Listen for the sound of a katydid that lived 165 million years ago, re-created after studying the structure of its fossilized wings. The image shows the artistic reconstruction of a Jurassic forest in China. (Audio: Montealegre-Zapata et al., PNAS/University of Bristol; image: Hinz et al., Palaeobidivers Palaeoenviron.)
Researchers have re-created the love song of a katydid from 165 million years ago, based on an analysis of fossilized wings found in northwest China. They say the chirp adds an aural dimension to our picture of the forests of the Jurassic Era.
"The Jurassic forest was already packed with many animals singing at night," Fernando Montealegre-Zapata, a University of Bristol biologist who specializes in insect sounds, told me today. "I'm not just talking about the crickets but the frogs. That would create a noisy environment, and in a noisy environment the best way to communicate is with a single frequency, and loudly."
That assumption fits with the analysis conducted by Montealegre-Zapata and his colleagues, which appears in this week's Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. They started with a well-preserved Middle Jurassic fossil, one of several found by Chinese paleontologists at Inner Mongolia's Jiulongshan Formation. This particular fossil revealed the wing structure for a long-extinct species of katydid, also known as a bushcricket, which has been dubbed Archabolilus musicus.
In life, the bug would have had relatively large wings, measuring more than 2.8 inches (7 centimeters) in length, with broad stripes of color. Its closest living relatives include katydids (Tettigonidae) and grigs (Prophalangopsidae).
The researchers made detailed measurements of the fossil wing's parts, including the organs that katydids use to produce their mating calls. Scientists believe that ancient katydid, like their modern-day descendants, strummed their songs by rubbing the tiny teeth of one wing against a plectrum on the other wing.
For comparison's sake, Montealegre-Zapata and a colleague of his at the University of Bristol, Daniel Robert, analyzed the wing structures of 59 modern-day katydid species. They fed all those readings and the characteristics of the insects' songs into a mathematical model. Then they looked at where A. musicus would fit in that model.
Their conclusion, based on the size of the wing and the precise spacing of the teeth, was that the Jurassic katydid would emit a steady tone at a frequency of 6.4 kHz for 16 milliseconds. That was enough information to reconstruct the sound, which you can hear by clicking on the video button above.

T.J. Walker / Univ. of Fla.
Some of the closest modern analogs of the ancient katydid known as Archaboilus musicus are in the Cyphoderris insect family. This male specimen of the species Cyphoderris monstrosa was collected in Douglas County, Oregon.
The researchers' reconstruction has the calls coming less than a second apart, because that would be the typical frequency for species of katydids that are not threatened by bats. Paleontologists say bats were not a threat to Jurassic bugs because they didn't exist during that period.
The single-tone call would have come through loud and clear to other katydids, Montealegre-Zapata said in a news release.
"For Archaboilus, as for living bushcricket species, singing constitutes a key component of mate attraction," he said. "Singing loud and clear advertises the presence, location and quality of the singer, a message that females choose to respond to — or not. Using a single tone, the male's call carries further and better, and therefore is likely to serenade more females. However, it also makes the male more conspicuous to predators if they have also evolved ears to eavesdrop on these mating calls."
His guess is that the Jurassic katydid was a nocturnal creature, since all present-day katydids that use musical calls are nocturnal. That would have kept the crickets from being picked off by daytime predators such as the feathered, flying Archaeopteryx. But Montealegre-Zapata said they may have made tasty morsels for bug-eating Jurassic mammals such as Morganucodon and Dryolestes (which could conceivably hear the cricket calls).
The findings strongly suggest that katydids were well-adapted for music-making during the Middle Jurassic, 165 million years ago. That led the researchers to speculate that the katydid's distant ancestors might have begun chirping more than 50 million years earlier, during the Triassic Period, thanks to "the formation of random teeth across several veins on the forewings, and the associated production of noisy sounds."
Reconstructing the ancient song of a katydid could also help answer questions about modern-day insect communications, Montealegre-Zapata said. There's quite a bit of variation to the chirps of katydids and crickets, as you'll find out if you listen to the audio clips on this webpage. Over time, musical bugs may well change their tune to suit their biggest fans and frustrate their worst foes.
Montealegre-Zapata said the reconstruction of the Jurassic katydid's love song "suggests the evolutionary mechanisms that drove modern bushcrickets to develop ultrasonic signals for sexual pairing and for avoiding an increasingly relevant echolocating predator — but that only happened 100 million years later, possibly with the appearance of bats."
More about prehistoric sounds:
- Duck-billed dinos had built-in sound systems
- Fossil shows traces of first modern ears
- Listen to the music of prehistoric flutes
- Interactive: When was the Jurassic Period?
