NASA's Curiosity rover works on first sample drilled from gray Mars rock

NASA / JPL-Caltech / MSSS

This image from NASA's Curiosity rover shows the first tablespoon of powdered rock extracted by the rover's drill. The image was taken after the sample was transferred from the drill to the rover's scoop.



The scientists and engineers behind NASA's Curiosity rover say they're thrilled to see the first tablespoon of rock dust drilled from the interior of a rock on Mars — and they're intrigued by the fact that it's gray, not red.

"We're seeing a new coloration for Mars here, and it's exciting for us," Joel Hurowitz, sampling system scientist for the Curiosity mission at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, told reporters during a teleconference on Wednesday.

Things could get more exciting in the next few days, when Curiosity's sampling system drops dollops of the dust into the rover's onboard chemistry labs, known as CheMin (which stands for Chemistry and Mineralogy) and SAM (Sample Analysis at Mars). The main goal of the $2.5 billion mission is to find organic compounds on Mars, and scientists suspect that the gray interior of rocks could preserve those organics better than the red, highly oxidized surface.


"All things being equal, it's better to have a gray color than a red color," said Caltech's John Grotzinger, the mission's project scientist, "just simply because oxidation ... is something that we know destroys organic compounds."

The rover has spent several weeks at a rock formation known as John Klein in preparation for this first drilling operation, six months into what's expected to be a two-year primary mission. Some scientists and engineers have been working for years in anticipation of Wednesday's first sight of ground-up rock in Curiosity's sampling cup.

"For the sampling team, this is the equivalent of the landing team going crazy after the successful touchdown," said JPL's Scott McCloskey, drill systems engineer for the Curiosity mission.

The sample came from a 2.5-inch-deep hole that Curiosity drilled into the Martian bedrock on Feb. 8. One of McCloskey's colleagues at JPL, sample system chief engineer Louise Jandura, noted that this was the first time a rover has drilled samples out of a rock on another planet. Earlier missions have used grinders to scrape off the top layer of a Martian rock, but none has gone down as deeply as Curiosity did.

"In the five-decade history of the Space Age, this is indeed a rare event," she said.

Grotzinger said getting the samples represented the final milestone in the commissioning process for the rover. Last week marked the "passing of the keys to the rover" from the engineering team to the science team, he noted. "It's a real big turning point for us," Grotzinger said. 

NASA / JPL-Caltech / MSSS

At the center of this image from NASA's Curiosity rover is the hole in a rock called "John Klein" where the rover conducted its first sample drilling on Mars. The drilling took place on Feb. 8. Several preparatory activities with the drill preceded this operation, including a test that produced the shallower hole on the right two days earlier.

NASA / JPL-Caltech / MSSS

This image from October 2012 shows the location of a sieve screen on the Curiosity rover that is used to remove large particles from samples before delivery to science instruments. Scientists say problems that came to light on a test unit on Earth have led them to change their procedures for sifting Martian samples.

Going through glitches
It will take a few more days to start analyzing the ground-up rock: Some of the material in the cup is being used to clear out the plumbing in the rover's sample delivery system. Once scientists back on Earth see imagery confirming that everything is working as expected, they'll give the go-ahead for more of the material to be shaken through a sieve and then deposited into CheMin and SAM for analysis.

A software glitch delayed the sampling operation, McCloskey said, but the team found a work-around that allowed the task to continue with no loss of functionality. "It didn't end up being a significant roadblock to getting this done," he said.

Another concern arose when engineers found that the sieve on one of the test items back on Earth started coming loose after about 60 shaking operations, also known as "thwacks." That was a signal to the rover team that there was "reason to be cautious," said JPL's Daniel Limonadi, lead systems engineer for Curiosity's surface sampling and science system.

The team decided to reduce the shaking time from 60 minutes to 20 minutes at a time, which should be long enough for most samples. If it isn't, the rover will just keep shaking the stuff until the job is done, Limonadi said.

What the rocks may reveal
Hurowitz said the evidence so far suggests that Curiosity is looking at a sedimentary rock formation that was "more likely deposited in water." Veins of whitish material appear to consist of calcium sulfate, which could provide additional clues to the formation's aqueous origins. He said about 25 separate analyses have been conducted with Curiosity's Alpha Particle X-ray Spectrometer, more than 100 images have been recorded by the Mars Hand Lens Imager, and the ChemCam instrument has taken 12,000 laser shots at the rock.

The gray color of the rock dust suggests that the interior of Martian rocks may reflect ancient geological processes that are significantly different from the current weathering process on the Red Planet, Hurowitz told NBC News.

"This is something that the science team is really excited about — the fact that the tailings from our drill operation aren't the typical rusty orange red that we associate with just about everything on Mars," he said. "You can probably bet that when things turn orange, it's because there's a rusting process of some kind going on that oxidizes the iron in the rock. So the fact that these rocks aren't that color may be telling us that these rocks didn't go through that process that usually turns things to rust on Mars. It may preserve some indication of what iron was doing in these samples without the effect of some later oxidative process."

Eventually, Curiosity will be commanded to retrace its route and head for a 3-mile-high (5-kilometer-high) mountain known as Aeolis Mons or Mount Sharp. But Grotzinger emphasized that the mission was "discovery-driven" — and that the rover team was in no hurry to have the rover make its mountain trek.

"We're going to take it one step at a time," Grotzinger said.

More about Mars:


Alan Boyle is NBCNews.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter and adding the Cosmic Log page to your Google+ presence. To keep up with Cosmic Log as well as NBCNews.com's other stories about science and space, sign up for the Tech & Science newsletter, delivered to your email in-box every weekday. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.

