
NASA
This screenshot from NASA's "Eyes on Mars" interactive simulation shows the Mars Science Laboratory's heat shield flying away from the rest of the spacecraft and its parachute, two and a half minutes before landing. Earth is barely visible as a bright spot in the sky at upper left.
The descent of NASA's Curiosity rover to the surface of Mars is must-see TV on Sunday night, but for the uninitiated, all the geekspeak, apps and animations can be disorienting. Now you can consider yourself initiated: Here's a rundown of the basics for the $2.5 billion mission, plus lots of goodies you can sample online.
Mars Curiosity in 150 words
Eight months after its launch last November, the Mars Science Laboratory will plunge through Mars' atmosphere and deliver the Curiosity rover to the bottom of Gale Crater, for a two-year mission aimed at documenting billions of years' worth of the geological record. Its prime objective is to study the layers of rock on a 3-mile-high mountain inside the crater, known as Aeolis Mons or Mount Sharp.
Curiosity’s 10 instruments can analyze the chemistry of Mars' rocks, soil and atmosphere in unprecedented detail. It has a drill, a robotic arm with a microscope, a miniaturized laboratory and even a rock-blasting laser. Curiosity isn't designed to detect life directly, but it can identify chemicals hinting at how habitable Mars was in ancient times.
Because the nuclear-powered rover weighs a ton, it has to be lowered to the surface on cables during a set of maneuvers known as the "Seven Minutes of Terror."
Where and when to watch
NASA TV will provide live commentary on the countdown to landing beginning at 11:30 p.m. ET Sunday. We're due to receive the first signals relayed from Curiosity on the surface at 1:31 a.m. ET Monday. The first thumbnail pictures from Curiosity may be available within minutes, or it may take hours for them to come down. You'll know whether the landing is a success or failure by the televised looks on the faces of Curiosity team members in the mission control room at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif.
NBCNews.com will be streaming NASA's coverage on Sunday night as part of our video offerings. You can also turn to NASA TV for pre-landing coverage all weekend. JPL has set up a "Curiosity Cam" channel on Ustream. And Universe Today has teamed up with Google, the SETI Institute and CosmoQuest to present a webcast starting at 11 p.m. ET Sunday.
There may well be a museum, science center or other space-savvy venue that's planning to broadcast the Mars Curiosity coverage on a big screen in your area. NASA has put together a directory of Mars-related events around the world as well as a clickable map. One of the biggest events is the Planetary Society's Planetfest, which will be having a sold-out Curiosity-watching party at the Paseo Colorado mall in downtown Pasadena.
Mars on your screen
NASA's Mars Curiosity website offers a variety of apps for your desktop and smartphone, including a citizen-science portal called "Be a Martian," and a Java-based interactive display called "Eyes on the Solar System." The "Eyes" dashboard allows you to track the location of the Mars Science Laboratory spacecraft in real time, and you can also take a virtual tour to watch the "Seven Minutes of Terror" from all sorts of perspectives. Clickable controls let you stop and start the action, or speed up time to get to the scary parts. One caveat: "Eyes" is a relatively resource-intensive Java program.
If video games are your thing, there's a free Mars Rover Landing game that's been created for Microsoft's Xbox system with Kinect motion sensor. And if you just want to find out what time it is for Curiosity on Mars, there's an app for that — a Java desktop application, that is.
Mars Curiosity has its own Facebook page and a Twitter account (@MarsCuriosity) well worth following. If you tweet about the mission, be sure to use the hashtag #MSL. Flickr fans may well flock to the NASA HQ photostream, while JPL's YouTube channel offers videos galore.
Your guide to the TLAs
This wouldn't be a NASA mission without the TLAs — three-letter acronyms. One acronym that came to light just today is EVR, or "event record," which refers to the data messages that Curiosity will be sending down during EDL. "You can't take the acronym out of the engineer," Steve Sell, a member of JPL's EDL team, joked.
So what's an EDL? This glossary that spells out that term and other TLAs:
- DAN - Dynamic Albedo of Neutrons, a hydrogen-detecting device on MSL that may find traces of water in ice or minerals
- DSN - Deep Space Network, the array of radio antennas in California, Australia and Spain receiving signals from interplanetary probes
- EDL - Entry, descent and landing, also known as the Seven Minutes of Terror.
