New find revives 'Jesus Tomb' flap

One of the designs etched on a bone box found within a 1st-century Jerusalem tomb suggests the biblical story of Jonah and the fish, which held significant symbolism for early Christians.




Using a remote-controlled camera on the end of a robotic arm, investigators have found what could be the earliest evidence of a Christian iconography in Jerusalem, engraved on a set of "bone boxes" inside a nearly intact 1st-century tomb.

One of the limestone boxes, known more formally as an ossuary, carries a Greek inscription calling on God to "rise up" or "raise up" someone. Another box appears to show the carved image of a fish, perhaps with the prophet Jonah in its mouth. Allusions to fish and the "sign of Jonah" came to be widely used among early Christians, but not among Jerusalem's Jews.

Update: Doubts raised about the 'Jesus Discovery'

Those discoveries alone would be enough to get biblical scholars excited. But the investigators in this case are the same people who claimed five years ago that ossuaries from a nearby tomb were engraved with the names of the biblical Jesus and his family. They're putting forth this new find as supporting evidence for their earlier claims, and resurrecting the topic in a newly published book ("The Jesus Discovery") as well as a Discovery Channel documentary that's due to air this spring.

"This does reopen the whole question about the 'Jesus Tomb,'" James Tabor, a scriptural scholar at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, told me.


That almost guarantees that the link to Jesus will take center stage once again in the discussion of the discovery, with most archaeologists discounting the connection. There's even a chance that the renewed controversy would push this most recent find out of the spotlight. That would be a terrible shame, said John Dominic Crossan, an expert on 1st-century Christianity and former Catholic priest who is a professor emeritus at DePaul University.

"It's a stunning discovery," he said. "It's a stunning piece of technology. As a scholar, I really don't want to get lost in saying, 'Oh, come on, it's off the wall.' Yeah, it's off the wall. But look at the wall!"

James Tabor / UNCC

Engineer Walter Klassen and filmmaker Simcha Jacobovici hold the camera-equipped robotic arm in its folded-up configuration.

Or in this case, look at the box.

How the boxes were found
Tabor and documentary filmmaker Simcha Jacobovici located both of the 1st-century tombs — the so-called Jesus Family Tomb as well as the one with the newly revealed inscriptions — in a Jerusalem neighborhood known as Talpiot years ago. They looked into previous claims that the bone boxes in the Jesus Family Tomb were marked with names that meshed with the names of Jesus' brothers and sisters, as mentioned in the Gospels. The investigators went on to cite a statistical analysis of name frequency as evidence that the family interred in the caskets was that of Jesus.

Most provocatively, they pointed to one box that was said to contain the remains of Jesus, and another containing the remains of "Judah, son of Jesus." These claims ran counter to the mainstream Christian view that Jesus made a bodily resurrection after his crucifixion and death, and that he did not marry or have children. To explain the seeming discrepancy with the Gospels, Tabor and his colleagues suggested that early Christians did not necessarily believe in a bodily resurrection, but rather a spiritual resurrection in which Jesus left behind the "old clothes" of the flesh.

The first book ("The Jesus Family Tomb") and TV documentary ("The Lost Tomb of Jesus") set off a wave of protests, with skeptics saying that Tabor and Jacobovici were sensationalizing an unprovable assertion. Despite the criticism, the team continued their work, focusing on the other tomb. This tomb was only briefly examined in 1981 before protests by Orthodox Jews, concerned about the disturbance of a gravesite, forced an end to the archaeological study. The tomb was sealed back up, and a condominium was built over it. Tabor and his colleagues refer to this tomb as the "Patio Tomb," because a patio sits almost directly above the tomb.

Israel's civil and religious authorities were resistant to efforts to reopen the Patio Tomb, so Tabor, Jacobovici and their colleagues came up with an unorthodox alternative: They suggested building a robotic arm that could be extended down vent holes and drill holes into the tomb, to a maximum length of more than 15 feet. The authorities gave their permission, and the documentary team proceeded with their remote-controlled video exploration in June 2010.

James Tabor / UNCC

Investigators shot imagery of the 1st-century Jerusalem tomb and the bone boxes inside the tomb using a robotic arm, as shown in this video frame.

