The Dragon space capsule returned to Earth from the International Space Station, capping off its historic mission with a splashdown in the Pacific Ocean. NBC's Mark Barger reports.
SpaceX's Dragon cargo capsule parachuted to a picture-perfect splashdown in the Pacific Ocean today, ending the first-ever commercial mission to the International Space Station.
The gumdrop-shaped Dragon made history last week as the first U.S. craft to reach the orbital station since last year's retirement of the space shuttle fleet, and it made history today as the first commercial craft to return a shipment from orbit.
SpaceX's 40-year-old billionaire founder, Elon Musk, told reporters that the nine-day space station resupply mission was "like a grand slam" in baseball, and repeatedly voiced joy and surprise at how well it went. "There are a thousand ways that it could fail, so this may sound sort of odd, but when you see it actually work, you're sort of surprised," he said.
The 14.4-foot-high (4.4-meter-high) capsule came down about 560 miles west of Baja California, within a mile of its target point, Musk said. When he saw the first pictures of the craft bobbing in the Pacific, he said his reaction was, "Welcome home, baby. ... It's like seeing your kid come home."

Michael Altenhofen / SpaceX via AP
A photo from SpaceX shows the Dragon spacecraft floating on the surface of the Pacific Ocean about 500 miles west of Mexico's Baja California today.
The demonstration flight will almost certainly earn a go-ahead for SpaceX to start space station resupply missions in earnest under the terms of a $1.6 billion contract with NASA. Alan Lindenmoyer, manager of NASA's commercial crew and cargo program, said a few more items needed to be marked off on the list of criteria, but he voiced nearly as much satisfaction about the results as Musk did.
"It is very easy to see that this satisfies, I believe, 100 percent of those criteria," he said.
The demonstration flight began on May 22 with the Dragon's launch from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida, atop a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket. The mission reached its climax last Friday when astronauts used the space station's robotic arm to pull the Dragon in to its docking port on the the station's Harmony module. On the following day, when station crew members entered the Dragon for the first time, NASA astronaut Don Pettit gushed over its new-car smell.
Over the days that followed, the station's crew unloaded a half-ton of food, equipment, experiments and other supplies — then loaded it back up with more than 1,300 pounds (620 kilograms) of non-essential Earth-bound shipments.
What happened today
Today, astronauts reversed the process they went through last week. The robotic arm pulled the Dragon out from its port and positioned it for release at 5:49 a.m. ET. SpaceX's craft then executed a series of engine burns to take itself out of the station's neighborhood and descend from orbit.
The final engine burn slowed the Dragon's orbital velocity by 100 meters per second (224 mph) — enough to drop it into a fiery descent through the atmosphere. The craft's bottom is coated with a layer of protective material called PICA-X, which SpaceX's engineers say is resilient enough to weather a return to Earth from Mars. At its peak, the heat shield had to endure temperatures in excess of 3,000 degrees Fahrenheit (1,650 degrees Celsius).
The suspense built during a few minutes of scheduled communication blackout, but eased when infrared imagery from airplanes circling the projected splashdown site showed the Dragon's parachutes opening. For some observers, the sight of the red-and-white main parachutes sprouting from the capsule sparked a flashback to the days of the Apollo moonshots.

Michael Altenhofen / SpaceX
A photo taken from a recovery ship shows the SpaceX Dragon's parachutes floating in the air after the cargo craft's splashdown.
At 11:42 a.m. ET, SpaceX's controllers confirmed that the craft made a successful splashdown. NASA mission commentator Josh Byerly observed that the Dragon mission "ended like it began — which is, fairly easily."
A pre-positioned flotilla of recovery ships loaded up the Dragon and will bring it back to Los Angeles, near SpaceX's headquarters in Hawthorne, Calif. Some high-value experimental payloads will be express-delivered to NASA within 48 hours; however, the bulk of Dragon's cargo will be taken off after it's transported to SpaceX's rocket test facility in MacGregor, Texas. This particular Dragon won't be reused for another NASA flight, but eventually SpaceX plans to refurbish the capsules as well as rocket stages.
