
Herb Terrace, Columbia University
Nim Chimpsky gets a kiss on the cheek from one of his chimp-sitters.
"Project Nim," a documentary by Oscar-winning director James Marsh, is a heartwarming and heartbreaking story about a home-bred, pot-smoking, cookie-chomping chimpanzee called Nim Chimpsky. Nim was the star player in a controversial language experiment that failed ... but nevertheless laid the foundations for research into primate communication.
In the early 1970s, Herb Terrace, a Columbia University psychologist, adopted a 2-week-old chimpanzee. Nim Chimpsky (named after linguist Noam Chomsky) was to be the star of an experiment to see if non-human animals could be taught the elements of language. At the time, linguists and psychologists were locked in a shouting match about the true nature of our chatty brains and the origins of human language. Terrace hoped Nim would end the raging debate about how and why human language evolved.
The behaviorists led one camp, and said that language could be taught and learned by other intelligent, non-human species. The opposing camp, led by Chomsky, insisted that language was a human product and there were parts of it that non-human species could never ape.
Terrace, who still does research on primate intelligence at Columbia, had heard stories about another precocious chimpanzee named Washoe, who lived with her scientist "parents" at the University of Nevada in Reno and had been taught to communicate through American Sign Language.
But Terrace wasn’t satisfied with the way Washoe’s feats had been documented. Terrace wanted to raise young Nim among people, just as Washoe had been brought up, but scrupulously log his progress and learning abilities. If chimpanzees could in fact master elements of human language, he wanted to be sure how they did it, and how well they picked it up. "I wanted to have a total record of how Nim signed," Terrace told me.

Courtesy of "Project Nim"
It wasn't speech that Terrace was after: The vocal cords of chimpanzees weren't designed to replicate human speech. But if the behaviorists were correct, chimps, our nearest genetic relatives, should be able to learn and communicate using the grammatical rules and expressive elements that American Sign Language and spoken languages shared if they were brought up among people.
So, at the age of 2 weeks, Nim Chimpsky was put in the foster care of Terrace's student, Stephanie LaFarge, who lived with her family in Manhattan. LaFarge, who even breast-fed Nim, would be the first of a string of chimp-sitters who tried to teach him American Sign Language. Laura-Ann Petitto, then an undergraduate at Columbia, would be next. She raised Nim from the time he was 3 months old until he was 4 years old.
At first, the results were astonishing. Nim learned quickly, and his caretakers — Terrace's small army of students — carefully recorded reams of video and pages of notes describing Nim's signs and behavior. In all, Nim learned 120 words, and used them to communicate with thousands and thousands of phrases.
"[Other researchers used to say], this is like getting an SOS from out of space. And I felt the same way," Terrace told me. "How amazing would it be to ask a chimp how he felt about something?

Herb Terrace, Columbia University
The experimental data made it look as if Nim the "A" student had settled the matter: Human brains weren't that special when it came to language abilities. For a time, it seemed as though the behaviorists had a resounding victory on their hands.
Terrace was writing up his findings for the journal Science when one day, as he watched a well-worn tape of Nim signing with his teacher, he began to notice that something was off. “Then I realized the teachers were prompting him,” Terrace told me. “They weren’t even aware of this. But Nim was.”
In a “quarter of a second,” years of observations came crashing down, Terrace told me. "My understanding of Nim signing the grammatical rule was wrong," he said. "Eventually I concluded that our minds are fundamentally different from a chimp's."
It had to do with our understanding of ourselves as individuals. "We’re aware of our mind," Terrace said. "With a chimpanzee, I don’t think there’s any awareness of one’s own mind and another mind out there. That means you can’t have any concept in a chimpanzee of a self and other."
Nim used the concepts of “I” and “Nim” interchangeably. When he wanted cookies, Nim's second caretaker Petitto told me, the chimp would take Petitto’s hand and lead her to the kitchen, to the locked cabinet in which the cookies were stored. While his message was clear, Petitto said, Nim could never take himself out of the picture. “He took me through the motions. It was physical. He couldn’t say, 'On Monday could you buy the cookies,'" she explained.

