Mars rover snaps spooky portraits

NASA / JPL-Caltech / MSSS / JMKnapp

A mosaic of images from the Curiosity rover's Mars Hand Lens Imager shows the rover's camera mast and deck. The pictures were taken on Oct. 31 during operations at a Martian sampling site known as Rocknest.


It looks as if someone is taking portraits of NASA's Curiosity rover on Mars from a few feet away — but wait a minute: Who's the photographer?

The answer is that Curiosity itself is responsible for the pictures, with strong assists from image-processing gurus. These views show the six-wheeled, nuclear-powered mobile laboratory at a geological site of interest known as Glenelg, as of Sol 84 (Oct. 31). They were assembled from imagery captured by the Mars Hand Lens Imager, or MAHLI, looking backward from the end of the rover's 7-foot-long (2.1-meter-long) robotic arm.

MAHLI's main function is to get microscope-quality views of Martian details, such as the shape of sand grains on the surface — but it can also snap some killer self-portraits, just as smartphone users do with their forward-facing cameras. That's how Curiosity captured a Facebook-style profile picture of its own camera mast back in September, a month after landing in Mars' Gale Crater. Since then, the MAHLI team at San Diego-based Malin Space Science Systems and NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory has really hit its stride.

So have the amateur image processors at UnmannedSpaceflight.com. The website serves as a forum for the fans of interplanetary robotic missions, and particularly for those who love to riff off NASA's raw imagery. Often, the amateurs are quicker on the draw than the professionals, who have to hew a little more closely to the standard procedures for releasing imagery.

The view above, focusing on Curiosity's mast, was put together by Ohio engineer Joe Knapp. The fish-eye view below, with Mount Sharp looming in the background at far right, was done by Stuart Atkinson, a British educator-astronomer who also shares Martian views via The Gale Gazette. Because of the way the mosaic was made, the very end of the robotic arm has made a spooky disappearance.

"I did it in a bit of a rush," Atkinson wrote, "but it doesn't really matter, does it? Just a pretty pic, not an official NASA product. :-)"

NASA / JPL-Caltech / MSSS / Stuart Atkinson

This full-color self-portrait of Curiosity was stitched together from MAHLI imagery, with a fisheye-lens perspective. A 3-mile-high (5-kilometer-high) peak known as Aeolis Mons or Mount Sharp can be seen in the background at right.

NASA / JPL-Caltech / MSSS

On Sol 84 (Oct. 31, 2012), NASA's Curiosity rover used the MAHLI camera to capture this set of 55 high-resolution images, which were stitched together to create this full-color self-portrait. The mosaic shows the rover at "Rocknest," the spot in Gale Crater where the mission's first scoop sampling took place. Four scoop scars can be seen in the regolith in front of the rover. The base of Gale Crater's 3-mile-high (5-kilometer) mountain, Mount Sharp, rises on the right side of the frame. Mountains in the background to the left are the northern wall of Gale Crater. The Martian landscape appears inverted within the round, reflective ChemCam instrument at the top of the rover's mast. Self-portraits like this one document the state of the rover and allow mission engineers to track changes over time, such as dust accumulation and wheel wear. Due to its location on the end of the robotic arm, only MAHLI is able to image some parts of the craft, including the port-side wheels.

NASA's high-resolution view of Curiosity, released today and shown above, was assembled from 55 MAHLI images. This hi-res view follows up on a lower-resolution view that was issued earlier in the day. On the UnmannedSpaceflight.com forum, Malin Space Science Systems' Michael Caplinger asked for a little patience on the part of his amateur colleagues. "We've been working on this particular project since before landing," Caplinger wrote, "and I feel like we are having to rush it to avoid being scooped."

As someone who's been working on Internet time for 16 years, I know exactly how he feels.

Update for 9:20 p.m. ET: Scientists are due to discuss Curiosity's studies of the Martian atmosphere during a media teleconference at 1 p.m. ET Friday, and it seems likely that methane will be on the agenda. Previous missions have detected methane in the Red Planet's atmosphere, which could hint at microbial activity, volcanic activity or some other intriguing chemical process. For weeks, there's been a buzz in the air about the readings recorded by Curiosity's Sample Analysis at Mars lab, or SAM. What will come to light on Friday? Check out this backgrounder by Nature's Eric Hand, then tune in JPL's Ustream channel to find out.

