Ups and downs for Higgs boson buzz

CERN / CMS Collaboration

A computer graphic shows a typical Higgs boson candidate event, including two high-energy photons whose energy (depicted by red towers) is measured in the Compact Muon Solenoid's electromagnetic calorimeter. The yellow lines are the measured tracks of other particles produced in the collision. The pale blue volume represents the CMS' crystal calorimeter barrel.


A week ago, sources started passing the word that physicists were "fired up" about further evidence for the existence of the Higgs boson, the last undiscovered particle predicted by the Standard Model and the main quarry for the $10 billion Large Hadron Collider.

That blaze of buzz reached a high point this week, when Columbia mathematician Peter Woit reported "reliable rumors" that the confidence level for a detection of the Higgs' signature in the mass range of around 125 billion electron-volts, or 125 GeV, was increasing.

"CERN will soon have to decide how to spin this: will they announce discovery of the Higgs, or will they wait for some overwhelmingly convincing standard to be met, such as 5 sigma in at least one channel of one experiment?" Woit wrote.


"Sigma" refers to the statistical confidence that a given result is more than a fluke, with 5 sigma serving as the gold standard for a discovery. If you're a Higgs-watcher, you'll be hearing a lot about sigma in the next couple of weeks, leading up to the International Conference on High-Energy Physics, or ICHEP, in Australia from July 4 to 11. That's when the LHC's teams are due to provide a status report on the search for the Higgs. 

The Higgs hunt is hot because physicists have hypothesized about the boson for 40 years as part of the mechanism by which some particles acquire mass while others don't. The Higgs is so fundamental to the frontier of physics that Fermilab's Leon Lederman once called it the "God Particle" — a term that most other physicists positively hate. Finding it in the mass range where it's expected to be would serve as solid confirmation for the Standard Model, one of the most successful theories in the history of science. Not finding it would be more interesting: Physicists would have to consider some other mechanism, outside the Standard Model, to explain particle mass. And there's nothing theorists love more than a challenge like that.

In December, the teams behind the ATLAS and CMS detectors reported "tantalizing hints" of a Higgs detection at 125 GeV, with confidence levels of 3.6 sigma for ATLAS and 2.6 sigma for CMS. If the additional observations made since then show the same sorts of hints, those sigma levels should go up — and that's been the gist of the buzz over the last week or so. For science geeks, that's a big deal, or at least a big meme: so big that the hashtag #HiggsRumors was for a time on top of Twitter's trending list, Discovery News' Jennifer Ouelette noted.

A lot of that trending took place because of the in-jokes spawned by the original buzz — which has now fallen to a steady hum, thanks to a string of reality checks.

"Please do not believe the blogs," ATLAS spokeswoman Fabiola Gianotti told The New York Times. "I am very surprised that rumors appear on a subject that is really evolving daily," CMS spokesman Guido Tonelli told Science News. "The experimenters can't possibly have their data in presentable form yet, so the rumors can't be correct in every detail," Rutgers theoretical physicist Matt Strassler observed on his blog.

Union College physicist Chad Orzel, the author of "How to Teach Relativity to Your Dog," said the celebrity-level hype was "the price of success":

"I mean, it’s not an accident that there’s a lot of excitement about the maybe-sorta-kinda discovery of the Higgs. This is the product of years of relentless hype from the particle physics community. They've been talking about this goddamn particle for longer than I've been running this blog, and it's finally percolated out into the general public consciousness enough that buzz about it can trend on Twitter. Complaining that your persistent effort to get people to care about particle physics esoterica has led to people being excited about particle physics esoterica seems more than a little churlish.

"So, lighten up. Revel in the success of your hype machine. God knows, if there were a Twitter trending topic about Bose-Einstein Condensation or anything else in atomic physics, I’d do the Happy Dance all the way down the hall. You’ve worked hard to make your elusive particle a celebrity, now reap the rewards."

