• MSN
  • Hotmail
  • More
    • Autos
    • My MSN
    • Video
    • Careers & Jobs
    • Personals
    • Weather
    • Delish
    • Quotes
    • White Pages
    • Games
    • Real Estate
    • Wonderwall
    • Horoscopes
    • Shopping
    • Yellow Pages
    • Local Edition
    • Traffic
    • Feedback
    • Maps & Directions
    • Travel
    • Full MSN Index
  • Bing
  • NBCNews.com
  • TODAY
  • Nightly News
  • Rock Center
  • Meet the Press
  • Dateline
  • msnbc
  • Breaking News
  • Newsvine
  • Home
  • US
  • World
  • Politics
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Entertainment
  • Health
  • Tech
  • Science
  • Travel
  • Local
  • Weather
Advertise | AdChoices
  • Recommended: Months after death, Sally Ride wins honors from White House and NASA
  • Recommended: Dolphins persuade Navy trainers to dredge up 130-year-old torpedo
  • Recommended: Why sign up for a one-way Mars trip? Three applicants explain the appeal
  • Recommended: Storming sun sets the skies aglow

Quantum fluctuations in science, space and society, from quarks to Hubble and Mars. Served up by Alan Boyle, NBC News Digital science editor. E-mail Alan, or connect via Facebook, Twitter or Google+.

  • ↓ About this blog
  • ↓ Archives
    • Icons Email E-mail updates
    • Icons Twitter Follow on Twitter
    • Icons Feed Subscribe to RSS
  • 27
    Dec
    2011
    4:52pm, EST

    Will Russia's Mars probe fall in Afghanistan? Too early to tell

    AGI animation shows where Russia's Phobos-Grunt probe would have gone, and what will happen instead.

    Watch on YouTube
    By Alan Boyle, Science Editor, NBC News

    Follow @b0yle



    When and where will Russia's doomed probe to a Martian moon fall back to Earth? The RIA-Novosti news service caused a stir when it reported that the 13-ton Phobos-Grunt spacecraft would crash in southwestern Afghanistan at 2:22 a.m. Moscow time on Jan. 14. The report attributed the prediction to the U.S. Strategic Command, but experts say it's way too early to be that precise about the Phobos-Grunt debris zone.

    "Yes, it is much too early to predict" the circumstances of Phobos-Grunt's re-entry, Gene Stansbery of NASA's Orbital Debris Program Office at Johnson Space Center told me today.

    The U.S. Strategic Command is being circumspect as well, deferring comment to NASA and to Roscosmos, Russia's space agency.


    The most that can be said about the impact zone right now is that it will be somewhere between 51.4 degrees north and 51.4 degrees south latitude. That's a swath of the planet that stretches from Calgary, Alberta (or Ghent, Belgium) in the north to the Falkland Islands in the south and takes in the vast majority of the world's population. Satellite-watcher Marco Langbroek reports on the See-Sat-L discussion forum that the predicted time of re-entry is Jan. 13, plus or minus 11 days. A couple of weeks ago, Roscosmos estimated that re-entry would come sometime between Jan. 6 and 19.

    Typically, the projected area of the debris zone can't be narrowed down until hours before re-entry, if then. It's possible that RIA-Novosti picked up on a prediction that was centered around a precise time and place of re-entry, but left out the part about the plus-or-minus uncertainty. (You can see where Phobos-Grunt is right now by checking the Heavens-Above website.)

    The spacecraft was launched from Russia's Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan on Nov. 9 local time, and was supposed to leave Earth orbit hours later for the trip to Phobos, the larger of Mars' two moons. Along the way, it would have deployed a Chinese mini-probe in Martian orbit. If everything went well, the $165 million Phobos-Grunt mission would have brought a sample of Phobos soil back to Earth in 2014. ("Phobos-Grunt," or the more correctly transliterated "Fobos-Grunt," is Russian for "Phobos-Soil.")