The filmmakers peered into niches cut into the tomb and found several inscribed bone boxes, including one that was left ajar to reveal the bones still within. In one of the niches, two boxes were jammed close together. As the robotic arm maneuvered to look at the side of one of the boxes, one of the investigators cried out, "Wait, wait, stop there!" A design had been etched into the limestone — a design that could be interpreted as a fish with a stick figure hanging out of its mouth.

The meaning of the inscriptions
After consulting with other scriptural experts, the investigators concluded that the etching showed a representation of Jonah and the fish. The biblical tale of the prophet who was swallowed by a giant fish, only to be vomited up alive three days later, had a special resonance for early Christians, who believed in Jesus' resurrection after three days in a tomb. The image of the fish, which would not typically be carved on a Jewish ossuary, suggested to Tabor and his colleagues that this might be the earliest surviving example of a Christian marking on an artifact in Jerusalem.

The team's excitement grew when they saw the inscription on the box sitting next to the one with the fish: A four-line inscription in Greek appeared to refer to a belief in the resurrection. The inscription could be read as "Divine Jehovah, raise up, raise up," or "The Divine Jehovah raises up to the Holy Place," or "Divine Jehovah, raise up [abbreviated name]."

"This inscription has something to do with resurrection of the dead, either of the deceased in the ossuary, or perhaps, given the Jonah image nearby, an expression of faith in Jesus' resurrection," Tabor said in a news release.

The Jesus connection
Tabor and his colleagues tie this latest discovery to their earlier claims by suggesting that the two tombs were part of one complex, which might have been chiseled out by a wealthy supporter of Jesus and his disciples. They even name their prime suspect: Joseph of Arimathea, a high-ranking religious official who was said in the Gospels to have arranged Jesus' burial. In the investigators' view, the fact that they found such a strong connection to early Christianity in the Patio Tomb strengthens their original claims for the Jesus Family Tomb, which is 200 feet away.

"We now have the new archaeological evidence, literally written in stone, that can guide us in properly understanding what Jesus' earliest followers meant by their faith in Jesus' resurrection from the dead — with his earthly remains, and those of his family, peacefully interred just yards away," Tabor and Jacobovici wrote.

Crossan said that was too much of a leap. "There's nothing that associates [the Patio Tomb] with Joseph of Arimathea," he said.

He said the two tombs may well have no relationship to each other: "This whole area is riddled with tombs, as far as we can tell."

Ben Witherington, a New Testament scholar at Asbury Theological Seminary, voiced a similar view. "The attempt to connect [the Patio Tomb] to the other tombs is sheer conjecture, unless the tombs were connected," he told me.

Witherington said the connections made in the newly published book were similar to those put forth in Tabor's earlier work. "Most of us who have evaluated his work would say, OK, all very interesting, but it's building one speculation on another speculation," he said.

However, Witherington was intrigued by the fish carving. "We have early Christian ossuaries with the fish symbol ... in the 2nd century, if not back into the 1st century," he said. "That is the early Christian symbol for I-Ch-Th-Y-S ... 'Jesus Christ, Son of God, Savior.' What we don't have any evidence for is that symbol on Jewish ossuaries."

The words of the inscription also caught Witherington's interest. "They imply a belief about the resurrection," he said.

It is thought that the use of such bone boxes in Jerusalem ceased in the year 70, due to the Roman destruction of the city. Thus, there's a chance that the residents buried in the Patio Tomb actually lived during the time of Jesus and his first disciples. However, Crossan noted that Christians weren't the only ones in 1st-century Jerusalem who held a religious belief in resurrection. The Pharisees and the Essenes also looked forward to the resurrection of the righteous, he said.

"What I would say is ... this is a rich Pharisee, a rich person in the 1st century who believes in the resurrection," Crossan told me. "We always thought that [the image of] Jonah coming out of the fish was peculiarly Christian. Maybe that's one more thing that the early Christians took from Jewish tradition, and this would be the first evidence."

More about biblical archaeology:


An academic paper on the Patio Tomb project is being posted to The Bible and Interpretation on Tuesday, and Tabor says the paper will be submitted for print publication as well. A press event about the project and the Discovery Channel documentary has been scheduled for 11 a.m. ET Tuesday at Discovery Times Square in New York City. Funding for the project was provided by Discovery Channel / Vision Television / Associated Producers. Tabor's colleague in obtaining the excavation license from the Israel Antiquities Authority was Rami Arav, professor of archaeology at the University of Nebraska at Omaha.

