided detection for so long. Click through our

"Changes have occurred much earlier than we thought," Poiner told me. "In the few cases where intervention to support recovery has happened, we've found that although change occurs quickly, recovery takes much longer."

Poiner said the census suggests that "a different sort of management is required," based on protecting whole ecosystems rather than individual species.

He and his colleagues are just starting to think about how to follow up on what they've discovered over the past decade. "After 10 years of intensive work, our focus to date has been on ensuring the success of this first census, ensuring that we do have this baseline," he said. "And it's truly been a major accomplishment. But we also have this process to be thinking about what's next."

The process begins this week with a series of meetings in London and is to culminate next September in the Scottish city of Aberdeen, during the World Conference on Marine Biodiversity. The next chapter in the census will draw upon the tools used for this first census, including:

  • OBIS: The Ocean Biogeographic Information System is an open-access database documenting the names and locales of 120,000 marine species. In the years to come, fresh observations can be compared with OBIS' baseline data to keep track of the rise and fall of species populations.
  • DNA barcoding: Analysis of standard genetic markers can identify which species went where, even on the basis of a single fish scale.
  • GEOSS: The Global Earth Observation System of Systems provides a foundation for standardized tracking of marine species by monitoring thousands of electronically tagged "bio-logger" animals, using sonar to look for marine life on the move, and setting up networks of mocrophones to track salmon and the ocean's other migrants. GEOSS is about more than just the oceans: It's an international effort to link together observation systems for a wide spectrum of Earth phenomena, ranging from seismic monitoring networks to satellite imagery databases.
  • ARMS: Underwater Autonomous Reef Monitoring Structures, which Poiner compared to "small dollhouses designed in a careful way [to] see what's happening with coral reef diversity," have helped standardize monitoring systems for species in the world's reefs.

One of the census' most eye-opening findings has to do with just how much more is out there still to be found, even after a "decade of discovery." About 250,000 marine species bigger than microbes have been documented to date, but based on an analysis of the discovery rate so far, Poiner said "we know that number will grow to at least a million species, and it's likely to be much higher."

The marine microbial world is an even bigger frontier. The census documented 40,000 genetic sequences from more than 100 microbial families, or phyla, and that's just the start. "There's a richness of microbes out there," Poiner told me. "The estimated kinds of marine microbes could be up to a billion."

So although Poiner, Grassle and their colleagues are in a celebratory mood today, they realize that today's big reveal is just a beginning, and by no means the end of the sea's story.

"All surface life depends on life inside and beneath the oceans," Poiner observed in today's news release. "Sea life provides half of our oxygen and a lot of our food, and regulates climate. We are all citizens of the sea. And while much remains unknown, including at least 750,000 undiscovered species and their roles, we are better acquainted now with our fellow travelers and their vast habitat on this globe."

More wonders of the deep:


Don't miss clicking through our slideshow highlighting some of the weirder and more wonderful species documented by the Census of Marine Life. Among the newly released resources are:

Visit the brand-spanking-new Cosmic Log page on Facebook and hit the "Like" button. You can also follow @boyle on Twitter. And if you really want to be friendly, ask me about "The Case for Pluto."

Discuss this post

Incredibly important. Yet, even this, leaves us with many unanswered mysteries of our most important planetary asset. We cannot spend enough time or effort learning its workings to prevent the demise of our world.

  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 9:55 AM EDT

All these wonderful things and we use the ocean as a trash receptacle. Shame on us.

  • 5 votes
Reply#2 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 12:06 PM EDT

The oceans of Earth are amazing treasure troves of life. A glimpse into what might exist on other planets in the vast universe, yet some people still don't take our impact on these delicate ecosystems seriously.

  • 1 vote
Reply#3 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 12:56 PM EDT

breathtaking......becareful climbing any higher.......one might fall off the edge looking for common ground.....qenisis 40:34

  • 1 vote
Reply#4 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 1:09 PM EDT

Stunning!  Breathtaking!  Wonderful!

  • 3 votes
Reply#5 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 1:51 PM EDT

pat.... true. And yet the people of the jungle cut and chop and burn the rain forests to the bare ground. For firewood.

    #5.1 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 8:38 AM EDT

    Incorrect. The largest cause of deforestation is agriculture... clearing land for crops and livestock.

    • 1 vote
    #5.2 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 4:31 PM EDT

    cjsks we are both right. The original biggest money maker in Africa is firewood I was on the wrong Continent. You are right in the Americas it is cattle.

    • 2 votes
    #5.3 - Fri Oct 15, 2010 11:54 AM EDT

    cjsks the first AND BIGGEST REASON TO CHOP DOWN THE RAIN FOREST ARE Firewood made into charcoal, then mining then crops. see WWF.

    First off the indigenous people living in these regions do not plant crops they are looking for a way to make money and or trade with the outer areas of the region they live in.

    These indigenous are not thinking about planting since the nomadic nature of the tribes are influenced by the seasons and not crop rotation cycles.

    These clear cutters do not own the land they cut and run. The mining companies in the Americas ( south and central America) Clear cut and drill or open pit mine for the resources.

      #5.4 - Tue Oct 19, 2010 9:31 AM EDT
      Reply

      Like I've always said. The oceans are self-healing and regenerative. I'm not surprised that the clueless look at these wonderful pictures of the health and beauty of our undersea world, with their own eyes and still don't get that we are NOT causing as much harm as these enviro-alarmists would have us believe.

