• MSN
  • Hotmail
  • More
    • Autos
    • My MSN
    • Video
    • Careers & Jobs
    • Personals
    • Weather
    • Delish
    • Quotes
    • White Pages
    • Games
    • Real Estate
    • Wonderwall
    • Horoscopes
    • Shopping
    • Yellow Pages
    • Local Edition
    • Traffic
    • Feedback
    • Maps & Directions
    • Travel
    • Full MSN Index
  • Bing
  • NBCNews.com
  • TODAY
  • Nightly News
  • Rock Center
  • Meet the Press
  • Dateline
  • msnbc
  • Breaking News
  • Newsvine
  • Home
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Travel
  • Local
  • Weather
Advertise | AdChoices
  • Recommended: Scientists respond to planet hunter's plight with pointers – and poetry
  • Recommended: Buggy hordes of cicadas sighted in Virginia ... but New York? Not yet
  • Recommended: Virgin birth or hanky-panky? Anteater mom sparks a scientific debate
  • Recommended: 'Star Trek' stars go ga-ga over real astronauts during video hangout

Quantum fluctuations in science, space and society, from quarks to Hubble and Mars. Served up by Alan Boyle, NBC News Digital science editor. E-mail Alan, or connect via Facebook, Twitter or Google+.

  • ↓ About this blog
  • ↓ Archives
    • Icons Email E-mail updates
    • Icons Twitter Follow on Twitter
    • Icons Feed Subscribe to RSS
  • 10
    Feb
    2012
    3:29pm, EST

    Help design the future of robotic cars

    Ford.com

    A screenshot from a Ford video shows how Active Park Assist works in the Flex model. Drivers just need to target a spot, and the car uses ultrasonic range finders to park itself.

    By John Roach, Contributing Writer, NBC News

    Do you want a future where C-3P0 and his robotic pals do the driving as you text your friends the 411 on the next stop in a crosstown pub crawl? Minds capable of making this dream come true want your opinion.

    Students with Stanford University's Center for Automotive Research have prepared on online survey to find out your robotic car desires. After providing a few generic personal details, you can weigh in on questions such as:

    • How much control you're willing to give up to an automated self-driving technology? All? Some, like an airplane pilot? None at all?
    • Would you take a cab driven by a robot? Choices range from "Definitely not" to "Definitely would. There is no way a computer can drive worse than current human cab drivers :)".
    • What are your feelings about a car that could drive you without any input? Choices include: "Excitement – where can I get one," "Party time – I can go out partying without having to worry about drinking and driving," and "Fear – That's it. Run for the hills. The robots are taking over."

    To take the survey, click here. When the results are out this spring, we'll share the details.

    More on robotic cars:

    • Road rage at driverless cars? It's possible
    • GM researching driverless cars
    • With these autonomous cars, who needs to drive?
    • Cars are approaching 'auto' pilot mode
    • Audi to climb Pikes Peak without a driver 
    • Google tests cars that steer without drivers
    • Google self-driving car crash caused by human

    John Roach is a contributing writer for msnbc.com. To learn more about him, check out his website. You can also follow him on Twitter.

    For more of our Future of Technology series, watch the featured video below.

    Ten years of war have given robot developers a chance to refine and improve their bots. Now the robots are finding all sorts of new jobs on the homefront.

    11 comments

    "How much control you're willing to give up to an automated self-driving technology? All? Some, like an airplane pilot? None at all?" This line made me chuckle.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: robot, car, future, science, survey, innovation, featured, driverless
  • 20
    Jan
    2012
    6:39pm, EST

    Road rage at driverless cars? It's possible

    Paul Sakuma / AP

    Stanford graduate student Mick Kritayakirana shows the computer system inside a driverless car on the Stanford University campus in Palo Alto, Calif.

    By John Roach, Contributing Writer, NBC News

    The road to a future where we jump in our cars, enter a destination, and let them do the driving could be filled with rage, according to an expert on driverless car technology.

    For starters, driverless cars will likely be programmed to obey all traffic laws. They won't speed and will always come to a complete stop at stop signs, for example.

    Throw just a few of those law-abiding robots on roads clogged with 250 million human-controlled cars, and there's bound to be some shaken fists, or worse.

    "Let's face it, … [we] don’t always follow exactly the traffic rules," Sven Beiker, the executive director of the Center for Automotive Research at Stanford University in California, told me Friday. 

    "An autonomous car would probably need to because there's a company putting code into a system and that obviously then becomes a legal action."

    20-year vision?
    The road rage-at-the-robot scenario came up as we discussed the evolution of driverless car technology and how we might eventually realize the dream of texting while the robot does the driving.

    It'll likely remain a dream, Beiker said, for the foreseeable future.

    Some experts in the field, he noted, call it a 20-year vision. "Quite frankly, if someone says 20 years, that's basically telling you we don't really know," he said.

    But, driver-assisted technologies such as cars that can park themselves, maintain a safe distance from other cars on the road, and have other crash-avoidance technologies are increasingly available on cars today.

    All of these technologies, Beiker said, still require drivers to keep their hands on the wheel and their eyes on the road. But those aids are becoming more common, and not just in luxury models.

    "These things are definitely happening, and basically you can expect something new every year in that regard," he noted.

    Technological, legal, cultural hurdles
    When the field will reach the point where we can relinquish control of the car will depend, in part, on further technological developments, a new set of laws — and a cultural shift.

    From the technological standpoint, cars can and do drive themselves today (see the Google Street View cars, for example). So, in a sense, we are technologically there.

    But a future of roads full of driverless cars would be enhanced by the development and deployment of a wireless communication system that lets the robots anywhere on the road talk to each other.