- JPL - Jet Propulsion Laboratory
- MER - Mars Exploration Rovers, also known as Spirit and Opportunity
- MRO - Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, a satellite with a high-resolution camera that can relay signals from MSL and may take its picture on the way down
- MSL - Mars Science Laboratory
- NET - No earlier than
- RAD - Radiation Assessment Detector, an MSL instrument
- SAM - Sample Analysis at Mars, one of MSL's onboard laboratories
- TCM - Trajectory correction maneuver
Know your Red Planet
Finally, here's a quiz to help you sharpen your wits for the big party on Sunday night. Here's hoping the party ends with broad smiles rather than quizzical looks.
More about Mars:
- Even the weather is on the Mars rover's side
- What will we see from Mars, and when will we see it?
- Why we're obsessed with Mars
- Mars probe provides radiation revelations
- Is there a virtual Mars in our future?
Correction for 11:40 p.m. ET: I initially wrote that the Mars Science Laboratory mission cost "$2.5 million" instead of the actual $2.5 billion. Also, when discussing the landing time, I accidentally referred to Sunday instead of Monday ET. Sorry about the errors, and thanks to the commenters for helping me get the basics right.
Alan Boyle is NBCNews.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter and adding the Cosmic Log page to your Google+ presence. To keep up with Cosmic Log as well as NBCNews.com's other stories about science and space, sign up for the Tech & Science newsletter, delivered to your email in-box every weekday. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.


The whole world will be watching. Any failure to produce something soon after landing is confirmed, will create a firestorm of criticism for the mission and NASA.
Media stories are already busy talking up reasons why we may not see or hear anything for days post-touchdown. This does nothing to inspire confidence of anyone except the conspiracy theorist. With at least three orbiters capable of relaying some degree of data back to Earth, there won't be much sympathy for a long term delay regardless of reason.
Come on guys... be square with us... and make this work.
The only thing it will produce soon after landing are pictures. NASA has already explained that the rover won't start moving for up to 60 days while they perform a complete systems check.
People expect this thing to land, drive off 10 seconds later, and have proof of life before breakfast on Monday morning. Sorry, it doesn't wok that way, has never worked that way, and NASA has repeatedly stressed how this mission will proceed in what will certainly be a futile effort to head off the masses of instant gratification types who want it now, now, now.
LMAO ! It's sooo true.
pictures are good enough, that's proof that it made it.
And they won't be grand huge pictures --- they will be thumbnail images from the nav cams.
"The whole world will be watching. Any failure to produce something soon after landing is confirmed, will create a firestorm of criticism for the mission and NASA."
It's sad that people understand the process so poorly that they expect 'instant results' from any sort of science, yes...
On the other hand, this is neither the first, nor the last Mars surface probe, merely the most sophisticated. We'll learn more over its operational life, perhaps a great deal more. But sudden 'quantum leaps' in knowledge? Unlikely.
Its $2.5 BILLION, not million.
This is a great time for Alan ....
It's great to see his excitement and keeping us updated ....
LOL..ya are we still in the faster, cheaper , DUMBER days !
Ugh, got that fixed ... thanks!
I can imagine from Alan's excitement he simply put Sunday again , instead of Monday ....
Here ....
Where and when to watch
NASA TV will provide live commentary on the countdown to landing beginning at 11:30 p.m. ET Sunday. We're due to receive the first signals relayed from Curiosity on the surface at 1:31 a.m. ET Sunday.
Since I think Alan will be at the command and control center for the announcement ....
I wish I was going to be there then ....
Thanks for keeping us informed during this exciting time for you .....
Thanks Alan ....
You're being charitable, Big Ben ... I don't think excitement has as much to do with it as haste and a little bit of fatigue (plus stretched resources on a Saturday). But I appreciate the fact that you folks are setting me straight, and I'm just glad I was in a position to scramble back and do something about it. Thanks for keeping me honest.
I know that NASA had this on the drawing board for year's, just curious of who's "pet project" this came from.?
We scrap the space shuttle due to cost and now contract it out, but...we have $$$ for this with (American's) people out of work?
Could say...."Seen one red planet, seem em' all", but the timing?
Alan. Your OK in my book, as I dropped one of those Titanic "didn't know that" facts, and responded.
Government spending..........
It is what it is !
I'm glad to see that the major news stations are announcing this mission as an intense time or the "Minutes Of Terror" deal for "CURIOSITY'S" type of landing ....
I got only 60% on your questionnaire on Mars .... "LOL"
You're always first class Alan ....
This is going to be good ....
100% on your Mars quiz on the second shot ....
