Federal agencies kick off $132 million effort to create 'human on a chip'

Dominic Doyle, Frank Block / Vanderbilt

An artist's conception shows a microbrain reactor being developed at Vanderbilt University. The bioreactor is aimed at reproducing the brain's microenvironment in a device about the size of a grain of rice.

Many medications and treatments, even after years of research, fail in the final phase of review — when they're actually tested in humans. Despite having performed well in the lab, in mice, and perhaps in closer human analogues like monkeys, drugs occasionally turn out to be ineffective or toxic when used by the humans they're meant to help. To improve this process, and limit the risks to human testers, the National Institutes of Health and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency are together pledging up to up to $132 million for creating "organ-on-a-chip" systems, with the eventual goal of simulating the entire human body.


The tissue-chip project is a natural outgrowth (so to speak) of existing lab testing on human tissue. Each of the projects being funded is aimed at isolating a small, living piece of a human being. It may be just a few cells, but those cells would grow and function as if they were in their native habitat, the human body. And surrounding those cells would be sensors for detecting microscopic changes in the test environment.

Each type of cell and organ must be approached differently: Brain cells exist in an environment vastly different from muscles or the liver. Consequently, the funding is spread over a number of institutions and programs, some of which are specializing in just one type of tissue or organ.

Vanderbilt University, for instance, will be receiving up to $2.1 million from the NIH's $70 million allocation, for the creation of what they call a "microbrain reactor." It would put human brain cells into an artificial environment that not only keeps them alive, but simulates the physiological barriers that protect the brain from contaminants in blood and other fluids. John Wikswo, who is leading Vanderbilt's effort, is enthusiastic about the research:

"Given the differences in cellular biology in the brains of rodents and humans, development of a brain model that contains neurons and all three barriers between blood, brain and cerebral spinal fluid, using entirely human cells, will represent a fundamental advance in and of itself."

Much more information on the project and its multidisciplinary lineup of researchers can be found in Vanderbilt's news release.

Other institutions are undertaking much larger efforts. Harvard University has received a similar amount from the NIH, but Harvard's Wyss Institute could also get more than 10 times as much — up to $37 million — from DARPA to develop a device that integrates as many as 10 organs on a chip. It would be a closer and more complete representation of the human body than has ever been created — a veritable homunculus that could open the way to cheaper, quicker and safer drug testing. It would also reduce the number and variety of animals used in testing, and enable widespread, standardized techniques requiring less training.

This video of experts explaining the Wyss Institute's lung on a chip gives a more specific idea of the context and purpose of this technology:

Researchers at Harvard's Wyss Institute explain how "organs on a chip" can improve drug testing.

Another double-barreled dose of funding is heading toward the Massachusetts Institute of Technology: MIT and the Draper Laboratory, in collaboration with researchers from the University of Pittsburgh, are set to receive up to $6.25 million from NIH to model cancer thereapies using engineered human tissue constructs. Up to $26.3 million more will be provided under an agreement with DARPA to create an "organ-on-a-chip" platform, through a new program called BIO-MIMETICS. (That's not only a word in itself, but also a mouthful of an acronym standing for "Barrier-Immune-Organ: Microphysiology, Microenvironment Engineered Construct Systems.")

If everything goes as planned, the MIT-led work with human tissue would be adapted for the BIO-MIMETICS platform. MIT's news release provides more details.

The NIH, DARPA, and the Food and Drug Administration are working in concert, but their funding is separate. (The description of DARPA's proposal is here). In addition to the grants given to Vanderbilt, Harvard and MIT, the NIH has awarded funding to 14 other projects, adding up to a potential total of $70 million over five years.

The FDA isn't kicking in any money for the researchers right now, but the fact sheet for the initiative says the FDA "will help explore how this new technology might be used to assess drug safety prior to approval for first-in-human studies."

You'll find more details about all 17 projects via the NIH's webpage on the Tissue Chip Project Awards. Here's a brief rundown on the projects and their principal researchers.