Susan Kuklin
Nim signing with Laura-Ann Petitto.
And the ability to take ourselves out of the situations we describe through language is one of the things that make humans unique as communicators. “Language frees us up from the here and now, [to] let you and I talk about Mars without leaving Earth,” Petitto says.
Terrace eventually concluded that chimpanzees lacked the "social intelligence" that made humans able to talk to each other, and Project Nim was closed. Nim, now a full-grown hulk of a chimp, was shipped off to a center in Norman, Okla., to rub shoulders with other chimpanzees his own size.
With that, Nim’s participation in science ended — unless you count his stint as a medical test subject. His Oklahoma caretakers covertly sold him to a cancer research facility, but the sale was exposed by the media. A legal challenge resulted in Nim's return to the sanctuary in Norman, an adventure that "Project Nim" describes in detail.
Though scientists concluded that Nim did not use language to communicate independently, they also saw that this was no dumb animal. "[The Nim project] opened people up to the possibility of incredible intelligence that they hadn't suspected before," said Frans de Waal, a primate researcher at Emory University who studies the emotional bonds that chimpanzees have with each other.
Bringing a chimpanzee home to teach it human language was all the rage once upon a time, but that’s old hat now, he said. Communication studies on chimp behavior now look at the many and varied ways in which chimps and other primates interact naturally. The Nim project was pivotal in giving scientists an early glimpse of those rich possibilities. “We feel like the language studies have opened up an enormous amount of knowledge about cognition, but not about linguistics,” de Waal said.
De Waal is particularly interested in chimp communication through body language and gestures. It’s complex, involved and surprisingly similar to human gestural communication. “If you put young human children with chimpanzees, they make wonderful playmates,” de Waal told me. “They understand each other perfectly because their body language is the same — there’s an enormous similarity.”
Chimps have also shown a deep capacity for empathy. When one family of chimps experiences a death, "other chimpanzees come over and comfort them," de Waal said.
Laura-Ann Petitto, who was Nim's longest caregiver, still speaks gushingly about her emotional bond with Nim. “It’s unlike anything you’ve experienced," she told me. "It’s not like being with a child, it's not like being with a dog — [Nim] was his own category. So he pulled out of me emotions and thoughts that were unique to me, and very powerful, because he was unlike any category that we have."

Harry Benson
"Project Nim," the documentary, opened in U.S. theaters on Friday.
Petitto said her experience with Nim deeply motivated and influenced her work on the human brain. "I know how the brain tissue changes over time. I can look inside a baby's brain at a couple of days old and I can understand if that baby is at risk for language disorders later in its life," she told me. "All of these gifts that I can give to our species have been fundamentally informed by my work through Nim. So there’s been a wonderful closed circle."
More recent research reveals that chimps may be more attuned to understand human speech than previously thought, even if they can’t communicate themselves. A study published last month in Current Biology reported that a chimp raised by humans, as Nim was, could understand distorted human speech sounds. Such findings highlight "the importance of early experience in shaping speech perception," the study’s lead author told BBC News.
Though he does not work on language studies any more, Terrace continues to explore the intelligence and memory capacity of monkeys, studying how quickly and extensively they remember combinations and sequences of images and numbers. “I’ve been studying how good their memory is, and I found it’s fantastic,” Terrace says. “And, I can sort of relate that to the work I did with the chimp in that. These monkeys are much smarter than anybody thought. But that kind of smarts does not give you language.”
More about animal communication:
Nidhi Subbaraman writes about science and technology at msnbc.com. Find her on Twitter and join our conversation on the Cosmic Log Facebook page.
To learn more about 'Project Nim,' check out the film's website. The film was based on the book, 'Project Nim: The Chimp Who Would Be Human,' by Elizabeth Hess.