What happened to Darrah .... ??
i got 60 too, it should have been a true or false test...lol
Bigben....lay off of Alan, he does a very good job. His articles are well written, and informative, which is more than I can say about 90% of the stories I read online. It's obvious he cares about what he writes about which is a welcome change from most of the hacks who try to pass themselves off as professionals.
Keep up the good work Alan, lots of us appreciate it.
BigBen's a good'un, David ... Thanks to everyone for keeping me straight, there are times when I make mistakes and it's good to know about that sooner rather than later.
david 1969 ....
I'm a "COSMIC LOG" and Alan Boyle fan ....
Alan knows I meant no harm here , ever ....
And Alan knows more about me than anyone else on the web ....
But I like your defense ....
Take care ....
Have fun ....
@Dave: We always correct Alan, not to be mean or anything, but we know he does take pride in his work and tries to be as accurate as possible and appreciates it when we see errors and brings it to his attention.
We think he's one of the best writers here because of his desire to be accurate (and his willingness to engage in conversation on the forms). :)
Mitchell
Imagine! A place where freezing cold, the atmosphere have 15% visibility, the sky will shifting that color orange to light blue.You can run faster than usin bolt on the surface, But you have to wear a hard harness protect your body form approximatly1% pressure consider earth. you can see huge mountains everywhere~ you see around desert like view. you feel you standing in the middle of evaporated ocean. you can see little rocks here and there look like same in the bottom in river. you can see dry river streams... you can see water drop footprints on surface...its like " Mars dreaming & waiting for the rain billions of years"
Sounds amazing! Thanks for taking me there with your description:)
70% on the first test (I'm so slipping) :(
BTW- Thanks Alan. I always enjoy your articles.
Actually the Mars landing is worse than porn as Damon 1415903 comments .
Here we have a real good chance to infect this world . It is absurd that most of the tests are to find out what is there that might be here , when the opposite should be done . What is there is theirs . This is the point . It is one thing to observe the universe and planet , it is another to be ready to land there , and more important bring anything back . Do not bring anything back , please . We are not ready to deal with condition of each planet . Certain there may be organisms that have adapted to that planet that may kill us if we expose ourselves to them . Our science has not dealt well with the diseases we have here let alone the diseases that we have no idea how to stop that may be on Mars . This is foolishness and recklessness of power staved men . We have a space station but these individuals are not on an alien planet . The fact is the few individuals we have on this space station have to be replaced and constantly tested . It is not a environment that we can live in very well and this is with the support of this planet .
When we cure aides and most disease , and we are fairly certain on how to kill different diseases this is the time to tread lightly on other planets , not now .
One day...thousands, millions, or even billions, of years from now Mankind will have to evacuate the planet in order to survive. Yeah I know I won't be here. But it doesn't change the fact that interplanetary/interstellar travel will one day be required in order to exist. Today we have the technology to start taking baby steps towards that end. We might fail sometimes, but we can learn from those failures and hopefully we can overcome them. Fear of what might happen will only doom our existence.
David 1969 . Fear is necessary in all things . I am sure you were never in the Service during a war or you would know this . Combat is only the effects of being prepared to for this . There is a common in all learning , even in the Bible . The common is being prepared for what one is getting into .
Do you read The Bible ? G-d knew Israel was ready to leave Egypt by the prayers of oppression that he said He was aware of . G-ds ' name was known, as a set up so that they would recognize the real leader . X number of years went by to turn Pharoah mind set to see the Jews as slaves . G-d says to Moses that all of his old enemies are dead , namely , the Egyptian man , who Moses had killed due to his abuse of Jews. Even G-ds' first plague and proof of G-d where one snake of G-d eats the other two of the Egyptian priests. The producing of snakes from a rod was a common trick by the Egyptians , but there was not trick where a third rod ate the other two and was return as rod. Nor a rod touching a river and turning the river to blood . Once the Rod was used to eat the other snakes or kill them then the rod was the cause of the next effect or turning the river to blood .
The ten plagues themselves was a proof of the harshness of Pharoah and that Pharoah glory was that he believed he was god and the jews his servants. This by readiness progression was to prove that G-d is G_d . Do you get the readiness scheme ?
Oh, you mean like all the plagues and diseases that the astronauts brought back from the moon?
Hmmm....? Sounds like Chuck is one of those types of people who believe that knowledge is advanced through the intense study and scrutiny of the Bible, and any other attempts to obtain knowledge through science is simply tempting God's wrath.
That's unfortunate.
