Graphene: Thin stuff is a big fat deal

DIMES

This image of a carbon nanotube made from graphene was created using a scanning tunneling microscope. The reddish or yellow blobs are individual carbon atoms, with dark hexagonal holes between atoms.

What's graphene, and why is its development worth a Nobel Prize? In just a few years you might be riding in it, tapping on it as you use your iPhone 9, or watching 3-D TV on a lightweight, big-screen panel made using graphene.

But wait ... there's more: Sheets of graphene could also be tweaked to create electronic circuits that are mere molecules thick, or built into a new generation of body scanners for hospitals or airports.

And it all basically started with a strip of Scotch tape.

The researchers who shared the physics Nobel today, Konstantin Novoselov and Andre Geim of the University of Manchester, reported back in 2004 that they were able to demonstrate interesting electronic effects with ultra-thin sheets of carbon that they created "by mechanical exfoliation ... of small mesas of highly oriented pyrolytic graphite." In other words, they used Scotch tape to pull thin layers of carbon off a block of pencil lead.

That was the start of something big. Atom for atom, graphene turned out to be 100 times stronger than steel — in large part because the single-layered atoms are tightly bonded together in a honeycomb lattice.

Stronger, lighter composites
One atom-thick sheet is not that tough, but when graphene sheets are incorporated into composites, you could come up with a material that's many times stronger than Kevlar. The Chinese are already working on carbon-nanotube yarn for spacesuits and bulletproof vests. Graphene composites could be produced less expensively than the current generation of carbon-nanotube composites. That opens the way for lighter, cheaper body armor, as well as lighter auto bodies and airplane fuselages as well. Maybe "graphene golf-club shafts" will become the status symbols of 2015.

Graphene in your touchscreen
If you make the graphene sheets thin enough, they basically become transparent ... which has led some experts to suggest that the material could be used in a new generation of low-cost, crack-resistant display screens for televisions and laptops. This year, researchers reported that they created a working touch-screen display using graphene. Maybe the stuff will be ready for the market by the time that future iPhone 9 is ready to pop.

Will graphene replace silicon?
There could be graphene inside the guts of that mobile device as well. Geim and Novoselov pioneered the study of graphene's electronic effects, but that work has been accelerating in the years since then. Electricity flows easily through graphene without losing much energy along the way. And scientists are finding ways to "dope" the material with other elements, opening the way for ultra-thin, ultra-fast circuitry. This year, IBM demonstrated a graphene-based transistor that operates 10 times faster than the fastest silicon chip. Maybe graphene is the thing that will keep Moore's Law going beyond the current age of silicon.

T-ray scanners
The fast frequencies that can be achieved using graphene circuits are the key to another potential application. "Graphene might emerge as a basis for chemical sensors and for generators of terahertz-range light," Inside Science News Service's Philip Schewe explains. Terahertz radiation, or T-rays, are particularly well-suited for detecting hidden objects at airport security checkpoints without the health risk posed by X-rays. T-rays could also serve as the basis for medical scanning devices that come even closer to the "Star Trek" tricorder. T-ray scanning is already being used in Britain for skin-cancer screening and tooth-cavity detection. Maybe graphene will hasten the arrival of those brave new T-ray scanners, for better or worse.

Geim and Novoselov aren't in on all those applications, but their initial Scotch-tape experiments — along with the even more rigorous lab work that followed — are why they won a Nobel Prize today. So how long will it be before all these graphene dreams turn into real products?

"I can only accurately predict the past, not the future," Geim told Reuters. "I would compare this situation with the one 100 years ago when people discovered polymers. It took quite some time before polymers went into use in plastics and became so important in our lives."

But it's a sure thing that graphene will eventually make an impact — and for that we have Geim and Novoselov to thank, along with a host of other scientists and engineers. To learn more about the Nobel-winning pair's achievement, check out the background material from the Nobel Prize website, or read their detailed scientific paper about "The Rise of Graphene."


Visit the brand-spanking-new Cosmic Log page on Facebook and hit the "Like" button. You can also follow @boyle on Twitter. And if you really want to be friendly, ask me about "The Case for Pluto."

Discuss this post

Holy cow. This is amazing! I wish I had some money to invest because this sounds to me like a sure bet!!

  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 7:38 PM EDT

There are still a lot of technical challenges to solve ... if you follow the links, you'll find a lot of the caveats that I didn't delve into. But eventually someone will figure out those challenges, and we'll be well into the carbon age (or maybe the Diamond Age, to use the term that Neal Stephenson used).

