Billionaire Paul Allen kicks off 'brain observatory' effort with $300 million

A video provides background on the Allen Institute for Brain Science and looks ahead to the new project.




Software billionaire Paul Allen is pledging $300 million to establish a series of "brain observatories" at the Seattle research facility named after him, with the aim of mapping and manipulating the mouse brain.

The project's leaders say the insights gained could be applied as well to higher forms of life, including humans. "We believe that this project has the potential to revolutionize our understanding of the mammalian brain," Christoph Koch, chief scientific officer for the Allen Institute for Brain Science, and Harvard neuroscientist R. Clay Reid said in the journal Nature.

Details about the brain observatory project were laid out today at the Allen Institute in Seattle. In an advance interview, Koch cast the effort in terms usually reserved for the multibillion-dollar Hubble Space Telescope project or the $10 billion Large Hadron Collider.


"We're focusing a huge amount of resources on trying to understand this piece of highly, highly complex math and science. The most organized piece of matter in the known universe is the cerebral cortex, the one that makes you and me think and smell and hear and talk. That's what we're trying to understand," Koch told me. "Just as people spend a huge amount of time and effort to build these different observatories to look at the origin of space and time, we're going to build these observatories, these very sophisticated instruments, all of them using common standards, all peering at the brain — primarily animal brains, but also the human brain."

In a way, seeking out the secrets of the brain is harder than looking for the Higgs boson, because neuroscientists have not yet developed a model for brain function as robust as, say, the Standard Model of particle physics. "In that sense, neuroscience may never have the maturity of physics, partly because the system we're dealing with is enormously more complex," Koch said.

Allen Institute for Brain Science

This image highlights a coronal section of an entire mouse brain, which was stained to mark anatomical boundaries in many brain regions. This process reveals areas where the density of cell bodies is higher (stained in red) compared to the density of axonal projections, or connections between neurons (stained in green). Such anatomical maps will be among the products emerging from the "brain observatories" created by the Allen Institute for Brain Science.

The brain observatory project plans to start with the visual cerebral cortex of the mouse brain, because that's an area that neuroscientists understand relatively well, Koch said. Researchers from outside institutions could work with the Allen Institute's staff, using sophisticated instruments to light up the electrical circuitry of individual neurons, trace the connections between neurons, and watch how thousands of brain cells respond to specific stimuli.

All these techniques would be stitched together to produce a full physiological and structural characterization of entire brain regions. Such insights should lead to better computer models for brain function, which can be fed back into the experimental side of the project for validation. Having the firepower for computer modeling right next door to the experimental labs should produce "a virtuous circle that will be iterated until the model faithfully reproduces the data," Koch and Reid wrote.

From mice to humans
An estimated 60,000 neuroscientists are studying the brain at 10,000 labs worldwide, but the brain-observatory approach should be "very complementary" to those widely distributed efforts, said Allan Jones, the Allen Institute's chief executive officer. The institute's findings, including genetic atlases of the mouse brain and the human brain, are traditionally shared openly with other researchers, even before journal publication.

Koch compared the mouse brain to a set of 100 billion Lego toy blocks, organized into 1,000 different kinds of blocks. "First we need to understand how many different parts are out there, and then how they fit together," he said.

The insights gained from the visual cortex could be applied to further exploration of other functional areas of the mouse brain, and then to other mammalian brains — including our own brains. When it comes to cortical structure, "there isn't anything particularly unique about us," Koch said. "The principles are all going to be the same. ... If we understand them in a simpler system, then we are a long way toward understanding us."

Another aspect of the project is the development of lab-grown human brain cells that reflect the genetic components associated with neurological conditions ranging from autism to Alzheimer's. Stanford neuroscientist Ricardo Dolmetsch, a specialist in that technique, will be joining the Allen Institute later this year, as will Harvard's Reid.

Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen discusses how the donation to his Allen Institute For Brain Science could help spur new understanding and treatments for diseases of the brain. KING's Jean Enersen reports.

During today's briefing in Seattle, Allen said his interest in brain research stems from his work in computer software, as a founder of Microsoft Corp. and other ventures. (Microsoft is one of the partners in the msnbc.com joint venture.) He noted that the most advanced software doesn't come close to matching the complexity of the human brain.

"There is really no greater challenge, with potentially huge impact, than understanding how brains work," he said. Allen said he was also motivated by the fact that his mother suffers from Alzheimer's disease. But he emphasized that the institute would focus on basic research rather than disease treatment.

"Our dream is to one day uncover the essence of what makes us human — to explore and understand how the brain makes us remember, forget, interact with each other and become the people we are," Allen said.

