
Google / DigitalGlobe / GeoEye
An intriguing site near an Egyptian town called Dimai consists of a large, square formation and smaller features.
Remember that researcher who thought she spotted previously undiscovered Egyptian pyramids in Google Earth imagery? It turns out that there really are some ruins in the picture, but they’re not pyramids.
That's the verdict of an Italian archaeologist who has been surveying the area around the present-day town of Dimai in Egypt's Fayoum Desert.
"The features in Google images are well-known since 1925, when they were surveyed by G. Caton-Thompson and E.W. Gardner," Paola Davoli, an Egyptologist at Italy's University of Salento and co-director of the Soknopaiou Nesos Project, told me in an email. "They are natural mounds surmounted by a building (the biggest one) and by dug wells (in the other cases). For sure they are not pyramids, but their date and use are still not known."
The Dimai formations have been a subject of interest for many years. "We [have] still not dug them, but they will be the objects of future study by the Soknopaiou Nesos Project," Davoli said.
For more than a decade, the project has been doing a territorial survey of the area around Dimai, which was known as Soknopaiou Nesos during the Greco-Roman period in Egypt. The city is thought to have been founded by Ptolemy II in the third century B.C., on a site that shows evidence of habitation going back to the Neolithic period. During its heyday, it was situated on the shore of a large freshwater lake, but the lake has shrunk and gone salty since ancient times.
Davoli said the prevailing view is that the structures might have been watchtowers, designed to look over "an agricultural area or a paleo-lake just in front of them to the east," or perhaps tombs.
Dan Billin, a former newspaper reporter in New Hampshire who turned us on to the Soknopaiou Nesos Project, cites multiple reports about the Dimai site. "Micol was correct to think that at least one of the anomalies she saw on Google Earth was a man-made feature," Billin wrote in an email. "What she didn't manage to discover, however, was that archaeologists already knew about it, and that it's surrounded by numerous other archaeological sites."
Bob Brier, an Egyptologist based at Long Island University's C.W. Post Campus, said in an email that Billin's evaluation of the site "sounds like a reasonable scenario."

Google Earth via Angela Micol
Several eroded features can be seen in this image of terrain about 12 miles from Abu Sidhum, a city on the Nile.
"Note, there is no mention of pyramids," Brier wrote.
The North Carolina researcher who started the fuss over the "Google Earth pyramids," Angela Micol, had pointed to another intriguing area of the Egyptian desert with four mounds and a large, triangular-shaped plateau, alongside the Nile in Upper Egypt, 12 miles (19 kilometers) from Abu Sidhum. The prevailing view is that those formations are not mounds or pyramids built by human hands, but are buttes carved by natural erosion.
Such formations are commonly seen in that part of the desert, James Harrell, professor emeritus of archaeological geology at the University of Toledo, told Life's Little Mysteries.
More mysteries from Egypt:
- Severed right hands unearthed in ancient Egyptian palace
- Ancient Egyptian calendar notes flickering 'Demon Star'
- Mystery of pyramid hieroglyphs: It all adds up
- Lost pyramids spotted by space scientists
Alan Boyle is NBCNews.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter and adding the Cosmic Log page to your Google+ presence. To keep up with Cosmic Log as well as NBCNews.com's other stories about science and space, sign up for the Tech & Science newsletter, delivered to your email in-box every weekday. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.


Good follow up although your aerial is still dated. The current aerial gives a better perspective.
Aha, you mean of the Dimai site? I guess I could change that out. I never could find the Abu Sidhum triangle.
What you have all failed to see and what Micol has been stating in her Facebook group and in multiple posts online where no one in the archaeological community has responded to, is your image clearly shows SOMEONE HAS BEEN DIGGING AT THIS SITE!! No one has even mentioned this piece of information. It's right there, clear as day in the image. Who had been digging at the site? According to Micol, you, Alan and other's associated with this article will not respond to her emails. She is also trying to get in touch with the archaeologists, apparently she has identified more sites close by they should look at. Will someone contact her and get her help and information?
