
F. Pastawski / MPG / Vektorportal.com
A quantum $100 bill bears a picture of Werner Heisenberg and the motto "In Quantum Physics We Trust."
Quantum physics is getting real — and getting really weird. If the strange properties of entanglement, teleportation and superposition can be harnessed, it could revolutionize computing, communication, banking and much, much more. That's a big "if." But several reports over the past few days suggest that folks are willing to spend millions of dollars to turn theory into reality:
• Can quantum physics stop credit card fraud? Researchers have laid out a couple of schemes that banks and their customers could use to verify transactions using delicate quantum systems in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The two methods involve the transmission of "quantum tokens" or "quantum tickets" that are essentially rendered useless once they're read and compared with the codes that are held securely by the banks.
One of the key issues is determining how many errors should be tolerated in the transmission. "We can deduce from theory that on average no more than 83 percent of the secret digits may be duplicated correctly by a counterfeiter. Under realistic conditions, we can assume that an honest participant should be able to recover 95 percent of the digits. If now the verifier sets the tolerance level to 90 percent, it will be almost impossible to accept fraudulent tokens or to reject an authentic holder," Fernando Pastawski of the Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics said in a news release.
• Who will win the quantum communication race? Wired's Adam Mann provides an in-depth update on the "quantum teleportation space race." We're not talking about teleportation Star Trek-style, but about a system that allows for unhackable data transmission between distant points by sending quantum states back and forth, typically in the form of entangled photons. Just a few months ago, European researchers one-upped their Chinese counterparts in claiming a distance record for quantum teleportation (88 miles).
Now a number of countries are planning space-based experiments that involve quantum teleportation: Japanese researchers are reportedly working on a small-scale experiment that could be conducted using the Socrates satellite, due for launch in 2014. But it's the Chinese who appear to be the most serious about proving out the technology, with plans to launch a satellite with quantum teleportation capabilities in 2016. "We hope we will be the first real experiment in space," Pan Jianwei, project leader for the Quantum Science Satellite, told the journal Science in June. The U.S. appears to be behind the curve, although there are suggestions that classified research on space-based quantum communications is under way.
• When will quantum computers enter the mainstream? Technology Review's Tom Simonite pays a visit to D-Wave Systems' quantum computing operation in Canada, which has attracted $30 million in its latest equity investment round. Among the investors: Amazon.com billionaire Jeff Bezos and the CIA's In-Q-Tel investment arm. Why the CIA? "Our intelligence community customers have many complex problems that tax classical computing architecture," Robert Ames, In-Q-Tel vice president in charge of information and communication technologies, said in D-Wave's news release. "We believe our customers can benefit from the promise of quantum computing, and this investment in D-Wave is a first step in that direction."
D-Wave made a splash five years ago when it claimed that it had created the world's first commercial quantum computer, but observers voiced deep skepticism at the time. Last year, D-Wave researchers and their academic colleagues published a paper in Nature to support the quantum claims, and the company has sold one of its computers to Lockheed Martin for $10 million. Simonite quotes D-Wave as saying more evidence — and more customers — will be forthcoming.
• Could quantum physics put a kink in causality? Quantum confusion over causality is a classic plot device in science-fiction movies ranging from "Back to the Future" to "Timeline" to "Looper" — but physicists report in this week's issue of Nature Communications that such confusion may be science-factual as well. Traditionally, causality requires that if A causes B, then B cannot cause A. But the researchers from the University of Vienna and the Universite Libre de Bruxelles point out that quantum physics allows for situations in which A causes B causes A. They say such situations would involve quantum systems that are in a state of superposition — for example, Schrödinger's dead-and-alive cat, or a quantum bit that holds a value of 1 and 0 simultaneously.
"The real challenge is finding out where in nature we should look for superpositions of causal orders," the University of Vienna's Caslav Brukner said in a news release. Brukner and his colleagues point to a model for future circuitry that would connect quantum logic gates with "wires" in superposition. Such circuitry "may allow creating situations in which events are not localized in time," they write.
Does this mean it'd be theoretically possible to go back in time and kill your grandfather, in accordance with the classic time-travel paradox? The researchers say no. "Our framework ... is by construction linear and in agreement with local quantum mechanics, and yet paradoxes are avoided, in accordance with the Novikov principle, due to the noise in the evolution 'backward in time,'" they write.
All this makes me feel as disoriented as Schrödinger's cat in a dark, dark box — but you've got to admit it's intriguing. Feel free to leave your own quantum quips as comments below.
More about quantum weirdness:
- Time travelogue
- Interactive: Cats and qubits
- How to spot quantum quackery
- Tales from the quantum frontier
- Nobel Prize for quantum teleportation?
- Why 3-month-olds get quantum mechanics (and you don't)
- Distance record set for quantum teleportation
- Is the uncertainty principle misunderstood?
Alan Boyle is NBCNews.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter and adding the Cosmic Log page to your Google+ presence. To keep up with Cosmic Log as well as NBCNews.com's other stories about science and space, sign up for the Tech & Science newsletter, delivered to your email in-box every weekday. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.


And those experiments that say otherwise were of course never conducted to begin with. So when I explained where I thought they were wrong, this person explains that they never happened, although he now has a name and explanation for them if they ever did. Which of course he's said he's sure they didn't.
"codes that are held securely by the banks"
...which will quickly be stolen by Russian hackers.
Basically what he is talking about is transferring information between various points where the algorythm changes at every point until it reaches the recipient and the code materializes into the actual code.
For example: Think of 3D cube. or square with depth. A cube has eight points of contact located at the corners of each face. When information is passed through these points in sequence they create a traceable pattern that can be hacked.
But using a central point along each line between each point now gives us twelve new points of information encryption for a total of 20 points. The encoded information is then broken up into packets and distributed along each route until it comes into contact with another point that breaks the packet up even further.
In all there are a total of 400 different paths the the encrypted data will take before reaching the encoder that recodes that data back into useable information.
If a hacker does hack such a system they would not be able to re-code the date into anything useable.
The only way to read the date would be to have a similar "cube" that would run the encoded date back through the cube to reassemble the data. Such information would of how the code is recoded would be part of the packet sent in the first cube but would only be able to be read by the second cube. Once the cubes intergrate back into a single cube all information is erased from the cube and the cube vanishes into sub-atomic particle heaven.