New species from New Guinea

Piotr Naskrecki / Conservation International

Scientists found at least 20 new species of katydids in Papua New Guinea's Muller Range, including this pink-eyed Caedicia. Click through a slideshow of new species found in Papua New Guinea.

Conservationists are celebrating the discovery of more than 200 new species in the remote mountains of Papua New Guinea, ranging from flowers to frogs to mice.

The island of New Guinea and its surroundings have been a biological gold mine for more than a century, going back to the expeditions of Alfred Russel Wallace, a pioneer in evolutionary biology and contemporary of Charles Darwin who cataloged hundreds of species throughout the Malay Archipelago.

Most recently it's been a gold mine of discoveries for Conservation International, a nonprofit group that monitors biodiversity around the world. The group has helped organize a series of "rapid assessment projects" in Papua New Guinea on the east side of the island, as well as Indonesian New Guinea on the west side. Hundreds of new species have been discovered as a result, building CI's case for greater protection of the island's biological riches.

The newly announced finds were made during two expeditions conducted last year in the remote Nakanai Mountains on the island of New Britain, and the Muller Range on New Guinea. CI's researchers were accompanied by partners from Papua New Guinea's Institute for Biological Research and A Rocha International. Among the modes of transportation required to get to the sites were a small plane, a dinghy, a helicopter ... and hiking boots.

The roll call of new species includes 24 types of frogs, two types of mammals, nine varieties of plants (including a spectacular new kind of rhododendron), nearly 100 types of insects and 100 species of spiders. The most memorable creatures included a beautiful yellow-spotted frog, a curious-looking long-tailed mouse, an emerald-green katydid and another bug with bugged-out pink eyes. You can see all of those new species and more in our Papua New Guinea slideshow.

Harvard University entomologist Piotr Naskrecki used sophisticated audio equipment to track down katydids by listening for their nocturnal chirps. He found five to 10 new katydid species per night.

"In some cases, nearly 80 percent of what I found was new to science," Naskrecki told Live Science's Stephanie Pappas. "Almost every species I collected was new, or it was something that had not been seen for 100 years or so. To me, it was like landing on another planet."

The expeditions are aimed at documenting the diversity of environmental hotspots, particularly in wild places that have not yet been hit by deforestation. In the Nakanai Mountains, Conservation International is working with the East New Britain provincial government and local communities to protect a large tract of rainforest from logging. After last year's surveys, community leaders from the Nakanai as well as the Muller Range said they'd be willing to participate in forest protection projects.

Papua New Guinea

United Nations

The Muller Range is in Papua New Guinea's Southern Highlands, while the Nakanai Mountains are in East New Britain province.

"With both the Nakanai Mountains and the Muller Range on UNESCO's World Heritage Tentative List, we hope that news of these amazing new species will bolster the nomination of these spectacular environments for World Heritage status, " Conservation International's Stephen Richards said in a statement.

This month, conservationists from around the world are gathering in Japan for a high-level meeting related to the Convention on Biological Diversity. CI says it will support the goal of protecting at least 25 percent of Earth's land and inland waters and 15 percent of marine ecosystems by 2020.

"There's no question that the discoveries we made in both surveys are incredibly significant both for the large numbers of new species recorded, and the new genera identified," Conservation International's Leeanne Alonso said. "While very encouraging, these discoveries do not mean that our global biodiversity is out of the woods. On the contrary, they should serve as a cautionary message about how much we still don't know about Earth's still hidden secrets and important natural resources, which we can only preserve with coordinated, long-term management."

More on biodiversity:


Visit the brand-spanking-new Cosmic Log page on Facebook and hit the "Like" button. You can also follow @boyle on Twitter. And if you really want to be friendly, ask me about "The Case for Pluto."

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2

What a pretty little instect.

  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:47 PM EDT

it's a pretty little insect too.

  • 4 votes
#1.1 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 1:07 PM EDT

Yes. All we need now is for that Survivor dude from the reality shows to parachute in there. He can spear a few of those rascals and roast them up on an open fire.

    #1.2 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 5:15 PM EDT
    Reply

    The slide show is spectacular!!

    • 4 votes
    Reply#2 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:54 PM EDT

    Yes, it is! Love the frogs.