    Such a system, for example, would let cars know if the car in front of it was planning to turn left or right, as well as provide points of traffic congestion that alert robot drivers to alternate routes.

    Think of such a system as a radio traffic report on steroids.

    Roads full of autonomous vehicles all talking to each other could be much safer than they are today, Beiker noted. After all, human error contributes to 95 percent of all accidents. 

    But, "no technology is 100 percent safe," he said.

    When a wreck happens, who gets the blame? That's unclear today. Stanford's automotive center has a legal fellow, Bryant Walker Smith, on staff precisely to help answer these types of questions.

    It'll probably shake out one of two ways: Either the car owner and/or passenger will be legally responsible just as drivers are today for most accidents, or the manufacturer will be.

    But until such laws are written — and there are some are in the works, such as in Nevada where a law has been passed to make driverless cars legal — it's unlikely that autonomous cars will rule the roads.

    And then there's the question of how to deploy the robots once we're technologically and legally ready. Perhaps at first autonomous cars will be restricted to one lane of travel on certain roads, such HOV lanes.

    "But mixing the conventional vehicle and the autonomous vehicles?" Beiker said. "That's quite a challenge."

    More on driverless car technology:

    • GM researching driverless cars
    • With these autonomous cars, who needs to drive?
    • Cars are approaching 'auto' pilot mode
    • Audi to climb Pikes Peak without a driver
    • Google tests cars that steer without drivers
    • Google self-driving car crash caused by human

    John Roach is a contributing writer for msnbc.com. To learn more about him, check out his website. For more of our Future of Technology series, watch the featured video below.

    Ten years of war have given robot developers a chance to refine and improve their bots. Now the robots are finding all sorts of new jobs on the homefront.

    2 comments

    We need driverless cars. Most problems are drivers who have no idea how to merge or switch lanes. Or don't realize there are other drivers on the roads. And turn signals are installed for a reason. I can't read your mind.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: robot, car, science, innovation, featured, driverless

Browse

  • featured,
  • science,
  • space,
  • images,
  • nasa,
  • innovation,
  • cosmic-log,
  • video,
  • john-roach,
  • tech-science,
  • mars,
  • new-space,
  • daily-dose,
  • technology,
  • energy,
  • participation,
  • environment,
  • whimsy,
  • holiday-calendar,
  • planets,
  • on-the-fringe,
  • archaeology,
  • physics,
  • spacex,
  • curiosity,
  • moon,
  • books,
  • msl,
  • politics,
  • hubble,
  • aurora,
  • sun,
  • robot,
  • religion,
  • japan,
  • 3-d,
  • genetics,
  • iss,
  • movies,
  • astrobiology,
  • saturn,
  • automotive,
  • evolution,
  • shuttle,
  • updated
Also
Advertise | AdChoices

John Roach, Contributing Writer, NBC News

John Roach is a contributing writer for NBC News. From climate change and mass extinctions to human evolution and deep space, his writing explores life on Earth and its place in the universe. He was a staff writer at the Environmental News Network for several years and has contributed to National Geographic News for more than a decade.

Archives

  • 2013
    • May (27)
    • April (55)
    • March (53)
    • February (44)
    • January (45)
  • 2012
    • December (67)
    • November (12)
    • October (39)
    • September (43)
    • August (62)
    • July (45)
    • June (51)
    • May (46)
    • April (40)
    • March (56)
    • February (63)
    • January (66)
  • 2011
    • December (89)
    • November (73)
    • October (62)
    • September (67)
    • August (61)
    • July (70)
    • June (82)
    • May (86)
    • April (69)
    • March (94)
    • February (67)
    • January (82)
  • 2010
    • December (118)
    • November (62)
    • October (82)
    • September (63)
    • August (62)
    • July (54)
    • June (83)
    • May (51)
    • April (31)
    • March (35)
    • February (36)
    • January (35)
  • 2009
    • December (42)
    • November (34)
    • October (35)
    • September (40)
    • August (32)
    • July (38)
    • June (45)
    • May (37)
    • April (42)
    • March (38)
    • February (37)
    • January (35)
  • 2008
    • December (33)
    • November (31)
    • October (42)
    • September (48)
    • August (35)
    • July (37)
    • June (42)
    • May (43)
    • April (40)
    • March (39)
    • February (42)
    • January (42)
  • 2007
    • December (29)
    • November (40)
    • October (57)
    • September (35)
    • August (47)
    • July (38)
    • June (44)
    • May (44)
    • April (43)
    • March (40)
    • February (41)
    • January (47)
  • 2006
    • December (45)
    • November (49)
    • October (39)
    • September (50)
    • August (58)
    • July (45)
    • June (56)
    • May (8)

Most Commented

  • Wheel fails on NASA's Kepler probe, halting its search for alien planets (257)
  • Virgin birth or hanky-panky? Anteater mom sparks a scientific debate (84)
  • Chris Hadfield's 'Space Oddity' is a hit: What's next for space superstar? (70)
  • 'Ciudad Blanca' found? Scientists share images of lost city in Honduras (63)
  • Buggy hordes of cicadas sighted in Virginia ... but New York? Not yet (59)
  • In Dan Brown's 'Inferno,' numeric riddles and controversial science mix (40)
  • 'The World at Night' can be brightly beautiful – but there's a dark side, too (17)

Other blogs

  • The Body Odd
  • Red Tape Chronicles
  • PhotoBlog
  • US News
  • Open Channel

NBCNews.com top stories

3147,10
© 2013 NBCNews.com
  • Science on NBCNews.com
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Help
  • Site map
  • Careers
  • Closed captioning
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Advertise