
Roberts et al. / AGU / HiRISE / NASA
Scientists have found evidence of relatively recent quakes on the surface of Mars by studying boulders that fell off cliffs, leaving tracks behind.
Geologists see signs that seismic shocks as powerful as magnitude-7 quakes on Earth have rumbled on the Red Planet recently, and such "marsquakes" could be a good thing for the search for life on Mars.
"The fact that Mars is geologically active means that it may offer geothermal power, subsurface liquid water, and extant life," Robert Zubrin, a rocket scientist and president of the nonprofit Mars Society, told me in an email.
The study that's getting Zubrin's juices flowing appears in Thursday's issue of the Journal of Geophysical Research-Planets.
A research team led by Gerald Roberts, a geologist at the University of London's Birkbeck center, charted ruptures in the Martian crust and the trails left behind by dislodged boulders, as seen in high-resolution images from NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. The researchers compared the images with earthly faults to gauge what kinds of disturbances could have caused the changes they saw. They also looked at how much Martian dust was covering over the evidence, to estimate how long ago the disturbances happened.
Their conclusion? Powerful earthquakes have rattled Mars in recent geologic time, and may well be rumbling on Mars today.
The researchers acknowledged there could be other ways for boulders to loosen up and go tumbling on Mars. For example, ice or frozen soil could thaw along the rim of a crater, setting off an avalanche. Other researchers have said meteor strikes can cause avalanches as well. But Roberts and his colleagues saw a pattern in which the size and the number of dislodged boulders gradually decreased over a radius of 62 miles (100 kilometers), moving out from a central point on a fault line in Mars' Cerberus Fossae region. The biggest dislodged boulders were 65 feet (20 meters) wide.
"This is consistent with the hypothesis that boulders had been mobilized by ground-shaking, and that the severity of the ground-shaking decreased away from the epicenter of marsquakes," Roberts said in a news release from the American Geophysical Union, which publishes JGR-Planets.

An image from Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter's HiRISE camera shows an avalanche in progress in Mars' north polar region. Such avalanches could be caused by thawing ice, or meteor impacts, or marsquakes.
The fact that the trails left behind by the boulders have not yet been erased by Martian winds suggested to the researchers that the rumbling happened relatively recently, perhaps sometime in the past few million years. And the pattern of the disruption suggested that the seismic activity at Cerberus Fossae hit magnitude 7, which is comparable to the strength of the quake that hit Haiti in 2010.
"The magnitude 7 is based on comparison on the size of the ruptured piece of crust," Roberts told me in an email. "On Earth, a rupture of several hundred kilometers and 15-kilometer depth would be typical for, say, a California magnitude-7 earthquake. The energy release is proportional to the size of the rupture. ... Thus, on Mars the same energy would be released, but the weaker gravity would mean the effect of shaking would be more severe in terms of vertical motions of particles on the surface — things would be thrown in the air more easily."
You might think that would be bad news for future Mars exploration. If you were an astronaut on Mars, a magnitude-7 quake is not the sort of thing you'd want to go through. If you're an astrobiologist, however, it might be very good news. Seismic activity could serve as a source of energy for microbes beneath the Martian surface. And as Zubrin suggests, seismic activity could be harnessed as an energy source for future settlements.
But is it for real? Right now, the evidence is based merely on image analysis rather than on-the-ground measurements. Roberts noted that the Mars Viking landers, which touched down on the Red Planet in 1976, had seismometers. They also had wind-speed sensors.
"The problem was that when the wind was strong ... the lander shook, setting off the seismometers," Roberts said. "The problem was the design, as it would have been better to have put the seismometers on the ground, as in the Apollo lunar instruments."
NASA has been considering a mission known as InSight (Interior Exploration using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy and Heat Transport) as one of three options for future funding as part of the space agency's Discovery Program. If InSight is selected, a spacecraft equipped with a seismometer, a heat-flow probe and other sensors would be sent to Mars in 2016.
NASA's Mars program is currently up in the air, but if InSight or something like it gets off the ground, we might find out how frequent and how powerful those marsquakes can get.
More about Mars:
- Seismic study hints at a rumbling Mars
- Martian life might thrive in lava tubes
- Are Martian volcanoes still ready to rumble?
