What's living on your smartphone?

Home Microbiome Study

A graph charts the relative proportions of different types of bacteria on shoes (odd-numbered columns) and cell phones (even-numbered columns). For a detailed breakdown, check the Home Microbiome Study website.




Your cell phone and your shoes have whole communities of microbes living on them, as distinctive as the germs on your fingers and in your mouth.

Among the bacteria that typically live in your pocket are the relatives of nasty bugs that can cause pneumonia, meningitis and gonorrhea. In contrast, the soles of your shoes could harbor bacteria related to E. coli, salmonella and the microscopic critters that cause pink eye.

Eww, right? Maybe a more appropriate reaction would be "Wow!" At least that's the way I see it, as a participant in what could be the world's first comparative study of smartphones and shoes.


"We've never actually done this stunt before," said Jack Gilbert, a microbial ecologist at Argonne National Laboratory and the University of Chicago. He and his colleagues had yours truly and 30 other journalists swab their phones and their shoes to collect the microbial samples last weekend in Vancouver, Canada, during a news briefing at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. The results of the DNA tests, conducted under the auspices of the Earth Microbiome Project, were distributed today.

Jonathan Eisen, a microbiologist at the University of California at Davis, said today's gene-sequencing technologies makes it possible to process genetic samples for mere hundreds of dollars, as opposed to millions of dollars, in a fraction of the time it used to take. "Five years ago, this would have taken our lab six months or more," he said.

That technological quantum leap is opening up new scientific frontiers. "For the first time, we're able to do surveys of places quickly and cheaply," Eisen said. "It's like we're kids in a candy store."

Last year, researchers turned up the "eww" factor by analyzing the microbial communities in public restrooms, which include germs linked to staph and diarrhea. Some of the researchers involved in the Earth Microbiome Project charted the microbial signatures of toilet seats, restroom floors and sink surfaces, and found that the flush handles and seats were "relatively enriched" with bacteria from our bowels.

Home Microbiome Study

Genetic markers distinguish between the samples taken from shoes (in blue) and the samples taken from cell phones (in red).

Compared to those findings, the results from the phone-vs.-shoe study are positively tame. "We found nothing that was pathogenic ... which means all of you are healthy. That's a good thing," Gilbert said.

There was a clear difference between the bacterial signatures of our shoes and our phones, although a couple of the samples look as if they were switched — suggesting that journalists don't always follow directions.

The researchers couldn't take samples from our bodies, because that would have run counter to the privacy guidelines for their experiments. But the fact that the cellphone samples were so similar suggests that we nurture those microbial communities with the germs from our hands. And we're not talking just about phones.

"One of the reporters in the room didn't have a phone on him, and said, 'Could you sample my wallet instead?' The sample from his wallet looks exactly like the smartphones," Gilbert said.

As for those nasty-sounding bacterial types, Gilbert said we shouldn't worry too much. These bacteria are almost certainly benign cousins to the bad sort of bugs. "The hypothesis is that the good bacteria are out-competing the bad bacteria," Gilbert said. "If they weren't there, the pathogens may be able to take root."

Our shoes reflected a wider diversity of microbes than the cell phones did — which makes sense when you consider how much we had to walk through to get to the news briefing in Vancouver. "There was one pair of shoes which was a significant outlier to the rest of the data," Gilbert observed. "We don't know why. It could have been that the person who owned those shoes may have stepped in some mud or something. ... If the person's been walking in a different environment from everybody else, we could potentially trace where someone is walking."

Which raises the question: Could your microbes serve as diagnostic tool, or even a detective tool? Researchers have talked about being able to figure out what ails you by analyzing your personal microbiome, but they're not there yet. Eventually, it may even be possible to read your whole history by checking exactly which bacteria you've picked up from which places.

"There's enough to suggest that this might be a tool, but the robustness of that tool would have to be seriously investigated," Gilbert said.

That's what the Earth Microbiome Project is all about.