      #2.1 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 3:57 PM EDT
      Reply

      alien's are planting these new species because we are killing all the other one off.

      • 4 votes
      Reply#3 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 10:59 PM EDT

      You may be right, DJ.

        #3.1 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:03 PM EDT
        Reply

        How can this be??? The environmentalist schmucks keep telling me that we are destroying the earth and killing off species.

          Reply#4 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:23 PM EDT

          bernie; just because it was just now discovered, does not mean it just evolved in the past week - you can't be that dumb, can you?

          go schmuck yer self fool.

          • 5 votes
          #4.1 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 12:26 AM EDT

          Humans are currently causing between 1,000 and 10,000 species to go extinct every year on Earth. Once species go extinct, that's it, they can never come back, in case you didn't know. That's tens of millions of years of evolution gone in the blink of an eye. How does us discovering new species have anything to do with the havoc we are wrecking on the environment? Do you really think like this? I hope not, we are doomed.

          • 8 votes
          #4.2 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 12:41 AM EDT

          BS. Show us a list of all the extinctions from last year. I bet there's not even 100.

          • 2 votes
          #4.3 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 3:09 AM EDT

          Wow

          "Not even a hundred"

          That makes me feel so much better?

          • 1 vote
          #4.4 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 9:50 AM EDT

          Too bad humans aren't on that list...then everything else might have a fighting chance...

          • 2 votes
          #4.5 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 11:01 AM EDT

          Well, there's a way to get humans on the list. We can start with you.

          • 3 votes
          #4.6 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 11:57 AM EDT

          For more info on the rate of extinction at the present moment, you might google "rate of extinction". There is a great number of sites that cover this topic, including the following: http://news.minnesota.publicradio.org/features/2005/01/31_olsond_biodiversity/. Unfortunately, they all seem to agree that the rate of extinction has increased dramatically. You can find, on some of theses sites, charts and graphs that illustrate how much this process has increased, and yes, human activity is blamed. There may not be quite as large a number of species going extinct as one poster suggested, but that does not mean we can feel better about the situation. Unfortunately, if the situation continues unchecked, there may be one more species added to that list, and I think we all now which one it will be.

            #4.7 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 1:31 PM EDT

            ripsnortinroy,

            None of those numbers are based on real counts. They are all extrapolations and guess-work based on fantasy. If the were real numbers, then they would have lists of the names of the species that went extinct. Why is it so hard to produce a list of actual species that went extinct? Because the numbers are made up, and their purpose is to sock and scare you so you give them more money.

              #4.8 - Thu Oct 7, 2010 6:50 AM EDT
              Reply

               We are adapting and changing, as all things that do not, will not survive. As well as people that need to change with the things that are going on around us.  all is right with the world, we are just adjusting to the changes that must take place as the world changes.  yes all is not lost, the creatures of the sea are adjusting to the changes in the water with the temp and oxigen levels that are present.  just as the ameno acids ate the oil from the spill in the gulf, nature will take care of things, and change, when they are needed. :)

                Reply#5 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:42 PM EDT

                You have absolutely no scientific evidence for this, because it does not exist. Life in the water is not adapting to the changing temperatures because it is occurring at an astounding rate, not over a period of thousands or tens of thousands of years. Coral reefs will be gone, GONE, from planet Earth WITHIN OUR LIFE TIME. The Great Barrier Reef, a marvel of nature, will be dead before my children can ever see it. All is not right with the world, and that kind of thinking is what is destroying life on this planet. Everyone just turns a blind eye and thinks everything will be okay when science is telling us IT IS NOT. People need a reality check.

                • 8 votes
                #5.1 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 12:46 AM EDT

                BP you are joking right, because if you are not you are an joke, Changes that happen in the environment due to mans involvement are not natural, we are not part of nature or natures balance, we bend, warp, RAPE, nature and our environment to suit our needs, no animal does that.

                Humanity is liken to a virus but instead of infecting a living host we all infect a living planet. HIV is a good example that can be used to describe our species and what it is doing to the earth.

