Tiny critter becomes a big wheel

Charles Krebs

The first-place winner in this year's Olympus BioScapes competition shows a rotifer (Floscularia ringens) feeding. Its rapidly beating hairlike structures, known as cilia, bring in water that contains food for the rotifer. Click on the image to see the top 10 Olympus BioScapes entries.

Rotifers have been the big wheels of the microscopic world for more than 300 years, so it's fitting that a rotifer's wheel-like head gets its turn in the photographic spotlight.

An extreme close-up of a type of rotifer known as Floscularia ringens has won first prize in the 2011 Olympus BioScapes Digital Imaging Competition, which showcases photos and movies of life science subjects. The image was the top selection out of more than 2,000 entries in this year's contest — and it earned the photographer, Charles Krebs, $5,000 worth of Olympus imaging equipment.

"I've always gravitated toward abstract small things that people don't normally look at," Krebs told me last week as he prepared to pick up his prize at a Washington ceremony. "So the microscope takes that to another level."


Prize-winner in a pond
Krebs has been doing photography for decades from a home base in the "other Washington": a suburb of Seattle called Issaquah. He's been focusing on photomicrography — the creation of images using a microscope — since 2004, and in that time he's become one of the leaders in the field. Most of the contests for microscope-made images feature one of Krebs' pictures as a finalist.

"The camera that I use is a Canon digital SLR camera, which many researchers do not use," Krebs said. His lab, which is a converted darkroom, is outfitted with a complement of Olympus microscopes and optics. "But it's not the latest and the greatest," he said. "It's about 20 years old. The latest and the greatest is a little out of my price range." (State-of-the-art, professional-grade microscopic imaging systems can cost tens of thousands of dollars.)

Krebs' prize-winning subject came from a pond near his house. "This is a particular type of rotifer that I've always found fascinating to watch," he said. "One of the most striking things to me is the little domicile, the tube that it builds. Each individual 'brick,' if you will, is made by the rotifer."

In the picture, you can see a "brick" inside the rotifer's semi-transparent body, about to be added to the tube-shaped matrix at the bottom.

Even more striking are the "ears" of a rotifer. These structures, which measure 300 microns or 0.012 inch from one edge to the other, make up the marine animal's corona. Tiny hairs on the corona, known as cilia, sweep at lightning speed to direct water containing bits of food into the rotifer's mouth. "When you see this in life, those things are moving so fast that they look like two little wheels on top," Krebs said.

Wheel animalcules
That activity is what earned the critter its name: "Rotifer" comes from the Latin words for "wheel-bearing." When Anton von Leeuwenhoek, the Dutch tradesman known as the father of microbiology, looked at rotifers through one of the world's first microscopes in 1703, he called them "wheel animalcules." Some rotifers are just big enough to be seen with the unaided eye. One common type, the bdelloid rotifer, has been reproducing for 40 million years without sex

Rotifers play a key role in filtering out the decomposing organic matter contained in water. And those rotifers, in turn, make nice snacks for fish, shrimp and crabs. A single drop of pond water might contain 50 to 100 rotifers.

A video from EDF Williams shows a rotifer feeding.

Although it's easy for Krebs to get his little critters, it's not so easy to capture a great picture of them. Krebs used a complex lighting scheme known as differential interference contrast illumination to bring out the fine details of the rotifer's structure. An electronic flash was used to freeze the rotifer's motion.

"After I took the shot, I knew it was probably one of the nicest headshots of this particular animal that I had," he said. "You may look at 100 different specimens, and they're just not at the right angle, or they stick their head out and there's a big blade of grass covering it."

Krebs does a lot of other photographic work, including product shots. "There's a fair number of companies that need photographs of very small things," he explained. But tiny critters like the prize-winning rotifer rank among his favorite subjects.

"I'm not a scientist," he said. "I'm not a zoologist, I'm not a biologist. But it's always been an interest of mine."

To see more of Krebs' work, check out his website as well as his favorite hangout on Photomacrography.net. And while you're at it, take a spin through these galleries on msnbc.com:


Correction for 2:55 p.m. ET Nov. 15: In one of the more humorous mistakes I've made lately, I misheard Krebs' reference to a blade of grass as a "plate of glass." I've corrected the quote.

Images from the 2011 Olympus BioScapes Digital Imaging Competition will go on a national museum tour. For additional information, hvisit the Olympus Bioscapes website

Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter or following the Cosmic Log Google+ page. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.

Discuss this post

Man, I've looked through microscopes dozens of times with my kids, and it's rare enough that I get it adjusted well enough to see what's on the slide. Seeing something moving there would be like a dream -- I've read about it, but never seen anything that looked alive in water from any number of ponds and puddles.

    Reply#1 - Mon Nov 14, 2011 10:03 AM EST

    Well two things - 1) the microscope you are using is probably not a compound scope, especially if it's one you use with your kids or buy in a local store - many of those are single lens glorified magnifying glass. Many of these organisms you can see at 10, 20, and very well at 100x mag with a very low-priced compound scope you can pick up from lab supply stores or get on the cheap when schools auction off their old equipment. 2) It's hard to focus and maintain field of view on a moving specimen. You can fix the sample to the slide to get a nice view.

    When you do finally see life swimming around in all its glory, it's a pretty cool experience! Then you can start getting into polarized light and fluorescence microscopy after that! I myself have entered the Olympus micro world competition every year for the past 5 years, and I never win :(

    • 2 votes
    #1.1 - Mon Nov 14, 2011 1:35 PM EST

    I'd invest in a better scope, as mmBeer describes, and also search for mucky pond water. The greener the better. It's algae that turn it green, you'll definitely see those, and other stuff then feed on the algae. If it's clean there's likely nothing interesting in it.

    You'll also need microscope slides, small glass cover slips for laying over your sample, which flatten out the stuff so you can focus on it. Also, a gooey compound called methyl cellulose is handy for slowing down the really fast moving stuff like paramecia if you happen to find a good pond location with any of those.

      #1.2 - Mon Nov 14, 2011 3:21 PM EST
      Reply

      the tubular shape is a wonder made , shape of strongest, by other animals like bees resemble the carbon fiber currently known. The ciliary motion liken the cilia of our bronchial pulmonary epithelium that swept away the harmfull substances entered our lung are what prevents our lungs to become concrete. Well done.

      hjc

      • 1 vote
      Reply#2 - Mon Nov 14, 2011 2:25 PM EST

      Shrimp is one of the words in the English dictionary that can be used in both a plural and singular manner. I don't think "shrimps" is correct. But that is the olny error I found. Congrats.

        Reply#3 - Mon Nov 14, 2011 2:27 PM EST

        Fixed that, thanks

          #3.1 - Tue Nov 15, 2011 1:07 AM EST
          Reply

          So this is what "sh!tting bricks" means.

            Reply#4 - Mon Nov 14, 2011 3:00 PM EST

            Awesome photo, awesome video too.

              Reply#5 - Mon Nov 14, 2011 6:29 PM EST
              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.