Update for 3:35 a.m. ET Nov. 2: I've updated this item with the magnificent high-resolution view from NASA.

More about Curiosity:


Alan Boyle is NBCNews.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter and adding the Cosmic Log page to your Google+ presence. To keep up with Cosmic Log as well as NBCNews.com's other stories about science and space, sign up for the Tech & Science newsletter, delivered to your email in-box every weekday. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4
Comment author avatarStyroRestored

First!

But then, what really is there to say about this?

  • 3 votes
#1 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 4:27 PM EDT

Nice set of wheels, for a geek. Don't think I could pick up too many chicks with it, however!

  • 5 votes
#1.1 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 8:42 PM EDT
Comment author avatarCuongDNguyenExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

@ Roadkill

A billion dollar vehicle and you say that will have problem with picking up chicks? I bet your 5000 or less used car will have more chance, right?

  • 5 votes
#1.2 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 9:11 PM EDT
Comment author avatarbtj89Expand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

Well I think it's safe to say CuongDNguyen is the bitch in this conversation. Get a sense of humor prick.

  • 4 votes
#1.3 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 10:08 PM EDT

What do you mean it can't pick up chicks, Roadkill?

It's got a scoop.....

  • 12 votes
#1.4 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 11:07 PM EDT

My self portraits are usually an attractive array of nostril hairs and teeth fillings.

    #1.5 - Fri Nov 2, 2012 12:20 AM EDT
    Comment author avatarmarkwonderExpand Comment Comment collapsed by the community

    ...and the Negroes are like, "Who gives a f*ck about Mars?"

    • 2 votes
    #1.6 - Fri Nov 2, 2012 1:16 AM EDT

    @markwonder: I beg your pardon! What do you mean by your comment on us Blacks? We love and care about astronomy as well as the next person. I hope that was not meant to be a racist comment.

    I know a lot of whites love to use these blogs to get their racist attitude on, but you need to be a nut case showing their racist ass stupidity off.

    • 8 votes
    #1.7 - Fri Nov 2, 2012 2:12 AM EDT

    Markwonder

    I'm wondering why you havn't been banned for life. What an uncalled for racist comment. You win the prize today for most worthless, racist or sexist comment on any blog for November 2, 2012. You may pick up your prize at the next Klan rally in White City, Alabama.

    BAN HIM NBC!

    • 7 votes
    #1.9 - Fri Nov 2, 2012 8:46 AM EDT

    What's funny is Mark is so stupid he doesn't realize the director of NASA is black!

    Toss the boy a banjo!

    • 7 votes
    #1.10 - Fri Nov 2, 2012 11:36 AM EDT

    Oh, derrr... What I MEANT to say was, ...and the Caucasians are like, "Who gives a f*ck about Mars?"

    • 1 vote
    #1.11 - Sun Nov 4, 2012 1:20 AM EDT

    Restored #1, even though it's pretty garbage, for clarity.

    and the Negroes are like, "Who gives a f*ck about Mars?"

    and the Caucasians are like, "Who gives a f*ck about Mars?"

    markwonder, smearing everyone in a race is always a bad contribution. Stop it. You're suspended for a week for violating #5 of the Code of Honor.

    Well I think it's safe to say CuongDNguyen is the bitch in this conversation. Get a sense of humor prick.

    you need to be a nut case showing their racist ass stupidity off.

    What's funny is Mark is so stupid

    btj89, george-3973351, D Fields43066, you're each suspended for a day for violating #1 of the Code of Honor.

    Above all else, respect others. Address issues and arguments and refrain from making personal attacks. If you see something disrespectful or inappropriate, report it - rather than further inflaming the situation.