    Everything didn't go well, as we now know: The spacecraft's upper-stage thrusters didn't fire, and it's been stuck in Earth orbit ever since. This month, Russian officials finally gave up on attempts to revive the craft and admitted that it would fall to its destruction next month.

    Most of the spacecraft's mass consists of the toxic propellants it would have used to get to Phobos. There's also a small amount of radioactive cobalt-57 that was meant to power a spectrometer. The Russians say that the fuel will burn up in Earth's atmosphere, and that the cobalt won't pose a contamination threat.

    Twenty to 30 parts from the probe with a total weight of up to 440 pounds (200 kilograms) are expected to survive the plunge. One of those parts could be the sample return capsule, which is designed to withstand the intense heat of atmospheric re-entry. David Warmflash, the principal investigator for one of the mission's experiments, said "it is quite possible" that his team's LIFE capsule will make it back to Earth intact.  

    If it lands in Afghanistan, the chances of recovery might be poor, given the proximity to a war zone. But if it lands in the ocean, which is currently the likeliest scenario, the chances aren't any better. Over the past few months, two other high-profile satellites — NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite and Germany's ROSAT space telescope — fell through the atmosphere over the South Pacific and the Bay of Bengal, respectively, and no trace of them was ever found.

    More about Phobos-Grunt and other falls to Earth:

    • Mars probe to crash to Earth in January
    • Russian leader suggests punishing space failures
    • Skywatcher snaps photos of stranded probe
    • Christmas Eve fireball sparked by Russian rocket debris
    • Russian communications satellite falls after launch

    Alan Boyle is msnbc.com's science editor. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter and adding the Cosmic Log page to your Google+ presence. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for new worlds.

    21 comments

    Get your tin foil helmets on, here comes another one. :-P

    Show more
    Explore related topics: space, satellite, featured, orbital-debris, phobos-grunt
  • 15
    Sep
    2011
    6:17pm, EDT

    Satellite's doom coming sooner

    A 20-year-old satellite is expected to crash back to Earth late next week, but NASA said it still does not know where it will fall. Msnbc's Alex Witt talks with space expert James Oberg.

    By Alan Boyle, Science Editor, NBC News

    Last updated 1 a.m. ET Sept. 19:

    NASA's Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite is now expected to fall to Earth sometime between Sept. 22 and 24, orbital experts reported Friday.

    That's toward the early end of the original projections for UARS' fiery descent: Last week, when NASA announced that the long-defunct, six-ton satellite would crash, the time frame was given as late September to early October. That wide window of possibilities was due to the uncertainties over atmospheric conditions. Now the picture is becoming clearer, said Nicholas Johnson, head of NASA's Orbital Debris Program Office at Johnson Space Center in Texas.

    "The sun has become very active since the beginning of this week, and it's accelerating the prediction," he told me.


    Higher solar activity heats and expands the upper atmosphere, creating more drag for satellites in decaying orbits. The increased drag pulls down those satellites more quickly — and that's what's behind the earlier prediction.

    On Thursday, the prediction was revised to say the fall would come Sept. 24, plus or minus a day. On Friday, the time frame was revised again to put the fall at Sept. 23, plus or minus a day.

    As of Friday, NASA's UARS status page said the bus-sized satellite's orbit was 140 by 155 miles (225 by 250 kilometers). That compares with 143 by 158 miles (230 by 255 kilometers) for Thursday, and 155 by 174 miles (250 by 280 kilometers) on Sept. 7. The figures suggest that the decay of the satellite's orbit is accelerating.

    Other parts of the prediction remain in force: The satellite, which monitored atmospheric changes between 1991 and 2005 but was then put in a disposal orbit, could fall anywhere in latitude between northern Canada and southern South America. The biggest piece to survive the fall is expected to weigh about 300 pounds (150 kilograms), or roughly the weight of a refrigerator. Johnson says the chance that any piece of the satellite will hit anybody at all is 1-in-3,200, and the chance that you specifically would be hit is 1-in-20 trillion. (Unless you live in, say, Finland. Then there's zero chance.)

