Righties ruled 600,000 years ago

University of Kansas

Teeth show markings of a right-handed person. The markings are from accidental tooth whacking by people using stone tools, according to researchers.

Lefties were as outnumbered 600,000 years ago as they are today, according to telltale markings on teeth found on Neanderthal and Neanderthal ancestors in Europe.

The finding serves as a new technique to determine whether a person was left- or right-handed from limited skeletal remains, and it also suggests that a key piece for the origin of language was in place at least half a million years ago, David Frayer, an anthropologist at the University of Kansas, told me today.


But while ancient righties appeared to outnumber lefties nine to one, the findings don't reveal whether some of the ancient lefties dominated in sports, as baseball players do today; and in politics, where being left-handed seems to help open the door to the White House.  

Tooth markings
The telltale tooth markings, based on experiments, appear to result from how these Neanderthals and their relatives processed hides with stone tools, explained Frayer, a co-author of a paper on the findings published this month in the journal Laterality.

One of his colleagues in Spain had people wear a mouth guard and then strike a hide as if they were cutting or stretching it with a stone tool. Every now and then, the test subjects were asked to whack their guarded teeth, as the researchers think would have accidentally happened as the ancient humans worked away.

AFP - Getty Images file

A reconstructed Neanderthal appears to strike a pose at the Prehistoric Museum in Halle, Germany.

Imagine a person pulling on the hide with their left hand and striking it with a tool held in their right hand. When they accidentally hit a tooth, the angle of the strike would be from the upper left to the lower right, Frayer explained.

"It doesn't matter what tooth it was, it would always be in that direction," he told me. "That tells you if you see scratches that are running in that direction, it tells you that the individual was primarily using their right hand to process."

Markings primarily going the opposite way — from the upper right to the lower left — are the sign of a lefty.

Frayer and colleagues examined isolated teeth from 27 Neanderthal and Neanderthal ancestors from Europe dating back 600,000 years and found that 25 of them have the telltale markings of a righty.

"That's the pattern we see in modern populations," Frayer noted, suggesting that right-handed dominance is an ancient human trait.

Language link
Although some studies of tool-using chimpanzees suggest a preference for the left hand, the ratio isn't as sharp as 9 to 1, according to Frayer. Such a distinctive ratio of handedness is unique to humans and their immediate ancestors and relatives.

And such laterality, he adds, appears linked to the development of language, a skill that humans have and chimps don't.

"The connection is the left side of the brain controls the right side of the body, and language is located on the left side," Frayer said.

We know this because when people experience a stroke on the left side of the brain, their speech is impaired and they lose control of the right side of their body. A person who has a stroke on the right side of the brain retains the ability to talk, but loses control of the left side of their body.

Finding that right-handedness goes back at least 600,000 years thus suggests that this key piece for language was in place, "so the people probably spoke," Frayer said.

More stories on handedness:


John Roach is a contributing writer for msnbc.com. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by hitting the "like" button on the Cosmic Log Facebook page or following msnbc.com's science editor, Alan Boyle, on Twitter (@b0yle).

Discuss this post

Irregardless of what linguists say, I think we have had language since we have been making tools. I don't see how Homo Erectis could have flourished and spread without language. They made sophisticated tools and must have had a way of passing this knowledge on.

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Wed Apr 20, 2011 6:07 PM EDT

"so the people probably spoke," Frayer said.

That seems like a very big leap. Did trilobites or their predators — in which similar asymmetry has been found — also speak?

— Steve Kass

    Reply#2 - Wed Apr 20, 2011 8:42 PM EDT

    irregardless aint a wurd dood

    lol

      Reply#3 - Wed Apr 20, 2011 11:21 PM EDT

      Seems like a bit of conjecture on rather flimsy evidence if you ask me. Although the probability is high, I think you need more proof for such a conclusionary title.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#4 - Thu Apr 21, 2011 10:28 AM EDT

      I question that people striking stone tools would strike their teeth repeatedly, which would be a painful process, one that would enhance learning to be careful with the striker. The inference chain in this research seems stretched to the limit.

      On the other hand, we know that chimpanzees communicate verbally, with different sosunds for predator, food, threat, etc. Of course the australopithecines used some sort of language, although it may not have had a complex syntax. Even birds, whose behavior is largely instinctive, have different sosunds for different meanings. I don't see why there is any doubt that the Neanderthals has advanced speech, since their culture had many abstract concepts.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#5 - Thu Apr 21, 2011 12:05 PM EDT

      Actually, a point that was not made here, consider the Inuit's use of their Ulu, the curved knife that they use for many purposes, including eating. To take a bite of their raw or even cooked meats, instead of cutting it into small pieces before taking their bite, they bite and then cut it off with their ulu. Perhaps this is an echo of ancient technique, taking a bite of their game and then cutting it off with a stone flake or knife. If that is taken into consideration then this makes perfect sense that they would end up with the occasional scratch on their teeth from their stone knives. Perhaps an examination and comparison of Inuit teeth, historically, if they would allow the examination of skeletons, would show similar patterns of scratches. Ya never know, this may actually be the missing key in this study.

      • 2 votes
      #5.1 - Thu Apr 21, 2011 4:13 PM EDT

      I would like to thank those who find my idea illuminating. Another point that I have, to back up this premise, is that, after looking more closely at the pattern of these scratches, some of them appear to be in very close, parallel sets, as if the stone flake they were using as a knife had multiple points that scratched the tooth in series in the same motion, making it appear that it was a habitual, continuing practice that scratched the teeth, and the only reason that I can think of that this would occur is that it happened in the process of eating. That and the fact that most of the scratches appear to have the same basic curved shape and direction, which also upholds my premise. I may be wrong, but somehow I do not think so.

      Inuit-ition, very good pun on the subject, I got a good laugh out of that! Thank You Darthdon!

      • 1 vote
      #5.2 - Fri Apr 22, 2011 1:24 PM EDT
      Reply

      @B.Honest - That's using your Inuit-ition! ;-D

      • 1 vote
      Reply#6 - Fri Apr 22, 2011 3:50 AM EDT
      WungTooDeleted
      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.