 

Discuss this post

Don't get me wrong, I think this is awesome, but I still can't get out of my mind the picture of a kid in a sandbox with a bucket and plastic shovel.

  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Feb 20, 2013 6:03 PM EST

Oh goody. Gray rock. That should help mankind. NASA geeks and their expensive toys.

  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Wed Feb 20, 2013 6:05 PM EST

Don't get it, do ya. All that money was spent here in the good ol' USA, developing new technologies and working their collective butts off just getting Curiosity over there. The science is the fruit of all this labor, and results in a lot of good jobs that affect the entire country. Not just a few geeks with an expensive toy. And yeah - the science itself is worth it. The moment we stop wondering about what is out there is the day I get worried about our future.

  • 5 votes
#2.1 - Thu Feb 21, 2013 9:20 AM EST
Reply

OK guys, where's the beef? 25 spectometer analyses, 100 microscopic images, 12,000 laser zaps: What the the results of the spectrometer analysis, where are the images, and what about the 12,000 laser zaps? Wasn't anything found of interest to report? Almost nothing of import has been reported on the Tech and Science News of NBC NEWS, but "robo car moves arm, photographs self" sets off paroxyms of reporting. Booooring. Where's the hard science folks? Are you scientists holding out on us?

I realize there is probably a better website for finding all this information, but as I look at NBC News daily, I would think they would have more coverage.

  • 4 votes
Reply#3 - Wed Feb 20, 2013 6:05 PM EST

Hmm, did you miss the part about finding the calcium sulfate ... which, if it's hydrated gypsum, could serve as evidence of water at work? There were suggestions during the press briefing that this could be "mudstone," but it's a bit too early for the science team to produce results on this. Right now they can tell you what they've done, but they can't always tell you right away what they've found, even though we poor scribes occasionally try to pry it out of them.

Here's another nugget from a couple of months ago:

http://cosmiclog.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/12/03/15645732-curiosity-rover-finds-organic-compounds-but-are-they-from-mars?lite

I'll try to add more links to the story once I get a chance to fine-tune things. I do try to provide what I can, and I hope my work compares favorably with what other folks do. But that's for users to decide.

  • 8 votes
#3.1 - Wed Feb 20, 2013 6:54 PM EST

You do just fine, Alan.

  • 2 votes
#3.2 - Wed Feb 20, 2013 10:54 PM EST

I trust your reporting more than most, and I know you are not vying to get a NSF grant or anything, keep up the good work, and we love the links too. I kinda wondered if you might have been a little perturbed with the way the annual GEO meeting went, but I am GLAD to see more rover reports. If I am ever down at goddard again bidding on surplus, I'll up my bid an extra buck two ninty eight to help ease the pain of all those complaining we should spend their buck two ninty eight elsewhere....hehe.....besides, you post the cooooolest science pics......

  • 1 vote
#3.3 - Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:46 AM EST

No Rural Washinton is right. I understand it may not be your fault out there Alan but the news coming out of this billion dollar super robot project has been slow and on the whole boring. NASA needs to put this project into a higher gear and come out with something interesting to justify this mission real fast or admit they might have been a little to optimistic in amping everyone up on this one and move the funding from this and future Mars Rover projects to something else. Other than the landing this mission has been a total flop in my book and I'm not alone in that thinking.

    #3.4 - Sat Feb 23, 2013 8:26 PM EST
    Reply

    When will we come to the conclusion there's nothing on Mars but rocks?

      Reply#4 - Wed Feb 20, 2013 7:06 PM EST

      Ummm... We already know there's more on Mars than just rocks. New to this science thing are ya?

      • 3 votes
      #4.1 - Thu Feb 21, 2013 9:12 AM EST
      Reply

      Looks like really old concrete, wonder what's under the roof ?

        Reply#5 - Wed Feb 20, 2013 10:26 PM EST

        I wish NBC would treat all this informational material like they were talking to geology major's , people are not as stupid as they think, I / we expect much more in depth science for our buck.

          Reply#6 - Wed Feb 20, 2013 11:29 PM EST

          More bang for the buck...?

          What were you promised...?

          A second earth perhaps...?

          Enough TV for you.

          It's all about the human drive to reach out over the horizon, and see what's there.

          Sometimes it reaps rewards, sometimes the adventure is the reward itself.

          Get into the spirit of it. Naked adventure.

            #6.1 - Thu Feb 21, 2013 10:21 AM EST
            Reply

            I posted here almost two weeks ago after they drilled the first test hole, I am eagerly awaiting the analysis. Part of me wants the rover to stay around and look for fossils, often fossils collect where streams made sharp bends or after short drops. This was an active area but from what? the over spray from the original asteroid? condensation from eons of being next to a big mound? an underground spring? a nearby lake?...way to early to even think of speculating. I wonder if anyone is considering the the task of a carbon dating instrument in the next rover (and a big drill, like 300 feet of drill bit to boot). Thanks for the CaSo4 tip. I wonder if it is a hydride or hydrate, I am betting it's the former....would make a nice battery if it is (suits one of my older posts as well!!). anyways, keep it up, and remember, the other rover is really in some interesting territory too!!. Good thing it is them driving, me, I would rush right up to the top of that hill, get a look around and head on out for something that looked cool.....like a cave for instance....

              Reply#7 - Thu Feb 21, 2013 1:41 AM EST

              Martians will be mad at us for making a hole on their roof.

                Reply#8 - Thu Feb 21, 2013 9:59 AM EST
                You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.