Over the past few years, NASA has paid out about $300 million to help SpaceX develop the Dragon and the Falcon 9 rocket. SpaceX has invested a similar amount of its own capital. This test mission should clear the way for SpaceX to start in on the $1.6 billion station resupply contract, which covers 12 flights through 2015. Musk said he expected the first full-fledged Dragon cargo run to lift off late this summer.
Another company, Virginia-based Orbital Sciences Corp., is working on an alternate commercial delivery system, but that system hasn't yet gone through flight testing.
Grand plans for NASA and SpaceX
Such deliveries are part of NASA's grand plan in the post-shuttle era to transfer space station resupply operations to commercial companies, at what is expected to be a cost far less expensive than space shuttle operations. Theoretically, that would free up money for NASA to concentrate on developing a more powerful heavy-lift rocket and a more capable Orion spacecraft for missions beyond Earth orbit — heading toward asteroids, the moon and eventually Mars.
SpaceX and three other companies — Blue Origin, the Boeing Co. and Sierra Nevada Corp. — are working on spacecraft capable of transporting astronauts to and from the station, and NASA expects those ships to be available for its use by 2017. SpaceX's crew-carrying craft will be an upgraded version of the Dragon that was used for the current cargo mission.

Musk said Dragon 2.0 would have a thruster system capable of making near-pinpoint, helicopter-style landings. That system is due for testing later this year, and could be ready for NASA in three to five years. Such a system would be a must-have for landings on other worlds, Musk noted.
Musk, a dot-com billionaire who made his fortune with PayPal, founded SpaceX in 2002 as part of his own grand plan to help humans get to Mars and become a "multiplanet species."
Today he noted that the company, known more formally as Space Exploration Technologies Corp., is under contract for about 40 launches, including the 12 planned Dragon cargo missions for NASA as well as additional commercial launches. Just this week, SpaceX announced a deal with Intelsat to put a telecom satellite into geosynchronous transfer orbit using the Falcon Heavy rocket, which is still under development. SpaceX also hopes to win some launch contracts for the Falcon Heavy from the U.S. military.
Some veteran observers of the space effort, including Apollo moonwalkers Neil Armstrong and Gene Cernan, have been critical of NASA's move toward commercialization. Cernan, for example, complained to Congress that commercial space companies "don't know what they don't know." But Musk said the Dragon mission demonstrated that "commercial spaceflight can be successful." He voiced hope that SpaceX's efforts would inspire a new generation of engineers and explorers.
"We're really at the dawn of a new age of space exploration, where there's going to be a huge amount of opportunity and a lot of exciting things happening," Musk said.
NASA Administrator Charles Bolden expressed similar sentiment in a post-splashdown statement: "This successful splashdown and the many other achievements of this mission herald a new era in U.S. commercial spaceflight. American innovation and inspiration have once again shown their great strength in the design and operation of a new generation of vehicles to carry cargo to our laboratory in space. Now more than ever we're counting on the inventiveness of American companies and American workers to make the International Space Station and other low-Earth-orbit destinations accessible to any and all who have dreams of space travel."
More about the mission:
- Scenes from a SpaceX spectacular
- Space milestone sparks high praise
- Next steps in a new space race
- Cosmic Log archive on SpaceX
This item was last updated at 4 p.m. ET.
Alan Boyle is msnbc.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter or adding Cosmic Log's Google+ page to your circle. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for other worlds.


I think the US government made a mistake shutting down the shuttle program with no replacement. There will come a time when the US government will need to get into space, and the only choices will be private enterprise or the Russians. Not, in my opinion, a good set of options.
I'd rather fly in a private rocket than a government-designed one any day.
I mean, you HAVE heard of the Challenger accident, right?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Challenger_disaster
Remember, this is only the beginning.
