
M. Showalter / SETI Institute / NASA / ESA
This photo from the Hubble Space Telescope shows Pluto and its five known moons, including a newly discovered satellite indicated as P5. Its provisional name is S/2012 (134340) 1.
Astronomers using the Hubble Space Telescope have discovered Pluto's fifth moon, a little more than three years before a NASA space probe is due to sail past the dwarf planet and its tribe of satellites.
The irregular moon, estimated to be 6 to 15 miles (10 to 25 kilometers) across, was found in the course of checking out the potential collision hazards facing NASA's New Horizons spacecraft for the Bastille Day flyby on July 14, 2015. "The inventory of the Pluto system we're taking now with Hubble will help the New Horizons team design a safer trajectory for the spacecraft," the mission's principal investigator, Alan Stern of the Southwest Research Institute, said in a Hubble news release.
Stern and his colleagues suspect this fifth moon won't be the stuff they find in Pluto's neighborhood. "The discovery of so many small moons indirectly tells us that there must be lots of small particles lurking unseen in the Pluto system," said Harold Weaver of the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.
Call it P5 ... for now
The fifth moon is currently known only by its provisional names: S/2012 (134340) 1, or P5 for short. It'll be up to the discoverers to propose a more lyrical name to the International Astronomical Union, which classified Pluto as a dwarf planet in 2006.
P5 was detected in 14 separate sets of images taken by Hubble's Wide Field Camera 3 on June 26, 27 and 29 plus July 7 and 9. The Hubble team says it's in a 58,000-mile-diameter circular orbit around Pluto that steers clear of the dwarf planet's four other satellites — including the biggest moon, Charon. Two other moons, Nix and Hydra, were discovered in 2006, and the fourth moon (P4) was found in Hubble data last year.
"The moons form a series of neatly nested orbits, a bit like Russian dolls," team leader Mark Showalter of the SETI Institute said in today's news release. He told me that small moons have now been found in the Pluto-Charon system at close to a 1-to-3 orbital resonance with Charon (P5), a 1-to-4 resonance (Nix), 1-to-5 (P4) and 1-to-6 (Hydra). This suggests that the moons were formed from debris blasted away by the collision that led to the coalescence of Pluto and Charon as we know them today.
"This is a very tidy system, and what that means is, it's an orbitally evolved system," Showalter said. "Literally there are shells where the orbits are stable."
Pluto's moons are traditionally named after Greek mythological characters associated with the underworld. Nix, for example, is an alternate spelling for Nyx, the name of the Greek goddess of the night and the mother of the Fates. (The more typical spelling, Nyx, was used previously in the name of an asteroid.) Hydra is the serpentine monster that guarded the gates of the underworld. "It's a very colorful cast of characters," Showalter told me.
For P4 and P5, the team members are holding off on proposing names for now, just in case a P6 comes along. "It's still a moving target, because we don't know what might come along," Showalter said. "I expect that in a month or two, we'll have finished everything we're going to find until New Horizons gets close." Only then will the team seriously consider what the two (or more) moons will be named. If things stay as they are, P4 and P5 will probably be named after a pair of characters with Greek underworld connections, such as Orpheus and Eurydice. (The name Orpheus is already taken, but they could go with a variant, such as Orfeo.)
As of today, Showalter says there are no other Plutonian moon candidates in sight. "Of all the things that we have looked at, that we thought might be moons, none of them has ever been convincing until this came along," he said of P5. "There is no P6 in our back pocket at this time."
The detection ... and the debate
Finding P5 was hard enough. Showalter told me that he first spotted the moon in the data on Saturday, the 7th. He and his colleagues then went back and found signs of the moon in the data gathered earlier, as well as the follow-up imagery captured on Monday. The object is just 0.001 percent as bright as Pluto, and 4 percent as bright as Nix, Showalter said. "We're really at the edge of what we can accomplish with Hubble," he said. "I don't know of any instrument that's going to be better than that."
In an IAU circular issued today, the team reports that P5's brightness is about magnitude 27, which makes it half as bright as P4. The brightness was used to estimate P5's size.
Today's announcement revived the debate over whether Pluto should be counted as a planet, period, rather than a dwarf planet. The difference, as outlined by the IAU almost six years ago, has to do with how much a celestial body has "cleared out the neighborhood of its orbit." In my book, "The Case for Pluto," I set out the argument for counting Pluto and other worlds that have a basically roundish shape as types of planets, even if they're put in the dwarf category.
"The name 'dwarf planet' really doesn't bother me," Showalter said. "When you think of a bonsai tree, it's still a tree, and what's interesting about it is that it's really, really small. I think of Pluto the same way. ... It only gets more interesting with each one of these discoveries that comes along. If you don't like the term 'dwarf planet,' call it a 'bonsai planet.'"
I like that approach. But what about you? Feel free to weigh in below with your comments on Pluto, P5, or your suggestions for the names of the bonsai planet's newest moons.