In addition to Montealegre-Zapata and Robert, authors of the PNAS study, "Wing Stridulation in a Jurassic Katydid (Insect, Orthoptera) Produced Low-Pitched Musical Calls to Attract Females," include Jun-Jie Gu, Michael S. Engel, Ge-Xia Qiao and Dong Ren.
Alan Boyle is msnbc.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter and adding the Cosmic Log page to your Google+ presence. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.


Researchers can photograph old, fragile wax cylinders on which music had been recorded, load the photo into a computer, and accurately recreate the music without damaging the original recording. It should be no more difficult to recreate the sound of an ancient insect using similar methods. This is fascinating stuff!
OKay, this is it. I'm drawing the line. This is the one that sails over the cuckoo's nest.
Alan, you know me. I love science, I support science, I grok science. But this one is a bug too far even for me. Sheesh.
C'mon Guys, cure cancer, the common cold, right wing politics, send humans to Mars, or a few right wing politicians if no humans are available. Let's look for life on Titan and Europa and THEN get back to me on the whole bug song thing.
OR they can go to an antique store and listen to any of the old recordings in person.
Really? Try going to an antique store and playing a fragile 100 year old wax cylinder on an old, rickety Edison machine and see what management does to you.
Who can honestly say that their life is not now complete?
Tom Brady.. he NEEDS one more ring!
Awesome. Now they need to multiply that sound by thousands and let's hear the racket they really made back then.
Super cool :) If we can't have a real "Jurassic Park", being able to recreate what it may have sounded like is enough for me. I'd pay top dollar to go to a museum that recreated the sounds of most of the animals of the time, wouldn't that just be spectacular?
Yeah they have sound, but were they good eatin'???????
With this new technology the sky is the limit . No reason fossilized dinosaur poo can't be analysed and their flatulence sound waves reproduced . Prolly' sound just like a Congressional debate on balancing the budget.
with so much present day wrong in the world to make right, how does the money spent on this research accomplish this? if the sound can cure sickness, stop war, end poverty, great! however, all i can hear is that it satisfied curiosity...
Because curiosity is the engine that drives mankind.
But can you bring the katydid like they did in jurassic park. No. No. Once a species is lost, it is gone. That's what is bad about using fossil fuels & climate change. Once a species is gone, it cannot be brought back. That's why they are raising frogs in zoos. To save the species.
Here's another waste of Grant money. This money should have been used to feed the poor!
The assertion by Skip, Ralph, and others that this scientific investigation has no merit makes me realize that you guys dont understand why learning about the distant past of the Earth is important. For this reason i will attempt to explain.
We live in a world where there are millions of people convinced that the Earth is actually around 5,000 years old simply because words written in an ancient book by people who also though the Earth was flat tell them so. Furthermore, they make their ignorance into a pseudo-virtue by declaring that blind faith is indeed the ultimate virtue, and then cheerfully ignore any and all evidence to the contrary as tricks of the devil. They are unshakeably immune to any logic because their opinions were not arrived at by logic in the first. Because these people are only exceeded in their ignorance by their desire to act on their beliefs, it is crucially important to make as much fact-based evidence available as possible in order to give people the best chance of being saved from ignorance. Some of you are probably thinking, "but why not just let the ignorant persist in their quaint notions, arent they kinda cute?" These non-fact-based ideologies are actually very dangerous because followers would like to send us all back into the dark ages of scientific ignorance (there is lightning, God is angry) or reduce us all into radioactive vapor. These are the same people that would trully welcome the destruction of the Earth by war or any other means, because they believe that death will bring them closer to Jesus, Muhammed, Osiris, or @#$% Mickey Mouse. The only way these belief systems can be fulfilled, if you believe the bible or koran (and they do), is if armageddon takes place. Scientific understanding is the only hope for man and womankind to avoid turning our planet into a place wholly ruled by superstition and lacking the powerful tools provided by science, or (better yet, from the perspective of the 5000 yo creationists) merely a lonely planet of dust, ghosts, shadows, radiation, and silence.
That this insect lived and was probably eaten by our first mammalian ancestors hundreds of millions of years ago is very important if even one child turns aside from ignorance because their imagination is stirred by hearing the actual sound that this insect would have made. The true power of the Holy Spirit, the divine potential of all humans, can be seen in compassion and love and also in the wonders that become possible by using the intelligence provided to us. We dishonor ourselves by blindly following the words of old men who seek to serve as paid intermediaries between us and the divine.
I would rather a child go to bed not hungry.
Your hypocritical self righteousness would be more believable if you were donating all of your disposal income to charities instead of grandstanding here by sniveling about scientific research.
Fail.