NASA has deliberately sent two satellites slamming into the moon's surface to avoid the possibility that they would damage any historic landing sites when they ran out of fuel. NBC's Brian Williams reports.
Update for 6 p.m ET: One year after their arrival at the moon, NASA's twin Grail spacecraft got a grand sendoff into oblivion, climaxing with a well-orchestrated crash onto a crater's rim. The place where they crashed will be named after Sally Ride, America's first woman in space, who passed away this summer.
Ride was in charge of the Grail mission's MoonKam project, which let students from around the world select targets for the probes' cameras. MIT's Maria Zuber, the mission's principal investigator, announced just after today's double whammy that her team received clearance from NASA to name the crash site after Ride.
"Sally was all about getting the job done, whether it be in exploring space, inspiring the next generation, or helping make the Grail mission the resounding success it is today," Zuber said in a NASA news release. "As we complete our lunar mission, we are proud we can honor Sally Ride's contributions by naming this corner of the moon after her."
The late astronaut's sister, Bear Ride, said the name is a fitting tribute to the space pioneer and her students. "It's really cool to know that when you look up now at the moon, there's this little corner of the moon that's named after Sally, and we hope that kids will really be inspired by that as well," she said during NASA's webcast of the Grail endgame.
The webcast showed mission team members applauding, shaking each other's hands and trading congratulations to mark the end of spacecraft operations at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory. But the main event — the actual crash into the rim of a crater in the moon's north polar region — went unseen. Each of the probes was the size of a washing machine, which means that even though they were going 3,760 mph (1.7 kilometers per second), they didn't make a fiery impact. What's more, at the time of the crash, 5:28 p.m. ET, the impact site was in shadow.
Eventually, NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter will take stock of the crash site, NASA spokesman D.C. Agle said. Mission managers don't expect to see any wreckage — just a couple of fresh holes in the ground. However, there's a chance that the blast may have kicked up some water ice or something similarly interesting that the orbiter could detect.
NASA's Grail mission probes, "Ebb" and "Flow." were successfully crashed into the lunar surface following a nearly yearlong project to map the moon's gravitational field in detail.

NASA / MIT
An artist's conception shows the Grail probes, known as Ebb and Flow, flying in formation over the moon.
Mission accomplished
The Grail mission's spacecraft entered lunar orbit on Jan. 1 and successfully completed their $496 million mission to map the moon's gravitational field in unprecedented detail. ("Grail" is an acronym standing for Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory.)
Earlier this month, the scientists behind the mission reported evidence that the moon was significantly more battered than they thought, early in its history. The fracturing goes deep into the crust and perhaps down further, into the mantle. Researchers also determined that the moon's crust goes 25 miles (40 kilometers) deep, which is not nearly as deep as previously thought.
Such findings are expected to shed light on the process that influenced the formation of the moon as well as Earth, billions of years ago. Before the mission, some scientists suspected that two moons smashed together to form the modern-day moon, in an ancient event nicknamed the "Big Splat." Grail's findings provided no evidence to back up that hypothesis, however.
The Grail mission also made a huge contribution to education and public outreach: The two probes were named Ebb and Flow by elementary-school students from Bozeman, Mont., who participated in a nationwide contest. Both Ebb and Flow were equipped with cameras that could be pointed at targets selected by students from around the world as part of Ride's project.
Although the spacecraft are gone, the job of analyzing the images and data produced by the mission is far from complete.
"Ebb and Flow have removed a veil from the moon, and removing this veil will enable discoveries about the way the moon formed and evolved for many years to come," Zuber said.
Avoiding Apollo sites
NASA opted for a controlled crash primarily to make sure that the Grail didn't end up hitting a historic site on the moon, such as the landing zones for the Apollo lunar modules or unmanned U.S. or Soviet probes.
The rocket burns that set the stage for the crash were successfully executed on Friday. Grail project manager David Lehman said that before the burns, mission navigators calculated a seven-out-of-a-million chance that one of the probes would hit a historic site. "Now, after these two successful rocket firings, there is zero chance," he said in a status report at the time.
Ebb was the first of the two spacecraft to go down. "Impact in 3, 2, 1, zero," a member of the systems team declared. Flow's crash followed about 25 seconds later. Mission navigators estimated that the two crash sites were separated by 2 miles (3 kilometers).
During their final hours of existence, the two probes were used for one last experiment. Mission engineers had the spacecraft fire their engines until all their remaining fuel was gone, to compare the computer models for fuel consumption against the actual figures.
"Fuel gauges in space are rather challenging, because fuel doesn't sit on the bottom like it does in car tanks on Earth," Agle explained. Grail's last experiment should help engineers get a better handle on the fuel requirements for future missions to the moon, Mars and other cosmic destinations.
Grail project manager Dave Lehman told NBC News that "we have all the data in" from the fuel-tank experiment, and that his team would analyze the data over the weeks ahead. Like many others on the Grail team, Lehman voiced mixed emotions about the end of a mission that went so well from start to finish.
"It's sad," he said, "but things turned out much better than expected."
More about Grail and the moon:
- Kids get their very own 'Earthrise'
- Watch the moon evolve in 3 minutes
- How Ebb and Flow got their names
- Grail snags first video of moon's far side
Alan Boyle is NBCNews.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter and adding the Cosmic Log page to your Google+ presence. To keep up with Cosmic Log as well as NBCNews.com's other stories about science and space, sign up for the Tech & Science newsletter, delivered to your email in-box every weekday. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.


... .... .... In the news ... .. ... .. NASA intentionally destroys space probe by crashing it into the moon... .. ... then names destruction site after first gay woman in space... ... ....
Well, the announcement that she was gay did have quite an 'impact' on the homophobes....
