Verdict issued on skeleton found under parking lot: It's King Richard III

The bones of King Richard III have been found in England. NBC's Stephanie Gosk reports.



Experts say DNA analysis supports their claim that the bones dug up last year under a parking lot in the English city of Leicester are the last mortal remains of England's King Richard III.

"It's the academic conclusion of the University of Leicester that beyond reasonable doubt the individual exhumed at Greyfriars in September 2012 is indeed Richard III, the last Plantagenet king of England," Richard Buckley, the project's lead archaeologist, said during a Monday news briefing in Leicester.

The project used 21st-century forensic science to solve a 500-year-old mystery surrounding one of William Shakespeare's best-known villains. Shakespeare's play, "Richard III," made the king out to be a scheming monster who killed children to get to the English throne. The bard gave Richard III dramatic lines that are still evoked today, ranging from "the winter of our discontent" to "A horse! A horse! My kingdom for a horse!"


In real life, Richard III's battlefield death in 1485 marked the end of England's Wars of the Roses, a decades-long conflict between the houses of York and Lancaster. Tradition held that he was buried in the choir of Leicester's Greyfriars Church, but the precise location of his remains was lost in the mists of time. Some even speculated that Richard's bones were thrown into the River Soar during Henry VIII's reign.

It was only in the past few years that archaeologists have been able to zero in on the location of the Greyfriars site again. Last year, a team led by the University of Leicester excavated a city parking lot and found a wealth of intriguing evidence — including a skeleton with a battle-scarred skull and a spine that was curved due to scoliosis. There was no evidence of a coffin, a shroud or clothing that was buried with the body.

All those clues suggested that the skeleton could have been that of the historical Richard III, but to firm up the connection, scientists put the bones through genetic tests, radiocarbon dating and more detailed osteological analysis.

"The skull was in good condition, although fragile, and was able to give us detailed information about this individual," University of Leicester archaeologist Jo Appleby reported Sunday in a news release. During Monday's news briefing, Appleby said experts identified 10 injuries to the bones, including eight wounds to the skull and "postmortem humiliation injuries." Such wounds are "highly consistent" with the accounts of Richard III's death, she said.

"Historical sources tell us that Richard's body was stripped," hacked and put on public display after the battle, Appleby noted.

The skeleton's relatively delicate structure was consistent with descriptions of Richard III's physical appearance, University of Leicester historian Lin Foxhall said. 

University of Leicester

A photo shows the Greyfriars skeleton lying in the site where it was found.

University of Leicester

The Greyfriars skeleton is laid out for forensic analysis. Experts believe the foot bones were separated from the rest of the body after burial.

University of Leicester

The Greyfriars skull was found by researchers during a search for the remains of King Richard III.

Researchers say they've found the skeleton of King Richard III of England.

Buckley told journalists that the position of the hands suggested that they might have been bound together. Initially, the team reported that an arrowhead was found among the bones, but Buckley said a closer look determined that the object was a nail that was apparently mixed in with the remains.

Radiocarbon dating showed that "the individual could have died in 1485," Buckley said. Two tests yielded dates possibly ranging from 1455 to 1540.  

The team's genetic analysis reinforced the link to Richard III: DNA was extracted from bone samples and compared with modern-day mitochondrial DNA from two direct descendants of Richard III's family, including an anonymous donor as well as Michael Ibsen, a Canadian-born cabinetmaker who is a 17th-generation descendant of Richard III's eldest sister, Anne of York.

"The DNA evidence points to these being the remains of Richard III," said Turi King, a geneticist at the University of Leicester. She said additional DNA tests were still in progress.

Genetic matches based on mitochondrial DNA aren't as clear-cut as, say, a paternity test — but a mismatch would have ruled out any family connection. Similar techniques were used to identify the remains of Czar Nicholas II and other members of Russia's royal family, who were killed in 1918 during the Russian Revolution.

A documentary about the Leicester project, "Richard III: The King in the Car Park," is to be aired by Britain's Channel 4 on Monday night. But this isn't the end of the story. For one thing, the results announced on Monday will have to go through review and publication in scientific journals. The announcement also could lead to a reassessment of Richard III's reign, which some historians say wasn't nearly as terrible as Shakespeare made it out to be.

"I think this could be the moment where Richard III's reputation actually turns," British historian Andrew Roberts told NBC News. "This could be the moment where we look at his achievements and the positive aspects of Richard III, and don't just see him as one of the old Dark Ages kings."

And then there's the matter of reburying the remains: Authorities said the skeleton would get a proper interment in Leicester Cathedral, not far from the parking lot where it was found. The cathedral's canon chancellor, David Monteith, said planning for an interment ceremony in 2014 has already begun, and he expressed the hope that after more than 500 years, Richard III "may come to rest in peace, and rise in glory."

