Astronomers produce most detailed analysis of alien planet's atmosphere

Dunlap Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics; Mediafarm

An artist's rendering shows the HR 8799 planetary system at an early stage in its evolution, with HR 8799c in the foreground. That giant planet orbits its parent star at a distance comparable to Pluto's distance from our sun.



Astronomers say they've confirmed the presence of water vapor and carbon monoxide in the atmosphere of a giant planet beyond our solar system, thanks to the most detailed spectroscopic scan ever made.

The observations, detailed Thursday on the journal Science's website, uses a method that could someday be used to sample the air of an alien Earth from light-years away, the researchers said.

"The big surprise was actually that we could do it," one of the study's co-authors, Travis Barman of the Lowell Observatory in Arizona, told reporters. "We can actually see the individual lines of these molecules. ... I personally felt like we would not be able to do what we have done."


This isn't the first time scientists have studied the atmosphere of HR 8799c, a planet about seven times as massive as Jupiter that orbits a star 130 light-years from Earth. The HR 8799 system is special because astronomers can actually pick up the light of several giant planets that orbit outside the glare of their parent star. HR 8799c, for example, follows an orbit similar to the one Pluto traces around our own sun.

That's what makes it possible for astronomers to get the "chemical fingerprint" of the planet's atmosphere. One team did it three years ago with an instrument on the European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope in Chile. Another team reported just this week that they did it for four planets in the HR 8799 system using an instrument known as Project 1640 on the Palomar Observatory's Hale Telescope in California.

Higher resolution
Barman and his colleagues said they used the OSIRIS spectrograph on the Keck II telescope in Hawaii to produce a chemical fingerprint with enough resolution to determine which chemicals were present in the atmosphere, and which were not.

They found that the planet had a cloudy atmosphere containing water vapor and carbon monoxide — but not methane, as some researchers had previously suspected. Methane is an ingredient in the atmospheres of our own solar system's giant planets.

RC-HIA / C. Marois / Keck Observatory

This is one of the discovery images of the HR 8799 planetary system, obtained by the Keck II telescope using the adaptive optics system and NIRC2 Near-Infrared Imager. The rectangle indicates the field-of view of the OSIRIS instrument, centered on HR 8799c.

HR 8799c isn't a likely candidate to harbor life as we know it. It's far too gassy and hot, with a surface temperature of 1,800 degrees Fahrenheit, or 1,000 degrees Celsius. But the same spectroscopic method could theoretically be used to analyze the atmospheres of Earthlike planets for signs of life — if the telescope could be made big enough.

"If you wanted to do an Earth-sized planet, you really need a spacecraft, and you really need a very dedicated spacecraft that was designed only for that purpose," said another co-author of the Science study, Bruce Macintosh of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California.

Barman said it might be possible to detect variations in the surface brightness of extrasolar planets using next-generation, ground-based instruments such as the Gemini Planet Imager. "We might be able to do that within the next few years," he said.

How were planets formed?
The researchers said the readings from OSIRIS also could provide insights into how the planetary system was formed. Theorists have proposed two scenarios for the formation of planets from the disk of gas and dust surrounding an infant star. In the core-accretion scenario, planets form gradually as solid cores grow massive enough to start taking on envelopes of gas from the disk. In the gravitational-instability scenario, planets form almost instantly as parts of the disk collapse on themselves.

"For the first time, we can actually make a statement, a suggestion about the way the system might have formed, which is an extremely difficult thing to do observationally," said the study's lead author, Quinn Konopacky, an astronomer at the University of Toronto's Dunlap Institute for Astronomy and Astrophysics.

The ratio of carbon to oxygen was higher than would have been expected if the planet shared the composition of its parent star and protoplanetary disk. That might have happened because the disk's gas cooled gradually over time, forming water ice that depleted the oxygen from the gas that remained. This is the way most astronomers believe our own solar system formed.

"Once the solid cores grew large enough, their gravity quickly attracted surrounding gas to become the massive planets we see today," Konopacky said in a news release. "Since that gas had lost some of its oxygen, the planet ends up with less oxygen and less water than if it had formed through a gravitational instability."

Not all astronomers think the case is that clear-cut, however. Alan Boss, a theoretical astrophysicist at the Washington-based Carnegie Institution for Science, told NBC News that giant planets as far away from their parent stars as HR 8799c were more likely to be formed through gravitational instability than through core accretion.

In any case, Boss said he doubted that the readings from OSIRIS could rule out either scenario for planetary formation, since so much depends on the details of a particular theory. "Theorists are clever," he said. "It's hard to paint them into a corner."

More about planets:


The authors of the Science study, "Detection of Carbon Monoxide and Water Absorption Lines in an Exoplanet Atmosphere," include Christian Marois as well as Konopacky, Barman and Macintosh.

Alan Boyle is NBCNews.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter and adding the Cosmic Log page to your Google+ presence. To keep up with Cosmic Log as well as NBCNews.com's other stories about science and space, sign up for the Tech & Science newsletter, delivered to your email in-box every weekday. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.

Discuss this post

Just like Barman said, doing it is the surprise. The implication there is that it exists isn't such a surprise.

  • 2 votes
Reply#1 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 9:52 PM EDT

That's my planet, stay out.