Seems as if Anjisan's hit the nail on the head.
Jokes and buffoons aside this is an amazing thing we are attempting to accomplish..
With over 7 BILLION people on this planet now, all fightin and complainin and generally just miserable, and it's OVER at around 9 BILLION anyway .......
WHAT will they be charging to be "MAROONED" up there, please?
We have disturbed them when we should have left them alone. Better watch out now. The aliens are coming!
Honestly, I'm sort of disappointed- AGAIN! More billions spent to merely look at rock and soil samples while ignoring the truly interesting stuff. Right now I'm looking at a picture of Mars from an earlier mission I posted on my wall next to my desk. It shows a 5 sided crater with a large geodesic dome at the bottom- I don't suppose that Curiosity will be so curious as to check that out, eh? Or how about those structures that Spirit went by and ignored (supposedly!) on one Martian night. You can see them at JPL's website if you search for Sol 2169. How nice of NASA to provide the world with the image of those structures out of the rear hazard camera as they simply drove by and ignored them. There must have been some interestingly colored dirt ahead that might have shown signs of ancient microbial life there on Mars! Apparently they have NO INTEREST WHATSOEVER in evidence of intelligent life existing/having existed there. In fact, one can pretty much count on NASA to ALWAYS land where there is little or nothing to be seen, and if there is you're lucky to get a view of it in the distance from the goddamned rear hazard camera! If you can't tell, I'm angry about this and I'm suprised no one else is too. I predict that this "Curiosity" rover will find nothing of interest. If it does we won't hear about it unless it deals with microbes or something similarly tame and uninteresting (unless you're a microbiologist or geologist!) So get ready Americans (and World!)! Drop your trousers and aim your gluteal cleft at Florida or Houston, grease up and prepare to have smoke blown up your ass, AGAIN! Our billions of dollars will have been spent to give a few select people any important info they find. The rest of us get rock scrapings, soil analysis, and MAYBE a picture from the goddamned rear hazard camera of something TRULY amazing in the distance as they drive away from it.
Merlin... ITS the WATER... They put something in the WATER!!! Get out of there, get out of there NOW!!! Stay under cover, don't let the black, unmarked helicopters see you. GO, GO, GO... Run, the government is going to try and shut you down for speaking the truth. Save yourself. GO!!!
You complain about billions of dollars being spent on scientific research that advances our understanding of the cosmos, and then bemoan the fact that billions of dollars isn't being spent on taking pretty pictures of things...
You seem to have odd priorities.
Josh,
Do you practice misreading what people say or are you dense? I didn't complain about the amount of money spent or even the mission of our landers on Mars looking at rock & soil samples to see what is in them. My complaint is that NASA regularly ignores things that are overwhelming PROOF of life (past or present, I don't know) while they yap to us about soil scrapings. No comments about the structures Spirit drove by. You'd think they'd pause there long enough to investigate structures on Mars, don't you? They were supposed to be looking for evidence of life but they ignore something that required intelligent life to construct. What does it take to make you people call "bullsh/t"? NASA is saying one thing to us yet doing the opposite Another thing they might look at is the areas that change color with the change of Martian seasons as plant life sprouts, lives and then recedes. Mars Orbiter has taken dozens of pictures of this and they show what appear to be trees and possibly grass or moss. It stands out like a sore thumb. But does NASA schedule a mission to check THAT out? Hell no. It is more rock scrapings, soil analysis and BS ponderings about the "possibility of life" on Mars as they turn a blind eye to the most obvious proof. That is why I say NASA is blowing smoke up the collective American rectal orifice, and if anyone has odd priorities it is the people who want to play inter-planetary geologist looking for signs of life, but who ignore structures that required an intelligent mind to create, or who send rover missions to the middle of a desert (relatively) instead of to the areas that sprout various types of plant life. My priorities are straight.
Does that clear things up for you, or are you still going to be happy scraping the rocks looking for life next to a 3 story building on Mars?
Anjisan,
Geez, you were almost funny enough to make me laugh- almost. Try doing a search for Mars anomalies online. Take a look at Lunar (or Moon) anomalies too. There is more out there than NASA is willing to acknowledge. See the proof from their own data and don't be such a lemming.
BTW- The government isn't going to try to shut me down for speaking the truth- that is simply mockery from you Coincidence Theorists. I AM the government, and I've slapped down (figuratively) more than one of my employees who has tried to impose on me. Any American who lets a public servant act like they were actually public master needs to have their spine replaced.
