It seems that the world was shocked to learn this week that astrology no longer reflects astronomical realities. But such shifts are merely part of the routine in a changing universe. They don't always come to our attention, but they can make more of a difference in your daily life than your horoscope.
Parke Kunkle, an astronomer who teaches at Minneapolis Community and Technical College, set off an Internet-wide viral buzz when the Star-Tribune published his observation that the constellations don't match the traditional astrological signs. Back in the days of Babylonian soothsayers, the sun might have been in the constellation Capricorn at this time of year. But due to the changing tilt of Earth's axis, it's actually in Sagittarius right now.
Today, Kunkle told MSNBC that his phone has been ringing off the hook — and he doesn't know why this has turned into such a big deal. "What we've been doing is just a standard astronomy lesson that we talk about in every astronomy class," he said.
Over the course of thousands of years, Earth's axis wobbles like a top, and as a result the apparent position of the sun against the constellations varies. The boundaries of the constellations have become more sharply defined as well, which means the sun doesn't spend equal amounts of time in each of the zodiacal "signs." In fact, the sun passes through a 13th constellation — Ophiuchus the serpent bearer — which throws off the whole traditional 12-house system that astrologers swear by.
Of course, most people don't give any credence to astrology, with or without Ophiuchus. A 2005 Gallup Poll found that only about a quarter of Americans believe that the position of stars or planets can affect their lives. And even if you are a believer, the planetary shift doesn't magically transform you from a Virgo to a Leo. "This doesn't change your chart at all," Shelly Ackerman, an astrologer and spokeswoman for the American Federation of Astrologers, told The Associated Press.
The same advice holds for other astrological systems. For example, it's still the Chinese Year of the Tiger (well, at least until February). The fact is that the practice of astrology is separate from the modern science of astronomy, even though ancient cultures spent so much effort on astronomy mainly so that astrologers could do their job better.
Earth's cosmic shifts have had other effects as well. Just for luck, here are seven examples:
Changing pole star: Another effect of Earth's wobbling axis is that different stars have served as the guide star for our planet's geographical north pole throughout history. During the heyday of the Egyptian pharaohs, for example, other stars took on the role of the pole star, an "undying" star that never set. This is thought to be the reason why the Great Pyramid of Khufu was built with a passageway that pointed to the star Thuban in the constellation Draco, which was the star closest to the north pole when Khufu died, around 2566 B.C. Later on, the pole stars were Kochab and Pherkad in the constellation Ursa Minor. Today it's Polaris, but the bright star Vega had its turn around 12,000 B.C. and will be the pole star once again in the year 13,727 or so.
Changing magnetic poles: Last week's big geophysical story had to do with the gradual shift of Earth's magnetic north pole away from Canada and toward Russia. The poles move because of the changing flow of molten iron in Earth's core, which drives the planet's huge magnetic dynamo. This doesn't affect Earth's spin or geographical north, but it does cause the structure of the magnetic field to shift, which affects compasses. Although a lot of navigation nowadays is done using GPS systems, the Federal Aviation Administration wants to make sure that aviators can still find their way to a safe landing using magnetic compasses — and that's why it requires airports to revise their runway designations periodically to reflect the magnetic shift.
Shifting continents: Earth's continents are on the move as well, and over the course of millions of years, that has affected the course of evolution. "The continents are drifting at about the same rate that your fingernails are growing," Phil Plait, the astronomer who presides over the Bad Astronomy blog, told me. If you go back 180 million years or so, nearly all of Earth's land mass was united in one large continent called Pangea, which meant land-based organisms could spread far and wide. Since then, the continents have drifted apart, separating populations and leading to the rise of new species. The breakup of Pangea helps explain why kangaroos thrived in Australia but not America.
Uneven gravity: Just as Earth's magnetic field has its variations, so does Earth's gravitational field. Readings from the European Space Agency's GOCE satellite have plotted the subtle differences in our planet's mass distribution, on land and in the oceans. "You'd think gravity is the same everywhere, until you start delving really deep into it," said Alice Enevoldsen, planetarium supervisor at the Pacific Science Center in Seattle (and the blogger behind Alice's Astro Info). Variations in Earth's mass could help explain how ocean circulation works and lead to better climate prediction models.