    • 6 votes
    #1.12 - Tue Nov 6, 2012 2:27 PM EST

    at the end of the day who cares. if i wanted to see racist comments id go to the other blogs like the mexican american on the most wanted list. those comments were much worse. these comments arent even catchy and are just angry. especially the responses. i understand where you are comming from though tyler. anyway i came to see what people had to say about these pictures because the last one had no arm in sight so how exactly were those pics taken? and secondly the fact that fuel molecules are on mars should mean something right.... i just dont want to be the one to say it.

    • 1 vote
    #1.13 - Mon Dec 3, 2012 4:36 PM EST

    Its Johnny 5!!!!

    • 1 vote
    #1.14 - Mon Dec 3, 2012 5:01 PM EST

    If, you bothered to read more, and comment less, then you would have understood, that it is a compilation of a number of images, and the arm has been removed, it is clearly stated IN the article, is that as " clear as mud " for you now?

    • 1 vote
    #1.15 - Mon Dec 3, 2012 5:30 PM EST
    Reply

    Amazing photo. Looks like the American southwest desert with mountains in the background with dust being blown in the wind.

    • 17 votes
    #2 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 4:29 PM EDT

    Can you believe the revenue from the Twilight series would have covered this entire mission - and that there aren't any more missions scheduled because NASA doesn't have the funding?!

    • 15 votes
    #2.2 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 7:34 PM EDT

    what? What about thermodynamics dont you understand. Freeze and boil. Common. Granted you would need a thermal insulating suit with oxygen. Does water boil when it freezes?

    • 1 vote
    #2.3 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 7:39 PM EDT

    In thin atmosphere you're darn tootin your blood can boil.

    Temperatures in the mesosphere decrease with altitude. Since there are very few gas molecules in the mesosphere to absorb the Sun's radiation, the heat source here is the stratosphere below. The mesosphere is extremely cold, especially at its top, about -90°C (-130°F).

    The air in the mesosphere is extremely thin: 99.9% of the mass of the atmosphere is below the mesosphere. As a result, air pressure is very low. Although the amount of oxygen relative to other gases is the same as at sea level, there is very little gas and so very little oxygen. A person traveling through the mesosphere would experience severe burns from ultraviolet light since the ozone layer which provides UV protection is in the stratosphere below them. And there would be almost no oxygen for breathing! Stranger yet, an unprotected traveler's blood would boil at normal body temperature because the pressure is so low.

    http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/High_School_Earth_Science/Atmospheric_Layers

    I'm not sure about Mars at ground level but it sure can boil because of a thin atmosphere.

    • 7 votes
    #2.4 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 8:11 PM EDT

    Mike Davis-433554

    NASA has many missions going on at this moment and more scheduled to fly. Read and learn something.

    http://www.nasa.gov/missions/index.html

    • 8 votes
    #2.5 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 8:24 PM EDT

    as long as you exhale, the effects of exposure would be survivable for short periods of time (15 seconds or so).

    At NASA's Manned Spacecraft Center (now renamed
    Johnson Space Center) we had a test subject accidentally exposed to a near
    vacuum (less than 1 psi) in an incident involving a leaking space suit in a
    vacuum chamber back in '65. He remained conscious for about 14 seconds, which is
    about the time it takes for O2 deprived blood to go from the lungs to the brain.
    The suit probably did not reach a hard vacuum, and we began repressurizing the
    chamber within 15 seconds. The subject regained consciousness at around 15,000
    feet equivalent altitude. The subject later reported that he could feel and hear
    the air leaking out, and his last conscious memory was of the water on his
    tongue beginning to boil.

    Aviation Week and Space Technology (02/13/95) printed a letter by Leonard
    Gordon which reported another vacuum-packed anecdote:

    "The experiment of exposing an unpressurized hand to near vacuum for a
    significant time while the pilot went about his business occurred in real life
    on Aug. 16, 1960. Joe Kittinger, during his ascent to 102,800 ft (19.5 miles) in
    an open gondola, lost pressurization of his right hand. He decided to continue
    the mission, and the hand became painful and useless as you would expect.
    However, once back to lower altitudes following his record-breaking parachute
    jump, the hand returned to normal."

    animal experiments have shown that the body can survive for roughly 60-90 seconds, but loss of consciousness occurs in 10-15 seconds

    • 7 votes
    #2.8 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 10:53 PM EDT

    What is Twilight? People and all their hip code words these days - ugh! If you use all this code lingo; you can't slam NBC or MSN writers when they don't give the complete story...who has (or wants) all this time too look all this jargon up...not me, not gunna do it.

