Plans set for 'Tricorder' contest

X Prize Foundation

The medical diagnostic tool envisioned by the $10 million Qualcomm Tricorder X Prize may well look much like a smartphone running an app with wireless sensing capability, as shown in this artist's concept.




Qualcomm and the X Prize Foundation have laid out a $10 million plan to spur the development of medical diagnosis devices like the ones seen on "Star Trek" science-fiction shows — not by the 23rd century, but by mid-2015.

The Qualcomm Tricorder X Prize is the latest multimillion-dollar competition designed to serve as an incentive for technological breakthroughs, following in the footsteps of X Prizes for private-sector spaceflight, ultra-efficient automobiles. low-cost genome sequencing and robotic moon missions.

"There is a generation of exponentially growing technologies ... that are coming together to empower us to make real the 'Star Trek' technology of a medical tricorder," Peter Diamandis, the X Prize Foundation's CEO, told me today.


Tricorders are the hand-held props that have been used by "Star Trek" characters dating back to the 1960s to check a crew member's vital signs — with the aim of keeping Bones from having to tell Captain Kirk, "He's dead, Jim." The old ones looked like cassette recorders with mini-TV screens, while the later models looked like flip phones gone wild.

The tricorder envisioned for the X Prize would be a hand-held wireless device like a smartphone, weighing no more than 5 pounds. It'll have to record health indicators such as blood pressure, respiratory rate, pulse and temperature, and diagnose a set of 15 diseases to be named later. Diamandis said the diseases on the list would probably include respiratory and cardiovascular conditions.

Details still to be determined
The X Prize specifications still have to be filled out, along with the scale to be used for judging the various models in the competition, but the foundation says "teams will have to consider tradeoffs amongst weight, functionality, power requirements, battery life, screen resolution, A.I. engine location, diagnosis capability, end consumer cost, and so on."

The schedule calls for the initial draft of the competition guidelines to be made public later this month, and massaged into their final form by September or so. The teams that seek the prize will show off their prototypes during a qualifying round in mid-2014, and the top 10 teams will compete in a final round in mid-2015. That final round will require teams to use their devices to diagnose 15 to 30 consumers over the course of three days. The teams will be judged based on the diagnoses as well an assessment of consumer experience and proof of adequate high-frequency data logging.

A video for the Qualcomm Tricorder X Prize lays out the $10 million challenge.

The top team will win $7 million, and there'll also be a $2 million second prize and a $1 million third prize, all put up by the Qualcomm Foundation.

"Health care today certainly falls far short of the vision portrayed in 'Star Trek,'" Paul Jacobs, who is Qualcomm's chairman and CEO as well as chair of the Qualcomm Foundation, said today in a news release. "By sponsoring the Qualcomm Tricorder X Prize competition, the Qualcomm Foundation will stimulate the imaginations of entrepreneurs, engineers, scientists and doctors to create wireless health services and technologies that improve lives, increase consumer access to health care and drive efficiencies in the health care system. This competition will accelerate the development of tools that can empower consumers to take charge of their own bodies and manage their own care."

The competition's formal kickoff came today during Jacobs' keynote address at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas. It follows up on last May's announcement that Qualcomm, a global company focusing on wireless network technology, would sponsor the competition.

Tricorders galore
Whether or not you call it a tricorder, the hand-held medical diagnostic device definitely seems to be an idea whose time has come. Just last month, the Canadian government and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation announced a $38.5 million initiative to further the development of such devices, as well as the medical tests and protocols that would run on them. Also last month, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration gave its approval to the first hand-held device to detect brain bleeding.

Meanwhile, a startup called Scanadu is working on a "tricorder" that parents can use to monitor their kids' health, and there are so many medical monitoring apps for smartphones that the FDA is working on regulatory guidelines for them.

Like other X Prizes, the Qualcomm Tricorder X Prize is intended to provide an extra incentive for innovators rather than a profitable venture in itself. The Ansari X Prize for private spaceflight serves as an example: Software billionaire Paul Allen spent upwards of $25 million to win the $10 milllion prize in 2004. But that venture opened the way for what could be more profitable space ventures to come, including Virgin Galactic and Stratolaunch.

Diamandis said the Tricorder X Prize competition was open to ventures that were already involved in the medical-device market, although he emphasized that the eligibility rules had not yet been put in their final form. He also emphasized that the winning device won't be the final word in the future history of the "Star Trek" tricorder.

"The target here is Tricorder 1.0," he told me. "It's about demonstrating the diversity of different diseases or conditions that can be diagnosed with a mobile, user-friendly, hand-held device."

Does it sound as if we're at a turning point for medical technology, or will this turn out to be just one more chapter in a science-fiction novel about more affordable health care? Feel free to weigh in with your comments below.