- Volcano vents could point to Martian life
In addition to Roberts, the authors of "Possible Evidence of Palaeomarsquakes From Fallen Boulder Populations, Cerberus Fossae, Mars" include Brian Matthews, Chris Bristow, Luca Guerrieri and Joyce Vetterlein.
Alan Boyle is science editor for msnbc.com. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter or adding the Cosmic Log Google+ page to your circles. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.


10 meters, that's a big boulder
It sure is. Dang
Yes I'm surprised it didn't leave a big trail, but obviously not all the boulders that are down there fell off the cliff
It was just a bunch of drunk teenagers rolling rocks off the edge. Probably endangering innocent hikers and vacationing astronauts.
If this is true, then could the largest volcano in our solar system erupt again?
Maybe the Martians are drinking Rolling Rock and getting a little rowdy.
I just have to say that we have no business attempting to colonize any planet until we learn how to care for our own. Using seismic activity as a power source? I don't think Zubrin has both oars in the water. I've seen him in interviews, and I think we should send him on his way, and he can let us know how his ideas pan out.
Having read his book, I found it pretty optimistic, but it didn't come off as crazy or impossible. I think he does make the process seem easier than it would be from a technical standpoint, but we need people like him to push the envelope and be an advocate for stuff like this. As for "caring for our own", I doubt that will ever happen. If we wait on doing ambitious things until we have a utopia on Earth, then we will still be piddling around here when the next big asteroid comes plowing into us. Ultimately, we will have to leave the Earth at some point, or face extinction. The sooner the better I say.
Dr, Zubrin is correct that this opens the possibility of using geothermal (sorry, Aresthermal)? heating as a power source. Mars today may or may not have microganisms living beneath its surface, but if the Red Planet is at least geologically active that is good news for any future colonization efforts.
boon, the calendar now reads 2012 A.D., how long has humanity had to "learn how to care for our own"? The closest we have ever been to utopia was probably back in our hunter/gatherer days. And, in those days, if a big asteroid had hit Earth it would have been ended us just as like the dinosaurs.
@ boon
you make no sens what do you think that human is the end of the line or man is Abel to destroy the earth ????
if we destroy any thing it will only be are selves and the earth will just keep on going .
so why do you think it fall's to us to any thing ....that is just stupid !!!!
@ Boon
Has it ever occurred to you that the very technology necessary to "Take care of our own planet" is the EXACT same technology necessary to live on another? Hyper efficient recycling processes, self contained and replenishing food production, water extraction and purification, non-fossil fuel reliant energy production...all of these are needed to survive on Mars and they WILL help us to "Take care of our Planet." The reason these technologies aren't being developed to "Take Care of our Planet" and then go to Mars is folks look around and go, "But we can survive just fine without these at the moment, why do we need to waste time and money developing them now. However, if you develop the technologies to go to Mars, guess what...YOU'VE JUST DEVELOPED THE TECHNOLOGIES TO TAKE CARE OF THE FRAPPIN' EARTH! Really folks, it's multipurpose technology...it will work in multiple places!
That is the number one reason to continue manned exploration of the cosmos, because the very technologies that allow us to survive in those most inhospitable of environments out there, can be applied here and enable us to live here cleaner, more efficiently, and have less of an impact. Or, you can all go back to living naked on the savannahs of Africa waiting for the Lions to chew on you...I personally like having my Air Conditioning, thank you very much.
MARSQUAKE - the next sci-fi disaster thriller - coming soon to a theater near you.
Starring Tiffany the mall singer no doubt.
More likely the next big E-ticket ride at the "Happiest Place On Earth".
I would guess that wind blew away sand from under the downhill side of the boulder, and gravity did the rest. If Mars has enough tectonic plate movement for substantial marsquakes, where are the signs of that plate movement, such as pushed up mountain ranges?
Interesting theory, hopefully we get some eyes and ears (human or robotic) on the ground soon to further investigate.
Hugo Chavez may be dismayed to hear that the US's earthquake ray will reach all the way to Mars.
The truth:
ProjectMars.net
If you want a marsquake set up some robotic seismometers around the planet and
smack the planet with a 50 Mt warhead. The interior makeup of the planet would revel itself.
"marsquake",,,cool. Also, the HiRise photo looks like water splash.