The Dimai formations have been a subject of interest for many years. "We [have] still not dug them, but they will be the objects of future study by the Soknopaiou Nesos Project," Davoli said.
The Giza site has an Orion Belt pattern just like this one. Slight offset probably not accidental.
You mean three dots in an almost straight line?
Care for a little axiomatic specificity? Directions Improved.
Abu Sidhum, Kom AR Raheb, Samalut, Egypt
12 Miles West and slightly to the North, Tri-sided Butte located at 28°21'25.95"N, 30°25'35.12"E
See 29°32'38.95"N, 30°38'48.60"E, 8,000 feet North North West of Dimeh (Dimei) (Not known to Google?) is North of Birkat Qarun (Lake Qarun) which is North of Faiyom, Egypt
Sell also Qasr Dimai - The antic paved road towards Lake Qarun?
Dimeh looks worth while, but the other features in this reports, have snow balls chance in the desert of being interesting.
Thanks for the specificity, Rich!
Mother of God!
Stop hiding Pyramids from us!!!
whatever they may turn out to be it could be really interesting...aliens maybe??
Yeah, the cover up has already started...."nothing to see here folks....not structures...no ruins...naturally occurring perfect triangles and straight lines of mounds....nothing to see...wind erosion...move along, move along."
When will they tell us the truth?
(cut to Jack Nicholson from A FEW GOOD MEN)
"You can't handle the truth!" (gulp)
Interesting that the "experts" say that they have not excavated but they already know there is nothing there of interest - the real scientific method!
Hmmm. I didn't see anywhere in the article that there wasn't anything of interest there. You read the same article I did? "They are natural mounds surmounted by a building (the biggest one) and by dug wells (in the other cases). For sure they are not pyramids, but their date and use are still not known."
Yes it's the same same article, apparently your brain doesn't connet leaving a discovery unexplored for nearly 90 years as either odd or as interesting as George. Guess he's just more 'curious'...lol... oh, I crack myself up.
Not quite the same. Take medicine - there are literally tens of thousands of compounds that have been identified to have some potential as a medicine, but you only have the resources and time to investigate a few at a time, so you take the most promising and investigate them. Doesn't mean there is no value or no interest in the others.
Maybe if you're putting up the resource$ to set up the expedition, you would pick this site over others. Apparently the people funding these jaunts have more interest in other sites, but that doesn't mean there is no interest there. So easy to criticize others and their decisions when its not your money that's being spent, eh?
Aliens, hidden pyramids, and Knights Templar. Global conspiracy to prevent our return to Sirius. Barrack will win again because he is the better alien. If these cannot be refuted with sound and tangible evidence, then they must be true.
NBCNews online, and even you Alan, did not vet this story very well...The original article claimed that it had been verified that this was an unknown site.
Gray, Mike, and Skip are onto something! "They" are hiding pyramids from us, it is possibly alien in nature, and the cover-up has started!
Say Egyptological too many times too fast...
I know what happened - some scientists drive out there to take a look, only to be captured by aliens, taken into the big triangular 'butte", probed and then released. Then when they returned, the cover story was "nothing to see, folks - just some naturally formed rock shapes."
Look real close and you can see the Mars Landrover just west of the rim too.
if google earth can spot these so called ruins then what ellss can google see from space, i say who is watching google??????????
You understand that Google doesn't launch and operate its own imaging aircraft and satellites, right? They buy the images from another provider (including updates, when and where needed)...and so could you.
You want to know what else 'they' can see? Install Google Earth on your computer. It's free, it's cool...but it's not even remotely sinister. ('I can see my house from here!' as they say)
Who's watching them? I'd say we are.
This is Obama's fault. :)
Mr. Hankey, I strongly advise you to install the free Google Earth application and tour the planet yourself - it's a marvel. And yes, you can see your house!!