I expect within a few years the Dragonrider version (which can carry up to seven astronauts) will be operational, and that could mean the ISS could have its life extended by ten years or more. And with the Falcon Heavy rocket, it means Bigelow Aerospace's own orbiting modules can be launched from Cape Canaveral, meaning we could have additional space stations in low Earth orbit by 2020, eventually stations much larger than the the current ISS that could house as much as 20-25 astronauts at a time.
And then, if we pay the 100 credit upgrade fee, we get a shipyard. As soon as we reach tech level 3, we'll have battlecruisers!
This is perplexing to me...
We want to take the space program FROM the government to SAVE tax payers money...BUT....
They want government TO take over the health care system??
Seems like a contradiction in terms to me.
Interesting lestweforget-3299938 ....
Obamacare would cost tax payers $1.7 trillion and many say it could cost double that amount ....
I would rather have a strong NASA program ....
At least it would cost us much less ....
Hey Ben....
Good point.
Most here do not realize that NASAs cost including the shuttles only cost us 1% of the TOTAL fiscal yearly budget.
Most here too, don't realize that this was an UNMANNED capsule. The costs WILL BE SIGNIFICANT when they have the capability to do so.
By "they" do you mean the 30-odd percent of Americans that supposedly think the Patient Protection etc. act is a good idea?
I mean, I see no reason at all to think that those are the same people. And besides, people's priorities are all over the place. I can see someone wanting Obamacare to increase health coverage, but wanting to cut spending on other things to help keep the deficit under control (like that'll happen).
The Space Program is to Health Care as apples are to oranges.
Both can be had and enjoyed without detriment to the other.
The Shuttle program cost was over $200 billion... over 135 flights, that's over $1.5 billion/flight...
So, a SINGLE shuttle flight cost what the entire 13 SpaceX CRS supply flights cost...
Why the massive difference?
Private enterprise innovation, efficiency, spirit...
vs
Federal Govt pork, waste, sloth, overhead
Not totally true. The cost of the shuttle also includes the cost to develop the necessary technology. SpaceX got a headstart in that they could use older technology and ignore those costs.
Which is an example of private-sector efficiency (which is your point) in its own way, but let's not paint the NASA program as a complete failure, here. SpaceX probably couldn't have managed without it.
New technology vs old technology for one. Shuttle maintenance technology never advanced to the point of seriously reducing the time and cost of preparing a vehicle for launch in a short time window. Capsule technology is much more basic, withe much fewer "moving parts", allowing reuse quicker and cheaper.
Also, too many hands were involved in designing the Shuttle (including the military), making a final design and system that was unwieldy from the start. I still love the Shuttle, but it was time to retire.
Reminds me of a quote, "The camel looks like a horse designed by a committee."
The SpaceX mission is historic... because it ends the 50 year monopoly of big govt NASA over US space...
With the Nasa monopoly… after 50 years, fewer than 500 Americans have been in space.. costing taxpayers over $1 billion each... and no American has left low earth orbit in over 40 years.. despite $500 billion spent on manned space flight.. and now Nasa can't even launch an American into space..
The US space program is too important to be further entrusted to our pork driven, wasteful, incompetent Federal Govt...
We need to fund private enterprise innovation, efficiency, spirit.. have a rational US space program which works for Americans
Not double down on more lost decades of Fed Govt waste, pork, incompetence, greed….
The private sector proves once again that things can be done without the expense of the federal government and its interference. Turn the war in Afghanistan over to a private company -- say Blackwater (or whatever it is called now) and this war will be over in six weeks. Note what they did for a couple of banana republics in Africa a few years ago -- but those conflicts flared back up when the local governments refused to pay up.
Ya - its a good step, lets hope they don't "outsource" it to China"
Considering China's level of space technology, and the fact they are not invited to participate in ISS activities right now, makes it a pretty dam safe bet SpaceX, and any other COTS or CCDev team, will NOT be outsourcing to China. Having an 8-year old make an IPhone is one thing, making a spacecraft is quite another. Lost cargo and dead astronauts make lousy PR.