I am not misreading anything. In fact, I wiil answer all your questions you posed in your response.
First off, there are no "structures" on Mars created by native intelligent life. The only constructs on Mars that were created by intelligent life were the rovers and other equipment made by people, sent by people, and left there by people. There are many reasons why macro fauna could not exist on MArs, or if it did, it did for only a brief time and did not have nearly the time required for evolution to reach a state of sentience. This is due to a number of reasons. Mars, like Earth, is approximately 4.5 Billion years old. However, after only 500 million years, thge magnetosphere of Mars vanished due to reasons attributed to the death of Mars molten core. With the magnetosphere gone, radiation in amounts you cannot imagine baked the Martian surface and atmoshphere, and solar flares ripped away the sky. It is thought that this is why Mars has (possibly) no surface water, and a thin, low pressure atmosphere. Remember the scare about how if we lost the ozone layer, the sun's UV rays would fry us all and theyred be death and cancer and whatnot? Imagine that, but multiplied by a number higher than any you can count to. Enough to bake away whole oceans. Now, that gives Mars 500 millions years to support life. However, life on earth took 1 billion years to come into existence. But even if Mars got a jumpstart on us, and developed life further, it took a further 2 billion years for life on earth to evlve into things as simple as worms and jellyfish. This, you will note, would be 2 billion years after the sun radiation started desroying anything that could sustain life on Mars. And, even on the ridiculously off chance that intelligent life evolved in 500 million years, Mars is plagued by huge sandstorms and windstorms that constantly wear at mountains and valleys on the surface. No structure is going to withstand those for 4 BILLION YEARS. Mountain ranges don't even last that long. There are no "structures" on Mars made by native martians.
And those dark patches you mentioned? Hi def pictures and video have shown that they are most likely to be hyper saline water, that melts off the ice caps with the seasons. As said before, no plant life can withstand the hyper radiation of the Martian surface without dying instantly.
The good men and women in charge of the rover missions are looking for FACT, because they already know everythig I've stated. Now they want to, as you say, "scrape in the dirt," looking for clues of the oceans that existed in the short 500 million year time, or hopefully, signs of any microbioligal life that lived back then. THEIR priorities are straight. They know what they are doing.
hope that answers your questions.
Hope this works out, and it all happens way after bed time.
I guess I will read about the crash in the paper in the morning.
Seriously though, while I see this thing as a technological and mechanical nightmare I hope it makes it.
Interesting, wee bit "rube goldberg" but interesting none the less,, more data would be good,, descent speed at chute opening? and after?..mass at moment of touchdown?..diameter of chute? etc,.. but hey,, not bad,... I wonder,..suppose they/it blew a "balloon" filled with, say, Helium, seconds before impact,.??..and the ability to "blow" others could be usefull if it gets hung up again..no??..I think the PSI is something like point 5 PSI,..??..in that kind of pressure helium should expand rather rapidly and to a large initial volume?..better than just a chute, gotta be,..btw, diameter of that chute??..re Alan and typo,s etc,,it happens pal,, I try and catch all mine, but never seem to get them all,..so be it,, we aint none of us "oracles"..I will be watching,..and gosh golly gee, NASA etc doesnt give us all!! the data etc,, surprised??..not I, ha ha ha...They pay the bills?? their choice I say,, I am gratefull for what we do get,.."I/we look on with a face of wonder".. and I remember watching sputnik,, its all relative I say,..a very kewl event and significant as well,,
Well im excited i hope it makes it there ok i mean i know it will not start doing its mission officially for like 50-60 day after it lands, but still just getting there and landing is what has me on edge.
if this fails and the rover does not make it and land safely i cannot imagine what the anti obama nuts will say and what the conspiracy nuts will say.
Due to the abundant life on Earth, it is difficult to imagine a process by which inorganic carbon without oxidation with water could provide for a source of abiogenic methane on Mars. This is not to say that it is not possible, but it does beg the question is the detection of methane on Mars biogenic or abiogenic, or is the current measure for detection of exoplanetary methane in error.
Per link -
http://www.criticalmass.uk.com/index.php/2012/07/02/possible-non-biological-source-of-martian-methane-emissions/
"In 2003 substantial plumes of Methane were detected on Mars causing a lot of excitement in the field of Astrobiology. Methane degrades quickly and shouldn’t last for long in the Martian atmosphere, so discovering substantial volumes was a clear indication that an active process was at work replenishing the gas. Meaning that Mars was in some way still alive… either in a biologic or geologic sense? Although Methane can be produced by geological activity, on Earth the primary source is the result of biological processes.