I'm not a homophobe, and I'm definetely not for gaysex marriage. Now go smoke another joint you weirdo.
You lie. You're a homophobe, dorko.
So jamesrogers - you're not a homophobe, but you just don't want them to have equal rights, eh? Kinda like the separate-but-equal stuff that was popular in the 50's and 60's, except more like separate-but-unequal. Someone's definitely been smoking something, that's for sure.
Why do we have marriage anyway? Why don't we outlaw marriage, period? It seems to be an outdated concept. All we do is marry, divorce, remarry.....
I wonder if the fuel test at the end was planned?
I just saw a video put out by NASA stating because we are still here we didn't die on 12/21/12 the day the Maya calendar was mess interpreted to be the last day of earth. Thank God, but what do they mean by this statement now. It's not 12/21/12 yet or is it and I'm dead? If we all die at once who will know we are dead? Will we notice decay or will we only see what is in our minds?
They've mastered time travel :)
http://cosmiclog.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/12/13/15886787-why-nasa-is-saying-we-told-you-so-about-doomsday-hype-a-week-early?lite
"The teaser for the video explains everything: 'NASA is so confident that the world is not coming to an end on Dec. 21, that they have already released a video for the day after,'" Tony Phillips, the writer and editor behind the NASA Science website as well as SpaceWeather.com, told NBC News in an email.
Phillips says the "day after" angle was his idea.
"I felt it was a lighter and more creative way to approach the topic than some of the other treatments we've seen," he wrote. "Some people have been confused by it, but not all. The unorthodox approach is definitely a conversation-starter, which was our goal all along."
Holy Grail fat man!! can I have some more silicone chips with that? "wham"-"o"
It is obvious that if we are going to put boots on the ground up thar anytime soon, we gonna need one of them thar rockets that gois on up and fetcha's them thar expendable sattelts 'fore they gotta xpend dem!!
It would be nice, if, when we show up and start operations, and, for what ever reason, need some odd, part, say like a platinum pressure valve rated for space use, someone would say, oh yeah, I was over in the junk yard yesterday, yep, thought I saw one, hmmm, seems to me it was just a bit after ebb but turn left before flow...no, go the opposite direction from voyager, don't know why they'd tow that one in here...
The else is clear,
<loudspeaker> expendable comm sat coming in from east in three, don't stare, 15 degrees off sun's halo, all but robot class ones, report to lower levels, repeat....... <loudspeaker>
(rumbling, shaking,minor moon quake, for effect mostly).
<loudspeaker>all clear <loudspeaker>
You know, they will get the landings down sooner or later... Dont lose faith guys..
Yeah everytime I get into a accideant while I'm trying to do my makeup while I'm driving I usually name the site in town after one of my friends, I've only got three left until I'm going to have to start reaching into the acquaintance-bag as well so keep your fingers crossed.
I'm still wondering why we don't design these orbiters to move on to other experiments after they initial mission. Send the probes to the asteroid belt to snoop around, or to the L4 and L5 spots and see what kind of material has been trapped there.
A little more fuel and a slow motion mission using an Earth gravity assist to get there?
Hiya Tony!
GRAIL was SO low, that carrying the rockets and fuel to go anywhere else would have made the mission 5-6 times larger. Since this mission was all about super-accurate measurements of the slightest difference in gravitational pull, making the beasties larger would increase the opportunity for error (not to mention adding a LOT to the cost).
It's been suggested that NASA should have left GRAIL in orbit for some future use; that simply was not an option. Folks don't appreciate just how low these birds were orbiting. Mission planners would command the sats to perform a manoeuvre to duck into a basin, and perform a matching manoeuvre to clear the ridge on the opposite side! They had run out of fuel, they WERE going to come down somewhere soon, and NASA could only pick the point (or let it crash willy-nilly wherever).
There is nothing at L4 or L5 to affect a gravitational probe, so they would be useless there. The Venetian atmosphere is too thick to allow GRAIL to orbit at its operational altitude. Mars would be an interesting option, but again, it was impossible for this mission to get there; it would be simpler, cheaper, and would return better science from both Luna AND Mars to send a separate mission to Mars.
This was the best choice.
Cheers! ~Michael (Astronomy.FM★Radio)
Well, aside from this mission, I would like to see more multi-purpose missions.
Understand the low orbit and sensitive nature of the study, so crashing sounds like a good idea (any science from the crash?), but put a word in to get some probes that can do more than one things, kinda like Dawn (I really like Dawn).
Unfortunately, the current economics of spaceflight are such that sending separate probes to each destination is almost always cheaper than sending one probe that can go to multiple destinations. The six times bigger probe to carry the fuel needed to orbit both the Moon and Mars with the same probe would have required a six times bigger rocket to launch from Earth, etc.
There are two exceptions to this one-probe-one-destination approach. First is where a probe does a flyby of intermediate planets during a gravitational slingshot to get to another planet. Probes going beyond Jupiter have all flown by Jupiter for a slingshot, and probes to Mercury have flown by Venus.
The second exception at present is with the Dawn probe, which orbited the asteroid Vesta and is currently en route to the dwarf planet Ceres. Dawn's double mission is made possible because it uses an electrically powered ion propulsion system, which is far more fuel-efficient than conventional rockets (though VERY slow--it took weeks just to escape from Vesta's tiny gravity), thus allowing it to be able to carry enough fuel to visit both destinations.
Exactly. And if things go well, Dawn will get a third object. But, design, planning and timing can make a difference.
Michael, any word on whether Dawn will make it to 2 Pallas, or will it do an extened Ceres mission instead? Too bad they delayed the launch.
Congrats to NASA on yet another successful mission. Well done!