
Univ. of Dundee
A forensic reconstruction shows the face of Simon of Sudbury, a 14th-century archbishop of Canterbury who was beheaded by English rebels.
More than 600 years after he was beheaded, Simon of Sudbury has his face back, thanks to a 21st-century virtual forensics project.
Sudbury was the archbishop of Canterbury when he lost his face, along with the rest of his head, in 1381. It was a mighty fall from grace for the man who made his way up to the top of England's ecclesiastical ladder and crowned King Richard II. But when Sudbury introduced the third Poll Tax as Lord Chancellor in 1380, the country's peasants had had enough. Sudbury was said to be so unpopular that the guards at the Tower of London just let rebels rush in during the Great Rising of 1381 and drag the bishop to his execution on Tower Hill.
Sudbury's head was put on a spike on London Bridge. Under cover of darkness, a man from the bishop's native Suffolk supposedly had it taken down and brought to St. Gregory's Church at Sudbury. (The bishop's body, meanwhile, ended up in a grave in Canterbury Cathedral, and the legend was that his ghost haunted the cathedral's tower.)
Now fast-forward six centuries: A Suffolk school worker named Ian Copeman worked with church officials to have Sudbury's partly mummified skull (with bits of facial tissue still attached) put through a CT scan at a local hospital. The readings from the skull were sent along to the University of Dundee's Center for Anatomy and Human Identification. In the past, the center has helped reconstruct the faces of other personages such as Johann Sebastian Bach. the sister of Cleopatra and the son of Ramses II.
Under the guidance of center director Caroline Wilkinson, forensic artist Adrienne Barker took on the project. She digitally removed the extra facial tissue and had the CT data turned into a cast of the skull, using rapid prototyping. Using that cast as her foundation, Barker built up layers of clay to simulate muscle, fat and skin. The teeth were missing from the skull, perhaps because they were sold off as relics, so Barker had to use a bit of artistry to fill out the face. But she told me she followed "the current most accurate standards" to complete the project.
Barker acknowledged that the result, unveiled last month at St. Gregory's Church, shows that Sudbury was "strange-looking fellow." She told Discovery News that some onlookers at the church gasped when they saw his visage. "He was compared to characters such as Spock and Shrek," she said.
For better or worse, this is probably how Simon of Sudbury will be known from now on. Barker noted that the only other depictions to come to light are found in two stained-glass windows in Canterbury Cathedral.
"Both of them were done in Victorian times, a good 400 years after Simon was killed, so they're not really accurate," Barker said. "This is the most accurate reconstruction."
Now she's filling out an educational website about the Simon of Sudbury project that she hopes will get kids interested in forensics.
Barker acknowledged that "a lot of people think that it's morbid" to put make-believe flesh on the shape of a 600-year-old skull. But she thinks it's "really fascinating," and I'm betting a lot of kids will as well.
Other faces from history:
- Was this the face of Jack the Ripper?
- Scans reveal the face of King Tut
- Archaeologists identify Copernicus' skull
- Experts try to reconstruct 'the real face of Jesus'
Tip o' the Log to Discovery News' Rossella Lorenzi.
Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter or adding me to your Google+ circle. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for other worlds.


Shrek was my first thought when I saw the pics.
Funny I thought Winston Churchill.
Holy cow! The guy was a VULCAN???
I think he must have looked better without it!
Now, that's my idea of "we the people" responding to a government out of touch with the citizens.
Since this is a science blog, perhaps I'll be forgiven for asking how much science there is to support these reconstructions. Seems like most of the face (all the soft tissue) is simply made up. Has anyone ever given such an artist a skull of a person of whom we have real photographs, to see how close the "reconstruction" comes to the real thing?
The same method is used by police to help identify skeletal remains. Success rate: unknown. But it's taken seriously.
I was thinking the same thing Joe what if the guy was extremely thin he would not have been so jowly then. It would be interesting to know how she decided to add a little extra weight to him.
Perhaps the preserved flesh gave her a clue?
Most likely they established his weight from his decapitated body (which was buried in the cathedral). and historical accounts which do depict an aged man of some girth. from there, there is some guess work but mostly taken from racial averages and the set of his bone structure.
messed up.
who the hell are we to change what happened in history so many years ago? We can't go around changing people's bodies because they don't fit our feelings. For goodness sake, leave the dead alone! I'm really sick of reading these kinds of stories and people making money and notoriety off of them. The Government needs to step in a put a stop to desecrating the dead.
Unless you are form the UK the government can't do anything, this is a story form the UK.
Besides dead is dead I am sure he does not mind! Better to be remembered than forgotten I say.
I agree Krestov. I'm sure he would much rather be remembered than forgotten like so many others. Very fascinating!
I also agree with a previous post: Has anyone ever put these forensic artists to the test with a known victim? Someone that we have photographic evidence, so that we may see how accurate this science really it!
I'm sure this makes him feel much better now.
In the middle ages, wealthy persons usually weighed more than the average working class or peasants. If you were "plump", that meant you were weatlhy and could afford to eat well. Most bishops were wealthy, and thus obese. Also keep in mind that this reconstruction is "sans" hair. That is why he looks odd. He most likely would have had a tonsure.