  • 3 votes
Reply#2 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 9:53 PM EDT

We're going to get a restraining order from a neaby planet, telling us to stop peeping on them

  • 4 votes
Reply#3 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 10:17 PM EDT

Detroit-Storm,

You're right! They included in the restraining order that we stop probing them as well! LOL

  • 1 vote
#3.1 - Fri Mar 15, 2013 11:16 AM EDT

That's TOTALLY what cosmologists are doing these days. Looking through their massive pointy telescopes at the gentle curves of alien planets, masturbating like crazy. "OOhhhhh, look at all that CO2...."

Somebody stop them!

  • 2 votes
#3.2 - Fri Mar 15, 2013 6:42 PM EDT
Reply

Listen up out there. We know our God made all. Why are you spending all that money when we know the answers. Just ask any good Christian.

  • 1 vote
Reply#4 - Thu Mar 14, 2013 11:51 PM EDT

Yeah, ask them, some say the Earth is 6000 years old.

  • 4 votes
#4.1 - Fri Mar 15, 2013 12:31 AM EDT

Russ-1704781

We don't know the answers, if I ask a Christian he/she can not tell me how many planets a certain star has, or what the composition of the atmosphere of those planets maybe, or even if life is thriving there.

  • 4 votes
#4.2 - Fri Mar 15, 2013 5:38 PM EDT

Yeah. Like Christians thought the earth was flat for 1400 years...oh.

  • 2 votes
#4.3 - Fri Mar 15, 2013 6:44 PM EDT

What if I get a second opinion from a Muslim, Jew, Hindu, Shinto, Buddhist, etc.?

Or even a 'bad' Christian...?

  • 1 vote
#4.4 - Fri Mar 15, 2013 9:37 PM EDT

Stratocumulus, I'd be really interested to see any proof of that statement about Christians thinking the world was flat for 1400 years..can you produce any?

  • 1 vote
#4.5 - Sat Mar 16, 2013 10:43 AM EDT
Reply

With current levels of robotic technology, I am curious why there has been no initiative to build a large observatory on the moon. We could ship out modules from the international space station and assemble it remotely.

Just a thought...

  • 2 votes
Reply#5 - Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:21 AM EDT

It has been thought of and proposed over the years and is something we'd like to do. But it is incredibly cost prohibitive and there's no impetus to do so. The latter is the bigger issue. science and exploration to increase the total sum of human knowledge takes a back seat to the somnambulant public's interest in Honey Boo Boo, fear mongering, and controlling the financial estates of the wealthy.

  • 6 votes
#5.1 - Fri Mar 15, 2013 2:15 PM EDT

Um, because it would cost a serious amount of money that no one is willing to spend, currently?

What, you think not having humans present makes it pocket change? Add in speed of light delay, and additional communication relays (I assume you want it on the farside.).

Is this a radio or optical observatory? What size/ how many dishes/mirrors? What constitutes 'large?'

Launch capacity? Can it be done with what currently exists? There's not even an operational Lunar landing capability (though it need not take too long to develop).

  • 2 votes
#5.2 - Fri Mar 15, 2013 9:45 PM EDT
Reply

every good dr. who fan knows you gotta take a spectragraph of the planet. Six times jup??...nobody toss a match at it, it might IGNITE!! I bet this thing resonates at some rf fequency loud enough to make it a navigational beacon for any weary space travelers wondering where in the galaxy they are. Database dude nails it. earth and space observation posts on the moon are way overdue for our scientific competence, perhaps not our political or societal competence, but scientifically, it is a rung on the ladder that we should be on right now so as we can reach for the next rung in due time. I say we commercialize the moon now, er, in what little ability we can, once there you can whip out a copy of the lunar treaty and tear it up in front of a google camera and accentuate the motion with a well known human inflection usally done with one hand and well understood worldwide....

  • 2 votes
Reply#6 - Fri Mar 15, 2013 2:09 AM EDT

"Six times jup??...nobody toss a match at it, it might IGNITE!!"

You need about 20 Jovian masses before that's an issue...

  • 1 vote
#6.1 - Fri Mar 15, 2013 9:46 PM EDT
Reply

They are right about needing a much larger telescope to see the small red dots a lot larger and clearer, to take some of the guess-work out of what is further out of our Galaxy.

  • 1 vote
Reply#7 - Fri Mar 15, 2013 2:30 AM EDT

That's one big planet!

  • 1 vote
Reply#8 - Fri Mar 15, 2013 10:32 AM EDT

Thats no planet, its a space station!!

  • 1 vote
#8.1 - Fri Mar 15, 2013 2:56 PM EDT
Reply

The progress being made in the study of exoplanets is amazing... at this rate it shouldn't be too too long before a true Earth-like planet is identified in another solar system.

  • 2 votes
Reply#9 - Sun Mar 17, 2013 6:38 PM EDT

I'm awed by the continued scientific research results. When I look at these photo's I can't help recalling Hawkins' comments about being careful with our broadcasts to let Otherworlders know we are here. Then I think about how those photos show us what that area of the Universe looked like maybe 5 billion years ago! Maybe someone could design 'planetary aging images', like those taking a baby and projecting what the adult will look like.

Perhaps our first large project in our immediate area would be large expandable space stations in orbit about Eath, the Moon and at least Mars. Then Jupiter.

It's all exciting!

    Reply#10 - Thu Mar 21, 2013 1:08 PM EDT
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.