One of the greatest current mysteries in Astrobiology has to be that of the seasonal Martian methane emissions. Although some assumed a geological explanation, many saw them as a clear indication of life! Now an international team of researchers have discovered that methane escapes from meteorites that are irradiated by ultra violet light, offering another potential source for the high levels detected in the Martian atmosphere"
Let's hope that Curiosity, the new Mars rover, will be able to shed more light on the ongoing mystery.
In 1976, the space program was barely 19 years old at the time. During the first 19 years, we launched 1-man, Mercury capsules; 2-man, Gemini capsules; and 3-man, Apollo capsules into space. We not only landed on the moon, we drove moon buggies across its surface. We transformed the telecommunications industry. We were building the Shuttle Enterprise which would test whether or not we could launch large payloads of men and equipment into orbit. Then, just a couple of weeks after we celebrated our Bicentennial, the Viking probes successfully landed on Mars.
I was 13 years old at the time.
It's hard to believe that in the subsequent 36 years, we would shutdown our ability to manufacture the heaviest lifting rocket the world has ever seen (Saturn), retire our only transportation into space, kill off our moon program, confine ourselves to low Earth orbit, all this while most Americans just stop dreaming about achieving the things we all thought we were destined to achieve by the next millenium.
It's sad. Getting to Mars is really tough. Landing on Mars is even tougher. Americans should be proud that this is one of those things that we do really, really well. My 1976, 13-year-old self truly believed that men would not only have landed on Mars by now, but would be establishing a colony on the planet by now. As an American kid, I was so excited to be an American during the 60's and 70's. Anxious for the heavens to open up to American ingenuity. It wasn't going to be just military-trained astronauts going to space, it was going to be all of us. Those dreams have really withered due to governmental mismanagement and corporate irresponsibility. With those dreams, we're going to have to watch all of our profound knowledge we've gained by landing on the moon, and mars fade as our space engineers seek employment elsewhere.
What's truly unfortunate is this: Win or lose, success or failure, this is the last time we'll be touching the surface of Mars for a long, long time. We do have the upcoming MAVEN orbital mission next year, and that's it. We've pulled out of the ESA sample return mission, and we really don't have any future orbiters or landers being built as of this writing. Nothing. We're taking our toys and staying home.
Here's to Curiosity. The final "Hail Mary Pass" from one of the greatest governmental organizations that we have working for us. It's just depressing to watch NASA being slowly starved for funds because the rest of our government believes that we need to beat every single one of our plowshares into swords rather than the other way around.
Thank you Anjisan1963. Very well put. Godspeed Curiosity!!!! I sincerely am hoping with all hope that it is a successful mission for everyone who has worked on this project. I hope that we will continue to be able to explore other worlds unknown.
Every landing is a pucker-up and hold-your-breath moment, they don't get any more 'routine' because we're making them harder every time with more ambitious vehicles. So I'll be awake, watching, wondering, and wowing.
While I give the landing a >90% chance of success, I'm not so sure we'll get enough signals fast enough -- or be able to understand unusual features of them -- to be sure what's really happened, for hours, if not days. And I'd love to turn out to have been excessively worried.
See y'all on line tonight.
Jim Oberg
www.jamesoberg.com
see my Mars exploration section....
Hope it is successful, too bad NASA get choked for money.
Here is a pic of the landing ellipse area . Looks small compared to the rest.
(www.calgarysun.com/2012/08/05/mars-rover-on-target-for-eye-of-the-needle-landing)
We interrupt this thread to bring you a special report:
The landing of the Mars Science Lab will be broadcast ONLY on the NFL Network, which will not be available to most to the US.
Please contact your cable operator and blame them only... or pay the NFL Network (you love them, right?) some money (in this economy) to let you see this event... along with as many commercials as possible.
Thank you. We now return you to the regularly scheduled comments.
Wonder if the F*cking christians will complain about this or life on other planets. :P Love you
Yeah, we screwed up our planet lets go find another one to screw up!!!
Angel4you,
Don't be so bleak about humanity going out into space and other worlds. At this pace, for a long time to come the only people going out will be highly trained in their jobs and it won't be the bottom of the barrel that will have the opportunity to out-migrate. On top of that they're probably likely to have pretty even tempers since they'll be on a ship for a while (selection system). Your average schmuck will be going nowhere.