    The minuscule chance that someone will be hit is largely due to the fact that most of our planet's area is empty of people.

    When word of the revised prediction got out over Twitter, Astro Guyz blogger David Dickinson noted that UARS would make a series of nighttime passes over the southeastern U.S. starting Sept. 20 — which means it's possible Americans might see debris streaking through the skies when UARS falls. But at this point, there's no way to predict when that might be, so we'll just have to wait and watch.

    Where's UARS now? This satellite-tracking page shows you its location in real time.

    Update for 1 a.m. ET Sept. 19: NASA's prediction still calls for re-entry on Sept. 23, plus or minus a day. As of early Sunday, UARS' orbit was at 133 by 149 miles (215 by 240 kilometers).

    More about space debris:

    • Who'll get hit by a falling satellite
    • Experts sound alarm about space junk
    • Japan to go fishing for space debris

    Check NASA's UARS status page for updated information about the satellite's whereabouts, all the way to the end.

    Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter or adding me to your Google+ circle. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for other worlds. 

    39 comments

    I can appreciate your sense of humor. Hope you guys get some rain soon.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: space, satellite, featured, orbital-debris, uars
  • 9
    Sep
    2011
    4:07pm, EDT

    Who'll get hit by a falling satellite?

    WESH's Dan Billow reports on the predictions for NASA's falling satellite.

    By Alan Boyle, Science Editor, NBC News

    Sometime in the next few weeks, NASA expects a refrigerator-sized hunk of a satellite to fall to Earth. But will it hit someone? Not likely. NASA says there's a 1-in-3,200 chance that any pieces of the satellite will hit anyone. In fact, there's a good chance no one will see it when it falls — whenever and wherever that turns out to be.

    The space agency and the military personnel who track orbital debris say NASA's six-ton Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite, or UARS, is due to re-enter the atmosphere in late September or perhaps early October. They can't yet say exactly when.

    The end of the month or the beginning of next month is still "the best estimate of what we can give right now," said Air Force Maj. Michael Duncan, deputy chief for space situational awareness at the U.S. Strategic Command at California's Vandenberg Air Force Base. "There are so many factors that will affect it between now and that point in time — the atmosphere changes on a daily basis — that it's impossible to say how that's going impact this re-entry from this point in time to then."


    As the bus-sized satellite's orbit descends from its current low point of about 150 miles (245 kilometers), the military's Joint Space Operations Center will refine its projections on when it will fall, all the way down to T-minus-2 hours and later. But even when the satellite makes its descent and breaks up in the atmosphere, NASA won't be confident exactly where the pieces will fall.

    "We're never really confident," said Nicholas Johnson, chief scientist and program manager for NASA's Orbital Debris Program Office at Johnson Space Center. "Even at ... T-minus-2 hours, there will be a lot of uncertainty. And when I say a lot of uncertainty, we're probably talking plus or minus 10,000 kilometers. We just will not know precisely where it's going to come down until it comes down."

    Long buildup to the end
    NASA does know a lot about what the falling satellite will do when it falls, however, in part because they've had a lot of time to think about it.

    UARS was deployed from the shuttle Discovery in 1991 to begin a fruitful $750 million mission studying the upper atmosphere and its interaction with the flux of particles from the sun. It was the first satellite to track the rise and fall of solar activity through the sun's full 11-year cycle, and it nailed down the cause and effect involving chlorofluorocarbon use and the extent of Earth's ozone hole. But in 2005, NASA determined that UARS was no longer fulfilling any scientific function that wasn't being done better by more recently launched satellites, said Paul Hertz, chief scientist for NASA's Science Mission Directorate. So the agency put it into a disposal orbit.

    Unfortunately, all of the satellite's propellant was used up when the orbit was changed, so there's nothing left to control when and where the now-inert UARS will make its final, fatal plunge. "It was really not given a lot of thought, and clearly was not part of the mission plan," Johnson said.

