Scientists expect to find alien Earths circling red dwarfs in our 'backyard'

ESO

An artist's impression shows a planetary system around a red dwarf star.


An analysis of data from NASA's Kepler planet-hunting mission suggests that about 6 percent of all red dwarf stars should have habitable, Earth-sized planets — and because red dwarfs are the most common stars in our galaxy, the nearest Earthlike planet could be as close as 13 light-years.

"We thought we would have to search vast distances to find an Earthlike planet. Now we realize another Earth is probably in our own backyard, waiting to be spotted," Harvard astronomer Courtney Dressing, the lead author of the data-crunching study, said in a news release.

That doesn't mean we can just hop out the back door and head for a red dwarf: Although 13 light-years is relatively close in astronomical terms, it would still take more than 50,000 years to cover that distance using current propulsion technology. But the finding could lead astronomers to cast a wider net in the search for the conditions conducive to extraterrestrial life.


Dressing presented her team's findings on Tuesday during a news briefing at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, or CfA. The research paper is expected to be published in The Astrophysical Journal.

Red dwarfs are thought to account for about 75 percent of the stars in the Milky Way: They're smaller, cooler and fainter than our sun — so faint, in fact, that no red dwarf is visible to the naked eye. But the fact that they're cooler means that closer-in planets are more likely to be habitable.

That's good news for planet-hunters: The Kepler space telescope, which was launched in 2009, detects alien worlds by looking for the subtle dimming of starlight as a planet passes in front of its alien sun. Closer-in planets would cover more of the star's disk, making them easier to detect.

Dressing and her colleagues sifted through the 158,000 stars targeted by the Kepler probe to identify all the red dwarfs. She said the stars' sizes and temperatures were calculated using computer models "that are more appropriate for these small red stars." Previously, those stellar characteristics were derived using a less precise, one-size-fits-all type of computer model, she said.

The fresh analysis showed that almost all of the stars were smaller and cooler than previously thought. That means the worlds detected around those planets would be proportionately smaller as well, bringing more of them into the Earth-sized category.

The astronomers identified 95 Kepler candidate planets that are circling red dwarfs. When they ran those candidates through their fine-tuned computer model, they found that three of them were roughly Earth-sized, with the right temperature to sustain liquid water and life. And when they factored in their estimates for the proportion of planets that would have gone undetected, due to the limitations of the Kepler mission's observing method, they concluded that 6 percent of all red dwarfs should have an Earth-sized, habitable planet.

"That rate implies that it will be significantly easier to search for life beyond the solar system than we previously thought," the CfA's David Charbonneau, a co-author of the study, said in Wednesday's news release.

Because our sun is surrounded by a swarm of red dwarfs, the statistics suggest that the most probable distance for such a habitable planet would be 13 light-years, if all the surrounding stars could be examined with a suitable telescope. Kepler isn't designed for such a survey — but a new type of space telescope, or a big enough network of ground-based telescopes, could take on the job. For example, NASA's James Webb Space Telescope, currently due for launch in 2018, could study the thermal characteristics and perhaps even the atmospheres of nearby red-dwarf planets, Charbonneau said.

The researchers said that a habitable planet circling a red dwarf would be markedly different from Earth: It would probably be locked into an orbit that kept one side of the planet perpetually facing its alien sun. Charbonneau said the heat could conceivably be transported around the globe via a thick atmosphere or ocean.

Also, red dwarfs are known to be quite variable in their emissions, with occasional strong flares of ultraviolet light. "If that were to happen on Earth, it would cause havoc," Charbonneau told journalists.

But Dressing said alien life could conceivably adapt to such stresses. "You don't need an Earth clone to have life," she said.

Red-dwarf planets might have at least one edge over Earth in the habitability department: Astrobiologists have estimated that our planet could be rendered inhospitable to life in the next couple of billion years, due to a long-term increase in solar radiation. Red dwarfs are different in that regard. "They are incredibly long-lived," Charbonneau told journalists. "They never show their age."

He said it's conceivable that some of the planets circling red dwarfs could remain habitable for 10 billion years or more.

Caltech astronomer John Johnson said the newly reported research marks one more step toward taking the search for alien Earths out of the realm of science fiction and putting it squarely in the realm of science fact. "Now I think the conversation is starting in earnest," he said. 

More about the planet search:


The three habitable-zone planetary candidates identified in this study are Kepler Object of Interest (KOI) 1422.02, which is 90 percent the size of Earth in a 20-day orbit; KOI 2626.01, 1.4 times the size of Earth in a 38-day orbit; and KOI 854.01, 1.7 times the size of Earth in a 56-day orbit. All three are located about 300 to 600 light-years away and orbit stars with temperatures between 5,700 and 5,900 degrees Fahrenheit (3,150 to 3,260 degrees Celsius). For comparison, our sun’s surface is 10,000 degrees F, or 5,500 degrees C.

Alan Boyle is NBCNews.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter and adding the Cosmic Log page to your Google+ presence. To keep up with Cosmic Log as well as NBCNews.com's other stories about science and space, sign up for the Tech & Science newsletter, delivered to your email in-box every weekday. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.

