It's boom time for weird science

Kyoto U. / INAH / The Daily Citizen / NBC

The weirdest science stories of 2011 include (clockwise from top left) the one about the game-playing chimps, the update on the 2012 Maya apocalypse, a bird-death epidemic and the zodiac debate.



Even with the supposed Mayan doomsday coming up, it's going to be hard for 2012 to match 2011 when it comes to weird science: What other year can boast a bird-killing "aflockalypse," a chupacabra prowling around the nation's capital, two Loch Ness-type monster sightings and two doomsday predictions. (News flash: The predictions were wrong.)

That's why the Weird Science Awards exist: To pay tribute to the strange but scientific (or pseudo-scientific) tales of each year. This year's winners of the fifth annual Weirdies will take their place alongside glow-in-the-dark cats and dogs, reattached rabbit penises, the 2,700-year-old marijuana stash and the Stone Age sex toy as talismans of this wacky age.


We're offering 30 nominees from the past year, and it's up to you to pick the top 10 award-winners. One of the nominees — the one about pee pressure — is a laureate from this year's Ig Nobel award ceremony, which honors "research that makes people laugh and then think." You can use that as your judging criterion, or you can go for the article that makes you laugh, and then ask, "What on earth were they thinking?"

Write-in votes and second-guessing are encouraged; you can register them in your comments below.

The 10 nominees that get the most votes as of noon ET on Jan. 3 will be recognized as the 2012 Weirdy winners, and to mark the occasion, we'll review the year in weird science on Wednesday with Ig Nobel creator Marc Abrahams.

Here are the nominees from the past year, in chronological order:

Review the nominees, then cast your vote. We'll talk about the winners next Wednesday on "Virtually Speaking Science." In the meantime, take a walk down memory lane with these Weirdies from past years:

More year-end reviews:


Alan Boyle is msnbc.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter and adding the Cosmic Log page to your Google+ presence. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds. 

Discuss this post

Rock, Paper, Scissors - the most practical and useful of them all.... plus the coolest

  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Dec 28, 2011 11:35 PM EST

The world is no longer a sure thing. Evidence has surfaced over the last century that suggests that our science and understanding of human history is faulty. Making it worse is that science, rather than taking the challenge head-on, simply chooses to ignore it and those who ask for... plead and even beg for answers.

The situation is not the problem of fringe belief. It is the result of a mainstream science that is so very out of touch with the society it serves. This is exactly the situation that led to the rise of science and the fall of religion to begin with.

What's next? What follows when our science finally fails?

  • 3 votes
Reply#2 - Thu Dec 29, 2011 12:10 AM EST

Another Dark Age?

  • 2 votes
#2.1 - Thu Dec 29, 2011 9:34 AM EST

agree...the approach to understanding quantum is so directional/narrow it has become dogma...I believe the only progressive understanding of these terrains is somehow gifted from the Conscious itself. ooops, sorry, area of discussion not valid in our current science world.

  • 1 vote
#2.2 - Thu Dec 29, 2011 11:16 AM EST

Nothing will happen when our science fails. We'll just get another one. The landfills are full of failed science, nothing happened. We just kept moving forward and we always will. Unless the GOP takes the White House and the Senate and then we'll start moving backwards. :-)

Sorry, I couldn't resist.

  • 5 votes
#2.3 - Thu Dec 29, 2011 11:59 AM EST

An excellent book on this schism between science and culture is Mechanistic and Nonmechanistic Science, Richard L. Thompson.

  • 2 votes
#2.4 - Thu Dec 29, 2011 12:24 PM EST

#2.4 continued. Though not specifically on the subject of mainstream science being out of touch with a society it supposedly serves, this theme predominates in it's text.

  • 1 vote
#2.5 - Thu Dec 29, 2011 12:34 PM EST
Reply

The sighting of the creature in the waters of Alaska and then a few months later the mass of unidentified eggs on an Alaskan shore both deserve Weirdy awards.

  • 2 votes
Reply#3 - Thu Dec 29, 2011 12:21 AM EST

The IgNobels are way cooler and funnier than this.

  • 1 vote
Reply#4 - Thu Dec 29, 2011 12:33 AM EST

Agreed. But they're not limited to the current year either.

  • 1 vote
#4.1 - Thu Dec 29, 2011 1:48 PM EST
Reply

Is that stash of marijuana still smokable. lol

  • 3 votes
Reply#5 - Thu Dec 29, 2011 3:23 AM EST

Weirdest science of the year..........republican predictions for presidential electorates.

  • 2 votes
Reply#6 - Thu Dec 29, 2011 5:57 AM EST

The flockalypse is most likely due to a poisoning that someone doe not want to admit and the chupacabra must be an escaped genetic experiment.

  • 1 vote
Reply#7 - Thu Dec 29, 2011 11:48 AM EST

Weirdest "science"--
The psycho/pharma industry...and getting weirder everyday/year.

  • 2 votes
Reply#8 - Thu Dec 29, 2011 12:35 PM EST

Mayan Doomsday is not Science. Sigh, nevermind. Go back to Pumpkin-chuckin, or whatever else it is you plebes watch....

  • 2 votes
Reply#9 - Thu Dec 29, 2011 12:53 PM EST

Pumpkin-chuckin? Plebes?

Who died and named you Einstien?

OK, Einstien, first of all, reading the Mayan Calender and making those calculations IS science. Secondly, pumpkin-chukin requires virtually all of the major scientific disciplines for a successful chuck.

Consider. You have a complex calculation involving the distance to the target, the weight of the pumpkin, the humidity, the wind, the resistance of the air and the speed at which the pumpkin will be traveling. You have to calculate all of that to determine the amount of energy necessary to successfully place the pumpkin in the center of the target at varying distances and with varipus sizes of pumpkins.

Far too complicated for you Mr. Einstien know-it-all-great-big-giant-brain-guy.

  • 1 vote
#9.1 - Thu Dec 29, 2011 1:18 PM EST

if one had sucess chucking a mini-black hole (created at LHC) to the subject pumpkin - would/could it neutralize said object in a plasma terrain event?

  • 1 vote
#9.2 - Thu Dec 29, 2011 1:33 PM EST

RobertPlattBell, some colleges teach a course called the History of Science, and the material is fascinating. Do not just dismiss something because some of it might be 'huey'.

For all that love these sort of subjects, search physics on the fringe.

  • 1 vote
#9.3 - Thu Dec 29, 2011 2:06 PM EST
Reply

I checked OTHER. Weirdest to me is republican partys complete lack and loss of honor.

  • 2 votes
Reply#10 - Thu Dec 29, 2011 1:55 PM EST

On a sidenote... even less the sarcasm and politics tossed into the mix, this has been one of the most interesting comment threads on MSNBC in quite some time.

Hat tip to all who have participated... and thank you.

  • 1 vote
Reply#11 - Thu Dec 29, 2011 4:11 PM EST

There has always been weird science. Hasn't there? There's a little weird in everything.

  • 1 vote
Reply#12 - Thu Dec 29, 2011 4:16 PM EST
mezmamaDeleted
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.