Alan Boyle is msnbc.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter or adding Cosmic Log's Google+ page to your circle. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for other worlds.

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 ... 20 21 22

Thank goodness this is a claim against the Christain Faith. Had it been about Muslims the people making the film would all be dead now and the President would be making another apology.

    Reply#455 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 1:21 PM EST

    It's a mermaid.

      Reply#456 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 1:31 PM EST

      All you folks who keep insisting that Jesus was just a man, nothing more, let me ask you a question : How does a guy who's "just a man, nothing more" whose work was as a carpenter, who never traveled more than a few miles from his home town-- usually on foot; who never led an army or held a political office, who never wrote a single word, who in fact preached for only 3 years... How does such a guy topple not only the greatest empire the world has ever known, but a worldwide belief system-- paganism-- that had lasted for THOUSANDS of freakin' years? For someone who's "just a man, nothing more", & who fits into each of the above categories, that's as close to the definition of impossible as I can get.

      Were you even aware that Jesus is mentioned by the same number of secular writers-- nine-- that mention Tiberius Caesar, the Roman Emperor at the time of His death? How does someone who's "just a man, nothing more" get into THAT club? Did you know that the three hours of darkness that is said to have covered a region of several tens of thousands of square miles at the moment of His death, along with the earthquakes & the resurrection of the dead, are attested in the SECULAR writings of Thallus & Phlegon-- both PAGANS-- & others, and quoted by Julius Africanus, Eusebius of Caesarea, Tertullian, Origen, & several others? How in the world does THAT happen, if we're talking about someone who's "just a man, nothing more". Other facts about Jesus that are recorded by the prominent Jewish historian Flavius Josephus as well as some of the pagan writers mentioned above are that there was something peculiar about His birth, that He performed inexplicable wonders including curing the sick & raising the dead, that His tomb was guarded by Roman soldiers-- which is also pretty strange, when you think about it, & that after a few days the tomb was empty & the soldiers had no explanation. You can call Jesus an alien from outer space if you like, but to say that He's "just a man, nothing more" is to completely ignore history.

      OK-- that's more than 1 question, but such ignorance masquerading as smug knowledge makes me crazy.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#457 - Wed Feb 29, 2012 4:51 PM EST
      Comment author avatarAlan Zanabriavia Facebook

      Religious people are funny. They love to jump into these kinds of semi scientific news. They feel so excited that finally they have a probe to show to us, atheists, of evidence of their god; In the meantime they reject everything Science has to say that really weakens the potential existence of such god.

      Why they need a god? To explain what they don't know...How the explain the creation of their god? It existed forever and ever......then why dont give that same attribute to the physical universe and stop inventing entities that have such a suspicious link to humans.

      I know that the current universe seems to have a beginning, but I really see the idea of a cycling universe as a much more logical explanation of our existence than something or someone that I must worship during my short period of time in this universe. Just look at the scale of time of what we know and what we live, Does it make any sense to waste our life worshiping anything else but life in itself?

      You see those in Afghanistan nowadays, rioting and killing americans, because they burned a book. How stupid is that? That's, in my point of view, is honest religion, the one that you have when you really think that your holly book, it's real and holly. That's why religion should not exist not even in the mild form, because it always can turn into the fanatic form.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#458 - Thu Mar 1, 2012 7:53 AM EST

      How stupid is that?

      I wonder if a more accurate descriptor would be "primitive", or "unenlightened".

        #458.1 - Thu Mar 1, 2012 8:04 AM EST
        Reply

        No I would say "ignorant", or "delusional"

          Reply#459 - Thu Mar 1, 2012 3:37 PM EST

          If that is the case, I hope they are only ignorant.

            #459.1 - Thu Mar 1, 2012 4:06 PM EST
            Reply

            Time is an illusion created by humans to convey to other humans the complex workings of the universe, and life itself. Without the concept of time or of humans the universe would still operate quite smoothly.

              Reply#460 - Fri Mar 2, 2012 1:38 AM EST

              Every year during Lent crackpots take shots at the Resurrection of Christ and other facts. They do it to make money and to confuse the gullible. Prior stupidity will not deter them from being stupid again. I recommend that, were you to stumble on any new "documentary" on your T on this discredited claim, that you change the channel.