First published 11 a.m. ET Feb. 6. Last updated 12:53 p.m. ET Feb. 6.

Discuss this post

Jump to discussion page: 1 2

I'm glad that these small people have land of their own. Not sure why the red ones get special attention (and isn't "red" kind of a dated descriptor?). There are plenty of other dwarfs that need / have earth also.

    Reply#27 - Thu Feb 7, 2013 1:15 AM EST

    I wish to be alive when they find actual life forms on other planets or moons.. That'll be so cool..

    • 1 vote
    Reply#28 - Thu Feb 7, 2013 3:02 AM EST

    Live long and prosper

    • 1 vote
    Reply#29 - Thu Feb 7, 2013 8:09 AM EST

    Speaking of red dwarfs. I saw a whole tribe of them scouting Fair Park at the Texas State Fair last year.

      Reply#30 - Thu Feb 7, 2013 8:29 AM EST

      within 20 years ,we should have the capabilities to analyze the chemical composition of a Earth like planet's atmosphere.That should give us a general idea of whats happening on the surface.We have looked at our own planet from a long ways off,so we can compare data.Just because their not visiting us,doesn't mean their not highly evolved,they could be very advanced.I think we will all be amazed to find out,were not alone,never were alone.

        Reply#31 - Thu Feb 7, 2013 1:57 PM EST

        Jose can you see???

        NASA calculates an estimated 100 billion planets in our Milky Way Galaxy. And they estimate another billion galaxies. Is that a gazillion? Can't count that high. The earth is about 4 billion years old with first signs of life roughly 3 billion years ago.

        Mathematical probabilities are that there are a bunch more dudes out there.

          Reply#32 - Thu Feb 7, 2013 7:49 PM EST

          Most of you writing to this article are idiots. Microbial life, started early after planet earth was formed, and has lasted for several billion years...while intelligent evolved life is less than a quarter million years. We are likely to find all kinds of microbial life: some very very hard to detect with even our current technology, and some very easy to identity and classify. We might also find weird plants and animals that would be different than what exists in our planet, but can be still identified as part of a plant or animal kingdom. Even microbial life, that form the root of our biological tree, are classified into three distinct domains or super kingdoms. We've known this classification only in the last thirty years.

          We might see elephants with necks like giraffes, blue or green roses, insects that are as large as our birds, or birds the size of our mosquito. The possibilities are immense...just like on our own planet earth (which harbors millions of species and varieties of animals, plants and microbes) with 95% of their genes shared. Some alteration to these genes can still be identified by us...some maybe so far out it is beyond our detection and our ability to even figure out something like that exists chemically.

          I believe there are plenty of planets with plenty of microbial life in our galaxy...even strange plants and animals (some of which may be harmless to us, some of which might be dangerous to us).

          But intelligent life is what we should be interested in. Intelligent enough to communicate with us, or be advanced enough for us to learn from or be guided by...but not so advanced that we can be in the same realm. If they are too advanced then they can study and research us like we are cockroaches. We would be of no interest and value to them. If they could do interstellar travel their technology would be 5,000 or 50,000 years ahead of us, and they would have managed to avoid extinction and self destruction meanwhile (which we seem to be headed for day in and day out).

          Finding that race of human-like or humanoid species that are ahead of us in ways we can recognize, learn from and work with...so they can be our allies in the federation of planets with human-like species (or evolving human species) is completely a different matter than looking for "just life - microbial mostly".

          Maybe dwarf stars do have planets with liquid water, much like ours, with intelligent life like ours...without too much of our stupidity and weakness. Imagine if they invented rockets, jets, computers...but never guns or bombs? Would they not think differently and act differently? They probably find us a bit primitive...but maybe are too polite and kind to tell us to our face.

          But as their middle man or woman let me tell you human idiots..."Evolve, evolve, please evolve!" so our curiosity and science will help us find new allies and friends in the universe while justice, fairness and compassion is practiced on our planet.

          And once in a while please say sincerely, "I am not worthy, I am not worthy, I am not worthy!"...it may help some of your neurology!

          Idiotas Humanos! Aaaah...but I love them! Why, why, why? :))

          • 1 vote
          Reply#33 - Thu Feb 7, 2013 11:59 PM EST

          Unfortunately, like in Star Trek, where the Earth meets the Vulcan's first, we could also meet the BORG first, Or like in "V" we could be the "Main Coarse".

            #33.1 - Sun Feb 10, 2013 8:23 PM EST
            Reply

            In all likelihood they,life on another world will find us before we find them.We have only been looking for a few years.where in there may be others out there that are hundreds maybe thousands of years ahead of us.But even then the signs of intelligent life from our world are only reaching out there a few hundred light years.We got to remember that it took billions of years for life here to advance beyond single cells.So if we do detect life it could be quite awhile before someone could respond.Any probe we might send should take every precaution to not interfere with the evolution of that planet.

              Reply#34 - Thu Apr 18, 2013 9:45 PM EDT
              Jump to discussion page: 1 2
              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.