Ten-year plan
Allen's $300 million pledge will be spread out over four years to jump-start the Seattle institute's initial 10-year plan for the observatories. The software executive, whose net worth was recently estimated at $13.2 billion, founded the institute in 2003 with a $100 million contribution, and has donated an additional $100 million since then.

"My commitment today doesn't just continue the work of the institute," Allen said. "It greatly expands the scale and the scope of our mission."

The Allen Institute says it will use some of the money to double its staff to more than 350 employees over the next four years, as well as to develop new suites of instruments and new computer-modeling capabilities.

Leroy Hood, president and co-founder of the Seattle-based Institute for Systems Biology, said he was looking forward to collaborating with the Allen Institute's researchers on the brain observatory project.

"I think it's a terrific project," Hood told me. "Their approach to 'big science' and openness is exactly what's needed to move the field forward."

In addition to Allen's contributions to neuroscience, the billionaire has pursued a wide variety of interests beyond software, including ownership of the Portland Trail Blazers basketball team and the Seattle Seahawks football team, the establishment of the Allen Telescope Array, and financial backing for SpaceShipOne's prize-winning rocket venture and the Stratolaunch air-launch company.

Back in 2008, I set up a scale of financial denominations for big scientific projects, ranging from 1 allen (the estimated cost of the SpaceShipOne project, $25 million to $30 million) to 1 apollo ($100 billion or more). On that scale, Allen's contribution to the brain observatory project equals roughly 10 allens, or three-quarters of a rover (the $400 million Opportunity rover, that is, not the $2.5 billion Curiosity rover). Still more money will be needed for the out-years of the project, perhaps including government funding.

Is this project worth the price tag? How will it mesh with other potential neuroscience projects, such as the proposed billion-dollar European Human Brain Project? Feel free to weigh in with your comments below.

Update for 6:30 p.m. ET: At today's Seattle news briefing, I asked Koch what the top technology on his wish list would be. "We'd like to listen to every single nerve cell," he replied. "Right now, we can't do that." He envisions some sort of wireless receiver system that would have so much resolution that it could monitor individual neural impulses inside your head. Sounds pretty science-fictional to me, but what do you think?

Also, this week's issue of Nature includes a report on the $40 million Human Connectome Project, a five-year, $40 million initiative funded by the National Institutes of Health to map the brain's long-distance communication network. Some researchers wonder whether the project is really ready for prime time. "I would do the basic neuroscience before I started running lots of people through MRI scanners," David Kleinfeld, a researcher in physics and neurobiology at the University of California at San Diego, is quoted as saying.

Is this the decade of big-science brain research? That's one more question to chew over in the comment section.


Alan Boyle is msnbc.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter or adding Cosmic Log's Google+ page to your circle. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for other worlds.

Discuss this post

Mouse brains? They can start with the GOP presidential contenders. Though that might be an insult to mice.

  • 5 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Mar 21, 2012 3:08 PM EDT

Monkey brains they can start with..... oh they can start with obama's . But that would be an insult to monkeys. Stupid people, the more the merrier.

    #1.1 - Fri Mar 23, 2012 8:51 PM EDT
    Reply

    Ya, totally worth it if it helps us get better control over ourselves

    • 1 vote
    Reply#2 - Wed Mar 21, 2012 3:09 PM EDT

    Ya, they totally wont use it to control your simple mind's even more. WAKE UP PEOPLE YOU'VE BEEN BRAINWASHED AND THIS IS MORE BRAINWASHING PROPAGANDA

      #2.1 - Thu Mar 22, 2012 7:45 PM EDT
      Reply

      First brains, then what we know, then intelligence is this a rising scale. Yes, even though intelligence eludes us, knowing more about anything improves the chances of understanding intelligence. Intelligence eludes us in the sense that it does so falteringly, flashing on and off, not steady enough to use as tool, and often used wrongly to limit further development. First brains, then what we know, then intelligence, is trilogy that also means that we may be looking for larger things to achieve, however this is like using a telescope normally to gather more light and see bigger structure. Some of this research will be better than looking through the telescope backward (microscope). Those First brains must look for smaller elements, and smaller details, facts and realizations. Starting with a complex brain and looking how it works has in the past, always, tried to make macroscopic observations with imprecise tools, that equally always seem to skip past so much details, as to be quaint and non-predictive. This old approach, I hope will not be much repeated by this wonderful project. A grand unified theory of the brain, will be need to explain many things about how brains evolved and became more complicated, and a number of things such as I might list below in a reply:

      (later)