More about tricorder dreams:


Alan Boyle is msnbc.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter and adding the Cosmic Log page to your Google+ presence. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.

Discuss this post

If you think about it, what are some noninvasive medical diagnostic technologies that can work from a distance? X-rays, MRI, IR, and such. X-rays and such really cannot be used in this portable manner because they will pose unacceptable cumulative harm by radiation to the medical technician. MRI currently requires a huge machine the size of a room, and shrinking this is not something that can be done for a few million. IR only gives you surface temperature. This doesn't seem to leave a whole lot to play with, and what's left may very well be more gimmicky than useful. I admit - I know nothing of the research companies have done to make this happen, but I am skeptical. There is however plenty of room for automated visual analysis using 2D and even 3D cameras.

    Reply#1 - Tue Jan 10, 2012 9:57 PM EST

    Didn't see anything in the article about safety of the patient, so as long as the "tricorder" works, who cares whether or not the patient survives the experience. Plus, the thing will always be able to tell you, "and you now have cancer". /sarc

    • 1 vote
    #1.1 - Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:43 AM EST

    Actually, the consumer experience (as in not dying, and not even getting stuck by a needle) will be a big factor in the judging. The guidelines say that placing a sensor on the skin would be OK, but an invasive procedure such as drawing blood would almost certainly be not OK.

      #1.2 - Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:41 PM EST

      There's already temporal thermometers that work with a simple quick swipe across the forehead. Combine that with a molecular vapor analyzer that could detect certain signature molecules in the breath, or in the sweat, which trained dogs can now do in order to detect cancer. Add a retinal scanning capability. Add a blood pressure cuff attachment, if that is allowed by the rules. Add all of this to a remote link up with "Watson" style Artificial Intelligence to crunch the data and give a diagnosis, and what you've got is something which could transform medical practice.

      The challenge is to make it all work and be reasonably portable. Remember that the first cell phones were the size of a brick. The first generation of this device might be a bit clunky as well, but that's only the first gen. Awesome competition idea.

        #1.3 - Wed Jan 11, 2012 4:46 PM EST

        MikeyMike, you exaggerate what's out there. The Exergen Temporal Artery Thermometer has significant problems if you read its reviews carefully on Amazon. I own one and I know how temperamental it can be. It's not always quick, simple, or accurate. Speaking of molecular vapor analysis, the best alcohol breathalyzer in the market also has significant accuracy problems. The best electric body weight scales on the market cannot even semi-accurately gauge body fat percentage for athletic persons.

        The challenge is to first make anything work very very well in isolation, and then to make it work well together. When you are dealing with the human body, there are seven billion ways to do it wrong.

          #1.4 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 9:37 AM EST

          when I was a kid and you walked past the TV it scrambled the picture I think that was the first tricorder ,of course it could only find human life forms but it worked every time!!!

            #1.5 - Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:59 PM EST
            Reply

            How is your reporting on overheard conversations going?????????

              Reply#2 - Wed Jan 11, 2012 3:52 AM EST

              What about sonar? That is long range and harmless. Don't know a whit about its efficacy though. Plus you have passive IR from the patient for temp.

                Reply#3 - Wed Jan 11, 2012 4:10 AM EST

                I'd probably marry Tricoder 1.0 up with some nano-tech that could be injected or swallowed, to transmit info from the inside.

                  Reply#4 - Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:21 AM EST

                  The "How" to do it is part of the contest. Just because you can't think of a way to get the required results, doesn't mean some smart person out there might figure it out! There is always the "Resonant" frequency that all things have. If a transmitter ran thru a range of frequencies and saw what was returned, or resonated, at those frequencies, then viruses and cancers and all sorts of things could be found. And IR could possibly see local hot spots within the body, where something is causing a problem. This should rusult in an insteresting collection of test devices. I'm excited about it. I hope it comes to fruition.

                    Reply#5 - Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:51 AM EST

                    MRI = magnetic resonance imaging = machine the size of a room. There may however be hope with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_resonance_imaging#Portable_instruments so we'll see.

                      #5.1 - Wed Jan 11, 2012 12:57 PM EST

                      Some folks who have worked on NASA on this challenge have been looking at ultrasound as an alternative to magnetic resonance imaging. Will have to see if I can recall how that's been going.

                      • 1 vote
                      #5.2 - Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:43 PM EST

                      Frankly, I don't think that this technology is that far away. Given advancements in technology in the last 20 years. What I believe, is that often, the best technology is derived from those folks who really have no idea, that something cannot be done. Those people who do not have a "formal" education in engineering, or other fields, who often just have a good idea, for something that does not exist, but they want, often come up with unique solutions to problems that formally educated folks don't. With the the capability of optical, thermal, radio frequency, low cost computer and other technologies now available to hobbyist types (at low cost), I believe some (quite probably) high-schooler will soon be able to crack this nut!

