
Murray Close / Lionsgate / Everett Collection
Peacekeepers escort Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawrence) in a scene from "The Hunger Games."
The technological divide between the rulers and the ruled is at the heart of "The Hunger Games": While the good guys struggle to survive, the bad guys employ fictional gee-whiz technologies inspired by real-life frontiers. And just as in real life, technology gets tripped up by unintended consequences.
That's not to say the post-apocalyptic North America of the book series and the much-anticipated movie, opening Friday, is anything close to real life. On one level, the technologies used by the villainous government of the nation known as Panem, ranging from force fields to extreme genetic engineering, serve as science-fiction plot devices and special effects. But on another level, the contrast between bows and arrows on one side, and death-dealing hovercraft on the other, accentuates the saga's David vs. Goliath angle — or, in this case, Katniss vs. the Capitol.
Here are a few of the technological trends that provide the twists in "The Hunger Games," along with real-world analogs:
What? No cellphones?
Much has been made of the fact that the starving, downtrodden residents of Panem's districts don't seem to have access to cellphones or the Internet. Instead, they have to huddle around giant television sets to find out what their overlords in the Capitol want them to see. But if you think of Panem as a fictional tweak of modern-day North Korea, "The Hunger Games" might not be that far off the mark: You've got a leadership capable of long-range missile launches, exercising virtually total control over what its impoverished populace sees and hears. Cellphones were outlawed until 2008, and even today they're confiscated from international visitors upon arrival. Internet access and international calling are limited to the elite.
The outlook for change is mixed: Today, a million North Koreans are said to be using mobile phones, but the State Department's Alec Ross told the Korea Times during a recent visit to Seoul that "it will be very difficult for technology to drive change in North Korea, given the extreme measures that North Korea has taken to create a media blackout." That's life in Panem ... er, Pyongyang.
Genetic engineering
The most vivid special effects are connected to genetic engineering of various organisms, including humanized animals. To minimize the plot-spoiler effect, the only "muttation" I'll mention in detail is the mockingjay, which figures so prominently in the advance publicity and provides the title for the third book in Suzanne Collins' "Hunger Games" trilogy. The geniuses at the Panem high command created genetically modified birds known as jabberjays that were able to listen in on rebel conversations and report them back to the authorities. When the rebels caught onto this, they started feeding the jays false information. And when the Capitol figured this out, they left the jabberjays to fend for themselves. Male jabberjays mated with female mockingbirds, resulting in birds that could learn and repeat musical notes but not human speech.
The twist illustrates a time-honored movie maxim about genetic engineering, enunciated in the first "Jurassic Park" film: "Life will not be contained." That may be putting it too simply, but the field has certainly raised a lot of questions about how to keep genetic genies in the bottle. This month, more than 100 groups issued a call to hold back on synthetic biology until new guidelines are drawn up.
Cross-species splicing is becoming more common: Jellyfish genes have been used to give a glow to mice and pigs. Other types of transgenic cloning have made cats and dogs glow in the dark. Experimental mice have been given a "humanized" version of a gene linked to speech, and there have been humanized sheep and cows as well. These real-life muttations aren't as scary as the tracker jackers, but the movie's genetic-engineering nightmares definitely strike closer to home than, say, vampire nightmares.
Force fields
When competitors fight each other in the Hunger Games, the arena is surrounded by some kind of force field to keep Katniss and the other kids from escaping. The invisible fence pushes back anyone or anything that's thrown against it. In real life, researchers have looked into building up short-lasting but powerful electromagnetic fields to repel projectiles directed against military vehicles, but they haven't yet reached the stage where a commander could truly issue the order to raise shields.
It's more realistic to expect that future spaceship captains will use electromagnetic fields to protect their crews from interplanetary radiation blasts. One such study is being funded at Johnson Space Center as part of the NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts program.
For years, the U.S. military has been looking into another type of force field, known as the Active Denial System or "pain ray." This non-lethal system can direct a beam of millimeter-wave radiation at a crowd, producing an extreme burning sensation on the skin. The heat ray's victims instinctively back away from wherever they're standing to get out of the beam. Wired.com's Spencer Ackerman was among a group of guinea pigs ... er, guests ... who got a taste of the pain ray during a recent demonstration at the Marine Corps Base Quantico in Virginia.
Wired.com senior writer Spencer Ackerman volunteers to step in front of the military's pain ray.
Ackerman's conclusion was that the system isn't anywhere near ready for prime time yet, due to lingering concerns about health effects, plus the hours-long buildup time for the beam generator, plus the fact that the system doesn't really work that well under dusty, rainy or snowy conditions. Bottom line: It might be a while before the odds are ever in the pain ray's favor.