Inconstant sun: Speaking of climate, the variations in solar irradiance play a significant role in the warming and cooling trends experienced on our planet as well as on others. Some suggest that the sun is a bigger factor than human industrial activity when it comes to global climate change. Most climate scientists say greenhouse-gas emissions have been playing a more significant role lately, but variations in the amount of solar radiation hitting the planet are definitely a factor as well. Last year, one study found that the amount of solar energy reaching Earth increased even though the sun was at the low point in its 11-year activity cycle. And just today, scientists reported that the solar energy levels were actually lower than previously thought.
Lengthening day: If it seems as if each day is longer than the last, you're right. But that's just because Earth is slowing down ever so slightly every day. Gravitational tugs from other celestial bodies (principally the moon and the sun) are causing the "great slowdown," as my colleague David Ropeik explained back in 2001. It's thought that when the moon formed, billions of years ago, a full day was six hours long, and that the day lasted less than 23 hours when dinosaurs ruled the earth. Nowadays, leap seconds are periodically added to keep atomic clocks in sync — most recently at the end of 2008.
Galactic tides: Our solar system's path through the Milky Way galaxy is subject to shifts as well. Scientists have noted that Earth's biodiversity seems to dip every 60 million years or so, at just about the time when the solar system bobs up through the average plane of the Milky Way's disk. Last month, researchers suggested that the rise through the galactic plane exposed the solar system to a surge of cosmic rays, dealing a damaging blow to life on Earth. Some scientists have also wondered whether the solar system's galactic oscillations might periodically send more comets into the solar system (killing off, let's say, the dinosaurs). This definitely sounds like a bad thing, and depending on who's doing the talking, we're either "very close" to the next risky period, or 10 million years away.
That puts this whole question over whether you're a Virgo or a Leo in perspective, doesn't it?
Update for 2:30 p.m. ET Jan. 15: I initially wrote that astrology is "totally divorced" from modern astronomy, but that's an overstatement. Astrologers still depend on accurate determinations of celestial bodies' positions in the sky, as seen from Earth. They incorporate astronomical advances as well, such as the discovery of additional dwarf planets. But the way they interpret that information is different from how astronomers would interpret it.
Take the constellations, for example: Some commenters have noted that when an astrologer says the sun is "in the house of Aries," that doesn't mean the sun is actually in the astronomical constellation of Aries. In astrology, the sun enters Aries at the time of the March equinox, as explained here by EarthSky. The sky is then divided into 12 houses (named after constellations) that take up equal amounts of angular distance around the celestial equator. Thus, the astrological signs do not correspond precisely with the astronomical constellations as they're defined today, and they never did.
In ancient times, the "first point of Aries" occurred when the sun was actually in the astronomical constellation of Aries. No more. Now the sun is in the constellation of Pisces for the March equinox, and by the time Earth wobbles its way to the year 2600 it will be in Aquarius for the start of northern spring. For astronomers, that will be the true dawning of the age of Aquarius, although some astrologers (and songwriters) argue that the Aquarian age has already begun.
Astrologers borrow quite a bit from astronomy, but generally speaking, the only professional interest that astronomers take in astrology is historical — since, as noted above, the roots of astronomy go back to ancient beliefs about the connections between the cosmos and our destinies. It's a natural human yearning. I'll bet that at least one or two young astronomers have checked their "love signs" at some point, even if they haven't written a research paper about it.
More on scientific paradigm shifts:
- Technolog: How Twitter snowballed the zodiac
- Vote: Has your opinion of astrology changed?
- Scientists give the periodic table a makeover
- Earth's timeline: How continents clashed
- Scientists question fundamental laws
Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" our Facebook page, or by following msnbc.com's science editor, Alan Boyle, on Twitter (@boyle).