Ten awards are aimed at investigating or creating systems by which organs are simulated on an extremely small scale. The terminology differs but they are largely working in the same sphere. We've already touched on the funding going to Vanderbilt, Harvard and MIT. Here are the other seven projects:

  • Microphysiological systems and low-cost microfluidic platform with analytics (Cornell University - Michael Shuler and James Hickman)
  • Circulatory system and integrated muscle tissue for drug and tissue toxicity (Duke University - George Truskey)
  • Human induced pluripotent stem cell and embryonic stem cell-based models for predictive neural toxicity and teratogenicity (University of Wisconsin, Madison - James Thomson)
  • Disease-specific integrated microphysiological human tissue models (UC Berkeley - Kevin Healy and Luke Lee)
  • An integrated in vitro model of perfused tumor and cardiac tissue (UC Irvine - Steven George)
  • A 3-D biomimetic liver sinusoid construct for predicting physiology and toxicity (University of Pittsburgh - D. Lansing Taylor and Martin Yarmush)
  • A tissue-engineered human kidney microphysiological system (University of Washington - Jonathan Himmelfarb)

Seven awards are for exploring stem/progenitor cells as sources for the tissues to be used in such microsystems:

  • Generating human intestinal organoids with an enteric nervous system (Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center - James Wells)
  • Modeling complex disease using induced pluripotent stem cell-derived skin constructs (Columbia University Health Sciences - Angela Christiano)
  • Human intestinal organoids: Pre-clinical models of non-inflammatory diarrhea (Johns Hopkins University - Mark Donowitz)
  • A 3-D model of human brain development for studying gene/environment interactions (Johns Hopkins University - Thomas Hartung)
  • Modeling oxidative stress and DNA damage using a gastrointestinal organotypic culture system (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia - John Lynch)
  • Three-dimensional osteochondral micro-tissue to model pathogenesis of osteoarthritis (University of Pittsburgh - Rocky Tuan)
  • Three-dimensional human lung model to study lung disease and formation of fibrosis (University of Texas - Joan Nichols)

Devin Coldewey is a contributing writer for NBC News. His personal website is coldewey.cc.

Discuss this post

Will the braincell tissue on a chip be conscious of it's existence?

  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Tue Jul 24, 2012 6:57 PM EDT

No. An individual cell is not conscious.

  • 6 votes
#1.1 - Tue Jul 24, 2012 7:07 PM EDT

What if they start hanging out with other chips?

  • 3 votes
#1.2 - Wed Jul 25, 2012 11:15 AM EDT
Reply

Awesome. If they succeed this could be the start of ultra-small but high power processors possibly even the starting point of virtual intelligence.

  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Tue Jul 24, 2012 7:27 PM EDT

It might not be virtual.

  • 3 votes
#2.1 - Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:24 PM EDT

They aren't building circuits but modelling the cellular environment of the brain with all of its minute structures and cell types. Of course it would be interesting to do what you propose, though I feel the upkeep on an organic system would be daunting. When this computer gets a virus there is no reboot! If it gets too warm or too cold, has too much or too little oxygen or not enough glucose it will die and have to be rebuilt.

  • 1 vote
#2.2 - Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:52 PM EDT
Reply

Nice: but it should be called something like Franken-chip, years from now with the use of a Bio-processor, and Bio-servos they would make one heck of a Robot!

  • 2 votes
Reply#3 - Tue Jul 24, 2012 7:32 PM EDT

We are the Borg.

  • 4 votes
#3.1 - Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:24 PM EDT

...resistance is futile...

  • 3 votes
#3.2 - Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:52 AM EDT
Reply

Yeah, everything is fine until the chips become self aware and go on a rampage! :o)

  • 3 votes
Reply#4 - Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:10 PM EDT

"$132 million effort to create human on a chip" meanwhile real humans are starving. "Federal agencies" that can't pay they're bills now with money stolen from; once again, real human tax payers.

  • 3 votes
Reply#5 - Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:06 AM EDT

So, aside from feeding poor people, are there any uses of tax payer monies that you don't consider a waste or stolen from you?

  • 5 votes
#5.1 - Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:58 AM EDT

Paul, if you want to live in a society that doesn't fund scientific research ... that's fine. Turn that computer of yours off and weigh your options, there's plenty of countries to choose from.

  • 7 votes
#5.2 - Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:01 AM EDT

So... having advanced ways of researching diseases and disorders and congenital defects isn't an effective use of taxpayer money? Well color me astonished. Paul, you are absolutely right. From now on, we should ONLY spend taxpayer money on feeding the starving. No more money for education, infrastructure, defense, homelessness, or anything else. JUST feed the starving.

Sounds like a great plan.

  • 4 votes
#5.3 - Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:56 AM EDT

Matt,

The country's broke, research is wonderful if you can afford it we can't. If you think it could create jobs that's wonderful but it's likely many years down the road, and the money should come from the private sector. My guess on why it didn't is that it's a bad bet.