                Reply#461 - Fri Mar 2, 2012 10:46 AM EST

                Every year during Lent crackpots take shots at the Resurrection of Christ and other facts.

                The only part I have a problem with is your reference to the word fact. They are not facts but only 3,000 year old fairy tales.

                  Reply#462 - Fri Mar 2, 2012 3:25 PM EST

                  So sad for you to think that. But then again, people witnessed Jesus first hand and even THEY still rejected him. They didnt want to accept or believe he was the messiah. So i dont blame you for not believing. Your no different from them. Just remember its never too late while your here to make that choice some time in your life :D

                    Reply#463 - Fri Mar 2, 2012 6:44 PM EST

                    Why is the cutting off point for choice, death? If a consciousnesses exists after death, why would it matter if someone accepted a god before death, or after death? Isn't the major issue that of acceptance of god? Why the seemingly arbitrary cut off of choice placed at the time of death?

                    It seems silly to me that we are instructed to give up things of the flesh, but yet such importance would be placed on its passing.

                    • 1 vote
                    #463.1 - Sat Mar 3, 2012 9:43 AM EST
                    Reply

                    ojno'

                      Reply#464 - Sat Mar 3, 2012 9:58 AM EST

                      To all of you who say you don't believe in God, is it because you cannot see him? If that is the case then I don't see your brain so should I assume then that it does not exist? I cannot see the wind but I can see the effects of it and it is the same with God. He didn't create evil man did, those are the effects seen that are blamed on God.

                        Reply#465 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 9:21 AM EST

                        just my humble opinion

                        To all of you who say you don't believe in God, is it because you cannot see him?

                        Yes, that's it. I am sure that the vast majority of atheists are hung up solely on the invisible aspect. I am certain that no more thought has gone into the matter than you suggest. </sarcasm>

                        If that is the case then I don't see your brain so should I assume then that it does not exist?

                        It is silly of you to project your feelings of intellectual inadequacy on to those who have the capacity to see through the illusory curtain of theism. Perhaps you should spend more time with your nose in a science text.

                        I cannot see the wind but I can see the effects of it and it is the same with God.

                        Really? I don't think you understand enough about how the material universe operates.

                        Wind is the movement of atmospheric gasses from one point to another. It is a measurable physical phenomena. There is no perceptible presence of God. No one has ever measured and recorded the presence of God, or the direct actions of God. Since God is (to date) nothing more than an unsupported theoretical concept, it is unreasonable to operate under the assumption that God exists. The same is true of rainbow-@!$%#ting unicorns and the Tooth Fairy.

                        If God was the same as the wind we would be able to objectively observe his/her/its presence. All you have to offer as evidence of God's existence is an old book of hearsay and lies, an assortment of spurious testimony from opportunists and the mentally-ill, and a warm fuzzy feeling in your heart (which is probably angina).

                        He didn't create evil man did, those are the effects seen that are blamed on God.

                        At least we can agree on something. Man did create the concept of evil. Man also created God.

                        • 1 vote
                        #465.1 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 10:15 AM EST

                        If that is the case then I don't see your brain so should I assume then that it does not exist?

                        You have to admit, that is a poor comparison. I'm being generous when I say "poor". I think there has been enough heads cracked open to say, without a doubt, there is a brain inside that skull.

                        I don't know if there is a god, or if there is not a god. It can't be proved either way. One thing I do know. There sure has been a lot of people killed because of the topic. If there is a god, I doubt it would have wanted all that killing and hate over a difference of opinion.

                          #465.2 - Tue Mar 6, 2012 2:34 PM EST
                          Reply

                          I think this is strong evidence of belief in resurrection from the dead. However, I would be very careful about presuming that this is a Christianit tomb, far less that it applies to the body of Jesus. The one e xpert who expressed the appropriate caution noted that the Pharisees and Essenes already believed in resurrection from the dead. Furthermore, this could provide evidence that the early Christian symbol of Jonah and the Whale as a symbol for resurrection could well have been inherited from Judaism. I wouldn't read any more than intothe discovery. The rest is sensationalism.

                            Reply#466 - Fri Apr 13, 2012 6:05 PM EDT
                            Jump to discussion page: 1 ... 20 21 22
                            You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                            As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.