Astrology as science is BS. None the less it has its uses; making $$$ for instance or just romantic fun, et al. But this so called "news" is also BS. It is nothing new that the star field (as observed from Earth) is shifting; it's not important to the basis of astrology. The fact that the original constallations of the Zodiac no longer align with their houses is not revelant to the underlying assumptions of astrology, which as i said is indeed BS.
just trying to frwd this 2a fb frnd who is of this realm for comment... but link doesn't seem 2b working... hoping we can still rely on one of you to set us @ ease despite out-of-whack/outdated/or @ least outnumbered orbital paths, so to know how much over-correcting (or undershooting) we need to bring harmony and balance to our miniscule lives in 2011. Though if you can tell the future w/o even knowing the whereabouts of the cosmos, planets, their (our?) houses, or even their axis, that's fine by me! This star-gazer isn't asking how tides work, since nobody has a current tidebook anyway, right? I'll ride the wave if you could just point the way to the beach. ;)
Precession has been brought up repeatedly for years by those who either don't understand astrology and/or those who want to come in on their white horse as the great debunkers saving all of us from not following the dogmatic practice of science. Good grief, do your research and then draw your own conclusions. This recent article describing someone's not so new aha about precession is misleading, utterly condescending, without analysis on the astrology aspects, and therefore nothing more than another incomplete and misleading opinion.
thanks.
The story of the birth of Christ includes astrologers/astrology and a mysterious "star" guiding them.
HA !
Now I could believe in Global warming and the breakup of the ice sheets as being due to the additional tipping of the earth's axis much more than pollution.
i would say that, although this is certainly not a phenomenon, this would rather strain the meager credibility that astrology has. if it now declared as being wrong, and the stars have been shifting throughout the millennia, then that would presumably mean all previous calculations were wrong. logically, astrology following reason, we find ourselves arriving at the conclusion that we have known for quite some time now: astrology is simply an attempt to understand the world and the universe at best, and a moneymaking venture at worst
Ah-hah! I knew it! I still feel like a Sagittarius hehehe
Now, I believe in evolution as a sound theory, and I know what the scientific method is, and I don't believe in a Judeo-Christian God as anything more than mythology, and all that...
But I still "knock on wood", and I don't ever want to break a mirror. Perhaps value placed in *harmless* superstitions is just human nature.
So I do sometimes look up horoscopes; for me it's a fun fusion of science and superstition, because I thought it's a superstition with a basis in astronomy. Now I learn that astrology actually has no basis in astronomy, not even in a superstitious manner.
Now some of you "educate" me that astronomy is based more on the "psychological analysis" of Babylonian astronomers, rather than said astronomers' analysis of the sky. What the H*** do I care about the psycho-babble of 5000-years-old pseudo-psychoanalysts??!? I care about the constellations! The mysterious forces of the stars! Not in 5000-years-old Dr. Phils!
If astrology don't update their astronomy, and include the 13th constellation, I will no longer read them even as a superstitious pastime.
There is a remarkable correlation between global temperatures and the shift of the magnetic poles, though correlation does not prove cause and effect. See the published paper in E&E on my web page. Comments welcome. Search for:
Climate Change And The Earth's Magnetic Poles, A Possible Connection
Astrology is the historical origin of astronomy and large parts of mathematics.
Along with agriculture, animal husbandry and public cleanliness, astrology and the sciences descended from it are the foundations of our civilization. It deserves a serious treatment.
Siderealism - the actual position of the stars with respect to the tropical zodiac - has been known perhaps for thousands of years and is the basis of some astrological systems. The ancient Greeks were aware of the precession of the equinoxes.
This article and a lot of its responses is an example of the low level of thinking and high levels of prejudice and ignorance among those who want to "own" science and use it for their own ends. Ubiquitous on cable "science" programming.
Disrespect for knowledge of any kind is the true hallmark of stupidity.
Here are some interesting questions:
(1) Find out what sign you are and a few of its keywords. Compare yourself to the other 11 signs. In your opinion, are you really more similar to another sign?
(2) What would be the purpose of having a fixed zodiac? (Hint: What is the relation between a clock face and the changing time given by the hour hand - what if you only had one or the other).
(3) At what time historically was the tropical zodiac set and by whom?
lets not forget the gregorian calender that screwed it all up to begin with.........