Maya doom teaches climate lesson

This temple in the Kingdom of Tikal is one of the most prominent of the Classic Maya Period.




Scientists have long assumed that the Classic Maya civilization was done in more than a millennium ago by a series of droughts, but now they say natural records suggest those droughts were "modest," with no more than a 40 percent reduction in rainfall. And that, in turn, suggests that similarly modest climate changes over the next century could have a not-so-modest effect.

"What seems like a minor reduction in water availability may lead to important, long-lasting problems ... Today, we have the benefit of awareness, and we should act accordingly," Martin Medina-Elizalde, a researcher at the Yucatan Center for Scientific Research in Mexico, said in a news release.

The study — conducted by Medina-Elizalde and Eelco Rohling, a colleague from the University of Southampton — appears in this week's issue of the journal Science. It addresses one of the big mysteries of Maya history: What caused a civilization that dominated areas of present-day Guatemala and Mexico in the year 800 to collapse by the year 1000? Deforestation and drought have figured prominently as the prime suspects, but just how dire did those droughts get?


To shed additional light on the mystery, the two climate experts analyzed chemicals in lake sediments, marine shells and cave stalagmites to track variations in rainfall. For example, the ratio of oxygen-16 to oxygen-18 in a particular layer of mineral can tell you how much rainfall fell during the season when the mineral was laid down. Such variations can be read year by year, like tree rings.

Science / AAAS

The elements in different layers of stalagmites in Yucatan Peninsula caves, such as this one, were analyzed to determine how rainfall varied through the centuries.

The researchers found that there was indeed a deficit in rainfall in the period between the years 800 and 1000. But that deficit was modest, amounting to a 25 to 40 percent reduction in the drought years. Medina-Elizalde and Rohling assume that the droughts took the form of reductions in the frequency and intensity of tropical storms during the summer.

"Summer was the main season for cultivation and replenishment of Mayan freshwater storage systems, and there are no rivers in the Yucatan lowlands," Rohling said in the news release. "Societal disruptions and abandonment of cities are likely consequences of critical water shortages, especially because there seems to have been a rapid repetition of multiyear droughts."

In an email, Medina-Elizalde told me that "these droughts may not have been strong enough to cause by themselves the collapse of the civilization, but they were likely strong enough and persistent enough ... to cause major sociopolitical disruptions that ultimately led to the final outcome."

"Let's imagine that today, from one year to another, major cities can no longer supply fresh water to a third of their populations. ... With no freshwater pumping systems, how would we keep producing agricultural produce and supplying fresh water to support the entire populations of these cities?" he wrote.

Today, much of the Yucatan Peninsula's rural population still relies on summer rainfall to support their crops. Medina-Elizalde said access to fresh water isn't so much of a problem, thanks to modern pumping systems. But he noted that lower-than-average summer rains still "have fairly dire consequences" for local farmers.

The current models from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predict that there could be annual rainfall reductions of up to 50 percent in the Yucatan Peninsula by the end of this century, Medina-Elizalde said. He and his colleagues are studying how such reductions might affect freshwater supplies in the region.

"Some climate models suggest that local vegetation does contribute to increase rainfall significantly ... which would suggest that by preserving the forests, we are mitigating the impacts of climate change," he said. "Definitely, local governments need to start making serious efforts to mitigate and adapt to climate change in light of the forecast for the next decades."

What do you think? Does this research merely add an interesting twist on a centuries-old story, or does it serve as a warning about our future fate? Please feel free to weigh in with your comments below.

More about climate and ancient civilizations:


Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter or following the Cosmic Log Google+ page. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3

Thodse who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

    Reply#53 - Fri Feb 24, 2012 1:36 PM EST

    Those who quote George Santayana are doomed to repeat it

      #53.1 - Fri Feb 24, 2012 4:44 PM EST
      Reply

      The interconnectedness of the world has no parallel in Mayan times. Aid from around the world gets pumped into areas under drought driven famine conditions. There was no such safety net in the time under discussion. So how the lessons learned from the Mayan history can be applied to today is a stretch. Sure there are still "events" such as the Somalia case, but that is not sigularly caused by the drought, but also by political forces, who are withholding food aid, and dislocating people which exacerbates the problem. This is just another instance of an interesting science project being promoted as having relevance in regard to a discredited misrepresentation of still other scientific data, all in the interests of driving a global agenda: redistribution of wealth from the developed world to the undeveloped world.