    Amazing photo. Looks like the American southwest desert with mountains in the background with dust being blown in the wind.

    If it was here in Tucson there would be a cross ever quarter mile marking where someone got run over...so nice of them to share their misery.

      #2.9 - Fri Nov 2, 2012 12:31 AM EDT

      @ ArterianMSP,

      "So your death would be measured in the same amount of time the oxygen in your brain will hold out." - Well now wouldn't that be a downer............Oh Bother ;)

      "Thankfully, you will pass out of lack of oxygen before the really nasty things happen to you." - So the storm cloud does have a silver lining :)

        #2.10 - Fri Nov 2, 2012 2:06 AM EDT

        Well, geez I hate to say this, because I'm a big supporter of science, NASA, and even the whole Jesus' Wife controversy, c'mon folks. Mars looks just like New Mexico without the cactus or the Navajo's, Hopi's or tourist traps.

        Man, where are the great discoveries? What about those shiny objects in the sand? What's the point.

        Yes, we put a rover on Mars, a planet millions of miles away and it's sending us pictures of ...NEW MEXICO?

        I hate to be like this. I really do. I was very excited about this mission and all it's possibilities but so far all we've gotten is some pretty boring vacation pictures. Where is the sex appeal? Where is the adventure? Where are the worms?

        I wish there were worms.

        • 1 vote
        #2.11 - Fri Nov 2, 2012 9:47 AM EDT

        Gosh, I never thought about New Mexico NOT being sexy. Now I'm depressed.

        • 1 vote
        #2.12 - Fri Nov 2, 2012 10:12 AM EDT

        Exactly what I was thinking. Looks amazingly like the southwest desert of the U.S. Ever watch the movie 'Capricorn One' with James Brolin, Elliot Gould, Sam Waterston and a pre-murderous O.J. Simpson? Hmmm....

          #2.13 - Fri Nov 2, 2012 11:05 AM EDT

          "Pre-murderous"? I'm not so sure. He killed a little bit of my soul with that movie.

          I just wish the picture were more squat and wide, instead of tall and narrow. I'm having a hard time cropping it for a monitor background. I'm going to have to choose between cutting off the camera up on the mast, or the wheel.

          • 1 vote
          #2.14 - Fri Nov 2, 2012 11:05 AM EDT

          I'm not saying New Mexico isn't wonderful. I love New Mexico. But for $40 and a days drive I can take MY OWN pictures of a landscape that looks a lot like Mars in NEW MEXICO. So why spend eleventy-ga-zillion dollars to go to Mars just so a rover can send back the same pictures I could have taken in New Mexico for a whole lot less?

          I really hate to be like this, but GEEEZ LOU-EEEZE, is that all there is?

          I admit my expectations were unrealistic. I wanted the rover to find evidence of past life, lost cities, John Carter and Dejah Thoris. Not New Mexico!

          I wish there were worms.

          • 2 votes
          #2.15 - Fri Nov 2, 2012 11:17 AM EDT

          Well, just consider how much easier it is to land on Tatooine than, say, Coruscant or Endor.

            #2.16 - Fri Nov 2, 2012 11:50 AM EDT

            I volunteer to be the first man to go to and die on Mars. NASA... Your move.

            • 3 votes
            #2.17 - Fri Nov 2, 2012 2:57 PM EDT

            I find there's really no place you can go in the desert and not find offroad tire tracks.

              #2.18 - Fri Nov 2, 2012 5:23 PM EDT

              Well, stop looking back!

              • 1 vote
              #2.19 - Sat Nov 3, 2012 1:07 PM EDT

              Beautiful on the inside?

                #2.20 - Tue Nov 6, 2012 1:21 PM EST
                Reply

                Notice the ghostly image in the camera's lense.