Hovercraft
The "Hunger Games" aerial hovercraft are like helicopters, only spookier. They transport cargo as well as people, and can be used for combat and covert operations as well. A real-life hovercraft might be something like the fan-driven vehicles that Moller International has been working on for decades, or a scaled-up version of the Martin Jetpack. Or who knows? Maybe the Capitol has perfected the superconducting anti-gravity effect that NASA looked into more than a decade ago. (Interest waned when it turned out that the Podkletnov Effect couldn't be reliably reproduced.)
Surveillance society
The biggest shadow looming over Katniss and the other denizens of the Districts is constant surveillance. That's what the Hunger Games are all about: a reality-TV fight to the death, on the air 24/7, complete with sponsors and wagering. It's a popular concept in fiction, popping up in films such as "The Running Man," "Battle Royale" and "Series 7."
The Capitol's surveillance isn't limited to the games, however. Just as the contestants are being monitored inside the arena, Panem's citizens have to assume they're being monitored on the outside. In real life, meanwhile, tens of millions of surveillance cameras are being installed across the United States, and there's talk about giving domestic duties to camera-carrying robo-planes.
Hmmmm ... maybe this part of the science-fiction saga is getting a little less fictional. What do you think? Feel free to share your thoughts about the book and the movie, or about real-life parallels, in the comment section below.
More about 'The Hunger Games'
- 'Hunger Games' fire show is Hollywood magic
- Navy opens 'Hunger Games' arenas for robots
- 'Hunger Games' is also a social media game
- Stars say 'Hunger Games' movie violence justified
More movie reality checks:
- Invisibility and other 'Harry Potter' technologies
- 'John Carter' and the real-life Martian quest
- Virtual actor takes over in 'Tron: Legacy'
- Apollo 18 in fiction and fact
- 'Avatar' and the future of 3-D moviemaking
- Reality check for 'Star Trek' tech
Alan Boyle is msnbc.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter or adding Cosmic Log's Google+ page to your circle. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for other worlds.


Seems like a intresting movie,but the book will probably be better.As for hovercrafts,I know they have land to water hovercrafts,but it would be cool to have a flying hovercraft.A lot of these gadgets seem to fit James Bond.
Hover crafts do seem to imply on the ground. Otherwise they are "flying", perhaps like Avatar. As for shields, the inertia imparting versions favored by Hollywood seem very unlikely. Possibly some kind of electromagnetic shields will be used by future space craft, but those will be effective against charged particles (plasma) not relatively charge neutral objects like people.
As for surveillance, for better and worse, I think the future will be far more capable than what has typically been depicted.
Oh, and the genetic stuff. Tricky predicting the future on that one. Sure the freak show like creation of Hollywood might be possible in the next hundred years or so, depending some on politics and society tolerance of such "mad science".
But in dark corners of authoritarian countries you have to wonder if worse things than "humanizing" animals is already taking place. What kind of experimental horror shows are playing out to construct advanced intelligence "humans" that will work in their secret labs, rejuvenation/anti-aging experiments being conducted on elderly test subjects, human medical experiments for treatment of diseases, and of course bio weapons.
And not to distant into the future, "bio-hacking" isn't going to require big government or company resources. There are communities *RIGHT NOW* of "basement bio-hackers" that organize via the internet. When individuals have the power to construct custom organisms in the privacy of their own home, it will only be a matter of time before a bright but unstable person makes something horrific.
wow this is a complete misunderstanding of what is going on in this story.
Way to go.
Pay not attention to the fact that this is really about the 'haves' and the 'have nots'
Well we do not have any flying hovercrafts,which was the main point of my comment.
Are you sure, mj? Could it possibly be about the evils of an over-powerful and intrusive government?
It's a science fiction movie and the critic is taking the movie to task because the technology doesn't exist? Seriously? It's fiction.
Are you talking about me? No, of course I'm not taking the movie to task... I say right up front that the movie isn't anywhere close to real life. I'm just trying to point out some (I hope) interesting parallels between the fictional technologies and a few real-life issues. I'm very much looking forward to this movie, but I don't expect it to be a documentary. Seriously! ;-)
Thanks for taking the time to reply. The headline for the article appears to be the antithesis of what you suggest the article is trying to point out. That's what led to my original comment.
I am too providing that special effects don't become a substitute for a good story and acting.
Isn't that what news organizations do best? Twist fiction into reality?
Wow, a lot of cynicism out there ... But I guess it was ever thus, that's what folks were saying when I started working at a news organization (the dearly departed Cincinnati Post) 35 years ago. We just make it easier for you to tell it to us nowadays.