"Anybody out there who is interested in microbes in the water, microbes in the air, microbes on skin, microbes on pets ... anybody can participate in the Earth Microbiome Project," Eisen said. "I can imagine scaling up to millions and millions of samples. If a citizen science project or a high-school class has an interesting quest, they can do this now."

Is that something that makes you go eww, wow ... or uh-oh? Please feel free to make your opinion known by registering a vote above, or leaving a comment below.

More about microbes:


For more about the phone-vs.-shoe experiment, check out the Home Microbiome Study's website and Facebook page.

Alan Boyle is msnbc.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter or following the Cosmic Log Google+ page. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.

Discuss this post

This is not news seein as how there are gajillions of microbes in the air at all times. Microbes in the air are what makes food go stale, and we probably breathe in and eat a trillion microbes daily. Probably more when having sex, especially oral.

  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Fri Feb 24, 2012 9:22 PM EST

Right, it's quite obvious that we live in a "cloud" of microbes. The interesting thing is that scientists are gaining the capability to figure out exactly what kinds of microbes are in that cloud. And sex certainly involves a lot of microbe-swapping. In fact, it's thought that vaginal microbes may contribute something special to newborns:

http://www.hhmi.org/news/knight20100629.html

  • 7 votes
#1.1 - Fri Feb 24, 2012 9:51 PM EST

Those creatures live on everything.

Stop killing them. They are part of the ecology. You're destroying your immune system with all this fear of bacteria no one ever gave a thought to before.

Wash your hands after you use the toilet like mom taught you, and forget about it.

  • 10 votes
#1.2 - Sat Feb 25, 2012 7:18 AM EST

As interesting as this study is, and to be honest there is nothing in it that really surprises me, I have a fist hand experience I would like to share:

My long time buddy had a his second son in 1998 he had a major liver infection and needed a transplant. This took a year to arrange (it is in England!) and a successful transplant was carried out. My buddy lives on a farm, his wife (bless her) is not shall we say the domestic type (more hippy really) anyway I digress, the kid has been raised in a generally farm environment with a lot of free range animals wondering around, the two boys (of course) loved this as a built in playground.

To present day, the boys liver is now over 85% his own, and they have reduced to an absolute minimum the rejection drugs, you would not know to look at him he is a transplant recipient.

My point is, he was allowed to be a kid, play in a farm environment, & you know what I mean by that? The kid has grown and developed, and physically become as immune as you & I to the world of bugs that surround us.

Was it a risk to allow this? maybe, has his quality of life been improved, most definitely.

  • 1 vote
#1.3 - Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:31 AM EST
Reply

Come on Allen, do you think people really give a rats?

Besides YOU of all people should know that more exposure to bugs makes you less likely to catch one.

People who "sanitize" everything stay sick far more than people who don't worry about these things.

  • 6 votes
Reply#3 - Sat Feb 25, 2012 12:02 AM EST

Completely agree. Those who sanitize everything they come into contact with don't give their immune systems enough germs to practice on and develop a resistance to common bacteria. I rarely get sick, and I work around food and dirty dishes all day, no sick days.

  • 2 votes
#3.1 - Sat Feb 25, 2012 2:09 AM EST

I hardly think the article inferred that we need to sanitize everything. Rather I think it is more about how cool this technology is and the implications for diagnosing existing conditions based on your personal microbiome or evidence in proving a particular crime. It almost makes the show 'Bones' more realistic! : )

  • 8 votes
#3.2 - Sat Feb 25, 2012 10:22 AM EST

Well there are some microbes that exist where repeat exposure does not protect, it just means another round of infection. This was an excellent article which has revealed to us whther there are potential pathogens present or absent on our phones.

    #3.3 - Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:31 PM EST
    Reply

    I kissed a microbe and I liked it.