                • 6 votes
                Reply#3 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 4:29 PM EDT

                The different photos we've been seeing are great. An amazing technology just to send these cameras all the way to mars. And then see the clarity is awesome. But, I would like to know more about the experiments with the martian soil and atmosphere. If there has been any indication of life in the soil. The mineral makeup. How much water may be there. If it's possible to terraform the planet, etc. Congrats to nasa and all others involved.

                • 7 votes
                Reply#4 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 4:37 PM EDT

                Also you can go to NASA JPL and get on the email list for daily updates on the mission.

                I have all of the emails since just before the landing saved.

                Contact me and I'll send you the most important ones or JPL may have an archive you can look through, would check but I gotta go.

                • 2 votes
                #4.3 - Fri Nov 2, 2012 8:08 AM EDT
                Reply

                Amazingly bad-ass. Really.

                • 5 votes
                Reply#5 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 4:40 PM EDT

                Say Cheeeeessssseeee...LOL..

                • 3 votes
                Reply#6 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 4:40 PM EDT

                I noticed how the daylight, color of the air, and landscape look like the Jazeera desert in Iraq or Udari range in Kuwait. If not for a lack of oxygen, a person might think they would see a Bedouin tent in the distance and camels or sheep.

                  Reply#7 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 4:41 PM EDT

                  Just imagine, here we are, seeing photos from Mars. I am so fascinated by this whole operation of the Mars rover. SOmeday this will be commonplace but to me, as a Senior Citizen, I am just fascinated by these photos.

                  • 12 votes
                  Reply#8 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 4:47 PM EDT

                  Me to. Wonder what our grand kids will see.

                  • 3 votes
                  #8.1 - Fri Nov 2, 2012 10:51 PM EDT
                  Reply

                  Well said William. I agree. Another question to bring up how did we get the snapshot of the full robot? Who took that shot? I'm beginning to think that this is just another trick to make us think that we're on Mars as they did with the Lunar landings. Just saying...

                  • 4 votes
                  Reply#9 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 4:54 PM EDT

                  Right ... As noted in the item, the shot was assembled from multiple pictures taken by the camera on the end of the robot's arm. But of course that camera couldn't take a picture of itself, just as a person taking multiple pictures of him or herself with a smartphone for stitching together can't take a picture of the forearm holding the camera. So the end of the robotic arm "disappears" in this picture. As for the experiments with Martian soil and atmosphere, stay tuned: There's a news conference on Friday during which the MSL team is expected to report its measurements of METHANE in the Martian atmosphere. I'll add that to the item itself.

                  • 20 votes
                  #9.1 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 5:05 PM EDT
                  Comment author avatarWilliam Yearoutvia Facebook

                  Does it bother you that nobody with an understanding of mathematics, physics, and science doubts we landed on the moon? Now, I can give you a million reasons why we didn't stay and why we're not going back. We only landed 6 times (plus the failure of Apollo 13) along with the 2 other missions which orbited to test out materials and map out sites (Apollo 8 and 10). Each of those launched on the sorta-kinda gigantic Saturn V rocket. And that sorta-kinda was expensive. Even if there was nobody on it, the Saturn V would have cost the same. So, if you know how to build working rockets and spaceships... Why not go to the moon? And, of course, fake the footage of the fake moon landing on the moon.

                  • 4 votes
                  #9.2 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 5:18 PM EDT

                  You're out of your mind. Get back on your meds, asap.

                  • 8 votes
                  #9.3 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 5:30 PM EDT

                  So. you've never seen someone's arm's length, self-taken, cellphone picture...?

                  • 5 votes
                  #9.4 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 5:46 PM EDT

                  Go Go gadget rover.

                  • 1 vote
                  #9.5 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 6:07 PM EDT

                  Oh obvisously it's all a conspiricy to that one guy WHO DIDN'T READ HOW THEY GOT THE PHOTO. Nutbag, need to go back to school and take reading classes again? DUH!

                    #9.6 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 6:27 PM EDT

                    Spirit

                    You, are a jerk

                    Just saying!