    #5.4 - Fri Jul 27, 2012 2:48 AM EDT

    Chad,

    I want to live in a society that actually does scientific research, instead of excepting government grants when no one else thinks it's a viable program, with science in general slipping on it's scientific approach to research. Do you honestly think there aren't better ways to spend $132 million tax payer dollars with our country in the shambles that it is? Extra money from shutting down the space shuttle lets dump it somewhere? The infrastructure, the deficit, the failing resources. I'd say a $132 million could be spent better on desalinisation plants to create water resources to irrigate drought plagued areas, like the three quarters of the country that are in a state of national emergency. Or feeding the starving in this country. There are plenty of other countries but this one is MINE.

      #5.5 - Fri Jul 27, 2012 3:04 AM EDT

      Elrenno,

      Logic studies; by saying that money could be better spent on an actual malady the type of which is all that the government should only be able to spend money on, is not to say that's all that money should be spent on. Don't put words in my mouth.

      As a matter of fact all of the truly great leaders throughout history would have made it a foremost priority to ensure that their people were fed properly. We don't have leaders we have taxers, regulators, finers, and revenue spenders. There is no plan or course from our communist government other than to spend us down river without a paddle and need them till hell freezes over. WAKE UP.

        #5.6 - Fri Jul 27, 2012 3:23 AM EDT
        Reply

        Only if the timeline is properly managed; will the future resist change.

          Reply#6 - Wed Jul 25, 2012 5:21 AM EDT

          Studying human cells in a lab is nothing new, but finding alternatives to animal and patient abuse for the sake of discovery is divine.

          • 4 votes
          Reply#7 - Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:26 AM EDT

          Implant one into every member of Congress. Let's find out how these chips function in a hostile, toxic environment.

          • 2 votes
          Reply#8 - Wed Jul 25, 2012 11:13 AM EDT

          Oh...I thought this was about a new dip

          • 1 vote
          Reply#9 - Wed Jul 25, 2012 11:38 AM EDT

          For those who have actually read Mary Shelley, whose Frankenstein is very different than most movie interpretations, the term 'a veritable homunculus' should ring a bell .... the same would hold for those with some familiarity with some of the more obscure works of Alchemy (Paracelsus, pseudonym of Theophrastus Bombastus von Hohenheim).... nice choice of words ... (more interesting and colorful than golem, though that is probably more appropriate) and an interesting story! Thanks!

          • 2 votes
          Reply#10 - Wed Jul 25, 2012 12:39 PM EDT

          OK people - way too many of you think this is some weird Frankenstein thing or some kind of cyborg brain. No, it would merely be cells growing in culture in such a way as to accurately reestablish the normal environment of those cells and then placing sensors to record certain chemical changes in that environment.

          We already have hundreds of ways to culture human cells, but all cell culture suffers from the fact that a petri dish is not the same thing as the organ the cells came from. If you take liver cells and culture them they quickly stop acting like liver cells - because they aren't in a liver, but are growing on plastic. This is why cell culture is not a viable way to test drugs. The cells are not acting exactly the way they would in a living person. Data from cell culture is helpful but it is not absolute.

          This project seeks to create testbeds of advanced culture techniques to faithfully reproduce the cellular behaviors, architecture, and interactions that make up our different organs. What it doesn't do is pave the way for cyborgs.

          I predict these projects will be very difficult and run way over budget from my experiences with cell culture.

          • 1 vote
          Reply#11 - Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:03 PM EDT

          There are many politicians with brains about the size of a grain of rice. Their moral integrity factor may possibly be contained within the confines of something equivalent to the size of a single molecule, if at all!

          • 1 vote
          Reply#12 - Sat Jul 28, 2012 10:42 AM EDT

          I am not sure we should be reading about this. Before long the religious fundamental crowd will jump on it and demand that politicians stop funding projects that are obviously trying to create the anti-christ. Can I get an AMEN on my suggestion that we take news about stuff like this offline and keep in a more academic environment where the less intelligent dont go?

          • 1 vote
          Reply#13 - Sat Jul 28, 2012 1:12 PM EDT

          Ahhh the rich using there money to grow organs or even new bodies and live for ever. But its realy to help the rest of us

          • 1 vote
          Reply#14 - Thu Aug 2, 2012 12:24 PM EDT
          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.