SpaceX teams up with Bigelow on space station marketing

Bigelow Aerospace

Bigelow Aerospace's Genesis 2 inflatable space module rushes into an orbital sunrise.




SpaceX and Bigelow Aerospace plan to meet with officials in Japan soon after this month's scheduled launch of SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket and Dragon capsule, to kick off an international marketing effort for private-sector space stations.

The plan, laid out today in a jointly issued news release, calls for clients to go into orbit inside the Dragon and link up with Bigelow's BA 330 inflatable space habitat.


"Together we will provide unique opportunities to entities — whether nations or corporations — wishing to have crewed access to the space environment for extended periods," said SpaceX's president, Gwynne Shotwell. "I'm looking forward to working with Bigelow Aerospace and engaging with international customers."

Robert Bigelow, the billionaire founder and president of Nevada-based Bigelow Aerospace, said he was eager to join up with California-based SpaceX and tell international clients about "the substantial benefits that BA 330 leasing can offer in combination with SpaceX transportation capabilities."

SpaceX is planning to launch an unmanned Dragon cargo capsule into orbit as early as May 19 for a potential test linkup with the International Space Station, and is already working with NASA to modify the Dragon for carrying astronauts as well. Just this week, NASA announced that SpaceX reached a milestone in that development effort by showing that seven astronauts could maneuver effectively inside the Dragon space taxi, even under emergency scenarios.

SpaceX

Astronauts and experts check out the crew accommodations in SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft. On top, from left, are NASA Crew Survival Engineering Team Lead Dustin Gohmert, NASA astronauts Tony Antonelli and Lee Archambault, and SpaceX Mission Operations Engineer Laura Crabtree. On bottom, from left, are SpaceX Thermal Engineer Brenda Hernandez and NASA astronauts Rex Walheim and Tim Kopra.

Bigelow's BA 330 space module would be designed to provide 330 cubic meters of usable volume, which is about the size of a two-bedroom apartment. The BA 330 could accommodate up to six astronauts, depending on how cozy they plan to get. Two or more BA 330 modules could be connected together in orbit for lease by national space agencies, companies or universities, according to Bigelow Aerospace.

Bigelow made his fortune in the hotel industry, which led some to suppose that he was getting into the space-hotel business — but the first users are likely to be researchers or governments aiming to pursue their own space programs on a leased orbital platform. The company has launched two prototype inflatable modules on Russian rockets — Genesis 1 in 2006 and Genesis 2 in 2007 — and both of those unmanned spacecraft are still in orbit.

Mike Gold, who serves as Bigelow Aerospace's director of Washington operations and business growth, told me that the company was ready to move forward with the BA 330 as well as the Bigelow Expandable Activity Module, or BEAM, an upscale version of the Genesis module that could be attached to the International Space Station. Future progress on both those projects is dependent on decisions made by NASA, however. NASA has not yet made a commitment to using the BEAM, and it has not yet announced how it will proceed with the next phase of its effort to support the development of commercial space taxis such as SpaceX's Dragon.

"We'll be ready to proceed when commercial crew is," Gold told me.

SpaceX

An artist's conception shows a SpaceX Dragon spacecraft docked to a Bigelow Aerospace module.

In addition to its marketing arrangement with SpaceX, Bigelow has partnered with the Boeing Co. on a project to create a space taxi called the CST-100 to ferry NASA astronauts. That scenario could see a successor to the CST-100 launched toward a Bigelow-built space station atop United Launch Alliance's Atlas 5 rocket.

Gold said the commercial crew vehicle development program was the "long pole in the tent" for Bigelow Aerospace's plans. Even if Bigelow Aerospace built its BA 330, it would have to rely upon an affordable, reliable, safe system for orbital transport — and that system probably would have to be developed and tested with NASA's help.

Four companies, including Boeing and SpaceX as well as Blue Origin and Sierra Nevada Corp., have been receiving hundreds of millions of dollars in funding from NASA, but it's not yet clear how much money Congress will approve for the next phase of the program. If the funding matches NASA's projected levels, space agency officials have said commercial space taxis could be flying astronauts by 2017. "We hope it could be even earlier," Gold said.

However, it's highly questionable whether NASA will get as much money for commercial crew development as it has requested. The request for fiscal year 2013 was almost $830 million, but a Senate subcommittee cut that figure to $525 million. Today the House passed a bill specifying an even lower funding level, $500 million. The White House has threatened a presidential veto of that bill, in part because of its concerns about the cutback in commercial crew support.

More about SpaceX and Bigelow:


Alan Boyle is msnbc.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter and adding the Cosmic Log page to your Google+ presence. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.

Discuss this post

A perfect chance to experiment with sex in space since NASA won't touch that issue knowing fully that sex in space is as inevitable as death and taxes. Whole experiments should be designed complete with video observation since the attending parties would be completely unable to do their own observing during such activities. And I am talking about all sexual behaviours done here on earth even though I surmise the end results would be more like..well, we can do this but we can't do that !

  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Thu May 10, 2012 8:40 PM EDT

It didn't take long for American companies to jump to the forefront of space travel after the Shuttles were retired. I with these companies the best. Many things in the USA are still at the Top of the Class! Many Americans are still caring, innovative and intelligent.

  • 2 votes
#1.1 - Fri May 11, 2012 5:47 AM EDT
Reply

Cool Alan ....