More about Pluto:
- Final push for Pluto's postage stamp
- Scientists spot Pluto's fourth moon
- Carbon monoxide found in Pluto's air
- Pluto debate is about more than one little world
- Cosmic Log archive on Pluto
Last updated 4:30 p.m. ET.
In addition to Showalter, Weaver and Stern, members of the discovery team include A.J. Steffl and M.W. Buie.
Alan Boyle is msnbc.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter and adding the Cosmic Log page to your Google+ presence. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.


That's no moon!
That's yo momma!
That's not a space station, that's yo momma.
Poor Pluto got kicked to the curb. Even juggling 5 balls isn't enough to get back in the house.
It's too small to be Uranus
So. Jupiter is small, too, to be Urmomsanus.
That does it, everyone knows anything with 5 moons is a planet!
Well, that demotes Earth to dwarf planet.
Eris is the same approximate diameter as Pluto and more massive. Eris has at least one moon, Dysnomia. Since Eris is several times farther away than Pluto from the sun, its satellites are harder to detect. It could very well have as many if not more moons than Pluto.
It also demotes Mars to a large round thing because the bodies orbiting Mars are not really Moons but merely large chunks of space debris caught in it's gravity.
Ditto for Venus & Mercury... they've got no moons at all!
Pluto IS a planet and that's all there is to it!
"All there is to it" based on what exactly?
Can't wait for the probe to get there.
As long as it doesn't tragically discover any other moons.
"Hey, there's a new moon!" - splat.
That's what she said!
The Mi-go have been busy, havent they?
Ah, a Lovecraft fan. Yes the Fungi from Yuggoth are an industrious bunch.
Cthulhu F'tahgn!
I haven't read much Lovecraft myself, but as a long time Space Battleship Yamato/Star Blazers fan I think they should set the probe to keep an electronic eye out any Gamilus/Galmon/Gamilons in the vicinity, just to be on the safe side.... (If you've never heard of SBY/SB, look it up...)
Seamus - Pluto's Puppy.
Its amazing what the Planet Pluto has in hiding. I can't wait for the Planetary probe to reach the Planet Pluto.
Pluto is a Planet, The Planet Pluto has never been demoted because the International Astronomical Union has NO GOVERNMENT authority.
And thats my Opinion.
Science is not constrained by governmental authority. It would be a disaster if it were.
Thats true, but I was referring to the International Astronomical Union's ability to force non-scientist and non-astronomers (And those Astronomers that are NOT part of the IAU) into believing that Pluto is not a Planet. In my Opinion, they cannot.
No, they can't force you to think correctly. You can believe anything is a planet. Knock yourself out.
yes, do knock yourself out. please.
The "trick" was to have the vote after the dissenters had left the conference. Neptune's not a planet, it hasn't cleared it's orbit either. For that matter even Big Jupe doesn't qualify.
I think that the main consideration involving determining if a planet is a planet or just a spacial object is the following.
The object will need to be of a certain mass that would have enough land area to support at least ten million humans.
The second criteria would be if that spacial object has satellites or Moons orbiting it then it would be considered a planet as well.
The main factor criteria involved with determining that status of a planet is not really how many Moons orbit it but can simply be summed up as how many humans are able to be placed the object.
Which is what a planet is really about, placing humans on it in order to inhabit the planet to make it our own.
Pluto is what it is. It doesn't give a rats posterior what sequence of syllables we use when we talk about it.
Attaboy Pluto!!! Your rightful place of glory will be restored. Who cares what creatures on a little one moon planet think anyway?
Pluto, the little planet that could! Remember, dwarfs and midgets are still people.
Dang, I hadn't heard of the midget planets.
Perhaps Neptune isn't into dwarf tossing. (apologies to the height-challenged 'viners out there.)
Magnum Serpentine said:
"Thats true, but I was referring to the International Astronomical Union's ability to force non-scientist and non-astronomers (And those Astronomers that are NOT part of the IAU) into believing that Pluto is not a Planet. In my Opinion, they cannot."
Scientists can't seem to convince an awful lot of non-scientists of a lot of things. The non-existence of gods, fairies and ghosts. The fact of evolution. The lack of evidence for U.F.O's, "bigfoot", appearences of the Virgin Mary and other mythical creatures. I have a feeling that no mere scientist could convince you to believe anything, let alone force you to do it.
oh pluto, you will always be a planet in my heart! <3
907, I like you already!
I'm advocating something.
http://tonyindallas.newsvine.com/_news/2012/07/18/12812966-i-propose-we-declare-2015-as-the-year-of-the-dwarf-planet
I'm just waiting for the probe to get there and discover that Pluto is actually a dormant Death Star.
suggested names:
Acheron
Mnemosyne
Phlegethon
(all rivers in Hades)
also how about Persephone
How about we don't name any moon smaller than a Volkswagen Beetle? Or an aircraft carrier? We will just call them "dwarf moons" or 'asteroidial satellites" or something.
Oh, the moon in the sky, is called P-5
Deep in the heart of Pluto
They gaze at the moons, and watch cartoons
Of Olive Oil, Popeye and Bluto!