        Reply#54 - Fri Feb 24, 2012 2:50 PM EST

        You guys know that the radioactive waste from Japan's crippled nuclear plant is set to hit Hawaii's shoreline very soon -- right? Even if the pay was a million dollars, I would have to pass up the tasting of this out of the world menu...

          Reply#55 - Fri Feb 24, 2012 3:14 PM EST

          The mayans must have used so much petroleum that the increased C02 caused the drought

            Reply#56 - Fri Feb 24, 2012 4:37 PM EST

            Bush and Cheney stole their water! OMG!

              Reply#57 - Fri Feb 24, 2012 4:46 PM EST

              Good , this world definately needs an enema .We are the earths cancer , we have already matastisized , and unless eradicated soon we might actually ruin this planet .I used to think that we might actually get a clue , but that's a joke . I hope that god takes care of this before we kill off any more species . I for one would gladly cash my life in if everyone else did too just to rid the planet of the scourge that is human beings . Or at least we have become that . Eskimos , native americans , most ancient civilizations were not a problem . Now corporations and the monetery system , greed in general has doomed us . I just hope it hasn't doomed this planet . We have no right to kill every living thing on earth .

                Reply#58 - Fri Feb 24, 2012 6:13 PM EST

                5,000 species go extinct every year.

                !0,000 new species are discovered every year.

                Do the math.

                  #58.1 - Sat Feb 25, 2012 6:34 PM EST
                  Reply

                  WOW..... GLOBAL WARMING IN THE YEAR 1000???

                  This article clearly says Droughts (prolonged) may have caused the demise of the Mayas. If this study were transferred with today's dates... BINGO..... we could all blame mankind for CREATING GLOBAL WARMING

                    Reply#59 - Fri Feb 24, 2012 9:40 PM EST

                    Maya hee, Maya hoo

                      Reply#60 - Fri Feb 24, 2012 10:15 PM EST

                      It needs quite a stretch of imagination to link the disappearance of the Mayan civilization with climate change. By its own admission, the study acknowledges the droughts were gradual and not calamitous overnight. If the Mayans lived up to their reputation in mathematics and astronomy, surely they would have either found ways around the problem or simply migrated elsewhere. If they did the latter, then they would have built newer cities and edifices wherever they resettled. Where is the evidence of that? This study expects too much of the reader by asking him/her to believe the Mayans rolled over and withered to extinction without making an attempt to survive elsewhere. It's intriguing how 'evidence' of the consequences of climate change is either too far into the future or too distant in the past to withstand empirical scrutiny in the present.

                        Reply#61 - Sun Feb 26, 2012 12:22 AM EST

                        It's intriguing how 'evidence' of the consequences of climate change is either too far into the future or too distant in the past to withstand empirical scrutiny in the present.

                        Glibly articulate, but unlike the Mayans, we are now recording a continuous stream of updated measurements about global warming for posterity. In time, it will be seen whether, or by how much, the global warming 'alarmists' were right or wrong.

                        • 1 vote
                        #61.1 - Sun Feb 26, 2012 12:49 AM EST

                        Indeed. It is the 'time' that matters and who will bear witness to the measurements and predictions of today...

                          #61.2 - Sun Feb 26, 2012 2:14 AM EST

                          I would contend that it is only the time, not the who. After enough data and measurements are obtained, empirical scrutiny by objective witnesses will settle the hash, in some future present.

                            #61.3 - Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:10 AM EST
                            Reply

                            The technology exists today that would enable society to produce all the desalinated sea water that is needed for domestic use. Where there is a will, there is a way. Where there is greed there is no good will.

                              Reply#62 - Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:17 AM EST

                              The single biggest threat is overpopulation, not global warming or greenhouse gases. We allow uncontrolled breeding by people who are either incapable of or unable to raise a family without "help" from governments. That is a recipe for disaster and we are beginning to see that here in the US, not to mention the third world countries who are totally dependent on others.

                                Reply#63 - Thu May 10, 2012 4:12 PM EDT
                                Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3
                                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.