    Over the years, Johnson and his colleagues have run models indicating that the satellite would break up during atmospheric re-entry, with 26 different components surviving the descent and falling to Earth's surface. The total mass would be about half a ton, or 500 kilograms. Johnson said the biggest piece would be a part of the satellite's main structure weighing a little more than 300 pounds (150 kilograms, or about the weight of a refrigerator).

    Having a refrigerator come down on you from space does not sound like a pleasant prospect, but Johnson emphasized that most space debris falls into an ocean, a desert or some other desolate place. "Throughout the entire 54 years of the Space Age, there has been no confirmed report of anybody in the world being injured or severely impacted by any re-entering debris," he said.

    One of the closest calls came in 1978, when the Soviets' nuclear-powered Cosmos 954 satellite spread radioactive debris over a lightly populated area of northern Canada. The incident caused no confirmed injuries — but it did spark a political uproar in Canada, largely because of the radioactivity and the failure to provide advance warning.

    NASA said there are no toxic materials aboard UARS.

    Working out the risk factors
    UARS is due to come down somewhere between 57 degrees north latitude and 57 degrees south, which takes in a huge swath of the globe from northern Canada to southern South America. Thus, virtually all of the planet's nearly 7 billion people could theoretically be in the debris zone, but only because of the uncertainty surrounding the time and place of UARS' fall. NASA expects that pieces of debris, including that cosmic refrigerator, would be spread out along a 500-mile-long (800-mile-long) path.

    Johnson has run the numbers for the global risk assessment, taking area and population into account. "Numerically it comes out to a chance of 1-in-3,200 that any person anywhere in the world might be struck by a piece of debris," he said.

    That may sound like a huge risk, compared with the chances of winning the lottery. But remember, we're talking about the chances of anyone being struck. For example, when you buy a ticket for a raffle, there's a 1-out-of-1 chance that someone is going to win. In this case, the 1-in-3,200 chance refers to the probability of any one person losing. The chance that a piece of UARS would strike any particular person — you, for example — is more like 1-out-of-20 trillion.

    Here's another way of looking at it: Johnson said that an object as big as UARS descends from orbit every year or so. If his projections are correct, you can expect to hear about a person hit by debris from such an object every 3,200 years.

    Seeing and touching the satellite
    The skies over Fiji lit up when fragments of Russia's 138-ton Mir space station fell through the atmosphere in 2001. Will anyone see anything like that when UARS falls?

    "If they're fortunately positioned, yeah, this should be quite a nice show," Johnson said. The fiery remains should be visible even during daylight. However, because authorities can't predict where the satellite will come down, there are no plans to monitor the skies — or tell skywatchers where to look. So much of Earth's area consists of open ocean, desert or wilderness that there's a good chance no one will see the descent.

    "We can't raise people's expectations and tell them to go out and look in their backyard," Johnson said.

    Some of the debris might not even be recognizable as parts of a satellite on the ground, but if you do come across the cosmic refrigerator or other parts of the satellite, NASA advises that you leave it alone and call the authorities. Part of the reason has to do with health and liability concerns. "You're much more likely to get a cut by some sharp edge on a piece," Johnson said.

    Johnson said there are also legal guidelines governing satellite debris that falls to Earth. "It is still the property of the United States government," he said. If debris falls in the U.S., federal authorities want to take custody of the material. If it falls within the borders of another country, the government has the right to ask for its return, Johnson said.

    "No, you don't have the luxury of trying to sell it on eBay," Johnson said.

    Johnson recalled a case involving a nose cone from a European Ariane 5 rocket booster that washed up on a Texas beach in 2000. A beachcomber named Barney Corey reportedly ended up with the object and planned to turn it into a hot tub.

    "We, however, convinced him with the help of our colleagues at the Department of Justice that that was not an option, and we did retrieve that object," Johnson said "We would do the same thing for any objects recovered in the United States from UARS."

    Robert Pearlman said times were different when NASA's Skylab fell from orbit in 1979: Pieces of the space station landed harmlessly in the Australian Outback and soon ended up on the open market. Fragments were incorporated in a wide range of products, including pens and posters. "Those pieces helped educate the public and got the public interested in space," he said.