Kookla & The One and Only:
Did you read the article? It's not about the movie, per say, it's about the technology in the movie and how it parallels to reality. The author was not taking the movie or the books to tasks; it was simply an observational article. Take it for what it was, not what you want to see within it.
peace.
roses are red,violets are blue, the u.s. is having a bloodless coup?
lol if you replace "u.s." with "Obama" i'd agree.I don't know what you are talking about?
Thank you for the article and the research you clearly put into writing it!
Most science fiction is too clean and avoids the complexity of life; For example with the lack of black market cell phones and make shift Internets. To add such complexity requires a great amount of effort. However when it is done properly it can actually inspire real world innovations. Minority Report for example has been a source of inspiration to many in the electronics industry. I can't wait for the Samsung smart window (transparent touch face computer) to come out!
If you'd read the books you'd understand why there's no internet or cell phones and you wouldn't be questioning it. That's the oppressive society that they live under. Not far from old Pyonyang at all.
You talking about London this summer? Believe me in London, you cant pass gas without it being recorded, anywhere in central London, and all stadiums are equipped with face recognition systems (to keep out know thug, ID terrorists, bear in mind your photo is on file if you're a visitor to the UK)
So the above statement is not too far out of wack
Yes, these cameras have been posted anywhere a citizen might be observed by a cop on the beat. The difference is these cops don’t sleep. Thieves, terrorists and rapists have all been caught and convicted by those cameras. Guess who complains about them the most?
I think what the author of this article meant to get across was that we have changed as a society. A very silent change. And that the comparison of the movie and real life have distinct proximity's.
Take it or leave it. The movie should be a good one. Nice article
i thought mutation had 1 T in in it.
I think he actually did mean "muttation" in the sense that the new creature is a combination of two or more different creatures, like a mutt is a combination of two or more breeds of dogs.
Drezz, he did mean "muttation". It is a direct quote from the book with the definition Dan supplied above. If you haven't read it I highly recommend the entire series.
Great article. I hope one day we will see hovercrafts, for a good reason though :)
This is a great crowd control device. My main concern is the claim that the device penetrates only 1/64th of an inch. That's great because it appears this will only cause discomfort and not damage but then I thought about our rather delicate eyes and realized this might not be as safe as it is being portrayed. I would also think that distance would be a factor and if someone inadvertently or even on purpose walked into the path of the beam midway between who was being targeted could they possibly be injured?
Still safer than a fully automatic .50 cal. Rubber shotgun bullets have killed people too, but they're still preferrable to the real thing in some situations.
About your last point? If someone "inadvertently" steps between a mob and a group of guards, that person probably deserves the darwin award that's waiting off-stage.
IMHO the cameras are fine.
the thing i wish could be developed is the sorting hat from Harry Potter..... i would be so nice to know what you might need and what to give away, sell or trash.
Reading through this is like reading through Fringe wikia. I grin.
A lot of it is possible but as for genetic engineering, I don't really think we're at that level to use complete biological-based militaristic drones like Jabberjays but it remain a possibility. We're venturing to the dark world of Philip K Dick's moral ethics.
Having read all three books the really scary bit is the fact that "the more things change, the more they stay the same". For, in the books, after the central government is defeated the first act of the new president is to instigate a hunger games using the children of the capital city dwellers who fought against the rebellion. Luckily Katniss makes her regret the suggestion in the most dramatic and FINAL way possible, by using her last arrow to execute the new president.
It doesn't matter about the technology, it's the mindset of those in power that is very alive and thriving; death lovers and warmongers just chomping at the bit to feed more into the grinder of war. Todays "elites" will pick fights like Israel v Iran but "when the rich wage war, it's the poor who die!", you will never see a Rockefeller or Rothschild in the trenches.
It is only the sons of the fields who get to make the ultimate sacrifice for what amounts to the elite's country. Reminds me of the WW1 recruiting stations they dramatise sometimes, some failed politician claiming patriotic fervour to go and fight in the great war...and "wish to God I could go with you!" when that should have the addendum of "Thank God I can't!"
War has and is a profit for the "elite", that's been true since the Crimean war maybe even before that. Rothschild family expanded their wealth and influence by funding both sides of the Napoleonic war, and that war only happened because Napoleon threw the french representative of the Rothschild family out on his ear.
The Hunger games is the same arrogant mindset, the central govt uses fear of the games to carry out it's rule, they draw the names by lottery to give the impression of fairness yet the rules change to suit themselves. Katniss only gets them to keep one rule change at the end of the first book by threatening the capital with having no winner at all in a double suicide!
The capital takes all the food produced in the districts, produces nothing of it's own, parcels out enough for itself (more than enough if one party is any guide) and then "shares" out what's left to the districts, and should a district question it they get a false spectre of district 13. I say look out if the elite get their way because one year we'll have the Olympics and they'll be renamed to The Hunger Games!