                • 2 votes
                #5.2 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 10:33 AM EDT

                Troll, when people like yourself can explain what human activity warmed the earth to the point to melt all of the ice that covered much of the planet during the last Ice Age or for the matter what human activity caused the earth to cool to the point that much of the planet became covered in ice in the first place you may begin to have credibility outside of your clique. Do you honestly believe that the Great Barrier Reef has been a prestine landmark since the Big Bang? The earth has been in a constant state of flux and we humans are just a blip in time. We will all be gone regardless of what we do today. Our only immediate concern is the same one that the dinosaurs faced, a giant asteroid slamming into this planet thus clearing the slate once again.

                  #5.3 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 10:50 AM EDT

                  Pirate, have you ever seen an area where beavers were not located and then a bunch of them took up residence, chewing down trees and damming riveres and streams causing upstream flooding? Have you ever seen an area where white-tailed deer were allowed to flourish unmolested by predators? There are a couple of examples for you from right here in the Midwest.

                    #5.4 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 10:55 AM EDT

                    Rodney nice try, since when do beavers set up cities, cut down an entire forest, strip mine a mountain top? Get the drift yet?

                    As for white tailed deer population explosions nature has a way of balancing that out, over grazing will cause starvation or predator populations will grow to counter the imbalance, I suggest you take some courses in ecology and wildlife.

                    Trying to compare Beavers and deer populations to the world wide destruction that man causes is a good example to demonstrate you dont have a clue what you are talking about.

                    Care to reach for more examples to justify mans wanton destruction of the environment?

                      #5.5 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 6:22 PM EDT

                      Also those pesky beavers that dam up areas and flooding results are beneficial to nature because that damming of rivers and the resulting flooding create wetlands where hundreds of species then populate.

                      It creates various small and large still water areas for fish, fowl and other wildlife. If you don’t believe me just go look it us, they help to slow down rivers, their damns don’t stop river flow they create small pockets of paradise for other creatures.

                      And nature has a way to keep it from getting out of control, its call rain, those dams are washed out.

                        #5.6 - Thu Oct 7, 2010 10:37 AM EDT
                        Reply

                        What a wonderfull world we live in!

                        • 4 votes
                        Reply#6 - Tue Oct 5, 2010 11:44 PM EDT

                         We are the aliens.

                        • 1 vote
                        Reply#7 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 12:07 AM EDT

                        Screw the mice

                          Reply#8 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 12:07 AM EDT

                          Which mice? The normal ones? Or the ones with fully functional human brains heh heh

                            #8.1 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 10:34 AM EDT
                            Reply

                            Maybe its us coming back from the future or distant past, before the last ice age, what happened, did we exist in a place called Atlantis. Just a thought?

                              Reply#9 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 12:10 AM EDT

                              Must be due to the whole "global climate change" thing... that or the ozone issue.......

                                Reply#10 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 12:14 AM EDT

                                Astounding!!

                                We're killing off species, yet we're still finding more new ones.

                                Could it be that one day we will discover a species which is killing all of US off?

                                • 1 vote
                                Reply#11 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 12:17 AM EDT

                                bacteria - it's the little dude's that got it out for us.

                                • 2 votes
                                #11.1 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 12:30 AM EDT

                                Could it be that one day we will discover a species which is killing all of US off?

                                Yes, they are called liberal progresives and democrats.

                                  #11.2 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 1:36 AM EDT

                                  Yup

                                  It's those damned progrssive ecologists who are polluting the atmosphere, and oiling up the waters. Yup, must be them. Couldn't possible be the corporatists, they have the welfare of all humans in mind in their dealings.

                                    #11.3 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 9:54 AM EDT
                                    Reply

                                    or...

                                    New species?

                                    I think we must start drilling more oil there!

                                    • 4 votes
                                    Reply#12 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 12:19 AM EDT

                                    It certainly looks like the Aliens they said were coming....

                                      Reply#13 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 12:28 AM EDT

                                      Arizon has lots of creepy crawlers - and our cats bring most of them inside for our enjoyment.

                                        Reply#14 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 12:32 AM EDT
                                        tremDeleted

                                        These critters are gorgeous! Love stories like these, they are so interesting. Boy, I sure would like a job where you discovered new plants and animals. It must be extremely gratifying and exciting!

                                        • 3 votes
                                        Reply#16 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 12:49 AM EDT

                                        Oh boy! More species to eradicate. Let's be realistic, Papua New Guinea is basically an isolated island and now that man is there they will be gone shortly. Not so good.