    Pearlman himself recalls getting a poster from New York's Hayden Planetarium that was accompanied by a smidgen of material from Skylab. "It hung in my room for all my childhood days," he said.

    As Pearlman discussed how times have changed, it sounded as if he was almost hoping a piece from UARS would fall in his backyard. Not the cosmic refrigerator, maybe, but enough of a keepsake to revive those childhood memories.

    "One wonders what the authorities would say," he mused, "if you said, 'Hey, I found it. ... If you don't need it, can I keep a piece of it?"

    Update for 5:45 p.m. ET Sept. 10: I initially used a comparison to lottery odds as an illustration of a situation where someone is assured of winning, but a commenter pointed out that lotteries don't necessarily guarantee a winner in a particular drawing. A better example would be a raffle, where the winning ticket is drawn out of a hat. Guess it's been a while since I've played the lottery.

    More about space debris:

    • Six-ton NASA satellite set to fall
    • Experts sound alarm about space junk
    • Russians determine cause of Soyuz crash
    • Japan to go fishing for space debris

    Check NASA's UARS status page for updated information about the satellite's whereabouts, all the way to the end.

    Connect with the Cosmic Log community by "liking" the log's Facebook page, following @b0yle on Twitter or adding me to your Google+ circle. You can also check out "The Case for Pluto," my book about the controversial dwarf planet and the search for other worlds. 

    101 comments

    I vote for Dick Cheney. He deserves, more than anyone else.

    Show more
    Explore related topics: space, featured, orbital-debris, uars
  • 8
    Feb
    2011
    3:27pm, EST

    Japan to go fishing...for space debris

    Electro Optic Systems / AFP - Getty Images

    An image created by Australia's Electro Optic Systems (EOS) aerospace company shows a view of the Earth from geostationary height depicting swarms of space debris -- approximately 50,000 of the half-million or more debris objects greater than 1cm -- in Low Earth Orbit (LEO).

    By John Roach, Contributing Writer, NBC News

    Japan's space agency is reportedly teaming up with a fishing net manufacturer to catch and remove debris from Earth orbit, where it poses a threat to spacecraft, astronauts and satellites.

    The space fishing net would span several kilometers and be made of thin metal wires. As it scoops up space debris, it will be charged with electricity, allowing Earth's magnetic field to reel in the haul and eventually burn it up in Earth's atmosphere, The Telegraph reports.

    "You've got a charged object moving in a magnetic field. By the laws of physics, you are going to have a force, which is going to change its orbit," Brian Weeden, a former U.S. Air Force orbital analyst who is now a technical advisor for the Secure World Foundation, explained to me today.


    Though Weeden is not familiar with the specifics of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency's fishing net plan, the space debris expert said the concept fits in with a class of ideas under consideration to remove junk from space.

    A key innovation of the JAXA concept, he noted, is that it "solves the fuel problem. You don't have to carry fuel onboard; you just have to have a way of generating electricity, which you can do at those altitudes with solar panels."

    Space junk threat
    The threat space debris poses to human operations in space is steadily increasing. Both the International Space Station and space shuttle have been forced to dodge space debris in the past. A collision between a Russian and U.S. satellite in 2009 underscored the need for effective ways to clean up space.

    The Secure World Foundation's Space Security 2010 report made space debris a top concern. Currently, the U.S. military is tracking 21,000 known objects bigger than 10 centimeters in Earth orbit. Of those, only about 1,000 are working satellites. The rest are dead satellites, rocket parts and other pieces of junk.

    This space junk is large enough to destroy whatever it hits, according to Weeden. Another 300,000 or so pieces between one and ten centimeters wide are known to exist, but aren't routinely tracked. Most of this stuff, big and small, is in orbit with functioning satellites and other spacecraft.