      • 1 vote
      Reply#3 - Wed Mar 21, 2012 3:41 PM EDT

      As promised: First brains, then what we know, then intelligence is this a rising scale. Yes, even though intelligence eludes us, knowing more about anything improves the chances of understanding intelligence. Intelligence eludes us in the sense that it does so falteringly, flashing on and off, not steady enough to use as tool, and often used wrongly to limit further development. First brains, then what we know, then intelligence, is trilogy that also means that we may be looking for larger things to achieve, however this is like using a telescope normally to gather more light and see bigger structure. Some of this research will be better than looking through the telescope backward (microscope). Those First brains must look for smaller elements, and smaller details, facts and realizations. Starting with a complex brain and looking how it works has in the past, always, tried to make macroscopic observations with imprecise tools, that equally always seem to skip past so much details, as to be quaint and non-predictive. This old approach, I hope will not be much repeated by this wonderful project. A grand unified theory of the brain, will be need to explain many things about how brains evolved and became more complicated, and a number of things such as I might list below in a reply:

      There are facets I am writing down as I think of them; you may not have to background to see the value in some questions. (But you can ask.)

      1) Humans eyes are in the front, the optic nerves traverse the brain to reach the visual cortex, since eyesight has evolved several times, the brain evolving structure (morphology) could explain this migration (or eyes from the back of the head). But this could be treated separately from other brain structures. Both (brain and visual) systems co-evolve to meet conditions, just as the various, layers of the brain evolved from earlier structures, developing the neo-cortex and areas of speech and language. Embryo genesis provides many clues about brain structure.

      2) How the brain is modeled, poorly as a computer of some sort, has not been productive, but is the idea were to be pursued, my amateurish approach may help improve this approach. There is no definitive analogy between how the brain works and how computers work, at least not without tearing up the normal scripts and taking a soft approach challenging some strongly held beliefs. The neuron synapse specialist need to extend their detailed work, to first explain memory, then to explain consciousness, then to explain sleep, these three divisions are based on one idea about synapses that I yet to hear much research about. Following are continuations of the computer vs. brain models.

      3) The computer as defined by the Turing machine generalization that (Turing 100th birth year, Nature, 23 February 2012) is well supported in the literature. However the idea of infinite computing has little biological appeal. There another item of software logic in so far as the brain is concerned is relevant, the software we commonly use spares no notion of practical limits in logical steps, but the notion that logical elements need 10 or 20 steps to determine and outcome, are not seen in biology at the building block level. Most practical solutions arrive within 4 logical steps, making extended algorithms unneeded. Both is these suggest that handful of synapses are needed to represent a logical processing unit, abstract as that is, to help explain, memory, consciousness and sleep.

      4) While the software modeling a limited computing capability for emulating logical processing units is simple enough, however combining the chemically powered neurons and synapses into putative groups to accomplish unit consciousness requires more effort. I not going anywhere near the whole of human consciousness, since occupied much unproductive literature. Unit consciousness, unit memory, suggest only that we should be able to understand that a sustained pattern of neuronal activity, synoptically connected might yield the analog needed to establish that consciousness, or concentration can be supported by underlying activity, where the exhausted neurons take a rest. The unit idea extended to memory is not farfetched, except that some preference for firing of synapsed may be established. The remote suggestion that sleep is primordial design induced globally.

      5) The many minds that have contributed thus far in brain science, dare I remind them, need to frame and reframe their questions, to facilitate the process of research, if for no other reason than to limit deep diving, and limited papers that do not improve understanding just by wandering into arcane areas that don’t appear to have been published. Making more unreadable reports does not help the brain, unless it needs to sleep.

      • 2 votes
      #3.1 - Wed Mar 21, 2012 4:52 PM EDT

      Memory is very interesting, how much of it is recorded, stored and retrieved information, and how much is re-created by the brain, from simpler building blocks, when a memory occurs? One example of the kind of question that this research might help answer.

      • 2 votes
      #3.2 - Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:11 PM EDT
      Reply

      These types of projects is where we should be directly our energies ... instead of fighting with each other over trivial things!!

      • 5 votes
      Reply#4 - Wed Mar 21, 2012 4:02 PM EDT

      Is it worth it? Of course it's worth it. How could it not be? Paul Allen is putting up the money. It's one of the best things a billionaire has ever done.

      When it comes to science, of course we're interested in space exploration. We're well overdue to figure out that space in our heads though. How can you give "birth" to more computers and robots without learning more about the brain?

      It's a no brainer, so to speak. (uh hem)

      I applaud you, Paul Allen!!

      Thanks, Alan!

      • 4 votes
      Reply#5 - Wed Mar 21, 2012 4:25 PM EDT

      The significance of this brain research could be enormous. Conservatively it could produce cures for Alzheimer's, epilepsy and other neurological disorders. Not-so-conservatively, imagine non-invasive recovery of stored memories, direct brain-machine interfaces ... the sort of stuff Singularity enthusiasts think about.