    • 4 votes
    Reply#4 - Sat Feb 25, 2012 8:41 AM EST
    trillmnDeleted

    So only smart phones have all these germs? What about just plain old ordinary cell phones? How about landlines? Why single out smartphones? Does that make you feel smart Alan?

    • 1 vote
    Reply#6 - Sat Feb 25, 2012 10:04 AM EST

    Hmmmm, lets think for just a wee little moment. Do you browse the internet on your regular cell phone, constantly swiping your fingers across the screen? How about your land line? Hand that to your five-year-old to play angry birds? Does that make you feel dumb Dave? Jackass.

    • 2 votes
    #6.1 - Sat Feb 25, 2012 11:04 AM EST

    Forest, your the jackass if you think any phone is not going to have about the same bio-burden.

    • 1 vote
    #6.2 - Sat Feb 25, 2012 12:02 PM EST

    I have heard similar things about landline phones, particularly public phones. You should get out a little more.

    • 1 vote
    #6.3 - Sun Feb 26, 2012 6:15 PM EST
    Reply

    I just uploaded a 'do not lick me' app. It will just display that message every time you unlock your phone as a friendly reminder. That's the free version. The pay version will also remind you not to lick your shoes!

    For those of you with more money to spend, Just buy a silver phone case. Silver is naturally anti-bacterial.

      Reply#7 - Sat Feb 25, 2012 11:22 AM EST

      I read an article not too long ago that certain smartphone users spend a good portion of time sitting on the toilet with their smartphone out. They watch movies, facebook, tweet, check emails and text!

      It would be interesting to compare microbial communities on a regular cell or landline phone to those on a smartphone to see which one carries the most.

        Reply#8 - Sun Feb 26, 2012 12:30 AM EST

        the implied issue here is not what microbes live on your phone, but what microbes live on the tips of your fingers. the phone is basically like a hotel for the microbes, and your fingers are like the unsuspecting travelers frequenting the hotel. after washing your hands or using a cleaning gel, as soon as you touch your phone those microbes are right back in business. how many times have you touched your phone, and then rub your eye or nose? definitely not a comforting thought for germophobes.

          Reply#9 - Sun Feb 26, 2012 10:28 AM EST

          Humans themselves, evolved from "gross" pond scum. I'm sure we can deal with a few germs in our modern environment. Our bodies were evolutionary designed to deal with and fight off all sorts of germs and bacteria. It's only in the last 200-300 years of human history, where anything resembling proper hygiene and sanitation was common.

            Reply#10 - Sun Feb 26, 2012 1:47 PM EST

            "Humans themselves, evolved from "gross" pond scum" and many never progressed beyond that first stage-just look who is running for office.

              #10.1 - Sun Feb 26, 2012 3:36 PM EST
              Reply

              "What creatures live on your smartphone?" Why the same creatures that live on your dumb phone, stupid!

              Or your: fill in the blank

              Alow news day MSNBC? Or is your web site "buggy"? TeHeTeHe, titter, twitter.

                Reply#11 - Sun Feb 26, 2012 3:34 PM EST

                Read this while after typing on my so very clean keyboard and scratching my balls.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#12 - Mon Feb 27, 2012 12:55 AM EST

                Thank God for that wonderful thing called the immune system.

                  Reply#13 - Mon Feb 27, 2012 6:15 AM EST

                  I don't own a smart phone.

                  Does that make me smarter?

                    Reply#14 - Mon Feb 27, 2012 9:48 AM EST

                    Good, more bacteria to build up my immune system. I rarely get sick and when I do I am only sick for a maximum of a couple of days, I am a firm believer in not "hiding" from germs.

                      Reply#15 - Mon Feb 27, 2012 12:46 PM EST

                      We use money to buy probiotic. You do not need to waste money buying bacteria infected yogort. Crowcordiles live on rotten food and live longer. We could live longer on bacteria that invade our mouth at night. Just stop washing that yerky and eat. The fowl mouth you get the longer you will be healthy.

                        Reply#16 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 7:40 AM EST
                        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.