Poor Nim---intelligent enough to be used and then dumped, intelligent enough to feel abandoned.
"Nim Chimpsky" is a good read. It is interesting enough to read through in a sitting. Can non-Human apes converse spontaneously, and make their needs, wants, and thoughts understood to Humans? That is the question. Well, yes and no.
By the end of the book, it becomes too obvious that the little chimpanzee was really doing elaborate food-begging. Its caretakers were unwittingly giving the chimp clues as to its next move/answer. And always the food reward. Things that many other animal species are capable of. Even when Nim dies, his last request was to sign for his caretaker to "hurry." Again, feeding time. But one pervasive question is left in the minds of readers; what did the ape think of the whole process?
For my part, I was left with an overall feeling of sorrow and pain; empathy for the ape. It was taken from its dame and then, removed to 100% Human care. Daily it was forced to recite sign language, and punished if not cooperative in that. It seriously maimed and injured some caretakers. Nothing wrong with that. After all, Nim was a wild animal, with all instincts intact.
Ultimately, Nim was returned to the chimp breeder, only to be beaten and punished by other apes at the compound. Nim didn't know how to behave like an ape. Through regular beatings, he did learn to get along with other animals, and began to settle down. He died at a very early age for a chimpanzee.
I can only feel a bit sick about what I read, and ashamed for those of whom basically abused and mistreated the animal. A chimpanzee is said to have at least 98% Human genetic code. But that really doesn't mean much.
The DNA is used differently by each species. Chimps are not Human, nor Humans chimps. After all, a mouse has 90% Human DNA; a broccoli, 50 %.
The zoo has been replaced by the laboratory and the zookeepers with scientists. Same thing, but in a different place and time. Wrong, wrong, wrong.
JPT, He's kind of like an allegory for the middle class, eh?
Came here right after the article making the ridiculous suggestion to remove obese kids from their parents.
Nim, the "pot-smoking, cookie-chomping chimpanzee." He doesn't seem to have been entirely well cared for either!
At exactly what point did Nim become a pot-smoker? It was thrown out there but never explained?
Nim's cognitive development obviously didn't make it anywhere near as far as Washoe's did.
It's sheer arrogance to believe we're the only species on this planet capable of being aware of our own minds, of our own self, and I believe Washoe in particular provided proof of that.
It's the beginning of the Planet of the Apes!
The chimp smokes pot? Maybe that's the problem.
"Pot smoking"??? Didn't a chimp NOT under the influence of anything, recently rip a woman's face off?
I may be wrong, but wasn't he under the influence of Xanax or some other sort of tranquilizer?
Xanax and caffeine. A combination almost guaranteed to elicit a violent reaction in animals.
Naming the poor thing after Noam Chomsky was an insult. To the chimps.
Too bad the story did not expand more on the chimps pot habbits. They threw it in there at the start then it was never brought up again. Sure, not really that important to the overall story, but if they mentioned it they could at least say why he smoked (or what was his favorite strain, "Grape Ape" perhaps?), how often, etc.
This proves that chimps do not have a "soul" that is comprised of abstract thought, imagination and most of all free will. That is, the concept of right and wrong and the choice to do either for their sake.
Man became man when he received a "soul", didn't matter what he looked like physically. That is how creationism and evolution can co-exist.
No Jim, creationism and evolution can't co-exist. One is full of factual evidence (evolution) and the other full of human created falsehoods (creationism). Nothing about this proves that chimps do or do not have a soul. It also doesn't "prove" that humans have one.
So, does that mean man did not become man until Jazz was invented?
Oh give me an effing break @Jim. The only thing your comment proves is how gullible you are.
As it turns out, white people don't have soul either.
I read the words about Stephanie Lafarge "breast feeding" the chimp, and found it incredibly disturbing.
"LaFarge, who even breast-fed Nim"
when keeping it real goes wrong
Read Laura Ann Petitto's comment and you will see that it's not only Nim who can't take himself out of the picture. Her every other word is "I," "me," "my"...and Terrace is just as arrogant and self-obsessed, for all these "researchers" it's all all about them, and who cares about Nim? -- and frankly even the reporter doesn't seem to care what ultimately happened to this poor chimp who was ripped away from his mother as a newborn. He was DUMPED at some random place in Oklahoma, and when those people secretly sell him for medical experiments the solution is to put him back with the same corrupt "caretakers"? WHERE is this chimp, is he alive? Animals are not office supplies, to be used up, wadded up and thrown out. This is (was?) a super-intelligent being who shares 98% of our DNA and not only does no one care what happened to him, not even the reporter -- you are all so cynical it doesn't even occur to you that we don't care about your stupid, ill-conceived and poorly executed experiment, or your sorry academic career. We care about the animal you exploited for your own gain, we care about that spirit and that soul. You've already told us by your lack of remorse or even interest in his life that you have no decent souls of your own. Now -- WHERE IS NIM?!
Kate--
Nim died of a heart attack in the year 2000. I believe he was 26 years old.
Thanks, I found it on Wikipedia. Obviously you and I are more interested than this reporter. He should have lived a lot longer, chimps' average lifespan is 45 - 50 years.
And for the record: it wasn't Nim who "couldn't." All he wanted to do was be a chimp. This article posits the chimp as the failure in this story -- but it's the humans in this story, including all these heartless, incompetent researchers, and this uninterested reporter -- who are the failures. Nim did the best he could, none of you even tried.
Re: "Nim did the best he could, none of you even tried."
Tried to do what? The people in this article seemed to me to be trying very hard to teach him ASL, not sure what more you expected from them.
I want them to try to show compassion for a fellow creature, not use him to prove a fundamentally flawed hypothesis with no regard for the impact on his psyche and his life. They used him, they had their fun when he was young and cute, and they seem to have zero thought or remorse for how his life turned out, or the fact that it ended very prematurely.
Does it even occur to you that a chimp has no inherent need to learn ASL? Does it occur to you that that chimp was not put on this planet to serve the needs of humans?
To Serve Man.
Thanks Kate. Well said. We're on the same page when it comes to the animals. After all, they were here first.
My dogs have a consciousnes of self and of others. They all empathized when one of my "pack" hurt his back a few months ago.
I remember being told in 5th grade, (according to the science of the day) dogs can't think, they only respond by instinct. Every kid in the class protested. They were right.
Once again the hubris of science, which is just as bad as religion in putting humans at the forefront of all species, is trotted out to leave a bad taste in all of our mouths.
Nim could, the failure of the scientist's approach could not.
Next time, RTFA:
"Chimps have also shown a deep capacity for empathy. When one family of chimps experiences a death, "other chimpanzees come over and comfort them," de Waal said."
There is a difference between empathy and cognition.
How can a being have empathy without cognition? You can't empathize with a situation you can't comprehend.
That's how I can empathize with your inability to grasp the relationship between the two, busy as you are attacking others' thoughtful comments with childish, tweety abbreviations (RTFA, really?) instead of using the cognition God gave you, and this poor dead chimpanzee.
Not necessarily commenting on this article, but it is hard to RTFA when the articles change. I've noticed many times people post, then the article changes, and new posts blast them for "not reading". However, information was deleted, added or changed.
Just a comment.
I've noticed that too. It's actually quite common.
Yes, Please speak English. RTFA means nothing to me.
Secondly the comment was specifically on the thread about Nim the chimp. Not my fault if they changed subjects and not much cognition going on if their threads are that glitchy.
Third, only one species enages in snottiness and it's not dogs or chimps, who possess both empathy and cognition. It's the two legged egocentric pack animals known as humans who do that.