  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 8:15 PM EDT

ok adam BOIL

    #2.1 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 2:29 AM EDT
    Reply

    Imagine, an entire computer in a spot the size of a period made with a pencil...not too terribly far fetched anymore.

    • 2 votes
    Reply#3 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 9:11 PM EDT

    I guess we will be seeing sid 6.7 pretty soon...hehe.

      #3.1 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 2:32 AM EDT

      lets try to avoid the lawnmower man though, he was really too hyper dimensional and dramatic for the liking.

        #3.2 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 2:33 AM EDT
        Reply

        Very interesting article; the versatility of carbon still doesn't stop being amazing! The term 'terahertz radiation', though, is usually used to make something ordinary and familiar sound techy and complex to the non-scientists out there. Somehow mysterious and arcane. However, all 'terahertz radiation' is, is electro-magnetic radiation in the 0.3 - 300 micrometer range of the EM spectrum. There is a much more familiar description of this radiation: it is simply infrared radiation.

          Reply#4 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 12:28 AM EDT

          More specifically, it is FAR infrared ight.

            Reply#5 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 12:42 AM EDT

            I'm sorry, but the implications for the practical applications of this material are staggering. I can't wait til credible companies jump aboard the "graphene ship" so I can invest early on.

              Reply#6 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 12:47 AM EDT

              Cool! I can foresee all kinds of commercial uses for variations of graphene that will improve our quality of life, improve energy efficiency, and reduce pollution too. And that's just for starters. Good Work!

              • 1 vote
              Reply#7 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 1:22 AM EDT
              Comment author avatarytcrackerExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

              yo this is stupid nerd stuff why would i read this

              you guys are dweebs

              • 1 vote
              Reply#8 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 2:26 AM EDT

              Hello Alan,

              Thank you for the post. What is preventing sequestering carbon emissions through a filter to isolate the carbon for Graphite/Graphene production? Would this change the Carbon FootPrint debate?

              Sincerely,

              AradoKY 

                Reply#9 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 7:24 AM EDT

                I am excited about these future composites, especially for use in automobiles. It's primitive that we are still driving since most of us aren't too adept at it, but that's another topic entirely. BMW was starting to delve in pushing carbon fiber panels onto their vehicles and I believe Toyota/Lexus built a machine to produce the material themselves. The only problem is the cost of production, so as far as I know the auto industry is reluctant to introduce/mass produce a better material if the consumer will see no value in paying for it.

                With lighter weight composite materials we can catch up on the advancements of the internal combustion engine (yes I know, but it's the most economical option we have right now). I can only imagine what a 3000lb car averaging 35mpg would do with 3/4 of its weight off. This will lead to smaller engines than the crop we have now because we wouldn't need to tow around all that unnecessary weight! Ah dreams...

                  Reply#10 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 7:26 AM EDT

                  Lighter cars would reduce your speed, too. I can feel the wind pushing me sideways if it's 30 or so.

                  Lighter cars would, however, help advance the electric car, making them more viable and able to run longer.

                  • 1 vote
                  #10.1 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 12:41 PM EDT
                  Reply

                  Possibly with the ability to generate specific terahertz frequencies it will enable the study into the applications of harmonic distortion/disruption beam frequency/weapons. This is something DARPA is very interested in, I'm sure. To be able to generate the specific frequencies for the molecular bonds of organic matter it will enable ovens to throughly cook meat and other items in seconds rather than minutes, as is currently experienced in microwave and convection type ovens, and at about 90% less power consumption.

                    Reply#11 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 7:40 AM EDT

                    This is incredible and well worth a prize.

                      Reply#12 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 7:41 AM EDT

                      all these great things happening and all to late for me to be around to enjoy them. dob22142

                        Reply#13 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 8:11 AM EDT

                        I'd like to see some sheets of that woven into house wrap for areas prone to Hurricanes and Tornadoes or even to line safe rooms with.

                          Reply#14 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 8:33 AM EDT

                          Sadly, cruise power required acts mostly against the retarding aerodynamic drag force. Making a car lighter doesn't change its drag appreciably. This means that fuel mileage for longer trips won't be affected much by a large weight reduction, and maximum speed takes the same power. (All assuming you don't do a lot of hill climbing.)

                          Lower mass makes higher acceleration possible though, so the extra power currently required to accelerate up to cruise speed can be less. It could help electric cars because the engines can be sized more to cruise than to acceleration requirements... or you can carry more energy storage for the same total mass as Tony pointed out.

                            Reply#15 - Thu Oct 7, 2010 7:53 AM EDT
                            You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                            As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.