It's nice to see that space exploration and space work is still rocketing forward ....

I saw the photo in one of the links here ....

James Oberg /MSNBC.com

Erik Haakonstad and Alan Boyle size

up a Genesis-scale test module ....

And I thought you were an article poster writer and space meeting participant ....

How involved you really are ....

I really hope you are enjoying your work ....

Thanks again ....

Always fun ....

  • 3 votes
Reply#2 - Thu May 10, 2012 11:09 PM EDT

Yeah, I'm jealous, would be pretty cool to tour Bigelow's facilities, especially now that they have models of the Sundancer and BA-330 that you can peek into!

  • 3 votes
#2.1 - Fri May 11, 2012 10:25 AM EDT
Reply

I talked to some astronauts that had sex in space. I asked them how it was, they looked at me, smiled and said, "why it was out of this world"!!

  • 3 votes
Reply#3 - Fri May 11, 2012 12:14 AM EDT

Liar.

    #3.1 - Fri May 11, 2012 8:27 AM EDT

    Indeed. Even if any had actually done it, they'd never admit it...at least not until long after retirement.

      #3.2 - Fri May 11, 2012 11:45 AM EDT
      Reply
      wavettoreDeleted

      @ Wave

      What does your cut and paste have to do with this article???

      • 4 votes
      Reply#5 - Fri May 11, 2012 7:50 AM EDT

      Wow Wave, nice "rant". I little off topic but..nice... are you selling the good stuff online?

        Reply#6 - Fri May 11, 2012 9:29 AM EDT

        Time to build a space station with artifical gravity!

        • 1 vote
        Reply#7 - Fri May 11, 2012 11:37 AM EDT

        What's the point in going to a zero-gravity environment where they've artifically induced gravity?

        Why not just go to Hawaii?

          #7.1 - Fri May 11, 2012 11:43 AM EDT

          Oh, I don't know...maybe it's because the human body still has issues with extended zero-gravity? You still have an astounding view, you still have unlimited hard vacuum, if you need only that for some industrial or research purpose, right? And you can still have all the weightlessness you want in the hub.

          You can go to Hawaii for the snorkeling/diving, but you aren't going to spend every second of your vacation in the water, right?

            #7.2 - Fri May 11, 2012 11:50 AM EDT
            Reply

            Congressional leaders and the White House need to work together on this CCDev funding problem. It is absolutely unacceptable to continually cut the proposed budgets in half and then (Congress) sit back and complain that the commercial space craft aren't coming along fast enough.

            But, then again, when was the last time politicians actually worked together towards something that actually benefits the public.

            • 3 votes
            Reply#8 - Fri May 11, 2012 12:08 PM EDT

            Somehow we need to present CCDEV in such a way that it seems like it's directly helping the senators and representatives... then it'd get approved in a heartbeat, with double the budget!!

            • 1 vote
            #8.1 - Fri May 11, 2012 2:01 PM EDT

            Indeed. It seems like the space state reps and senators are behind this, but I've heard (or read) those same folks trash talking the slow schedule of this stuff. It boggles my mind.

              #8.2 - Fri May 11, 2012 2:24 PM EDT

              The traditional space state congress people control NASA. The new commercial space companies like SpaceX and Bigelow are a direct threat to the establishment. Traditional NASA has directed billions into these states and created a lot of jobs.

              Of course projects like Constellation haven't produced any thing that can actually fly but still create jobs which keeps voters happy and will get you reelected. When you look at the NASA investment in a company like SpaceX and the ROI for the average tax payer in the US it is the only choice we should be making. But when the "Space State" congress people are trying to get massive pork directed to their states it doesn't make sense.

              This is exactly why Congress people complain about spending but it is only spending in other states not their state. No congress person can get reelected if they refused massive spending programs that would directly benefit their state.

                #8.3 - Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:29 PM EDT
                Reply

                It's great to see Bigelow and SpaceX working together. If they get substantial interest from overseas customers — as I well imagine they might — then it's entirely possible they could be launching people to Bigelow stations quite a bit before NASA gets around to certifying and using Dragon for ISS. And this would be a very good thing... we need a robust human space industry that's not dependent on NASA's pace and funding.

                  Reply#9 - Fri May 11, 2012 3:28 PM EDT

                  I don't think SpaceX can man-rate Dragon without NASA. So, NASA would surely be the first customer in line to use the craft, even if foreign entities were also chomping at the bit.

                    #9.1 - Fri May 11, 2012 4:03 PM EDT

                    "I don't think SpaceX can man-rate Dragon without NASA."

                    Why? They've stated more than once that they can meet NASA's own (often-bent) published human-rating standards. Nothing magical there. And as for non-NASA flights, it's the FAA/DOT that they have to satisfy. NASA is a research and development agency, not a regulatory one. Nor should it be.

                    BTW, the Russians don't meet all NASA standards either...but we and they know that they're the only game in town for now.

                    Even the notion that NASA personnel would be the first non-SpaceX people to fly aboard a Dragon, though likely, is not a certainty...

                      #9.2 - Sun May 13, 2012 10:27 PM EDT
                      Reply

                      Glad to see the progress of Space-X, everyone should check out Sol-X too

                        Reply#10 - Fri May 11, 2012 6:49 PM EDT
                        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.