"The moons form a series of neatly nested orbits, a bit like Russian dolls," team leader Mark Showalter of the SETI Institute said in today's news release. He told me that small moons have now been found in the Pluto-Charon system at close to a 1-to-3 orbital resonance with Charon (P5), a 1-to-4 resonance (Nix), 1-to-5 (P4) and 1-to-6 (Hydra). This suggests that the moons were formed from debris blasted away by the collision that led to the coalescence of Pluto and Charon as we know them today.
(my blockquote doesn't seem to be working) Is this a phenomenom of Neptune-Pluto's 3-2 resonance or in spite of it ? How does the orbital plane of Pluto's moons relate to the N-P resonance ?
They're separate issues, but they do show that resonances abound when you're talking about planetary dynamics.
Taking it one step further, if Charon hit Pluto those "moons" are probably pieces of a former, larger Pluto? It must have been a very low speed impact for those pieces to remain gravitation-ally linked to one another? But lacking the mass to re-coalesce?
Well, there you go, Alan... Stirring up a hornet's nest again. lol
It orbits the sun, doesn't it?
It has moons, doesn't it?
It is within the gravitational control of the sun, itsn't it?
If it walks like a duck, and looks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then by golly it must be a planet.
Silly IAU... They are so full of themselves, taking our planet away.
Let's all take it back, shall we?
I'm really surprised that this moon hasn't been found a while back , since we have been looking deeper and deeper into the cosmos ....
I guess it's pretty cool that we are still discovering little goodies in our own solar system ....
It's turning into a moon solar system with a few planets ....
Thanks Alan ....
Pluto is a planet. Always has been, always will be. Deal with it.
I could not have said it better myself!
I don't care what they call it, Pluto sounds like an interesting world. I can't wait to see some up-close pictures of it and it's moons in 2015.
Hate to burst Msnbc's biubble but Cerberus was the guardian to the Gates. Cerberus was the three headed dog wwho, after Charon the Ferryman would ferry the souls of the newly departed across the river Styx after obtaining the coin from them, would allow all souls to pass but if on tried to escape after entering, Cerberus would swallow the souls forever. The Hydra was one of Hercules Labors, given to him by the king. Sorry Msn.
Man, it's tough to keep track of all the mythological information. I hate to burst your "blubble," but here's the straight story from the Mythical Creatures Guide:
"The Hydra guards the entrance to the Underworld and from the murky swamps of the Lake of Lerna the monstrous serpent would rise and terrorize the city. The Hydra was finally killed by Hercules during his second labor."
http://www.mythicalcreaturesguide.com/page/Hydra
... And again, from Wikipedia's entry for Lernaean Hydra:
"Beneath the waters was an entrance to the Underworld, and the Hydra was its guardian."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lernaean_Hydra
You'll find plenty of references to the Hydra as a "chthonic" creature ... that is, a spirit of the underworld. Sure, Cerberus was in the game as well ... in fact, he was said to be a brother to Hydra, as noted on the Mythical Realm website:
http://www.mythicalrealm.com/creatures/cerberus.html
Ah, Alan, forever trying to re-instate poor little pluto to planet status :) it's cool that they've found yet another chunk of ice floating around a couple of slightly bigger chunks of ice, deep in the Kuiper belt, but to call anything that small a moon??? Give it a rest already!!! Gotta love that Hubble though!!!:) --S--
Actually, about half of the 60-plus moons discovered around Saturn are thought to be smaller than P5 ... so yes, I think it's valid to call P5 a moon. Revisiting Pluto's IAU status as a dwarf planet isn't in the cards, I think, but it does seem to make more sense to regard dwarf planets as a category of planetary bodies. You don't have to memorize them as a list, though I do make a suggestion for a mnemonic in "The Case for Pluto": My very excellent mother just made us nachos ... extra planets make her crazy. (Eris, Pluto, Makemake, Haumea, Ceres) For reference, here's a list of Saturn's moons:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moons_of_Saturn
"Mother Very Easily Made Creamy Jam Sandwiches Using No Peanuts, Ham, Mayonaise or Eggs."
Serious question. Nevermind if you want to call it a planet or s dwarf planet. What you call it has nothing to do with a much more intriguing issue. Why does such a tiny body have so many satellites? It kind if strains credulity.
It's thought that these moons coalesced from the debris created by the collision that gave rise to Pluto and Charon eons ago. The resonances allow all those moons to remain in stable orbits without crashing into each other. I suppose the balance of gravitational forces is such that the moons don't circle down to a collision with Pluto or Charon.
I wonder if the system is actually not all that old in that arrangement. Perhaps those smaller bodies have only been hanging around for a couple million years or less. I kind of wonder the same thing about Saturn's rings.
Well I can't wait to update my screensaver collection. Cool one, Alan.
If they explore further and closer they will uncover two more moons.
The July fly-by could be on a collision path. Postponement is an option.
The new moon can be named after a famous resident of Hades, such as Sisyphus, Salmoneus, or Ixion. But not Tantalus; that's already be assigned to an asteroid.