    "It's where the activity is because it’s a result of all the activity. That's really the problem," Weeden said. The fishing net concept and other ideas are the first concerted efforts at removing this hazardous junk.

    Removing space debris
    To get the stuff, scientists and engineers need to figure out how to actually catch it. These pieces could be spinning out of control, and may be vulnerable to disintegration with a mere touch, due to years of radiation exposure. Some potentially could be filled with unused rocket fuel that could cause an explosion.

    This makes grabbing it with a mechanical arm, for example, difficult if not impossible. "Let's say the piece of debris is spinning. Well then you've got to first de-spin it, otherwise it is just going to rip the arm right off," Weeden said.

    The space fishing net that JAXA is developing with Nitto Seimo Co is one way to solve the problem of catching the debris, he added. Other concepts include spacecraft that attach themselves to debris and then de-orbit it into Earth's atmosphere with the aid, for example, of a solar sail.

    Funding and legal questions
    Most of the concepts, at this point, are early in the planning stage, noted Weeden. Nothing has yet been flown and flight tested. "The other big question is who pays for it," he said. "The economic question is a big issue and it is tied into some of the legal and policy questions."

    For one, whoever launched the satellite owns it. It's essentially sovereign territory. So if, for example, a French cleanup mission scoops up a Russian-made piece of debris, there's a legal question concerning breach of national sovereignty.

    Legal issues aside, policy experts are floating some ideas on paying the clean-up bill. One under consideration is an account along the lines of the Superfund, which is used to clean-up hazardous waste sites in the U.S. Another is a deposit program similar to that used in some states when consumers pick up a six-pack of soda or beer.

    "You put your ten-cent deposit down — though it will likely be a lot bigger than that — when you launch the satellite, and you get it back when it is no longer in orbit," Weeden said.

    Whatever technology is eventually used — and whoever ends up paying for it — clean-up needs to start by 2020 to "have a fairly significant impact in terms of making things safer in orbit," he added.

    More stories on space debris:

    • Space junk buzzes station as astronauts sleep
    • Space shuttle moves to avoid space junk
    • Solar sails could clean up space junk
    • A close one for the space station
    • Satellite collision could pose space threat

    John Roach is a contributing writer for msnbc.com. Connect with the Cosmic Log community by hitting the "like" button on the Cosmic Log Facebook page or following msnbc.com's science editor, Alan Boyle, on Twitter (@b0yle).

    65 comments

    My question is: Wouldn't a spinning piece of space debris still need to be "de-spun" before it is caught in the Japanese space net? Otherwise wouldn't the net perhaps catch on the debris and spin up and reel in and therefore be very inefficient, unable to catch any other debris on that mission? On t …

    Show more
    Explore related topics: space, featured, orbital-debris, john-roach

Browse

  • featured,
  • science,
  • space,
  • images,
  • nasa,
  • innovation,
  • cosmic-log,
  • video,
  • john-roach,
  • tech-science,
  • mars,
  • new-space,
  • daily-dose,
  • technology,
  • energy,
  • participation,
  • environment,
  • whimsy,
  • holiday-calendar,
  • planets,
  • on-the-fringe,
  • archaeology,
  • physics,
  • spacex,
  • curiosity,
  • moon,
  • books,
  • msl,
  • politics,
  • aurora,
  • hubble,
  • sun,
  • robot,
  • religion,
  • japan,
  • 3-d,
  • genetics,
  • iss,
  • movies,
  • astrobiology,
  • saturn,
  • automotive,
  • updated,
  • evolution,
  • shuttle
Also
Advertise | AdChoices

Alan Boyle, Science Editor, NBC News

Science editor at msnbc.com, author of "The Case for Pluto," winner of the National Academies Communication Award for Cosmic Log in 2008. Alan Boyle covers the physical sciences, anthropology, technological innovation and space science and exploration for msnbc.com. Check out Cosmic Log's archives by following the links below, and see Boyle's full biography at http://bit.ly/boyle-bio