                    • 1 vote
                    #9.7 - Fri Nov 2, 2012 12:37 AM EDT

                    I was taking bets on how long it would take the Con-Quacks to show up. They LOVE this type stuff, i.e. "It looks strange. I don't understand it. I haven't a clue what's really happening. Therefore it is a conspiracy & I need to invent a good Con-Story to explain it."

                    Sad thing is, some of these people are actually very intelligent, just lacking old-fashion common sense. Just think how many REAL problems could be solved if that brain power was channeled into legitimate projects ..... rather than showing how a Mars-Buggie is actually here on Earth, because an engineer just snapped a picture of it & posted it on the NASA site.

                    • 11 votes
                    #9.8 - Fri Nov 2, 2012 3:08 AM EDT

                    Was wondering when you moon hoax / flat earth people would show up

                    • 5 votes
                    #9.9 - Fri Nov 2, 2012 7:40 AM EDT

                    i know im calling some of you out by saying this... but lets not call eachother out. you would never call someone out in person. you would just make the statement! the last pic shows the full rover with background so how can it be that the arm is sticking out somewhere?

                      #9.10 - Mon Dec 3, 2012 4:51 PM EST

                      my point being that we dont need to fill up comment space with trivial back and forths. lets ask more questions?

                        #9.11 - Mon Dec 3, 2012 4:53 PM EST
                        Reply

                        I really would like to see a close up of the lens from this picture. Mark-998558, It looks to much like a photo taken hear in the desert.

                          Reply#10 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 4:57 PM EDT

                          My 20 year-old cat is named MAHLI! lol

                            Reply#11 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 5:02 PM EDT

                            Don't know where this # behind my name came from. But.. As a photographer and detail specialist, I can't figure out why these photo's were enhanced. I mean the top photo only. No tracks, how'd the sucker get there and as part Indian, How long ago? Who messed with this pic and why? Questions to ask my friends> I see many things with the other two pics, but they look normal.

                            • 1 vote
                            Reply#12 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 5:03 PM EDT

                            There's no mystery, really. The color balance was indeed adjusted in the top photo. That picture also shows just part of the rover, so it misses out on showing the terrain that has the rover's tracks on it. (You can see those tracks in the full-body views.) Curiosity has been in that area for weeks. As I noted in the item, the person who "messed" with the imagery (or enhanced it) is Joe Knapp.

                            • 14 votes
                            #12.1 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 5:08 PM EDT

                            Thanks Alan... you deliver and then some. I look forward to the methane readouts and the pics looks curiously stellar... (Pun intended). And give Joe Knapp a slap of approval for me. (rhyme intended)

                            • 6 votes
                            #12.2 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 6:22 PM EDT

                            My God these images are just amazing. It reminds me of when I was a kid, during the space race in the 60's. Looking at them I feel the same excitement. The human desire to explore and quest for knowledge.

                            • 3 votes
                            #12.4 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 9:54 PM EDT

                            paul-2187097 said, "As a photographer and detail specialist ....."

                            Not much of one ..... since you don't know how to look at pic#2, which lives 12" below pic#1, giving a perfect explanation of what you can't figure out about pic#1.

                            Rule#1 of ALL Con-Theories = Don't invent a conspiracy & there won't be one.

                            • 4 votes
                            #12.5 - Fri Nov 2, 2012 3:14 AM EDT

                            If anyone else would like to try their hand at this, here's what I did:

                            1) get the raw image tiles from the public NASA website

                            2) use the free panorama stitching program hugin to put the image tiles together in a montage (I used only some of the images concentrated around the mast and deck)

                            3) use an image processing program like Adobe Lightroom to adjust color balance, contrast, etc.

                            Hugin is a very nice program but it does take some practice and there are lots of knobs to tweak to get a good result. Even so, the image above may have some imperfections, but hey, this isn't rocket science--that was NASA getting this amazing instrument there in the first place. Also amazing is that NASA/JPL and Malin make the raw images available within hours of when they're taken.

                            • 7 votes
                            #12.6 - Fri Nov 2, 2012 5:22 AM EDT

                            #10.6

                            Sir, If I may say so, You have done an excellent job, and thank you for the results, much appreciated!

