E-mail updates
Follow on Twitter
Subscribe to RSS
Nicholas Longrich / Yale University
An illustration depicts a newly discovered dinosaur called Titanoceratops, which predates the better-known Triceratops.
Paleontologists report that a massive horned dinosaur was roaming the American Southwest 5 million years before the well-known Triceratops ... or was that a Torosaurus?
The newly named species, Titanoceratops, weighed nearly 15,000 pounds and had an 8-foot-long skull. It lived during the Cretaceous period, around 74 million years ago.
The finding, accepted for publication in the journal Cretaceous Research, suggests that the large horned dinosaurs evolved their large size earlier than previously thought, reports Yale University paleontologist Nicholas Longrich.
The paleontologist got an inkling about the existence of this dinosaur while searching through scientific papers that described a partial skeleton discovered New Mexico in 1941. The skeleton was identified as Pentaceratops, a common species to the area, and was reconstructed as one for display at the Oklahoma Museum of Natural History in 1995.
"When I looked at the skeleton more closely, I realized it was just too different from the other known Pentaceratops to be a member of the species," Longrich said in a news release.
Nicholas Longrich / Yale University
The skull on the left is the Titanoceratops skull, the missing parts of which were reconstructed to look like a Pentaceratops. The illustration on the right shows the missing parts of the frill (shaded).
Instead, he says the dinosaur likely weighed twice as much as an adult Pentaceratops. It was similar to Triceratops, but with a thinner frill, longer nose and slightly bigger horns.
He suspects that Titanoceratops is the ancestor of both Triceratops and Torosaurus. "This skeleton is exactly what you would expect their ancestor to look like," he said.
More work is needed, however, before the assignment to a new species is confirmed. As pointed out by Brian Switek on the Smithsonian's Dinosaur Tracking blog, members of the Dinosaur Mailing List are debating whether Pentaceratops and Titanoceratops are different growth stages of a single species.
"The animal Longrich has named Titanoceratops certainly did exist," Switek writes, "but as with any other species, the animal's name is a scientific hypothesis that will likely be discussed and debated in years to come."
The discussion parallels the debate over whether Triceratops and Torosaurus fossils actually represent the juvenile and adult forms of the same animal. Some experts suggest that the name "Triceratops" (or more likely "Torosaurus") should go extinct, alongside "Brontosaurus." Others, however, insist that Triceratops and Torosaurus were truly different breeds of horned dinosaurs.
So how do you settle the debate? The best way is to find more fossils, and especially fossilized frills. That's exactly what Longrich is hoping for in Titanoceratops' case.
More stories on horned dinosaurs:
- Puzzling three-horned dino is adult Triceratops
- Mini Triceratops first horned dino from South Korea
- Triceratops had horn-to-horn battles with kin
- Dinosaur had horns the size of baseball bats
John Roach is a contributing writer for msnbc.com. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by hitting the "like" button on the Cosmic Log Facebook page or following msnbc.com's science editor, Alan Boyle, on Twitter (@b0yle).
Leave a Comment:
This is very interesting article. I'v heard of the debate about whether some species of dinosaur, like Dracorex, are really juveniles of already discovered species. But I never new that Triceratops relatives could grow as big as Titanosaurus.
Isn't he cute? Or should it be, isn't she cute? :)
You have a point. Maybe, instead of these different species being juvenile and adult forms, maybe they are male and female of the same species.
With the size of these animals at 15,000 pounds, the amount of food necessary to support their growth must have been extremely abundant.
If the number of these animals was small per total population of all species, another fossil may never be found.
No more Brontosaurus, no more Pluto, and maybe no more Triceratops? What are these scientists doing?
@DelFairchild - The rate of metabolism goes down as the size of a creature increases. The amount of food per unit of mass goes down as well. A shrew eats an enormous amount of food per day in relation to its body size. So do small birds. If we ate the same amount of food, (calories) per pound as an elephant, we would starve to death.
If these dinosaurs were warm blooded, they would have eaten as much as an elephant their size would. If they had a lower body temperature, they would have eaten even less. The largest elephant on record weighed 24,000 pounds, much more then these relatively small 15,000 pound animals.
I always think about how many "undiscovered" treasures a laying about on university and museum shelves.
A dirty little secret of the trade - there is many, much, much, muuuucchhh still-unpublished work done by archaeologists.
Really interesting article. I had hear about the debate that some dinosaurs, like Dracorex, might just be juveniles of already discovered species. I didn't know that dinosaurs like Titanoceratops could get that big though.