                        #5.3 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 3:36 PM EST

                        This biggest problem, as I see it would be in coding. Establishing a baseline for a "healthy" person. Then determining via multiple inputs, a differentation from that norm and establishing in a most to least probable scenario, possible conditions. A team effort across a wide range of disciplines would be the best effort to attain this goal. Having worked in multiple disciplines, I was able to provide a solution in a couple of different situations to acheive a goal in the food safety industry that others were not able to see. Though I thought them rather obvious. The sensors required to gather the initial data do already exist, non-intrusive for the most part. Having suffered a very traumatic injury in a motorcycle accident, I suffered through a number of rather nasty test procedures that I believe could at this point could be dealt with with non-intrusive testing procedures with equipment available in other industries. However if one is not aware of what is available, or its' capabilities, it does put one at a severe disatvantage.

                        • 1 vote
                        #5.4 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 4:07 PM EST
                        Reply

                        Temp can be monitored using IR. Heart rate by sonar. Pulse Ox by skin color or surface reflectivity maybe? There are probably a few other non-invasive things that can be checked. Can listen to breathing. There's also no reason the device can't ask the Dr. questions & it doesn't say that all tests have to be performed from a distance. A small data collector device that sticks on the forehead or chest could greatly increase the number of tests and the accuracy of the tests. All things considered, this is a great contest & one which will have lasting benefits to mankind.

                        Its just too bad DeForest Kelley wasn't able to live long enough to see this coming...

                          Reply#6 - Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:53 AM EST

                          The main difference between Star Trek and Star Wars, is that STAR TREK can possibly come true.

                          • 3 votes
                          Reply#7 - Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:56 AM EST

                          It's the difference between hard science fiction and space opera fantasy. Both are entertaining, but I personally prefer the former to the latter.

                            #7.1 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 3:16 PM EST

                            David, neither one was trying to be predictive...I'm still waiting for that late 1990's human genetic engineering and enhancement ("Space Seed,' 'Star Trek II'), and manned missions to Saturn ('Tomorrow is Yesterday'), for example.

                            (Even when 'Space Seed' was written, it was clear that such things could be done, and it still is. But obviously it'll take longer than seemed likely at the time. Oh, and BTW, we stopped using rotating mechanical digit wheels as in Sulu's chronometer [this scene was also 'cleaned up' with today's CG] in favor of LCD displays, long ago.)

                            In the end, fiction, including various flavors of science fiction, and even outright fantasy, only has to be entertaining, and internally consistent.

                              #7.2 - Fri Jan 13, 2012 8:10 PM EST
                              Reply

                              Unless it has a fashionable carrying strap and big, 60's era radio dial controls, I don't want it.

                              • 1 vote
                              Reply#8 - Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:29 PM EST

                              A phaser would be way cooler, and far more marketable.

                              • 1 vote
                              Reply#9 - Wed Jan 11, 2012 3:10 PM EST

                              Yeah, great. That's all we need.... the NPA (National Phaser Association) facing off against various forms of "Phaser Control". I can just see the bumper stickers now:

                              "Phaser Control" means setting for stun.
                              "Phaser Control" is a tight 5 disintigration grouping.
                              "You can have my phaser when you pry it from my cold, dead hands."
                              "Phasers don't kill people, people kill people."
                              "Barack Obama's healthcare system has killed more people than my phaser."

                              • 2 votes
                              #9.1 - Wed Jan 11, 2012 4:56 PM EST
                              Reply

                              No doubt, the use of a, "Tricorder" would be greatly appreciated, but why haven't the Gates Foundation, and others like it seen the crucial necessities of encouraging scientific investigation of gravity waves, and the limitless potential residing in the research, and development of gravity amplification, and manipulation, and the infinite advantages it provides? The future, and survival of our species literally depends on it. We know it has been successfully developed by someone! I've seen it with my own eyes (twice). Once at a distance of about 60 feet over my head! (no noise whatsoever). Why do we hear nothing concerning the research, and development of this technology? And, don't tell me our government isn't intensely involved with the R & D of this technology. Why doesn't the private community get on it? Whats wrong with you Bill Gates? What could you do with your money that would have more of an impact on humanity, and the earth itself?

                                Reply#10 - Thu Jan 12, 2012 10:19 PM EST

                                Why don't you ask the people you have allegedly seen do this, before asking someone else to spend their money on it?

                                  #10.1 - Fri Jan 13, 2012 8:13 PM EST
                                  Reply

                                  High PR Backlinks I agree with your point, please share with us more good articles.

                                    Reply#11 - Tue Feb 21, 2012 1:03 AM EST
                                    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.