      • 1 vote
      #5.1 - Thu Mar 22, 2012 1:45 PM EDT
      Reply

      The Alien Institute for Brain Science!?!?!?!? Whaaaaaat??

      • 1 vote
      Reply#6 - Thu Mar 22, 2012 1:43 AM EDT

      This is a very powerful post, masterfully done. I plan to share it with many people, including so

      me politicians I`m from Ukraine. With respect xxdevil.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#7 - Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:06 AM EDT

      This is a very powerful post, masterfully done. I plan to share it with many people, including so

      me politicians I`m from Ukraine. With respect xxdevil.

      [url][/url]

      <a>

      • 2 votes
      Reply#8 - Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:07 AM EDT

      These types of things are what our country should be spending our money on. Not endless wars.

      • 4 votes
      Reply#9 - Thu Mar 22, 2012 3:02 PM EDT

      At last! A definitive answer to the question, "Are you a man or a mouse?"!!!

      • 1 vote
      Reply#10 - Thu Mar 22, 2012 3:11 PM EDT

      Hmmm. We are the descendents of a common ancestor shared with mice. So... we are a great great great great--- brother from another great great great--- mother.

      • 1 vote
      #10.1 - Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:56 AM EDT
      Reply

      False Teeth for Sheep
      ◆ An Edinburgh, Scotland, dentist reasoned that since sheep's teeth in his area wear down in about six years, new teeth would assure their getting enough nourishment for an extended breeding life. "Last year, farmer friends allowed 30-year-old Mr. Thomson to fit two pedigree sheep with razor-sharp teeth made of chrome cobalt," reports London's Daily Mail. "Now, at the age of six, both ewes have raised twin lambs and, still munching contentedly, look set to breed happily for years to come." After fitting another 10 sheep recently, Thomson said: "Their teeth cost around £20 ($47, U.S.). I did the job properly, taking an impression in the same way as with human teeth, making a set to fit, then glueing them in."

      • 2 votes
      Reply#11 - Sat Mar 24, 2012 6:55 PM EDT
      Comment author avatarNitin Chopravia Facebook

      Dear Sir,

      Our Company M/S Glass Agencies based in Ambala Cantt, INDIA are Manufacturer & Exporter of all type of Laboratory Glassware, Scientific, Surgical, Medical, Hospital, Laboratory Plasticware, Laboratory Woodenware, Laboratory Silicaware, Laboratory Rubberware, Laboratory Porcelainware, Laboratory Quartzware, Orthopedic, Laboratory, Pharmacy, Dairy, Milk Testing, Surveying, Educational, Biology Lab, Physics Lab, Chemistry Lab Instruments & Equipments under EROSE brand including Microscope, Laboratory Chemical, Educational Charts, Models & Slides

      Kindly send us your specific requirements / inquiries, So that we can quote to you our best prices.

      Thanks & regards

      NITIN CHOPRA +91 9896807858
      ----------------------------

      M/S Glass Agencies,
      (An ISO 9001:2008 , 13485:2003 and D&B Certified Company)
      5309, Anaj Mandi,
      Ambala Cantt-133001 (India)
      Ph : 0091-171-2633027 (Office),
      Ph : 0091-171-3293186 (Res),
      Fax : 0091-171-2640566
      Cel : 0091-9416024836 & 9896807858
      E-Mails : glass@sancharnet.in
      glassagencies@gmail.com
      Web Site : www.glassagencies.com
      www.scientific-instrument.com
      www.glassagenciesindia.com
      www.glassagenciesambala.com
      www.labglasswareindia.com
      www.laboratorytestinginstruments.com
      www.scientificmedicalinstruments.com
      www.medicalinstrumentsindia.com
      www.microscopesmanufacturers.com
      www.pharmacyinstrument.com
      www.scientificinstrumentsmanufacturer.com
      www.educationallaboratoryinstruments.com
      www.hospitallaboratoryinstruments.com
      www.laboratoryglasswaremanufacturers.com
      www.chemistrylabinstruments.com
      www.physicslabinstrument.com
      www.scienctificeducationalinstrument.com
      www.pharmaceuticalinstrument.com
      Skype : glassagencies
      Yahoo : glassagencies
      Gtalk : glassagencies
      ------------------------------

        Reply#12 - Sun Apr 8, 2012 3:17 AM EDT

        Good for you, Allen. It's good to see big money going to something other than new ways of war for people to kill people. This should be extremely interesting.

          Reply#13 - Mon Apr 9, 2012 3:52 PM EDT
          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.