                            • 4 votes
                            #12.7 - Fri Nov 2, 2012 6:28 AM EDT

                            Great job, Joe!

                            • 2 votes
                            #12.8 - Fri Nov 2, 2012 8:17 AM EDT

                            Beautiful pics... Go Joe!

                            • 1 vote
                            #12.9 - Sun Nov 11, 2012 11:39 PM EST

                            nice work joe knapp. i ve seen the love that people in NASA have for space exploration like when the asteroids hit jupiter. why would anyone waste so much time and money on a conspiracy? picture yourself in that position! there is nothing to gain from lying and we can't move forward with space exploration by spending money on a hoax. what happened to dreaming? some of you have lost sight of that.

                              #12.10 - Mon Dec 3, 2012 5:00 PM EST
                              Reply

                              Maybe there's a ghost out there who wants to trick or treat.

                                Reply#13 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 5:05 PM EDT

                                To Alan Boyle : Its still no answer to my question. Why was it enhanced. Are we supposed to look at that image and accept it as gospel. Come on. I was at the very first space shuttle lauunch and have seen 4 others. NASA can do better than this.

                                  Reply#14 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 5:15 PM EDT

                                  "So have the amateur image processors at UnmannedSpaceflight.com. The website serves as a forum for the fans of interplanetary robotic missions, and particularly for those who love to riff off NASA's raw imagery. Often, the amateurs are quicker on the draw than the professionals, who have to hew a little more closely to the standard procedures for releasing imagery."

                                  Per the article, NASA didn't do this yet - Joe Knapp, an Ohio Engineer, put the picture together.

                                  SMH

                                  • 6 votes
                                  #14.1 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 5:21 PM EDT

                                  arterian;

                                  absolutely beautiful comeback!

                                  too bad it will likely go over the heads of the conspiracy nutcases...

                                  • 5 votes
                                  #14.3 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 11:02 PM EDT

                                  his comeback was deleted

                                    #14.4 - Mon Dec 3, 2012 5:04 PM EST
                                    Reply

                                    Kinda looks like one of the probe droids the Empire sent to the ice planet Hoth.

                                    • 2 votes
                                    Reply#15 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 5:31 PM EDT

                                    Still no comments from NASA about the water erosion. Where did the water go? The comet that will go close to Mars next October might bring it back. Next summer get out your lawn chairs and watch the night sky.

                                    • 2 votes
                                    Reply#16 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 5:34 PM EDT

                                    Water sublimates on Mars. That is, it turns from a solid to a gas. It can't flow in liquid form for long because of the make up of the atmosphere. As the Martian atmosphere escaped into space it lost it's ability to keep flowing water on the planet. Less pressure made it colder. The remaining frozen CO2 is what's left. That will probably eventually go away too as the last of the atmosphere slips away over the next couple of hundred million [to a billion] years or so. Soon looking at Mars will be like looking at the moon. Black sky and only the history of what used to be. Kinda sad but it shows just how special our planet is.

                                    Now, there's potential for flowing water in Martian caves and if there's life that's probably going to be one of the first places to look. It makes sense too: you have higher pressure because of the [partially] enclosed space and a natural shield against radiation among others. The real issue though is whether we can realistically reach and explore those caves.

                                    • 1 vote
                                    #16.2 - Wed Nov 7, 2012 12:23 PM EST

                                    #14.2 -

                                    See " Making Mars Habitable " in particular " vents "!

                                    • 1 vote
                                    #16.3 - Wed Nov 7, 2012 12:47 PM EST

                                    isnt there a moon that loses constant water into the atmosphere like a funnel? is that titan? this process reminds me of what may be happening on mars.

                                      #16.4 - Mon Dec 3, 2012 5:09 PM EST
                                      Reply
                                      Comment author avatarT.A. Clarkvia Facebook

                                      These are really cool, very eerie in a way.

                                      • 2 votes
                                      Reply#17 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 5:50 PM EDT

                                      Amazing! That is so cool to see another planet in such detail, and the similarity to the Mojave Desert is spooky.

