
ESA / NASA / JPL-Caltech
This map illustrates the numerous star-forming clouds, called cold cores, that Planck observed throughout our Milky Way galaxy. Planck, a European Space Agency mission with significant NASA participation, detected around 10,000 of these cores, thousands of which had never been seen before.
It'll be another couple of years before the European Space Agency's Planck probe delivers its baby picture of the universe, but in the meantime, the long-wavelength surveyor has pinpointed thousands of hot spots (and cold spots) worth watching.
The hot spots are huge galaxy clusters — including one cluster that holds the equivalent of a quadrillion stars, making it one of the most massive structures ever seen in the universe. The cold spots are clouds of chilly gas and dust within our own galaxy that are on the verge of forming their first stars.
Identifying these spots isn't the main reason for the billion-dollar Planck mission, which was launched in May 2009 along with the Herschel Space Telescope. Planck's main goal is to chart the cosmic background radiation in unprecedented detail, in wavelengths ranging from the infrared to the radio spectrum. The mission is expected to produce a map of the cosmic "afterglow" from just 380,000 years after the big bang, at a resolution that's three times bettern than the map produced by NASA's Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe in 2003.
Such maps provide scientists with their best guide to the infant universe's inflationary expansion. But before scientists can chart the cosmic background radiation, they have to retouch Planck's picture to remove all the "foreground" radiation — that is, all the stars, galaxies and pockets of gas and dust that lent their glow to the all-sky survey. These radiation sources are like "bugs on the windshield," Charles Lawrence of NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, the U.S. project scientist for the Planck mission, told journalists today at the American Astronomical Society's winter meeting in Seattle.
In Planck's case, even the bugs are valuable. The cold spots and the hot spots were the headliners for today's release of the mission's first scientific results. "So today, we're all entomologists," Lawrence joked.
An ESA video, prepared in advance of the Herschel-Planck launch, explains what the probes are designed to do.
Planck's data catalog includes about 10,000 so-called "cold cores," thousands of which are newly discovered. The dark, dense, dusty clouds are expected to fall in on themselves due to gravitational forces, and squeeze stars into existence. "These are the equivalent of a mother's womb before anything has happened," George Helou, a member of the Planck team, said at the Seattle briefing.
Temperatures in the cores approach absolute zero — to be precise, between 7 and 17 Kelvin, or as low as minus-447 degrees Fahrenheit. To measure such temperatures, the Planck detectors had to be chilled to 0.1 Kelvin, or a fraction of a degree above absolute zero.
Helou said astronomers will be studying all those cold cores to come up with a model explaining how the frigid wombs give birth to hot, young stars.
On the other side of the spectrum, the Planck team has identified 189 galaxy clusters so far, including 20 that have never been seen before. Those previously undetected clusters are being confirmed by cross-checking X-ray observations from ESA's XMM-Newton orbiting observatory.

ESA
The newly detected galaxy supercluster PLCK G214.6+37.0 was identified in imagery from the Planck probe (left), and its existence was confirmed by checking X-ray imagery from the XMM-Newton observatory (right).
Studying the clusters could yield new insights into the evolution of galaxies, as well as the effects of dark matter and dark energy. The data from Planck confirm the view that galaxies form along a network of dense regions that spread across empty space like the threads of a spider web.
"They sit in the knots of the cosmic web," said Elena Pierpaoli, a Planck team member from the University of Southern California.
Planck's first findings are the focus of a major scientific conference in Paris this week, based on 25 scientific papers that have been submitted to the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics. As impressive as all that sounds, it's just "the tip of the scientific iceberg," David Southworth, ESA's director fo science and robotic exploration, said in a statement released today.
"This catalog contains the raw material for many more discoveries," Southworth said. "Even then, we haven't got to the real treasure yet, the cosmic microwave background itself."
That big reveal is scheduled for the next data release ... in January 2013.
Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" our Facebook page, or by following msnbc.com's science editor, Alan Boyle, on Twitter (@boyle).


Several people believe they understand the fundamental idea of the Big Bang, but in my experience, not so many know of the leading theory behind its origin or of its eternally inflationary nature. I will borrow a couple of lines below from http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6392268/ns/technology_and_science-space/ . For more info, please see the link.
"Some theorists speculate that our entire universe came about as the result of a tiny quantum fluctuation of space-time. Under the right conditions, such a fluctuation could jump in size by an enormous factor in a fraction of a trillionth of a trillionth of a second."
"Some inflationary theorists speculate that a variety of universes can come into being, obeying different laws of physics."
Photonic BEC: 255, 255, 255 gamma corrected.
the concept of confirming observations through multiple instruments is cool....all unemployed astrophysicists should now have plenty to do....if only the funders could see the light...
Has anyone seen Lawrence Krauss' "Universe From Nothing" lecture?
I highly recommend you google it if that sort of thing interests you.
Here is the one thing (of many) that I don't understand about the "Big Bang"
If all of the matter in the universe was contained within the "Big Bang" and it was all within this small area at the "time" of the Bang, why didn't it collapse into a Black Hole ????????
I think our scientists are missing something here !
Danno
What if it did? What if (directionally) our "expansion" is a mere "collapse," in reverse terms. Could this entire universe be expanding within a super massive black hole of unimaginable proportions?
Perhaps the existence of our universe was preceded by the big crunch of the last one. If "dark energy" really exists (which I doubt) and our universe is indeed increasing it's rate of expansion (which I also doubt), then this won't happen again, and something unknown (a big grey bearded guy up in the sky?) initiated the first one. But if the current observations which lead to the supposition of this mysterious unknown force are eventually recalibrated (which I expect them to be) then maybe at some long distant time in the future, it (the big crunch) will happen again.
The important fact to remember is that the galaxies are racing away from each other. If that's 100% true, that would indicate some sort of "beginning source" from which they all burst from and are still to this day, travelling in the opposite direction of the source explosion. The galaxies themselves couldn't have just formed out of nothing.. matter and energy can easily be confused with each other but are completely separate from one another.
A star is born from the compression of gases at it's core... where then, did the material to create the gas come from? .. There has to be a source of matter for all of the stars that have and are still forming, otherwise, it would defy a major law of physics that matter cannot be either be "created" or destroyed.
-Caveman
Is it me, or is this artilcle vaguely dirty? Giant Big Bang followed by an afterglow. Now all we need is a picture of Venus and Mars smoking cigarettes, followed by Mars rolling over and going to sleep.