Alan Boyle, Science Editor, NBC News Blogroll

  • Bad Astronomy
  • CollectSpace
  • Cosmic Variance
  • Curmudgeons Corner
  • Discovery News
  • The Daily Grail
  • EarthSky
  • GeekPress
  • Habitable Zone
  • HobbySpace Log
  • LiveScience
  • The Loom
  • NASA Watch
  • NASA Spaceflight
  • Out of the Cradle
  • SciDev.net
  • Science Blog
  • ScienceBlogs
  • Science Quest
  • SciAm Observations
  • Seed Magazine
  • Slashdot Science
  • Space.com
  • Spaceflight Now
  • Space Fellowship
  • The Space Review
  • Transterrestrial Musings
  • Universe Today
  • Unmanned Spaceflight
  • Phenomena
  • Planetary Society Blog
  • Science News
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Popular Science
  • Science Insider
  • NASAEngineer.com
  • EurekAlert
  • Nature: The Great Beyond
  • Space Daily
  • Space Politics
The Case for Pluto
Alan Boyle's first book tells the story of Pluto's ups and downs as well as the discoveries of other dwarf planets in our own solar system and even more alien worlds beyond. Buy "The Case for Pluto" ...

John Roach, Contributing Writer, NBC News

John Roach is a contributing writer for NBC News. From climate change and mass extinctions to human evolution and deep space, his writing explores life on Earth and its place in the universe. He was a staff writer at the Environmental News Network for several years and has contributed to National Geographic News for more than a decade.

Archives

  • 2013
    • May (32)
    • April (55)
    • March (53)
    • February (44)
    • January (45)
  • 2012
    • December (67)
    • November (12)
    • October (39)
    • September (43)
    • August (62)
    • July (45)
    • June (51)
    • May (46)
    • April (40)
    • March (56)
    • February (63)
    • January (66)
  • 2011
    • December (89)
    • November (73)
    • October (62)
    • September (67)
    • August (61)
    • July (70)
    • June (82)
    • May (86)
    • April (69)
    • March (94)
    • February (67)
    • January (82)
  • 2010
    • December (118)
    • November (62)
    • October (82)
    • September (63)
    • August (62)
    • July (54)
    • June (83)
    • May (51)
    • April (31)
    • March (35)
    • February (36)
    • January (35)
  • 2009
    • December (42)
    • November (34)
    • October (35)
    • September (40)
    • August (32)
    • July (38)
    • June (45)
    • May (37)
    • April (42)
    • March (38)
    • February (37)
    • January (35)
  • 2008
    • December (33)
    • November (31)
    • October (42)
    • September (48)
    • August (35)
    • July (37)
    • June (42)
    • May (43)
    • April (40)
    • March (39)
    • February (42)
    • January (42)
  • 2007
    • December (29)
    • November (40)
    • October (57)
    • September (35)
    • August (47)
    • July (38)
    • June (44)
    • May (44)
    • April (43)
    • March (40)
    • February (41)
    • January (47)
  • 2006
    • December (45)
    • November (49)
    • October (39)
    • September (50)
    • August (58)
    • July (45)
    • June (56)
    • May (8)

Most Commented

  • Why sign up for a one-way Mars trip? Three applicants explain the appeal (321)
  • Wheel fails on NASA's Kepler probe, halting its search for alien planets (263)
  • Virgin birth or hanky-panky? Anteater mom sparks a scientific debate (90)
  • Buggy hordes of cicadas sighted in Virginia ... but New York? Not yet (75)
  • 'Ciudad Blanca' found? Scientists share images of lost city in Honduras (64)
  • In Dan Brown's 'Inferno,' numeric riddles and controversial science mix (40)
  • Scientists respond to planet hunter's plight with pointers – and poetry (28)

Other blogs

  • The Body Odd
  • Red Tape Chronicles
  • PhotoBlog
  • US News
  • Open Channel

NBCNews.com top stories

3147,10
© 2013 NBCNews.com
  • Science on NBCNews.com
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Help
  • Site map
  • Careers
  • Closed captioning
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Advertise