The true reaping will come in a couple of weeks. As Reuters' Robert Evans reported, the most recent readings from ATLAS and CMS are being analyzed in isolation, so that one team's conclusions don't influence the other team. Until the ICHEP actually takes place, hype is just about all we'll hear about. But in the meantime, get ready for the real news by reviewing these resources:

Update for 1 p.m. ET June 22: Europe's CERN particle-physics center just announced that the big update on the Higgs search will come on July 4, during a seminar at 3 a.m. ET that's tied to the start of the ICHEP conference. 

"We now have more than double the data we had last year," CERN's director for research and computing, Sergio Bertolucci, was quoted as saying. "That should be enough to see whether the trends we were seeing in the 2011 data are still there, or whether they’ve gone away. It’s a very exciting time."

CERN said that if a new particle is discovered, the ATLAS and CMS teams will need more time to ascertain whether it's the Higgs.

"It's a bit like spotting a familiar face from afar," CERN Director General Rolf Heuer explained. "Sometimes you need closer inspection to find out whether it’s really your best friend, or actually your best friend's twin."

CERN said physicists at the conference in Melbourne will be able to join the seminar via a live two-way link. The seminar will be followed by a news conference at CERN. There'll be a webcast available via http://webcast.cern.ch. Stay tuned...


Alan Boyle is msnbc.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter and adding the Cosmic Log page to your Google+ presence. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.

Discuss this post

Quite sensible. However, Higgs cannot be found. Gravitation was there even at the beginning of 'big bang' -- space was constantly getting distorted, even if it was and is filled out with radiation (which it even now is).

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Thu Jun 21, 2012 9:19 PM EDT

Alan, nice article my friend.

I am one of those guys that has been fallowing this research on the Higgs Boson forever, my hopes and dreams is we will find the Higgs, it is just a mater of time.

Have a good day, Tom And Lyn.

  • 1 vote
#1.1 - Sun Jun 24, 2012 10:38 PM EDT
Reply

N.B.

Woit has proven himself to be quite a rumor monger. Possibly he as a failed string theorist want to throw much around in an artful manner -- spreading rumors to eventually discredit groups working successfully with some purpose.

    Reply#2 - Thu Jun 21, 2012 9:37 PM EDT

    They're so eager to tie themselves to this new hopefully possible discovery , that I'm afraid that any teeny weeny blip in data will be falsely labeled as this mysteriously elusive particle ....

    They need to be careful what they announce ....

    Thanks Alan Boyle ....

    • 1 vote
    Reply#3 - Thu Jun 21, 2012 9:52 PM EDT

    Watch out for unicorns!

      Reply#4 - Thu Jun 21, 2012 10:23 PM EDT

      And Dragon's ....

        #4.1 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:00 AM EDT
        Reply

        What is this BS about Twitter?, as if Twitter itself, was the God particle.

          Reply#5 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:07 AM EDT

          These people have so much Data, that it should take them years to figure it all out. After that, more theories and guesses. They don't want to theorise themselves out of a job.

            Reply#6 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:13 AM EDT

            "A week ago, sources started passing the word that physicists were "fired up" about further evidence for the existence of the Higgs boson..."

            An Excited Nerd is truly a Happy Nerd.

              Reply#7 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 9:29 AM EDT

              "Not finding it would be more interesting: Physicists would have to consider some other mechanism......"

              Well... does "Not" finding it really "prove" that it doesn't exist? I would think that the inability to reach 5 sigma would mean it's merely inconclusive, which is probably what they don't want. How do you "prove" something doesn't exist when you have inconclusive data that it might exist? On the other hand, reaching 5 sigma would allow them to claim a discovery and close the books on it.

                Reply#8 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 10:05 AM EDT

                Whoa, wait a minute. I'm talking more long-term. I think the likeliest scenario is that confidence is increased thanks to fresh data, but not yet to the 5-sigma level. If the confidence level decreases, which appears unlikely at this point, then the experiments will continue, of course. (They'll continue either way, actually.) And eventually, if the Higgs bump turns out to be a fluke, that just means physicists will have to consider a number of different options, such as a non-Standard Model Higgs, or multiple Higgs particles, or some non-Higgs explanation for particle mass. Matt Strasser says it'll take 10 years to completely rule out the Higgs mechanism.