        Reply#6 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 2:42 PM EDT

        From the article:

        "In some areas of the ocean, up to 90 percent of the species have declined, due to overfishing, pollution and climate change and other ecosystem upsets"

        and further:

        "In the few cases where intervention to support recovery has happened, we've found that although change occurs quickly, recovery takes much longer."

        Poiner said the census suggests that "a different sort of management is required," based on protecting whole ecosystems rather than individual species.

        That's not advocating "enviro-alarmism". That's advocating protecting what's there from serious harm because it takes so long to recover and if enough damage is done, eventually we may reach a point where recovery is not possible. Do you want to push it to that point just to discover when and where that happens? Not a wise approach.

        • 2 votes
        #6.1 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 4:30 PM EDT

        "In some areas of the ocean, up to 90 percent of the species have declined, due to overfishing, pollution and climate change and other ecosystem upsets, Poiner said.

        'Changes have occurred much earlier than we thought," Poiner told me. "In the few cases where intervention to support recovery has happened, we've found that although change occurs quickly, recovery takes much longer.'"

        This is directly out of the article, which you obviously didn't bother to read very closely. These people aren't 'clueless'. They've spent their lives studying the oceans. What are your sources for your belief that we're not causing much harm to the oceans? Come on, give me some reports, evidence, facts to back up your statements. Heck...at the very least you could outline your logic for why you think our actions aren't having consequences.

        Give me a logical reason why dumping sewage, trash and oil into the oceans wouldn't have an effect. Give me a logical reason why modern fishing practices wouldn't be decimating species and ecosystems.

        Your statement that the oceans are 'self-healing' and 'regenerative' are completely baseless as evidenced by this very article and the quote that I mentioned above. The only core of truth in it is that life will adapt to any enviroment. The species that can adapt to the horrible things we're doing to the ocean will do so and the rest will be wiped out. Maybe you think this if all fine and dandy, but I personally want my kids to be able to see and enjoy the full variety of life that can currently be found in the ocean.

        I'm constantly frustrated that so many people think that we can make these huge changes in the enviroment without consequence. Actions have consequences. This is one of the most basic facts of life and of getting through life. We have the power to control our actions and we are in the unique position of all life on this planet of being able to understand the consequences those actions will have.

        And yet there are so many people like you who refuse to think ahead. Who refuse to consider the consequences their actions have. Because it's easy and we've evolved to look for the easiest way to survive. I suppose it's no true fault of our own...life seeks out the clearest path to survival. But it's so damn frustrating to have all the facts in front of us painting a clear picture of the destruction we're unleashing and yet to be completely powerless to stop it because people just don't want to see it.

        BAH! I'm so frustrated and sad right now.

        • 2 votes
        #6.2 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 4:56 PM EDT

        s,

        I am so disgusted with your comment, I can't find the right words to voice. Needless to say, you are typical of the puppets who believe the crap the oil and fossil fuels industry would like us all to believe, the government whose sole concern is to maintain jobs for the now, not tomorrow, and the lazy and cretinous gits who treat the planet like a toilet. Raise one big fist into the air and shout for your god given right to be stupid.

        • 2 votes
        #6.3 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:16 AM EDT

        sdhagarman

        And what about the Texas sized trash heap floating off the west coast?

        • 2 votes
        #6.4 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 12:12 PM EDT
        Reply

        Some one was telling me about all this great news. I think it is great to hear that science is actually doing something good. Im glad we all live in a world that good people still live in.I was also told there was something called the dill-doe fish? I tried looking it up on line but could not find it. Does anyone know where I could at least find a picture of a dill-doe fish? That would really be exciting. Thanks.

        • 1 vote
        Reply#7 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 5:45 PM EDT

        As a diver who spends a lot of time in the Carribean, I can tell you many of these wonderful things that were labeled as Austrailian are much closer home. The ocean, below the surface is so beautiful and so peaceful, you simply can't imagine until you see it. But it is far from pristine these days. I hear a lot of divers worry that we are over-diving certain area and there is some truth to that, but there are two tihngs that will damage a reef far faster. Hurricanes and pollution. And polution does far worse than any hurricane tearing a sea fan. It poisens an entire eco-system. The next time you throw something overboard and think "the sea will "fix" itself", think about a sea turtle or dolphin choking on the plastic rings from your 6 pack. Or your spliiled fuel completely destroying a coral bed. Coral is not a plant by the way, it is an animal, as is a sponge.

        • 2 votes
        Reply#8 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 5:58 PM EDT

        The more We, Humans, discover the incrediable possibilities of how "life" has evolved, the more surprised We become. If our species is to survive, We must not disturb the evolution of all "life" in its many forms.

        • 1 vote
        Reply#9 - Mon Oct 4, 2010 6:47 PM EDT

        Such fragile beauty steals my breath.

        • 1 vote
        Reply#10 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 4:38 PM EDT

        this a truly works of wonder, hopefully people will start to appreciate how fragile life is and care enough to take care this natural resource so it will still be here for next generation to come...

          Reply#11 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:38 PM EDT

          If these pictures cannot distract you from politics, then you simply lack a soul.

            Reply#12 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:54 PM EDT
            You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
            As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.