More about the search for Richard III:


Alan Boyle is NBCNews.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter and adding the Cosmic Log page to your Google+ presence. To keep up with Cosmic Log as well as NBCNews.com's other stories about science and space, sign up for the Tech & Science newsletter, delivered to your email in-box every weekday. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4
Comment author avatarIvan Tonavia Facebook

I've just watched this "My kingdom for a horse" scene from "Richard III" movie. I'm sure it'll be quite modified in the future remakes taking into account the findings: #!h&V=74ul7XeQgwg&N=The-Death-of-King-Richard-III

  • 1 vote
Reply#86 - Mon Feb 4, 2013 7:20 PM EST

If the DNA from the skeleton matches DNA from his relatives, then it probably is his skeleton. I had heard jokes that because there are more parking lots now then fields or buildings where he might have been buried, that he would be under a parking lot. Who really cares it’s a skeleton and if the DNA matches then it is his. People didn’t like him and now you’ve got him. What are they going to do with his skeleton? Is it going to a museum or is he going to get a proper grave? Where are the feet? Did they cut off his feet then and that would indicate that he was tortured before death. I’d seen movies where they would cut the hands and feet off and so maybe they tortured King Richard III and cut his feet off before he died.

    Reply#87 - Mon Feb 4, 2013 7:23 PM EST

    Tsk tsk tsk. Someone didn't read the article, which stated he would get a "proper internment" in Liecester Cathedral. And, no, he wasn't tortured before death - he met a violent end in battle, after which it was subject ot "indignities" before being buried (most accounts give the burial place ass Greyfairs Church, which was located in teh area of the parking lot). It's possible the feet were chopped off. However, under Henry VIII, when the monasteries were being suppressed and the church torn down, it's possible his grave was disturbed, or he was hasily reburied, and the feet lost at that time.

    • 1 vote
    #87.1 - Mon Feb 4, 2013 9:14 PM EST
    Reply

    Here is my question, why is the vertebrae arranged in that wierd S pattern?

      Reply#88 - Mon Feb 4, 2013 7:30 PM EST

      Richard III had scoliosis, which is curvature of the spine.

      • 2 votes
      #88.1 - Mon Feb 4, 2013 7:39 PM EST
      Reply

      I agree with those who side with Richard's killing of his nephews. There is no other conclusion. If they lived, why didn't he show them or banish them to some other country. He had them disinherited, you'd of thought that would have been enough, but he didn't have a hill of beans to collaborate that story. Henry Tudor searched the tower for the bodies and never found them. I think Richard was power hunger. He helped killed King Henry during his brother's reign, helped killed his own brother George, Duke of Clarence. Why wouldn't he have had his nephews murdered? Who knows, maybe he poisoned Edward II as well. He certainly doesn't deserve a funeral with all the pomp and glory of a "good" king. Reburied naturally with a tombstone should be good enough.

        Reply#89 - Mon Feb 4, 2013 8:10 PM EST

        History is written by the victors. "Naturally," Henry Tudor didn't find the two princes. Henry was proclaimed and crowned king on Bosworth Field; it would have been a problem for him if the two princes, one of whom was the rightful king, had been discovered alive in the tower. So, it was in his best interest that the two princes disappear.

        • 1 vote
        #89.1 - Mon Feb 4, 2013 9:21 PM EST

        Tudor propaganda that Shakespeare promulgated in Richard III.

          #89.2 - Mon Feb 4, 2013 9:27 PM EST

          he would've had trouble poisoning Edward II as Richard III lived 100+ years after Edward II's reign.

          • 1 vote
          #89.3 - Tue Feb 5, 2013 8:21 AM EST
          Reply

          As a joke it looks like Casey Anthony got a hold of the feet.

            Reply#90 - Mon Feb 4, 2013 8:16 PM EST

            media lie I'm a sheep u a sheep they a sheep............................

              Reply#91 - Mon Feb 4, 2013 8:22 PM EST

              Skip - (comment way above) - your account of Richard III was written by those who opposed him in the Wars of the Roses, and had everything to lose if their side of the family was disgraced in any way.

              No one actually knows what happened to those princes (though two childrens' skeletons were found several hundred years later behind a staircase). It's not clear who they were, and any number of people had motive to kill rightful heirs in front of them - why do you think the Wars of the Roses happened?

              If this is Richard III, I believe he was the last British monarch to die in battle actually leading his soldiers, the last of the great Plantagenet line, and he was known as a skilled warrior despite his deformed spine. This would be quite a historical find. Since his biographies were written by people with an agenda (to please the current monarch who got their status based on his death), it is nearly impossible to determine what he did or didn't do - but remember - nearly every monarch until recent times has had people put to death on a whim.

                Reply#93 - Mon Feb 4, 2013 11:26 PM EST

                on a whim

                  #93.1 - Tue Feb 5, 2013 5:44 PM EST
                  Reply

                  Absolutely amazing. We can find a dead man buried 500 years ago, but we can't get to the bottom of what took

                  place in Benghazi last year. I guess some things matter, and some don't.

                    Reply#94 - Mon Feb 4, 2013 11:44 PM EST

                    Thank goodness now i can now sleep at night!

                      Reply#95 - Tue Feb 5, 2013 5:15 PM EST

                      I'm only a direct cousin 17 times removed myself but nobody called.

                        Reply#96 - Tue Feb 5, 2013 5:42 PM EST

                        You may want to read the whole article, especially this paragraph: The team's genetic analysis reinforced the link to Richard III: DNA was extracted from bone samples and compared with modern-day mitochondrial DNA from two direct descendants of Richard III's family, including an anonymous donor as well as Michael Ibsen, a Canadian-born cabinetmaker who is a 17th-generation descendant of Richard III's eldest sister, Anne of York

                          Reply#97 - Wed Feb 6, 2013 8:37 PM EST
                          Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3 4
                          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.