                                      • 3 votes
                                      Reply#18 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 6:18 PM EDT

                                      The wheels hold the dirt on them like if its mud..I thought its a dry dusty rocky planet.

                                      Seeing the tracks in the dirt is ok..can see tracks in sand too on a dry beach here. The dirt on the wheels is strange to me, figure it would never hold unless...WET! Or is it the dirt is stuck in the grooves of the wheels???

                                      • 1 vote
                                      Reply#19 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 6:21 PM EDT

                                      possibly a static charge,mike...

                                      • 1 vote
                                      #19.1 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 7:18 PM EDT
                                      Reply

                                      typical liberal media will not give jesus credit for anythting. everyone knows it is he who is snapping the pics!

                                        Reply#20 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 6:22 PM EDT

                                        The eerie distance of nothingness reminds me of that song Rocket Man by Elton John when he sings its lonely out in space.

                                        Only in this case it would be Mars.

                                        I can't imagine standing right there knowing how far away I would be from home or anyone for that matter.

                                        The pictures are truly amazing in any case.

                                        Maybe one day we will be standing there looking back at the camera saying hello to Earth one day in the future.

                                        • 2 votes
                                        Reply#21 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 6:26 PM EDT

                                        Sorry, you will never sell me on this one. If it was a self portrait, you would see an extension arm hooked to the Curiosity and leading away to where the camera is suppose to be. Gotta do better than this to make me a believer.

                                        • 1 vote
                                        Reply#22 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 6:33 PM EDT

                                        lacywild

                                        Did you ever think that maybe they just airbrushed that part out so you could enjoy the full portrait of the image itself?

                                        I mean the whole idea was to try and get a full portrait shot of the thing with parts all stitched together.

                                        Just a thought....

                                        • 6 votes
                                        #22.1 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 6:36 PM EDT

                                        you can see it in the reflection of Curiosity's main mast.

                                        • 3 votes
                                        #22.2 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 6:57 PM EDT

                                        thats the wonderment of science....everyone has a choice till proven otherwise, Lacy

                                        • 1 vote
                                        #22.3 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 7:16 PM EDT

                                        "Because of the way the mosaic was made, the very end of the robotic arm has made a spooky disappearance.

                                        "I did it in a bit of a rush," Atkinson wrote, "but it doesn't really matter, does it? Just a pretty pic, not an official NASA product. :-)""

                                        Seems to Me, no one is trying to " fool the fool that fools themselves ";-)

                                        • 4 votes
                                        #22.5 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 8:43 PM EDT

                                        exactly Eagle, the author of the pic freely admits it is a rush and the conspiracy nuts jump all over the composite pic...

                                        • 4 votes
                                        #22.6 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 11:08 PM EDT

                                        lol Dan, Seems some are so eager, to prove a " conspiRacy " they race themselves to " fools or dunce corner "" :-)

                                        • 5 votes
                                        #22.7 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 11:30 PM EDT
                                        Reply

                                        Almost looks like a roadway on the upper right hand side of the photo in the distance, but I know that is just the stitching and panoramic lens causing that.

                                        Mmmm? lol

                                        good pic

                                        • 1 vote
                                        Reply#23 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 6:33 PM EDT

                                        must be one of those "canals"...

                                        • 3 votes
                                        #23.1 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 11:09 PM EDT
                                        Reply

                                        So where are all the right wing Romney supporters claiming that it's all a government hoax and that the picture was made in the Arizona desert by a guy with his Nikon?

                                        Come on conspiracy theorists with your tinfoil hats, you are falling down on the job here.

                                        • 2 votes
                                        Reply#24 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 6:53 PM EDT

                                        This is fake!! The photo of the rover is actually taken in the Arizona desert. No, way this is Mars!!

                                        • 3 votes
                                        Reply#25 - Thu Nov 1, 2012 6:59 PM EDT

                                        Thanks Ricky. I appreciate your comment. I was disappointed that this point of view had not been expressed...LOL.

                                          #25.2 - Fri Nov 2, 2012 3:55 AM EDT
                                          Reply
                                          Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4
                                          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.