                                          Reply#17 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 1:31 AM EDT

                                          Global warming is causing the creatures on earth to mutate themselves into another species. They're preparing themselves for the climate change that will be taking place soon. This is not a new phenomenon. Millions of years ago, some of the later dinosaurs mutated themselve to avoid dying out after the Impact Event. These dinosaurs eventually became what we know of today as birds. That's right, birds are descendant from dinosaurs.

                                            Reply#18 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 2:28 AM EDT

                                            Actually this is not true. Later dinosaurs did not mutate into birds to avoid the Impact Event. Birds descended from theropod dinosaurs 200 million years ago. The Impact Event happened 65 million years ago. So it took 140 million years for EARLY dinosaurs to evolve into a dinosaur (the ancestor of the bird) that was able to survive the Impact Event.

                                            Climate change is happening so fast along with habitat destruction that I seriously doubt that animals have sufficient time to adapt. But since you are so sure of yourself and your facts, I'm sure you have done a complete research on the topic and know what you are talking about.

                                            • 1 vote
                                            #18.1 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 3:58 AM EDT

                                            mrck

                                            That's not how it works. You've been watching too many movies. Kevin Costner with gills.

                                              #18.2 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 9:57 AM EDT

                                              MRk please put that copy of the Mario Brothers Movie back on the shelf it has warped your education.

                                                #18.3 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 10:39 AM EDT
                                                Reply

                                                trolleater,

                                                If those numbers are genuine, then supporting data should be easy to find. Back up your claim with links to real data, or admit you're an alarmist liar.

                                                • 1 vote
                                                Reply#19 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 3:11 AM EDT
                                                sdgdsgs12Deleted

                                                That settles it. Kermit the Frog was a New Guinean.

                                                  Reply#21 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 4:07 AM EDT

                                                  One thing we can be sure of, is that these newfound species haven't had time to evolve into something that can tolerate modern man and his chemicals.

                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  Reply#22 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 4:18 AM EDT
                                                  RickyBobbyDeleted

                                                   charles darwin said that the only drawback to his theories were that no evidence of evolution was ever found and in the end even he believed in a supreme being.

                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  Reply#24 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 6:14 AM EDT

                                                  Darwin Kick out the supreme, Stephen Hawkins give him "Le coup de Grace" . Now he look like Santa Clauss he can only play with the Kids and Unmature..........

                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  #24.1 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 7:11 AM EDT

                                                  Observation 102

                                                  This is NOT true.

                                                  • 1 vote
                                                  #24.2 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 10:17 AM EDT
                                                  Reply

                                                  I sure hope they cleaned off their feet this time! The last time scientists went skipping around the globe to study frogs, they forgot to clean off their feet after visiting a place filled with fungal spores that seemed to be killing off frogs in an area, and infected frogs the world over, everywhere they went, with a fungus that now threatens to make the amphibians world-over extinct!

                                                  Then, they had the gall to blame "global warming" for the carnage when it was the spores they tracked all over the world to blame.

                                                    Reply#25 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 6:57 AM EDT

                                                    Will be nice if the humans beings become an endangered specie. That will leave some room for others species. Save the Planete Kill Yourself or Stop making Babies like Rabbits. World Wide Family Planning like in China should be a Duty.........

                                                    • 1 vote
                                                    Reply#26 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 7:28 AM EDT

                                                    We are an endangered species.

                                                      #26.1 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 10:20 AM EDT

                                                      So I guess you don't have children of your own, because if you did, you wouldn't think that.

                                                      • 1 vote
                                                      #26.2 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 12:50 PM EDT
                                                      Reply

                                                      It,s the star tuna fish that just evolved or starsky from the old starsky and hutch looking for his hutch to smoke in his hookah, your all hallucinating, got better fashion then lady DoeDoe

                                                        Reply#27 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 7:40 AM EDT

                                                        OMG! You mean global warming is not a danger but a myth??? You mean that man is another species on earth that is part of the circle of life and not simply a destroyer? This article is blasphemy.

                                                          Reply#28 - Wed Oct 6, 2010 8:24 AM EDT
                                                          Jump to discussion page: 1 2
                                                          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.