                If the 125 GeV Higgs is confirmed, that won't close the books at all. Physicists will still be looking for ways to tie that Higgs field in with other open topics, such as supersymmetry, etc. Here are a couple of links to examinations of these topics which are much deeper and more satisfying than mine:

                http://profmattstrassler.com/2012/06/21/the-new-york-times-gets-it-wrong/

                http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2012/06/20/beyond-higgs-on-supersymmetry-or-lack-thereof/

                • 2 votes
                #8.1 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:57 PM EDT
                Reply

                I am somewhat skeptical that the Higgs boson will be found exactly as it is presently understood. Five sigma is a tall standard and I think it is more likely that physicists will find a four-and-a-half-sigma Higgs with enough anomalies to suggest that there is another deeper level of mechanics, of which the Standard Model is a manifestation or a special case, just as Newtonian mechanics is a special case of relativity and quantum mechanics.

                • 1 vote
                Reply#9 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:53 AM EDT

                Just another turn in the endless rabbit hole. If anyone thinks there is an end all to this, they are sadly mistaken, something is always made from something else, can't have something from nothing. I remember when quarks were "the smallest possible particle" oh how that was wrong. What if the Higgs boson exists in a different "dimension" that is totally outside our scope of observation and what we see is reactions of those objects on our observable space/time?

                  Reply#10 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:51 PM EDT

                  You've discovered a particle that's more basic than a Quark? Please share your discovery!

                  As it stands, String Theory contends that Quarks are made up of small strings or loops of energy that vibrate in 10 or 11 dimensions. But that idea is far from proven.

                  • 2 votes
                  #10.1 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:10 PM EDT

                  My standard model of lingo-istics predicts that 'rabbit hole' will have a relatively short half-life as a catch-word, and become inert and almost undetectable within a few years.

                    #10.2 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 2:33 PM EDT
                    Reply

                    It is still just a theory. Whether or not it is accepted, it still just a theory. When something sparks to life and runs out on its own 2 or 4 feet, I might believe the Higgs boson exist...until then....well....

                      Reply#11 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:13 PM EDT

                      Any treasure that costs $6.4 billion is bound to percolate into the general public consciousness. At that price, I want more than a god particle; I want GOD!

                        Reply#12 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:16 PM EDT

                        Please... God's toilet cost more than that

                          #12.1 - Fri Jun 22, 2012 4:00 PM EDT
                          Reply

                          Geometry, friends, geometry is the unifier, just the one equation generates all of the geometry. Geometry is all it takes. It takes one vector, rotating in a plane, multiplied by a connected second vector, which has its plane of rotation, perpendicular to the first, forming a dynamic third vector, connected to the first two vectors, which has its own plane of rotation, perpendicular to the previous other two planes of rotation.Then there is a fouth vector..., but that is as far as I have been able to determine. The four degrees of rotation, each perpendicular to the others, a rotational metric, through a rotating tetrahedronal structure, yields to a linear nature.

                            Reply#13 - Sat Jun 23, 2012 7:46 AM EDT

                            Even a bump in the resonance @ ~126 Mev/c squared @ ~ 5 sigma...the Golden Standard....does not necessarily mean a "Higgs". It can be the interaction of two Z bosons. Note, the masses add to just ~ 125.997 Gev. SEE:bautforum post:

                              Reply#14 - Mon Jun 25, 2012 11:43 AM EDT

                              Evidently I can not paste the post from ~ Dec 7.

                                #14.1 - Mon Jun 25, 2012 11:45 AM EDT
                                Reply

                                post:

                                  Reply#15 - Mon Jun 25, 2012 11:44 AM EDT

                                  Check out the bautforum posts sequential to Astromark's comments on Dec 10. Prediction of a mass of ~ 125.997 Mev for a W combined with half Z. No Higgs needed. "pete"

                                    Reply#16 - Mon Jun 25, 2012 12:04 PM EDT

                                      #16.1 - Mon Jun 25, 2012 12:05 PM EDT
                                      Reply
                                      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.